Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

The power of the almighty hammer

Recommended Posts

As I browse through some charts - stocks, etf's, futures - one thing really jumped out at me - how powerful some of these hammers on the daily charts are. Is it really as easy as finding the high volume hammer after a down move? :confused: I don't know, but it's worth watching in my opinion. We can find some great charts and others that failed miserably, so the question is can high volume hammers on daily charts make money in the long run? And can you play enough of them so that the statistics stay in your favor? That's probably the biggest question - finding high volume hammers is easy, but how much capital would it take to maximize the return here and minimize the risks?

 

Maybe we can make this a thread about hammers with some examples - both good and bad - and perhaps this can help a trader or two out with a rather simple 'system'.

 

There's a few words of caution when playing these kind of trades:

 

1) You may have to take 3 hammers before one works. Part of trading hammers.

 

2) In order to get a 'qualified' hammer, there must be a down trend. In other words, you will be trying to pick off the bottom of the down move.

 

3) Depending on the size of the hammer, the initial stop can be large if placed at the low of the hammer.

 

4) Entries are also important - once we see hammer, do we enter at the market the next day? Somewhere in the body of the hammer? Or only after price clears the high of the hammer? See this thread for more info.

 

5) And obviously how we exit is important as well. There's plenty of charts where in hindsight the hammer did pick off that bottom, but it may have taken days/weeks/months for it REALLY to deliver. I'm talking about significant move from the entry. Of course, any type of trail or whatever would be taken out more often than not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One problem I continually run into is the entry. If I exit on the close of the hammer, it seems that it doesn't work :o

 

When I enter during the middle of the confirmation candle after the highs have been cleared, I seem to find myself in a trap that gets taken out rather quickly. But if I wait for the close of the confirmation candle to enter, then it seems as if the move is already done since those are always the big moves. Obviously I need more experience on when to enter, but I think if we could bounce some ideas around that would really help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One problem I continually run into is the entry. If I exit on the close of the hammer, it seems that it doesn't work :o

 

When I enter during the middle of the confirmation candle after the highs have been cleared, I seem to find myself in a trap that gets taken out rather quickly. But if I wait for the close of the confirmation candle to enter, then it seems as if the move is already done since those are always the big moves. Obviously I need more experience on when to enter, but I think if we could bounce some ideas around that would really help.

 

James,

As illustrated here, there are 3 possible entries if you play the hammer. Basically, once a hammer is formed and confirmed by whatever you use, you have to act. Waiting for the close of the NEXT candle, esp on a daily is just waiting too long in my opinion. Sooner or later, action must be taken when you see the hammer.

 

Once a confirmed hammer is seen, the entries can be:

1) Buy @ market next day

2) Buy if price the following day is somewhere in the body of the hammer (you are trying to get a 'better' price)

3) Buy as soon as price clears the high of the hammer

 

I realize there's other ways to enter, such as waiting for a candle after the hammer to confirm your bullish movement. Problem is, as you've seen James, how long do you wait? At some point, you are no longer playing a hammer. If you get a large bullish WRB the next candle, now you are playing an engulfing candle or some other pattern. The hammer pattern by itself requires action to be taken the following day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got one question on Hammers which may seem very simple but has confused me none the less.

 

Lets say that you've established that there's a down trend and suddenly there is a hammer....does it matter if the hammer closes lower than the open (red candle) or for it to really be bullish does it have to be close above its open (green)?

 

As for entries, I think brown is 100% on that one, you have to strike pretty soon. If you're waiting for confirmation of an uptrend why don't you place a limit order a few ticks above the high on the hammer, if the move is just some short covering you may not get filled. If the hammer is genuine then you can get in at a relatively good price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've got one question on Hammers which may seem very simple but has confused me none the less.

 

Lets say that you've established that there's a down trend and suddenly there is a hammer....does it matter if the hammer closes lower than the open (red candle) or for it to really be bullish does it have to be close above its open (green)?

 

 

For me Nick, I don't care what color the hammer is. I see a bullish price candle, regardless of color. That could be a screen for hammers though and maybe others have found otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One way to enter after a hammer is to wait for a low volume "test" to enter on. Wait until you see that there for sure isn't any supply in the market and it's free to rise.

 

hammer_entry-20071029-101447.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.