Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

carcanaques

Bookmaker vigorish--who pays and how much?

Recommended Posts

I'm sure quite a few of you are going to place a bet or two tomorrow on NFL games and I wanted to share the inside scoop on the "vig." Unfortunately, I can't do this in a few short paragraphs and I know you guys like detailed explanations and backup, so I'm going to spend a bit of time getting my thoughts together and post it here, rather than the other forum. I hope to have this done before the games start (not that it will have any bearing on your wagers).

 

Stay tuned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that a suggestion or an order? Maybe you should lock this thread because you deem it to have no value? And all the poker talk should also go somewhere else too? Why do you have a problem with this? It is in the Generral Discussion forum. Let James decide if this is inappropriate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chances are, if you ask several different sports bettors what percentage they pay their bookmakers you'll get several different answers, and, chances are, most of those answers will not be ringing with confident finality. Even battle-worn veterans who flatly answer "Four-and-a-half percent" are really operating with a false understanding of what's going on. Contrary to what many veteran gamblers believe, almost no one actually pays 4.55% in bookmakers' commissions.

 

Many bettors are also operating under the fallacy that losers pay vigorish. The fact is--as explained below--losing bettors actually play for free. Only winners pay vigorish...And it's not 4.55 percent.

 

The bookmaker's rather unique commission has no precise English definition, but the French word for it is "vignes." American gamblers have long since converted "vignes" to "vigorish," or to just plain "vig." Nevertheless, the bookmaker's fee is as much a commission as a broker's fee for handling a stock transaction or a Realtor's fee for handling a real estate deal. To account for this commission on standard pointspread wagers or over/under wagers, at traditional bookmakers for every $10 a bettor wants to win he is required to risk $11 - to "lay" $11. (Many internet bookmakers now charge less, allowing bettors to risk as little as 10.5 to win 10, but for our purposes here we will use '11-10' bets.) These 'eleven-ten' bets lead many gamblers to conclude that they are paying the bookmaker a commission of 10 percent if they lose a bet, but that they pay nothing if they win.

 

That's not correct. Here's how it actually works: Say two bettors each risk $110 with the same bookmaker on opposite sides of the same proposition, each bettor trying to win $100: The bookmaker receives a total of $220 from the two bettors. One bettor wins, one bettor loses, and the winner picks up a total of $210; - the $110 he put at risk, plus his $100 profit. That leaves the bookmaker with $10 gross profit as his vigorish on the deal. The bookmaker kept $10 of the $220 total amount risked.

 

That's a service charge of 4.55 percent. Had the two bettors each risked $110 against the other without using the services of the bookmaker, the winner would have walked away with $220 instead of $210. The bookmaker kept 4.55 percent of that $220. The amount risked by each bettor was $110; not 100 dollars.

 

($10 divided by $220 = .0455)

 

So the bookmaker does, indeed, charge 4.55 percent of the total amount put at risk by both bettors...But be sure to note which bettor paid both bettors' share of the vigorish. It was not the loser. The loser--since he lost the bet-- would have lost whatever he put at risk, with or without the services of the bookmaker. The winner paid. The winnings, which would have been $110 without using the services of the bookmaker, were shorted by ten dollars - 9.1 percent.

 

($10 divided by $110 = .090909091)

 

The winner got back only 191 percent of the amount he put at risk.

 

($110 x 1.90909091 = $210)

 

This is also the way it works in virtually all other casino games, such as craps, roulette, baccarrat, blackjack, and even slot machines. When a loser loses, he loses what he puts at risk, of course. In roulette, for example, someone betting on an 'even-money' proposition (red or black, high or low, odd or even) and losing, loses his bet, whatever he risked, period. But someone winning an 'even-money' roulette proposition does not get paid the 'fair' odds of 10-to-9. (There are 20 ways to lose an even-money bet at roulette and only 18 ways to win. The odds are 10-9 against you.) The winner only gets paid 1-to-1 odds. In all these table games, the winner pays the vigorish.

 

Of course, in a larger, more philosophical sense losers not only pay the vigorish but also the light bills of the casino and the salaries of the casino employees and all the other expenses of the casino. But we're not addressing philosophy here. We're addressing how the business of gambling actually works. This is no place to play with words and semantics. Vigorish is deducted from winnings.

 

It is important to understand this point. You can be sure most bettors don't. In effect, the bookmaker becomes a partner of the winning bettor. Understanding this point is important when figuring the real cost of various sports betting opportunities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tread lightly. Your threads keep making waves and are borderline inappropriate manner-wise.

 

You show up out of the blue and want to get combative. Seek life elsewhere if that is what you're here for. It doesn't fly around here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How dare you call me a clown! I resent that and demand an apology. I have been nothing but courteous and professional here.

 

Doesn't every new member come out of the blue? Is this a private country club or an open forum?

 

And who are you to tell me what to do here? If James has a problem with my posts, I'm sure he'll let me know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that clown comment was inappropiate. I have no problem with carcanaques' posts on money and risk management. They have been very interesting and can be related to trading.

 

This forum is welcome for all new members. Please keep it this way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to make a correction on the word Vigorish, it's actually from Yiddish slang.

 

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition.

 

Vigorish

 

SYLLABICATION: vig·o·rish

PRONUNCIATION: vgr-sh

NOUN: Slang 1a. A charge taken on bets, as by a bookie or gambling establishment. b. The rate or amount of such a charge. 2. Interest, especially excessive interest, paid to a moneylender.

ETYMOLOGY: Yiddish slang, from Russian vyigrysh, winnings : vy-, out; see ud- in Appendix I + igrat', to play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yea damn guys, chillout. this is really interesting stuff.

 

carcanaques, have to read this a few times to grasp it yet.I would be interested in hearing how you view money management as far as trading goes.

Have you ever read Secrets of Professional Turf Betting? Thats a book I've read alot about but have never payed up for the used price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How dare you call me a clown! I resent that and demand an apology. I have been nothing but courteous and professional here.

 

Doesn't every new member come out of the blue? Is this a private country club or an open forum?

 

And who are you to tell me what to do here? If James has a problem with my posts, I'm sure he'll let me know.

 

You're not getting an apology. Deal with it. I don't say things I don't mean.

 

We'll see how it all pans out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're not getting an apology. Deal with it. I don't say things I don't mean.

We'll see how it all pans out.

Suite yourself. For the record, I offered a peace pipe to Reaver in a PM and it was rejected. Apparently, he thinks he owns the place. Oh well, that's between him and James.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yea damn guys, chillout. this is really interesting stuff.

 

carcanaques, have to read this a few times to grasp it yet.I would be interested in hearing how you view money management as far as trading goes.

Have you ever read Secrets of Professional Turf Betting? Thats a book I've read alot about but have never payed up for the used price.

Never read that book as I stayed for away from horses.

 

As far as trading goes, my money management is garden variety. I won't risk more than 2% of my capital on any trade and no more than 4% per day, which is to say, if I have two stoputs in a row, I quit for the day and live to trade another.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Things appear to be quite different to the UK (hence my comment in the other thread about betting being far from zero sum, well at least here).

 

Is this all legislated in th US (how much a bookie can charge and how they set odds)? Lets say your taking bets on a match where the outcome can only be A wins or B wins if you only get $1 on A and $100 on B you would offer odds of 100 to 1 (or maybe a bit less to make your 'vig') In the UK the bookies can set their rate without restriction (as far as I know). What if a bookie can't unload all their risk as bets get taken? They are now in a vulnerable position no longer being win win? Seems reasonable for them to get paid to take this risk.

 

A side question are most bets in the USA settled at 'starting prices' thats the case in the UK though a punter has the option of taking the current price which I guess gives bookies further headaches.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Things appear to be quite different to the UK (hence my comment in the other thread about betting being far from zero sum, well at least here).

 

Is this all legislated in th US (how much a bookie can charge and how they set odds)? Lets say your taking bets on a match where the outcome can only be A wins or B wins if you only get $1 on A and $100 on B you would offer odds of 100 to 1 (or maybe a bit less to make your 'vig') In the UK the bookies can set their rate without restriction (as far as I know). What if a bookie can't unload all their risk as bets get taken? They are now in a vulnerable position no longer being win win? Seems reasonable for them to get paid to take this risk.

 

A side question are most bets in the USA settled at 'starting prices' thats the case in the UK though a punter has the option of taking the current price which I guess gives bookies further headaches.

 

Cheers.

 

Bookmaking is illegal in the US except in jurisdictions where it is legal and operated by a licensed casino. Most of those outfits charge 11 to 10 on all bets that involve a pointspread; for example, football, basketball. Moneyline wagers (betting on the winner straightup) have set odds for payouts, much like the horses and the bookmakers cut is built in to those odds and payouts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh OK that's pretty different - things make more sense now. In the UK the bookmakers will take a bet on just about anything and I guess for some things just have to make up a price on the spot with little chance of finding a counter party. Snow at Xmas is a popular one. And every now and then you read about a wierd one in the papers.

 

How does betting on horses work in the US? Obviously no spread there? Horses are probably the most popular for sport betting in the UK. There are still bookies on most high streets. I guess if they use starting prices (final odds given at race start) its easier to set 'fair' prices to a prescribed (and legislated) formula.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ahh OK that's pretty different - things make more sense now. In the UK the bookmakers will take a bet on just about anything and I guess for some things just have to make up a price on the spot with little chance of finding a counter party. Snow at Xmas is a popular one. And every now and then you read about a wierd one in the papers.

 

How does betting on horses work in the US? Obviously no spread there? Horses are probably the most popular for sport betting in the UK. There are still bookies on most high streets. I guess if they use starting prices (final odds given at race start) its easier to set 'fair' prices to a prescribed (and legislated) formula.

 

Betting on horses here is done by Pari Mutuel wagering

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parimutuel_betting

 

Bookies, or the legal Off Track betting add a surcharge on top, on payouts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link. It just sounds as if things are more regulated in the USA. I may be mistaken about bookies being able to set there prices freely here of course. Pari Mutuel by definition uses starting prices I see.

 

Never been much of a gambler. I'll have a few quid on each race if I have a day at the races or might go to a casino for the odd night out but both of those are rare events, probably 500:1 against!

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad that I don't place bets. If I was a bookie then it would be a great business to get into however we all know that the book making industry is run by the mafia in whatever country you're in, and the only way to get a bookies license is to know people who know people.

 

The Melbroune Cup is going to be run pretty soon (Horse Race). The Bookmakers are going to make a killing. I heard that on average a bookie at the track turns over about $200k per hour, from which he will pay out a substantial amount to the winner, but they can and do leave the day with a lot of profit in their pocket from the vigorish that carcanaques describes.

 

Messy business lol.

 

P.S: I wanna retain all my fingers, toes, and other appendages that I find usefull so I don't wanna make any bets that I can't afford!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.