So who do you think will be the next president of the USA?

[waveslider 10]

PS the power is also in our tax dollars. If we stop funding the government, they have to listen. In that case, their options are to throw us all in jail, or begin martial law. Try imposing martial law on a society that has been free for so long.

[read_invest 10]

Barack Obama rocks

 

Mrs. Clinton farts!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zjksj3l7NA

[Soultrader 12]

Barack Obama rocks

 

Mrs. Clinton farts!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zjksj3l7NA

 

hahaha.....she looked so uncomfortable from the start. That look on Edwards face is priceless.

[torero 10]

I like both actually. Each has a different background that can serve many areas. Each has their own way of doing things so I don't see it as a hindrance. I think if one doesn't win, the other one should be chosen as vice president and vice versa. This would make the ticket unbeatable. McCain is not a bad choice, but I'm tired of Republicans running the country down the ground last 8 years (seems more though) and all their partisan taking part in it.

[Alfa 10]

Barack Obama rocks

 

Mrs. Clinton farts!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zjksj3l7NA

 

Hahahaha.. I second that!

[gajoinvest24 10]

I like Obama. I like what he could do so far. I think that he can make things better if he has more time.

[mikefullertons 10]

The new president of US is Mr. OBAMA

[WHY? 16]

Well Reaver you springing for Ron Paul this time after several years of Mr. O?

[MadMarketScientist 11]

Well Reaver you springing for Ron Paul this time after several years of Mr. O?

 

I would take Ron Paul over Spineless Obama anyday!

 

MMS

[WHY? 16]

I would take Ron Paul over Spineless Obama anyday!

 

MMS

I knew Mr O wasn't any good for the country from the very begining as was made known in posts by me in this thread several years ago. But, the proof is in the pudding. Now that we have had several years of Mr O time has shown I was correct in my assessment.

 

As concerns Mr Paul. He is the ONLY candidate out of all the candidates that actually stands 100% for the constitution. However, he has no charisma..is an old man..rambles some..so Americans will probally not vote for him in sufficient numbers for him to win. The reason is several fold:

 

1) Americans love a winner and Ron Paul doesn't come across as a winner.

 

2) Most Americans do not even know the constitution so how can they determine if a candidate stands for it or not. About the only thing Americans understand or remember about the constitution and bill of rights is "freedom of expression" and the right to own arms.

 

3) Since Americans don't know the constitution they vote for economic reason and "winner reason". They want their candidate to win. To win he has to come across as a winner. And he has to have economic policies that make them think he will bring prosperity.

 

Our present foreign policy contradicts the constitution. Our present economic policies contradict the constitution. Our federal gov contradicts the constitution. Ron Paul is the only one that addresses those issue and relates them to the constitution. But ..alas he doesn't look like a winner nor talks like a winner.

 

I ribbing mr reaver but alas he has disappeared I suppose so he cannot respond to the pudding.

[clmacdougall 11]

Mitt Romney will no doubt be the next president. The only speculation necessary is who will be his VP? Perry is too risky, I think Bachman would make for a great choice.