Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'm going to start trading credit spreads and wanted to keep a thread about it. I'll update with pictures of charts when I enter into a position and the reasoning for the position.

 

What will I be doing? Mainly selling credit spreads on ETF's. How will I be basing my decisions? Mostly volatility based probabilities. By watching different statistics I can discern which OTM spreads will offer real nice returns for the money invested. How much return on investment will I be looking for each month? I'd say anywhere from 10-15% is ideal for me. I'm going to selling some stuff so far OTM that the probabilities really will be on my side but the premium collected isn't "huge" by daytrading means. But, it's going to be about consistent monthly income, not about making millions before lunch. I'm tired of trying that game. What I'll be doing here is what I did before I started to day trade. Will I include some day trades? Absolutely. I'll mostly day trade the QQQQ as thats where the liquidity is and it's pretty cheap monetarily.

 

So, my first order to tackle:

 

tos_charts___thinkorswim__build_966_-20071019-094005.jpg

 

Currently working at a 0.19 credit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure,

 

With an option, you're holding a decaying or wasting asset...that is, when you BUY an option. So, when you sell it to someone else, they are the ones holding the bag of time decay while you reap the rewards of it. By selling them you've got a positive income so long as the market stays above the short strike of your vertical (if selling a put spread) or below the short strike (if selling a call spread) or in between them (as in an iron condor).

 

Each day will bring you more coin as long as it doesn't hit those strikes. It could be 1 penny inside and you'd still collect all your premium. My plan, though, is to be out of these trades within 4-10 days of expiration to mitigate any gamma ill effects on the trade coming in to expiration. Basically meaning as the time decay grows faster as expiration approaches, the gamma will move the delta (price the option moves per penny of underlying) faster. If I'm at expiration and price is close to a strike I dont want it to be so close to (which wouldn't happen as I've got risk measures in place to prevent that) then the position can move against me real fast. So, I'll be out of these positions before any of that can happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The risk is limited, so is the reward. Basically, you risk the difference between strikes minus the premium you collect.

 

Now, to update...I've gone and placed a modified order of the one above. I'm currently working :

 

NOV 161/160/143/142 Iron Condor for credit of .21 this equates to a 22% ROI after commissions.

 

In this case there is 1 dollar between the strikes and I'm looking to collect 21 cents, so risking 79 cents. After commissions get factored in, that gives me 22% ROI. What are the risks of this actually giving me my full loss? Not much.

 

What will happen if we get a swoon next week? Well, I've got the 161/160 call spread to give me credit there, and then I'll have to adjust the put spread by rolling it out to another month/strike and get defensive on it. What are the chances of that happening based on volatility right now? About a 13% chance that this will not work out. That reads : 87% chance of success on this trade.

 

For 22% in a month with 87% chance of success, I'll take it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TinGull said:
About a 13% chance that this will not work out. That reads : 87% chance of success on this trade.

 

For 22% in a month with 87% chance of success, I'll take it.

 

If you can share how you arrived at these numbers, I would love to see them. As soon as you translate it into math, I am onboard! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the probabilities of expiring are loosely based on the delta of the position. There are some other measures that go into it based on volatility and such, but if you have the delta readings you're pretty much set to gauge those probabilities.

 

Say, for instance, you're selling a spread on SPY. The current delta of the 142/143 vertical is average of .15 (.14 and .16 respectively). So, making that into % terms it'd be 15%. That 15% is basically the % chance of that option expiring in the money. Since we don't want credit spreads to expire ITM and we want them worthless, this gives you an 85% chance of expiring worthless.

 

The 22% I explained earlier, and is easy to figure out. Credit/risk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, just noticed I didn't include the call spread of this IC....the call spread has a delta of about .085 averaged between the 2. Gives an 8.5% chance of expiring ITM, or 92.5% chance of expiring worthless. I basically average the 2 together (85 + 92)/2 and get 88. So, pretty good odds it'll work out in my favor. The plan is, though, to have your risk measures in place just in case something unexpected happens.

 

Benefit of IC...you pay margin on only 1 side, but collect 2 sides of premium.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

••• Update •••

 

Filled on my NOV 161/160/143/142 Iron Condor for credit of .21 this equates to a 22% ROI after commissions.

 

28 days till expiry now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that you are filled Tin, that is telling us that someone out there is speculating that the market will reach either of the levels and if so, they will cash in, correct? So from their point of view, they are spending a little to hopefully make a lot, even though the odds are not in their favor?

 

Just trying to get a handle on both players here.

 

You are playing the probabilities and saying I'll collect this 'small' amount b/c the odds are really in my favor. The other person is saying I will pay this 'small' amount b/c I am paying so little for it.

 

Am I getting there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TinGull said:
First part...you're right on.

 

As for the 2 strikes, yes, you need 2 as you are long 1 strike and short the other. Basically a hedge so you're not selling naked.

 

OK - how do you determine how big the spread should be between the strikes? And how does that affect the bottom line?

 

In your trade here - if price goes PAST either level, that is not good, correct?

 

And as for needing two, that's b/c the long and short basically 'cancel' each other out so that you are not selling naked? This still allows you to sell the position as you have done here, but you are not naked b/c both sides are 'covered' in some fashion?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And in the end the Iron Condor just says - as long as price stays between my levels, profitable trade. If it reaches or approaches either level, you may need to do something as the trade did not work as planned.

 

Is that the idea and the rest is simply the mechanics?

 

If so, I could outline some possible S/R areas and you could illustrate how an iron condor would work?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
OK - how do you determine how big the spread should be between the strikes? And how does that affect the bottom line?

 

In your trade here - if price goes PAST either level, that is not good, correct?

 

And as for needing two, that's b/c the long and short basically 'cancel' each other out so that you are not selling naked? This still allows you to sell the position as you have done here, but you are not naked b/c both sides are 'covered' in some fashion?

 

I determine how big it should be by looking at the risk associated with it. Basically, I keep moving them around to see if a 2 dollar spread would work better than a 1 dollar...and right now there's a couple more positions that look TASTY.

 

If price were to go past one of those levels, I'd already be adjusted or hedged so that wouldn't matter. It would suck, yea, but I'd be safe.

 

3rd...right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
And in the end the Iron Condor just says - as long as price stays between my levels, profitable trade. If it reaches or approaches either level, you may need to do something as the trade did not work as planned.

 

Is that the idea and the rest is simply the mechanics?

 

If so, I could outline some possible S/R areas and you could illustrate how an iron condor would work?

 

 

And yes, exactly. That's one of my main beef's with people who are obsessed with greeks. Bottom line is that at expiration, price needs to be at a certain point and you make money. Sometimes people get real wrapped up in it all, and I know it's important to take into consideration for complex strategies, but things I do aren't complex.

 

Sure, outline some S/R areas and I can show you how it'd work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tin,

Thanks for sharing and bearing with me. It's been so long since I even thought about a call or put, let alone a condor that I needed some refreshing.

 

I'll see if I have some time this weekend to throw up some charts and see what you think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Currently working another SPY order (yay volatility)

 

158/160/141/139 IC for a .52 credit. I'd be really surprised if I get a fill on this, but wanted to put it out there just in case. It's a really nice ROI for a *kind* of riskier play with the short call being at 158. That'd basically be putting the SPX at 1580 and with what looks to be a failed break attempt in the SPX, I do feel pretty safe with it.

 

tos_charts___thinkorswim__build_966_-20071019-145201.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love credit spreads...making money when the market's down.

 

As for how I'll adjust these spreads...when any leg of an IC is .10 or less, I'll buy it back. No sense in having a gain and letting it potentially turn into a loss for a wimpy 10 cents more.

 

If price comes down into 1.50 - 2.00 of my short strike, I'll look to close out the short strike and hold the other IF there is a lot of time left to expiration AND there seems to be more potential to that side.

 

If we are inside of 10 days (calendar days) until expiration, I'll look to close out the trade. No sense in taking an un-needed gamma exposure coming into expiry.

 

Weekends are the best, because time decay is working for you while the markets aren't even open. Gotta love that.

 

Current market situation :

 

tos_charts___thinkorswim__build_966_-20071022-112151.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

chart_station_-_parallels_desktop-20071101-161225.jpg

 

Right in the middle of my sweetspot as of todays close. Very nice and am lovin' it. 2 weeks to expiry and these trades could be closed out next friday. Currently sitting at around a 10% gain on risk, looking to make up that next 10% in the next week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.