Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Reaver

So who do you think will be the next president of the USA?

Recommended Posts

I didn't recall hearing about his indictment for that. A code is not a legal requirement. You are illiterate apparently.

 

Well, maybe we'll have someone come along that's deaf and we'll have the three monkeys.

 

 

I never said I was voting for Obama, I was making a point.

 

From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access

[wais.access.gpo.gov]

[Laws in effect as of January 3, 2005]

[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between

January 3, 2005 and October 30, 2006]

[CITE: 36USC301]

 

 

TITLE 36--PATRIOTIC AND NATIONAL OBSERVANCES, CEREMONIES, AND

ORGANIZATIONS

 

Subtitle I--Patriotic and National Observances and Ceremonies

 

Part A--Observances and Ceremonies

 

CHAPTER 3--NATIONAL ANTHEM, MOTTO, FLORAL EMBLEM \1\ MARCH, AND TREE

 

Sec. 301. National anthem

 

(a) Designation.--The composition consisting of the words and music

known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.

(b) Conduct During Playing.--During a rendition of the national

anthem--

(1) when the flag is displayed--

(A) all present except those in uniform should stand at

attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart;

(B) men not in uniform should remove their headdress with

their right hand and hold the headdress at the left shoulder,

the hand being over the heart; and

© individuals in uniform should give the military salute

at the first note of the anthem and maintain that position until

the last note; and

 

(2) when the flag is not displayed, all present should face

toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag

were displayed.

 

(Pub. L. 105-225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1263.)

 

Historical and Revision Notes

 

Notice above it says Laws in Effect as of Jan 2005. Laws!

 

It is the same place where you find Title 26 and 26A the US code (laws) for IRS and the ones they will use against you in a court of law. So Mr Reaver me thinks any presidential candidate that would openly flaunt his disrespect has no business being the leader of our country, IMO. Now who is illiterate??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

United States Code

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The United States Code (U.S.C.) is a compilation and codification of the general and permanent federal law of the United States.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Right now,

 

I like Obama and Ron Paul....Ron Paul ran as a Libertarian in 1988 I believe....I like what he has to say about taxes,etc....

 

Obama, I like him because he keeps it real. He hasn't had a chance to be corrupted by the political system...

 

Who do I think will win?

 

Hell...I can't really even answer my own question...there are so many variables at play.

You like him but you won't vote for him ...eh??? Yeh he keeps it real all right. Publically show just how much he disrespects our laws and our country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First the Law:

 

 

 

4 USC Sec. 7 01/02/2006

 

-EXPCITE-

 

TITLE 4 - FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATES

 

CHAPTER 1 - THE FLAG

 

-HEAD-

 

Sec. 7. Position and manner of display

 

-STATUTE-

 

(f) When flags of States, cities, or localities, or pennants of

 

societies are flown on the same halyard with the flag of the United

 

States, the latter should always be at the peak. When the flags are

 

flown from adjacent staffs, the flag of the United States should be

 

hoisted first and lowered last. No such flag or pennant may be

 

placed above the flag of the United States or to the United States

 

flag's right.

 

 

Now HERE is a REAL American that loves their country and knows the law!! Obama apparently scores "0" on both!

 

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57960

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please find me the sentencing guidelines for violation of this "law".

 

 

Oh, there are none?

That would be for a court of law to decide. How old are you reaver? IT IS LAW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I guess this Mr Scarborough is a real American as well?

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=658_1185903108

 

You have to remember..my love for this country is not on trial, I have fought for it..have you?

 

I am making the point, that if put on trial in the Supreme Court, the first amendment will supersede any of the "codes" you are posting.

 

You say what you want, but like I said, it is not ILLEGAL. Post the sentencing guidelines for this violation please.

 

You can't even enforce the saying of the pledge of allegiance in public schools anymore..trust me, no one is going to arrest Mr Obama for not placing his hand on his heart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL try pulling the amendment stuff on title 26 and 26a of the same USC. against the IRS and see if that will fly in a court of law. Some of tried the amendment deal with IRS. Guess where they are at?? In prison!! IT IS THE LAW and HE should have been arrested or cited for it. THIS IS FEDERAL CODE reaver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access

[wais.access.gpo.gov]

[Laws in effect as of January 3, 2005]

[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between

January 3, 2005 and October 30, 2006]

[CITE: 36USC301]

 

 

TITLE 36--PATRIOTIC AND NATIONAL OBSERVANCES, CEREMONIES, AND

ORGANIZATIONS

 

Subtitle I--Patriotic and National Observances and Ceremonies

 

Part A--Observances and Ceremonies

 

CHAPTER 3--NATIONAL ANTHEM, MOTTO, FLORAL EMBLEM \1\ MARCH, AND TREE

 

Sec. 301. National anthem

 

(a) Designation.--The composition consisting of the words and music

known as the Star-Spangled Banner is the national anthem.

(b) Conduct During Playing.--During a rendition of the national

anthem--

(1) when the flag is displayed--

(A) all present except those in uniform should stand at

attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart;

 

Okey dokey....so...who in that picture is standing at attention? Go ahead, I am waiting. Oh, also..wonder what flag ol' Hillary is facing? hmmm what about Mr Richardson? I am getting confused here, I was under the impression it was required BY LAW to face the flag and stand at attention!!?? Gee willikers!

 

 

So "WHY?" are you just bashing Obama, or are you gonna bash everyone else in the picture for breaking the "law"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You have to remember..my love for this country is not on trial, I have fought for it..have you?
The you ought to be the more upset about it. But, no, instead you apparently think NOTHING is wrong with what he is doing????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....so...who in that picture is standing at attention? Go ahead, I am waiting. Oh, also..wonder what flag ol' Hillary is facing? hmmm what about Mr Richardson? I am getting confused here, I was under the impression it was required BY LAW to face the flag and stand at attention!!?? Gee willikers!

 

 

So "WHY?" are you just bashing Obama, or are you gonna bash everyone else in the picture for breaking the "law"?

Well it may not be the best stand but at least they tried. Obama stands with his hands clasped near his.....well you get the idea. They were probably facing a flag where the music was coming from. Is that so hard to figure out reaver???? You don't face a poster flag. You face THE flag.

This is going no where. so I am off this thread but IT IS LAW AND HE SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED A CITATION

 

Good night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well it may not be the best stand but at least they tried. Obama stands with his hands clasped near his.....well you get the idea. They were probably facing a flag where the music was coming from. Is that so hard to figure out reaver???? You don't face a poster flag. You face THE flag.

This is going no where. so I am off this thread but IT IS LAW AND HE SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED A CITATION

 

Good night.

 

 

Oh they "probably" were...oh...uh...okay..I see....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well it may not be the best stand but at least they tried. Obama stands with his hands clasped near his.....well you get the idea. They were probably facing a flag where the music was coming from. Is that so hard to figure out reaver???? You don't face a poster flag. You face THE flag.

This is going no where. so I am off this thread but IT IS LAW AND HE SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED A CITATION

 

Good night.

 

Oh THE flag? as in the one behind them???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The you ought to be the more upset about it. But, no, instead you apparently think NOTHING is wrong with what he is doing????

 

Nope, I am not upset..because my service in the military was for this country and the FREEDOM that it provides...even to the losers that bash the military and go out of their way to cause trouble. Just like I can go wave a 50'X50' flag on the street corner and it's not illegal, so can someone else go and wave a Russian flag and it's not illegal. This country is based on FREEDOM and RIGHTS OF EXPRESSION.

 

No, I do not agree with his actions....but my point is that he is no worse off than anyone else. Stop nitpicking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LOL try pulling the amendment stuff on title 26 and 26a of the same USC. against the IRS and see if that will fly in a court of law. Some of tried the amendment deal with IRS. Guess where they are at?? In prison!! IT IS THE LAW and HE should have been arrested or cited for it. THIS IS FEDERAL CODE reaver.

 

SHHHH! well don't tell this guy that!

 

http://consumerist.com/consumer/irs/man-dodges-taxes-for-10-years-wins-in-federal-district-court-279978.php

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am glad you see!:cheers:

 

I guess we're playing the ASSumption game now...Obama probably had a flare up of his Parkinsons and was clasping his hands together to prevent them from shaking in public.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If not putting your hand over your heart means you're unpatiotic then most of the citizens of Australia are pretty (to use a very "in" term now" un-Australian. We even make fun of our national anthem!

 

I don't believe that patriotism revolves around a set of gestures or hollow promises to be true and faithfull blah blah blah. Patriotism is more about the feeling of love and dedication you have for your land. It doesn't have to always be ostensibly shown through the innane practice of holding a hand over your heart. When your country looses a close sporting event and you're on the verge of tears that makes you pretty damn patriotic.

 

When you can sit back and joke about yourselves that makes you patriotic. Australia is definately a different place than the US. Over here we have a sense of larikanism that is pretty wide spread throughout the country. We don't like to take things too seriously here so if we had Obama here not putting his hand over his heart most people except for the ultra conservatives wouldn't give a rat's arse about it.

 

What is worrying here however, is that the government wants to implement a citizenship test for all new immigrants before they are allowed to become citizens. The test is meant to be about Australian values. How do you quantify something like that? Countries like the USA and Australia are relatively new countries in the world and since their inceptions have become melting pots to a very vast range of different people from different ethnic, cultural, religioius, and linguistic backgrounds. Is it fair to assume that the values held by the first white people to settle in the land as being the litmus (sp?) test for the level of patriotism we should all aspire too?

 

If we take the original settlers as being the epitomy of patriotism I should be speaking one of the 150+ Aboriginal dialects in this country which has been inhabited by the Aboriginals for over 45,000 years!

 

I reckon that in the end your meaningfull actions really define how much of a patriot you are. Not placing a hand over a heart is hardly a case for concern. For some of you it may be, however I'd be pretty offended if someone said I was un-Australian because I think that the Ugg boot is one of the worst inventions in fashion ever, or that Fosters and VB suck balls in the beer department (sorry USA fellas we ship that camel piss over to you guys lol).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If not putting your hand over your heart means you're unpatiotic then most of the citizens of Australia are pretty (to use a very "in" term now" un-Australian. We even make fun of our national anthem!

 

I don't believe that patriotism revolves around a set of gestures or hollow promises to be true and faithfull blah blah blah. Patriotism is more about the feeling of love and dedication you have for your land. It doesn't have to always be ostensibly shown through the innane practice of holding a hand over your heart. When your country looses a close sporting event and you're on the verge of tears that makes you pretty damn patriotic.

 

When you can sit back and joke about yourselves that makes you patriotic. Australia is definately a different place than the US. Over here we have a sense of larikanism that is pretty wide spread throughout the country. We don't like to take things too seriously here so if we had Obama here not putting his hand over his heart most people except for the ultra conservatives wouldn't give a rat's arse about it.

 

What is worrying here however, is that the government wants to implement a citizenship test for all new immigrants before they are allowed to become citizens. The test is meant to be about Australian values. How do you quantify something like that? Countries like the USA and Australia are relatively new countries in the world and since their inceptions have become melting pots to a very vast range of different people from different ethnic, cultural, religioius, and linguistic backgrounds. Is it fair to assume that the values held by the first white people to settle in the land as being the litmus (sp?) test for the level of patriotism we should all aspire too?

 

If we take the original settlers as being the epitomy of patriotism I should be speaking one of the 150+ Aboriginal dialects in this country which has been inhabited by the Aboriginals for over 45,000 years!

 

I reckon that in the end your meaningfull actions really define how much of a patriot you are. Not placing a hand over a heart is hardly a case for concern. For some of you it may be, however I'd be pretty offended if someone said I was un-Australian because I think that the Ugg boot is one of the worst inventions in fashion ever, or that Fosters and VB suck balls in the beer department (sorry USA fellas we ship that camel piss over to you guys lol).

 

Yeah I agree with you there Nick. As much as I personally take pride in putting my hand over my heart (or popping a salute as it used to be)...I am not going to jump to conclusions that someone is unpatriotic just because they don't share my exact beliefs. Like you said, your actions, not gestures are the defining characteristics of someone as a patriot.

 

ha ha funny, as I knew a couple girls from Sydney who said the same thing about Fosters. haha!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I was an american, I'd go with Ron Paul, what the guy talks about sounds good, dunno of course how good his policies would work out.

Politicians being politicians, it is of course doubtful that he'd live up to all of his promises, but his record looks real good.

The way that american politics works makes it very unlikely that he'll even become a candidate.

I got the video from the high probablity trader, I like that guy :D.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really enjoyed that Ron Paul video. There are some interesting points brought up on this thread, some beaten to death. Some important points:

 

1. It would be a travesty if the president was elected because he/she WAS AFRICAN AMERICAN OR A WOMAN. Sorry soultrader, that was a thoughtless comment and maybe you didn't mean it that way.

 

2. A president should be elected for their ideas. Not their past or the SIZE OF THEIR CAMPAIGN FUND. This is a key point guys - the money comes from special interest groups who are buying the presidency and positioning themselves. I realize it's a capitalist country, but money should have nothing to do with getting elected.

 

3. We need to look beneath the presidency to see what is really going on. How many people here think Bushy actually has "any" power, aside from being a figure-head. This is a trend, and a major sign of corruption at the top.

SO if Bush is not the one calling the shots, can we actually vote for someone who will? Or are there more powerful sources like special interest groups (oil, defense, drug, labor, etc.) that over-ride. DOES THIS GOVERNMENT REALLY REPRESENT THE PEOPLE anymore?

 

3. WHY? kept talking about some law about saluting the flag - Nick the aussie is right about not giving this stuff too much credence. This symbolism leads to blind patriotism which, in my opinion, is total bull. Even the founding fathers would agree that trusting your government is probably the worst mistake you can make. Any government that enforces mandatory patriotism/nationalism over freedom of speech sounds like nazism to me.

 

4. The power is in the people, the government needs to be reminded of this. For quite some time there has been a majority against the war in Iraq - so why are we paying for it! There is a parallel that goes back to Vietnam, when the PEOPLE were so fed up with the government sending youths off to die that they began rioting in masses. At the time Nixon did not admit their influence, but in his memoirs he said that he took the protesters very seriously, and was fearful of their effect.

 

We need more fear and accountability in government. Responsibility to the people and not to the special interest groups. Folks my parents age, baby boomers, still have this blind faith in the US that they learned from their parents (WWII era). Subsequent generations have lost this faith with the TRUTH about the crap that was done in the past 40 years by agencies like the CIA and even higher up. This is another trend.

 

Future generations are going to have less and less faith in the government when stuff like this keeps going on. They have no reason to have faith, instead what they have is a growing mistrust and a lack of power to do anything about it.

 

Well the power is in numbers, and yes I think that revolution and anarchy is not out of the question someday- just throw in a few variables. I don't like to think about what will happen when the full story comes to light on the 911 events.

 

So that's my ramble, maybe it can spark some new thoughts on this thread, as it seemed to be dying.

 

PS yes I am in canada - wife and daughter canadian, but born in the US and lived there most of my life. I don't agree with Socialism here, don't think it works except in situations like Norway where you have oil buffering the bureaucratic inefficiencies. Canada is so inefficient it's ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • AMZN Amazon stock, nice buying at the 187.26 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • DELL Dell Technologies stock, good day moving higher off the 90.99 double support area, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?DELL
    • MCK Mckesson stock, nice trend and continuation breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?MCK
    • lmfx just officially launched their own LMGX token, Im planning to grab a couple of hundred and maybe have the option to stake them. 
    • Date: 2nd April 2025.   Market on Edge: Tariff Announcement and Volatility Ahead!   The US economic and employment data continues to deteriorate with the job vacancies figures dropping to a 5-month low. In addition to this, the IMS Manufacturing PMI also fell below expectations. However, both the US Dollar and Gold declined simultaneously following the release of the two figures, an uncommon occurrence in the market. Traders expect a key factor to be today’s ‘liberation day’ where the US will impose tariffs on imports. USDJPY - Traders Await Tariff Confirmation! Traders looking to determine how the USDJPY will look today will find it difficult to determine until the US confirms its tariff plan. Today is the day when Trump previously stated he would finalize and announce his tariff plan. The administration has not yet released the policy, but investors expect it to be the most expansionary in a century. President Trump is due to speak at 20:00 GMT. On HFM's Calendar the speech is stated as "US Liberation Day Tariff Announcement". Currently, analysts are expecting Trump’s Tariff Plan to impose tariffs on the EU, chips and pharmaceuticals later today as well as reciprocal tariffs. Economists have a good idea of how these tariffs may take effect, but reciprocal tariffs are still unspecified. In addition to this, 25% tariffs on the car industry will start tomorrow. The tariffs on the foreign cars industry are a factor which will particularly impact Japan. Although, traders should note that this is what is expected and is not yet finalised. Last week, President Trump stated that he would implement retaliatory tariffs but allow exemptions for certain US trade partners. Treasury Secretary Mr Bessent and National Economic Council Director Mr Hassett suggested that the restrictions would primarily target 15 countries responsible for the bulk of the US trade deficit. However, yesterday, Trump contradicted these statements, asserting that additional duties would be imposed on any country that has implemented similar measures against US products. The day’s volatility will depend on which route the US administration takes. The harshness of the policy will influence both the Japanese Yen as well as the US Dollar.   USDJPY 5-Minute Chart   US Economic and Employment Data The JOLT Job Vacancies figure fell below expectations and is lower than the previous month’s figure. The JOLT Job Vacancies read 7.57 million whereas the average of the past 6 months is 7.78 million. The ISM Manufacturing Index also fell below the key level of 50.00 and was 5 points lower than what analysts were expecting. The data is negative for the US Dollar, particularly as the latest release applies more pressure on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates. However, this is unlikely to happen if the trade policy ignites higher and stickier inflation. In the Bank of Japan’s Governor's latest speech, Mr Ueda said that the tariffs are likely to trigger higher inflation. USDJPY Technical Analysis Currently, the Japanese Yen Index is the worst performing of the day while the US Dollar Index is more or less unchanged. However, this is something traders will continue to monitor as the EU session starts. In the 2-hour timeframe, the USDJPY is trading at the neutral level below the 75-bar EMA and 100-bar SMA. The RSI and MACD is also at the neutral level meaning traders should be open to price movements in either direction. On the smaller timeframes, such as the 5-minute timeframe, there is a slight bias towards a bullish outcome. However, this is only likely if the latest bearish swing does not drop below the 200-Bar SMA.     The key resistant level can be seen at 150.262 and the support level at 149.115. Breakout levels are at 149.988 and 149.674. Key Takeaway Points: Job vacancies hit a five-month low, and the ISM Manufacturing PMI missed expectations, adding pressure on the Federal Reserve regarding interest rate decisions. Traders await confirmation on Trump’s tariff policy, which is expected to impact the EU, chips, pharmaceuticals, and foreign car industries. The severity of the tariffs will influence both the JPY and the USD, with traders waiting for final policy details. The Japanese Yen Index is the worst index of the day while the US Dollar Index is unchanged. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.