Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Stocks to watch for week of 10/29 - 11/2

Recommended Posts

I thought we could try a thread listing some stocks to watch for the upcoming week, each week. I am trying to get back into watching some stocks and some that Tin has found ended up being some nice plays.

 

I'll be upfront - I don't have much to contribute to this thread right now. :roll eyes: I know... I was hoping to provide some feedback on stocks being mentioned until I figure out what type of stock trading/screener software to use. I'm dragging my feet on this as I'm not sure what I want or need.

 

So, if you have any stocks/etf's that you are watching this week, feel free to list here and elaborate if you want. If not, just tickers will work too.

 

Good trading swing traders!

 

;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm toying with using prophet.net as they have some scanners that may work for me... we'll see.

 

Off their list here - http://www.prophet.net/explore/charttoppers.jsp - called 'Chart Toppers' here's a few that grabbed my attention:

 

NYSE:

PMI - High Volume Hammer (a total of 3, first one failed)

CFC - Already had a high volume hammer, just noting here

RDN - High Volume Hammer

IMB - Already had a high volume hammer, just noting here

 

NASDAQ:

TGIC - Had high volume hammer, Nice bullish engulfing/spinning top, still playable

 

That's about it for tonight. I'm not sure what prophet defines as 'chart toppers' but the common theme I found was volume. They have a number of other scanners and such, so this may work best for me. For now, I'm thinking high volume, % gainers/losers could be useful with the candles.

 

Charts attached with brief annotations.

cfc.png.3ee0ab28e1ece90ce3a3d33a74d7b036.png

IMB.png.1a71f9a54c3e58b9f3fb299773418eba.png

pmi.png.578c62ef7ef7dc7a8b1dd628d8699371.png

RDN.png.daf1791104eb99c5a2e29ecf14310acd.png

TGIC.png.a20805cbd912ac0c8399dcbe446d1c0d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should note something on those plays after I got some sleep - I didn't see many (if any) where there was some support level around. I would prefer to see any level tested before and with the free stuff available at prophet, I didn't see any. Most of these looked like these were new lows, at least recently. The potential concern there, as you can see in a couple of these is that you may need to take multiple hammers or whatever before one works. You could also be caught buying into a strong downtrend.

 

Point is that tread carefully on just buying high volume hammers w/o any other support around. And as always, make sure to do your OWN homework and due diligence before placing any real money on the line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm...on EEM I have some discrepancy with volume on other charts. Seems as though this prophet chart is showing less volume on the break, where on other charts I see stronger volume on the break. So...EEM is a good go for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yup, and thru VSA we'd say an ULTRA wide spread on ULTRA high volume breaking into new ground is a good sign that institutional flow is starting to take part.

 

We may be onto something here Tin - with my candle analysis and your VSA confirmation... hmmm... can you say 'hedge fund' ;)

 

 

 

PS

I am not joking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see what these puppies are up to since these were all long plays and the market was down today.

 

PMI - ugly. This downtrend may be too strong. Stop not violated but getting close.

RDN - up on Monday, down today. Not much happening thus far.

TGIC - not much happening so far.

 

Well, stocks sure can suck sometimes. ;)

 

I guess when you are used to futures moving, stocks can seem like pulling teeth. As much as I enjoy screening stocks and looking for them, I am really thinking that I am best suited to just playing the indexes and futures. It's just so hard and time consuming looking for stocks that are worth playing and to be perfectly honest, that's a lot of extra work right now. I have a list of futures put together to watch on the dailys and probably best to stick with that for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you can absolutely position trade things like the cash Russell and SPX or OEX and MNX...if you wanted to.

 

I've got a list of about 50 ETF's/stocks that I watch and I don't go screening for other things anymore. Makes life a bit easier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

XME is interesting...had a real nice resistance point right around 68 bucks and then it broke on slightly increasing volume, and then the failed breakout. It's still in an uptrend channel, but will be interesting to see how this one pans out.

 

chart_station_-_parallels_desktop-20071101-160817.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let's see what these puppies are up to since these were all long plays and the market was down today.

 

PMI - ugly. This downtrend may be too strong. Stop not violated but getting close.

RDN - up on Monday, down today. Not much happening thus far.

TGIC - not much happening so far.

 

 

 

Wow, those were incredibly bad plays. I think a little more research will be needed on stocks before I consider getting back into these plays.

 

Let these be a good lesson - just buying hammers on volume is not enough. I knew that going into them, and it just provided another reminder of buying hammers with no support.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.