Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Taylor Trading Technique

Recommended Posts

...mitsu......

....i have no idea who you are ...... i could care less about anyone's character on any forum.....and don't know what forum you are referring to....and don't care at all.....

... having said that... thanks for the encouraging words.....

 

.....about cycles and inversions.... they don't really have to do with Taylor's method.... just something i came up with and i guess many others have come up with the same type of thing before me .....better to not worry about them and just keep things simple....

.... i just use them myself... but i don't recommend anyone else to use them.....

 

.... about today ... it was a buy day for me .... instead of getting what i wanted.... got a gap up and go..... Taylor says STAY OUT..... unless previously entered long.....

.... my next short day is monday ..... so that is my next play......if a high is made first and early.....

 

.... about my cycles.... the lower cycle ended...... the next cycle to finish is the upper cycle......

.... since price came in early on the lower cycle.... and therefore inverted by running the other way fast..... it is up in the air as to whether the upper cycle end will pull price upwards or downwards.... at least that has been my experience.....

..... but the next lower cycle should pull down......

 

..... if no one else wants to join the discussion or post...... that is pretty pitiful.... :0)

.... the fact that no one is interested in the Taylor method... makes it that much more appealing to me......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mitsubishi said:
I went short at 809 (cash) as it was the high on monday.I figured we wouldn't close higher than that. Also figured we would close up on the day but that futures overnight will cause the market to open down weds and for weds to be weak on a short sale day.If we had closed higher i would have averaged in there,and if there was a new high made first,added again to the position-more risk,i know,and lots of assumptions,but so far it's working- futures are negative tonight

Thanks for the chart but i don't really understand what i'm looking at. Eg,what does DP mean,what is bdl at the bottom there,what is ph,how is the ma calculated?

 

EDIT oK,i see from ttt.net DP is decision point and bdl is buy day low,correct? That still leaves ph and ma calc

 

Sorry I missed your question

 

 

There is a possibility of 9 lines for the 24 hour session and 9 for the day session and they are labeled as follows:

 

TTT MAp is the possible Penetration based on the new Moving Average Recap sheet

TTT MA is based on the MA recap sheet and represents either the possible Decline level on a Buy day, possible Rally level on Sell day, possible 3 day rally on SS day

TTT MAv is the possible Violation based on the MA recap sheet

TTT p is the possible Penetration based on the regular Recap sheet

TTT is based on the recap sheet and represents either the possible Decline level on a Buy day, possible Rally level on Sell day, possible 3 day rally on SS day

TTT v is the possible Violation based on the regular recap sheet

TTT PH is the Previous day's High

TTT PL is the Previous day's Low shown on Buy days and SS days

TTT BdL is the Buy Day Low shown on Sell and SS days

 

Any of these labels followed by a "D" indicates numbers from the Day Session.

 

 

MA is for Moving Average.

 

I have 2 recap sheets 1 is based on data from Jan 3,2008

tha second is based on data of the last 20 cycles. about 3 months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...... today friday was my middle day ..... low made first at 10.45am .....

.... high at the close matched up with end of upper cycle.... though that cycle did not predict a high or low....

... my cycle which may differ from others.... is for a short day on monday ....

.... so will look for a high made first at 10.15--10.45 am

 

.... or else a reaction long on a low made first at the same time.....

....next cycle to end is lower cycle ... ending at 3pm on tuesday ....

  elovemer said:
..... about today ...

...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys,

 

I haven't been keeping up so well with this thread but wanted to contribute and see if there is synergy.

 

I like Taylors method -- but its just a piece of how I think during the day.

 

One thing I ask about is the 'price targeting' of exits vs the variance of getting 'in the money' and then a reversal occurs causing a loss --- and how to quantify this so that your results are consistent -- variance is minimized --- but that your are also participating nicely when you catch a 'taylor type of swing' (ie, a big one).

 

So that is a question, do you go by the past cycles 'median' and use limits at that price??

 

I have spent some time working on 'range' and came up with some ideas -- using the implied volatility 'forecast' that is in the options market (VIX) to quantify expected volatility. I am still working on this but have so far found some interesting things. For instance, over the last 252 trading days (1 year) -- the market has formed RANGE of better than 0.8x the 1-day implied vol forecast 85% of the time. Said another way, convert VIX into a 1-day forecast and compare that to the final range on the next day.

 

The reason I like this conceptually is that implied volatility is always a near-term forecast that is based on real money. It is not historical -- it is forward looking --- this is important distinction vs only using historical data.

 

Why is this useful to Taylor practitioners? Because, if you establish a Taylor type of low or high made first -- then you can instantly calculate a price target the other way for that day --- with various degrees of confidence based on however you feel about it. ie, if a low is made at 800, and implied vol predicts 20 pts of range --- you 'could' say you have 85% confidence that price will trade to 816 (800 + (20 * 0.8))... if you like the set-up a TON, you could say -- hey, this is a 'top quartile' type of situation and therefore target something more like 30 pts off the 'Taylor low' (low + (1.5 * the VIX implied range forecast). Thus, in the previous scenario, you could arrive at a 'stretch target' of 830 (800 + (20 * 1.5)) -- assuming that you are right and the 'Taylor Low' holds. (note I am arriving at these 'confidence intervals' based on past market behavior -- and then making mental adjustments based on how conservative or aggressive I want to be -- ie, I know its very high odds to get X points of range and lower odds to get X+Y pts of range, so there is a trade-off: take the high-odds lower point gain -- or play for aggressive gain and be willing to accept some added variance in your results when it doesn't do the lower odds move).

 

Anyway, just sharing an idea -- so that I am contributing something.

 

This chart quantifies the relationship I am talking about (to be used as a starting point from which to work, this is not a science). To read, take example of RANGE getting to 1.0x the implied vol forecast -- The market gets 1.0 or greater ~62% of the time over the last year (1 - the 38.1% figure listed on the chart at the '1 level'). Another example, the market gets 0.8x or better ~85% of time (1 - the 15.08% figure listed at the 0.8 level) etc...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10048&stc=1&d=1238856370

5aa70ec0bd09b_April32009.thumb.png.4bf16f2a669ef45267469ebe6522e30e.png

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frank,

Interesting analysis,

 

What tactics you employ for entry and exit on intraday basis, ie. technical analysis, multiple timeframes , patterns, price derivatives etc. Presume you trade ESmini.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

55 point decline

buy day rally 11.5

63.25 point thru next buy day high

total rally

1.15

 

  elovemer said:
23.75 61.75 2.6

=================

25.5 62.75 2.46 first cycle

===================

39.25 61.25 1.56 second cycle

===================

36.5 43.5 1.19 third cycle

===================

======================

 

55 point decline

buy day rally 11.5

34.75 point thru sell day high

47.75 total rally

- 1.15

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote
What tactics you employ for entry and exit on intraday basis, ie. technical analysis, multiple timeframes , patterns, price derivatives etc. Presume you trade ESmini.

 

I just try to look through the noise to determine what I think the 'higher timeframe' players are doing and join in for a piece of it. Synchronizing the daily rhythm with the intraday high/low 'made first' are key in this. I do use some oscillator and price patterns to try to help find trades around this and I am always trying to quantify biases that can help in this regard through the use of statistics (ie, such as quantifying the relationship of VIX and intraday range).

 

One thing of secondary importance to me is the label of the days -- ie, buy day/sell day/ss-day. While many days do become clear-cut with labels, I find the market profile 'auction' to be a better way to think about the same thing Taylor was doing with his 3-day labeling system. But I view the Taylor technique and market profile as entirely complimentary to each other -- not that one is better than the other, they are both very useful.

 

Taylor was all about 'positioning and re-positioning' himself using the high and low violations (or the 'failures to penetrate') to guide his bias. I find this to be an extremely useful construct.

 

The issue I bring up is that of how to balance consistency with playing for occassional big profit. We can all agree that today (monday morning) is likely a good time and location to try a short (high violation after extended up move) --- but where to exit should this prove true and why??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...once again ....didn't get much of a high made first...

.... but the high made first would have to be the 10.00 high.....

....edit... my next lower cycle ends tomorrow at the close....

Edited by elovemer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  elovemer said:
...once again ....didn't get much of a high made first...

.... but the high made first would have to be the 10.00 high.....

....edit... my next lower cycle ends tomorrow at the close....

 

.... they stole our short day .... with the big gap

 

... and it looks like they might steal our buy day ..... with another gap up.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so true elovemer.

 

here are all the 'close to close' changes for ES this year (ranked from high to low) -- you can see how its not so common to get huge point moves vs the previous close -- so the location for shorting today was tricky with the gap. in shorting, you would be implicitly betting on getting a large move vs previous close -- if you expected continuation down that is... a high violation/high test would have allowed much better location for the market to 'start high' and would allow more profit room to the same level/zone --- 815-820.... shorting was fine -- but had to keep expectations in check and respect the lack of continuation below the previous days low...

 

we ended up right in the lower middle of the std dev bands at 9.75 pts (all numbers are in absolute terms fyi)

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10075&stc=1&d=1239051678

5aa70ec1e330a_April62009TrailingClosetoCloseChange.thumb.png.ef1fc8553477bc4b8b2605f36f0f2841.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Enjoy reading the posts and seeing how everyone trades TTT.

 

Here's my take on TTT:

 

Today (monday 4/6) was short sell day by my calcuations. Taylor says the objective is to sell at, near or slightly above, below yesterday's (Friday 4/3) high of 844.50. Market traded to 848 pretty quickly at the open of the overnight session. This was the clue to look to short at the objective. Nice run down with a decent close in the middle of the range today. For tomorrow's buy day, not sure if market will trade under the objective of today's low-given the nice recovery late today in price. Will watch to see what happens and look to go long tomorrow, per Taylor's rules.

 

It seems like a lot of you don't use the overnight session, but wait for the morning opening. Any thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

..... on the possible high made first....

... that cycle inversion may have meant something more ....

 

.... again... next cycle to end is lower cycle.... which ends at the close

  elovemer said:
....they didn't steal the buy day this time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted to discuss one concept that I think helps 'quantify' Taylor.

 

Taylors concept of 'high made first' and/or 'low made first' is quantifiable. If you think of the daily taylor rhythm in quantifiable terms, it become easier to understand, at least for me.

 

From studying the time of days that the 'made first' occured (low for day if low first, high for day if high first), it turns out that the market makes its high or low for the day 45-50% of the time in the opening 30 minutes. This is a very powerful tendency. If you add in the next 30-min zone (the classic 'opening range'/'initial balance'), then its about 65%. Toss in the next 2 30-min timezones (first 2 hours of day) -- then you capture ~75-80% of the days.

 

Thus, if you 'define' the upcycles and downcycles as movement relative to the opening 2-hour range, you have somewhat re-created taylors system for the intraday market. So look at this past week -- Tuesday made a 'high first' and a 'low last' -- the cycle was therefore down. This cycle does not mechanically 'switch' until a morning high is taken out. Now, price tested the Tuesday low on Wednesday for 'low first' -- and it did so in the opening 2 hours -- then the high was taken out for 'low made first' --- this signals that the market is in an up-cycle until a 'morning low' is violated to the downside. On Thursday the market gapped up and put in its low in the opening 30-minutes, which it will do nearly 50% of the time.

 

I find this to be a very useful framework to stay in the rhythm of the Taylor cycle. The market remains in an up-cycle until a 'morning low' is taken out, at which point the intraday statistics point toward a down-cycle.

 

This framework can be used within a buy day/sell-day/ss-day daily count -- or it can be used on its own. But either way, you know that you are on the side of the statistical tendencies if you use this as a 'mental guide'.

 

Just my 2 cents on making Taylor concepts easier to understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting take, Frank, Perhaps you can follow it up in forthcoming days to better illustrate the concept. Anything that enhances Taylor is worth pursuing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a quick glimpse from recent days. the arrows mark (with hindsight) the important high or low that was 'made first'. obviously, in real-time trading you will have to be making a judgment of whether its high or low first and then proceed accordingly -- your judgment might be right or wrong but there are other concepts to help guide you on that -- this is just to demonstrate that an important high or low is 'often' made in the first 2 hours of the day --- with particular emphasis on the first 30 minutes. the first 30-minute bar is very important (as I will show later) in that if a high or low is NOT made in the first 30 minutes, then the odds of a large move away from the previous days close drop in a big way -- and you need to proceed cautiously once price has moved AWAY from the previous close. As you can see on Thursday, the low WAS made in the first 30-minutes and price closed FAR away from the previous close, which is consistent.

 

Note how on March 27th, March 31st, April 3rd, April 7th and April 8th -- price did not make a high or low in the opening 30-minutes and its as if there is gravity of the previous close not allowing price to close TOO far away from the previous close.

 

One other thing -- a key question which is kind of market profile based but fits in here --- is the market showing 'urgency' vs the previous days range early in day (in first 30-minutes)? This is the 'don't get run over' indicator -- ie March 30th and April 1st -- and April 2nd and April 9th to a lesser extent. On these days, market is showing that it has no interest in staying near the previous days high or low. This price action is a strong indicator that something unusual is going on. The point of this comment is just to show importance of the opening 30-minute bar -- not only in its necessity to create a large move vs previous close -- but also interpreting strong action early in day vs the previous high or low as a 'Taylor signal' that an important high or low was just made. (Huge gaps do make this tougher to actually trade in reality).

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10123&stc=1&d=1239452864

5aa70ec340d19_IntradayHighLowFirst.thumb.png.f58d44c3b74f4e4416c86b5909e6b2cf.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

......................

........................

.......................

........................

  frank said:
i wanted to discuss one concept that i think helps 'quantify' taylor.

Edited by elovemer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frank,

In Taylor the emphasis is on whether or not the objective is made FIRST or LAST.

 

i.e on a BUY day, buying objective(LOW) is made FIRST if their is a decline from SS day high to that Low, however if the LOW is made LAST on the BUY day, then that would be Buying objective made LAST.

 

Similarly on say Short Sale Day, ideally the selling objective (HIGH) should be made FIRST for shorting, however if the day ends on the HIGH, then that would mean the Selling objective has been made LAST, one would not short then but wait for the BUY day.

Hope I am not beginning to write or sound like Taylor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Monad,

 

what I am showing is that statistically speaking -- you can/should be actually looking for the 'made first' objective in the first few 30-min bars. Not only this -- but you can quantify how often it begins its move in each period. This is highly complimentary to taylors 'rules'.

 

For example, if you are thinking of 'buy day' the next day --- ideally you would like to get into the 'buy objective' price zone (which is a violation or test of previous days low) during the first few 30-min bars -- because this is the most likely time of day, statistically speaking, for a 'key low' to be made (made first). if price instead 'starts high' and is trading down with momentum in B, the odds may be higher on 'Buy Day/High Made First' -- because this is consistent with the statistical tendencies.

 

again, this is not a 'system' within itself -- its just some added information when trying to come up with your 'overall read' of the situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frank,

I see what you are getting it, and it would be a good idea to follow up in the days to come, i.e as the market unfolds day by day. That way I guess you get a better grasp of the perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.