Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Another great day for time decay! The SPY position is sitting real nice and pretty, and I'll be putting a position on the IWM hopefully monday for a fill. Currently working a 88/86/72/70 Iron Condor with a wicked sweet spot. Overall the vol puts me at an 80% chance of expiring worthless come DEC expiration. Is this a beautiful trade? Absolutely! At a .75 credit, this is giving me a return of nearly 52% on the risk. Totally cool. The current mark of this spread is sitting at .71, and looking for a little rise in IWM Monday to give me a fill in the AM.

 

iwm_ic-20071102-161924.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tin,

I really like the idea of these credit spreads. I mean, I find that many of the candlestick Support/Resistance areas that I find are often respected, so this would seem like an easy trade. So, what am I missing here? Once the zones are identified (and it appears they can be pretty wide), it's a matter of finding the right options and getting filled, correct? Is that easier said than done?

 

I'll see if I can find an example or two for your inspection. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just some ideas for discussion. These could be completely off for credit spreads, so go easy on me.

 

SPY

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3804&stc=1&d=1194108601

 

 

The overhead resistance is kinda close though, so maybe that would void this trade? Or would you consider just making the upper even wider? This is a SPY weekly chart, so not sure if that's good, bad or indifferent.

 

IWM

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3805&stc=1&d=1194108997

 

 

 

I guess the real question is where is the 'sweet spot' on putting a credit spread on? What I mean is, as I flipped through some ETF's, I saw a good lower or upper area, but would be concerned that the other side of the trade was too close. In other words, with the SPY chart here, the upper side of this trade seems close to me. I think the lower end is 'safer', but the upper end would have me concerned.

 

How do you view this and handle this?

5aa70e199ce7b_tlspy.png.b324cf150848db3d21dbd4d2771241e1.png

5aa70e19a29af_tliwm.png.be8bd56eab96e86222bb407562eefd69.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the IWM chart you show marks out the exact trade I'm currently working. My short legs are at 72 and 86.

 

The SPY chart you show marks out almost exactly the trade I'm currently in. My short legs there are at 143 and 158. So, pretty much you're right on. With the current market conditions I'd say they're pretty much right on for doing these iron condors. We're seeing very whippy, volatile action without any real direction. ICs are directionless plays.

 

So...it is really that easy. You could certainly "leg into" an IC if you wanted, by selling a call vertical when price is at the top of an area you think it will respect, and then wait for it to venture down to the bottom to enter a put vertical and complete the IC. I tend to enter them all at once when market conditions warrant. If the market is trending like it was last year and half of this year, I'd be looking just at selling put verticals since the odds were with the market to go up.

 

Anyhow...you're seeing things right. The R/R really SUCKS on IC's, but the probabilities really play in your favor and as long as you know how to manage a trade and have a plan of attack when price gets to a S/R level you're watching...then you'll do fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IWM 70/72/86/88 IC was put on for a .58 credit / 36.6% ROI. I will be doing all my IC's at 40-50 days out, and this was 44 days out. If price comes down to 75 (using a 2.5 ATR) then I'll look to cover that put portion.

 

iwm_decic-20071108-100018.jpg

 

I've taken off my 158/161 call spread at a .02 cent debit, for a total of .35 credit. That was a risk of 2.63, or a 13.3% ROI. Right now, price is falling, tho not drastically. SPX is down 2 points this morning and I expect some chop around after the selloff yesterday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Phew...what a day today. Had me sweatin'!! haha Well, that 1450 level was supported big time this afternoon as buyers came in and swept the market off it's feet. Price is still under my really sweet spot, but within the range it needs to be. I hadn't been a part of what appears to be a shakeout before. When I was trading spreads before it was in a relentless uptrend that lasted months and months and months.

 

http__www3.stockfetcher.com_-_stockfetcher_2.0_-_preview_edition-20071108-173358.jpg

 

Looking forward to price rebounding a bit tomorrow...and hopefully vol will drop off a bit and I *might* close out the positions depending on what I see for debits to close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this isn't always a fun thing to have to talk about...got stopped on my put spreads from the SPY iron condor. My short strike was at 143 and 141 and after yesterdays closing action after trying to mount a relief rally during the day...I decided it'd be better to cut those trades loose now rather than risk the loss. I always want to close out 4-7 days prior to expiration anyhow, and this was the 4th day prior to it, so my rules would dictate me getting out then anyhow.

 

So, close the trade and when combined with the credit given from the call spread, I ended up losing a penny per contract. Basically break even. Sucks to have to wait for a few weeks to pass and then you get nothing. BUT, it's better than getting a big loss.

 

spy_nov_closed-20071113-101923.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Tin:

 

What's the advantage of an iron condor over and iron butterfly? An iron butterfly is essentially a combination of a long straddle and a short strangle. If I am looking at it right, the yield curve is about the same.

 

Thanks,

 

Bam-Bam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right...I don't know that there is a difference. More people just know about condors and iron condors rather than iron butterflies. Could've been the other way around, I suppose, too. Both IB and IC have wide sweetspots whereas a regular butterfly will have its max profit at a specific price. I really just like a couple different strategies rather than learn the myriad of them. ICs and regular verticals, calendars and just learning about diagonals. I'm cool with not having to guess the exact direction or strength of the directional trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also just got filled on a call vertical that I sold on SOLF for 40 cents, 17.6% return with 76% probability based on the vols.

 

solf_callvert-20071116-154316.jpg

 

It's a DEC and any close under the top of that range we've got will give me max profit. Note, too, IV is really pushing high. These folks report earnings on Tuesday and right now it's looking like "smart money" knows what those earnings are gonna be and they want to be poised for taking it lower. When the report is released and vol gets crushed even if earnings are good I won't get hit too hard with it. High odds setup here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Covered some positions today. Seeming how theres still 30 days left till DEC expiry and I get nearly my max profit...I'll take that. And actually....now that I look at my statement...I got out of that one at .02, NOT .04. Gotta love smart routing.

 

SOLF is working well, too.

 

chart_station_-_parallels_desktop-20071120-150252.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to bump this ancient thread :o

 

Here is a chart of the SPY, obviously price has dropped substantially since this thread originated. Tin, what would you setup for a credit spread in this instance?

 

Maybe July 132/133 (but these are nearly worthless) and July 119/118 puts. Would that be on the right track?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=7248&stc=1&d=1215213440

 

Also Tin, do you know where on TOS (or anywhere) where I can get tutorials for using their software?

EDIT: NVM, figured that part out :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I've been testing this strategy last few weeks, on weeklys. Here are the rules I followed:

1. Must be an ETF (during testing phase)

2. High level of liquidity and preferably penny bid/ask spread.

3. Min credit 4%, max 10% - to limit risk.

4. Spread must of beyond near-term resistance level. The stronger the better.

5. Spread must be at least 5 strike prices away.

6. During testing phase, ticker price must be more than 100$. This is to get choices for every 1% change in

 

price. Gradually shift this limit to 50$.

7. Wrote a program to find the price move of the underlying beween ticker price that time of day and closing on

 

expiration for last 1 year. Out of 52 instances, max 3 or 4 instances should have resulted in loss. (Thinking is

 

- in those 3-4 instances, volatility would be so high that I would be able to go way way far OOTM to get other

 

criteria met, so they may not result in loss).

8. Never initiate a new position in last 2 days of expiration.

 

Only SPY met all these criteria. And with decent levels of volatility last month, this worked out well.

 

But this last week volatily crushed dramatically, forcing me to explore other avenues. So did two things:

1. Bought 22.5/24 June VIX call bull spread for debit.

2. Bought SPY, LVS, PCLN reverse IC (Debit) this Thursday for next Friday expiration.

 

Here's my thoughts on them, would appreciate inputs/comments/criticism:

1. High beta (yes, I am debating my tell on SPY - probably wouldn't repeat it)

2. Low VIX days. (Switch to selling Vertical spreads in moderate/high volatility days)

3. Opened those positions Thursday morning, may be should wait until Friday (to take initial fluctuations in

 

options prices off) or even Monday (to void weekend's theta decay).

4. Premium paid must NOT be more than (I am thinking) about 50%. I spent 58%, 59% and 64% - which look on higher

 

side. Any suggestions?

5. Need to look at charts and do some technical analysis to assess probability of high movement in underlying.

6. Check the program to see average price moves in last 52 months for this trade to be profitable statistically.

7. Actually, check how this could work in moderate/high volatility market. I suspect volatility would drive prices too high for this to have the trade enough juice left for profitability.

 

Did quite a bit of reasearch on this, aint' getting much. I'm reading Sheldon Natenburg, and the guy is just

 

great! Difficult with full time job though. If anyone has any suggestion /good presentation/video... on subject,

 

please do share.

 

Please do share your ideas on what other criteria should I consider in chosing reverse IC in this market. Or at least criticise to tell me where you think I am making mistake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those of you with full time jobs that want to trade the Iron Condor, check out

 

7minutetrader.com.

 

They do weekly spreads on the S&P 500 Index (SPX). For a $50/month they will tell you the weekly setup for a credit spread reward/risk ranging from 6% to 14%/week.

I use them for my non daytrading portfolio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.