Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Taylor Trading Technique

Recommended Posts

  HAKUNA said:
WHY?/Richbois

 

On a BUY day, a short can be taken on HIGH made FIRST. and unlike a sale day, we do not have to wait for a sell objective.

 

This is especially pertinent if a HIGH was made LAST on SS day, however what if a LOW was made LAST on SS day.?

 

Weak closings forecast failures to penetrate ‘top side’ on the rallies after declines, while strong closings forecast failures to penetrate ‘down side’ on the declines after rallies. p47

 

"A weak closing on a Short Sale Day, may indicate a lower opening on the Buying Day—and we get set to buy on the low made FIRST—" p43

 

"Now, we go back to the close of the Short Sale Day and we find that it was a ‘flat’ closing, then from this indication we expect a lower opening on the Buying Day and so far this would cause the low to be made FIRST and is a stronger indication when made early in the session that a rally would start from this low and hold the gains for a strong closing, which in turn indicates an up opening and a penetration of the Selling Day Objective—the Buy Day High." p 28

 

"When the low and close are about the same on a Short Sale Day, we usually get our (BU) Buy Under, the price goes lower, next day" p71

 

When BU's are made tape reading skills must be especially sharp. Do not take long position on a BU UNTIL support has come in per the tape.

 

Qutoes from: The Tayor Trading Technique pdf version

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today 2/17/09 is obviousley a BV made on a sell day or the second day of the cycle. This presents a long opportunity in this slide down, however, one must not attempt to capture much as the market is very weak. Just a few quick points and out. Any decent rally back towards 2/16's low is the exit point. Again market is weak. We could perhaps see an afternoon rally of sorts..then again we might not so wisdom indicates exiting on any profit one can grab on any rally back to yesterdays low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks WHY?

o.k , the above scenario is buying after BV on a sell day.- only longs allowed on a Sell Day as you have explained before.

 

1. Lets say today 2/17 is a BUY day. That makes 2/16 a SS day which closed on the Low.

 

All of the premarket action today 2/17 was under 2/16 low (attached 5min and 15min both for Buy Day scenario), would it be o.k to go short on the open as shown, as it would be a HIGH made FIRST on a BUY day which can be shorted

 

Then to cover and go long as both short and long are allowed on a BUY day.

 

2. OTOH if it was SS day, after a weak close on 2/16 (sell day), would it then be o.k to short the HIGH made FIRST on a SS day, the only trade for the day as only shorts are taken on a SS day.

5aa70eb253275_eminishortonHighmadeFirst.png.24d0411b11d9754874fcf450a30cf3b1.png

5aa70eb256ec2_esminiwithpremarketaction.png.2df9cf7c83d5c6be4817a6a02f4bc973.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  HAKUNA said:
Thanks WHY?

o.k , the above scenario is buying after BV on a sell day.- only longs allowed on a Sell Day as you have explained before.

 

1. Lets say today 2/17 is a BUY day. That makes 2/16 a SS day which closed on the Low.

 

All of the premarket action today 2/17 was under 2/16 low (attached 5min and 15min both for Buy Day scenario), would it be o.k to go short on the open as shown, as it would be a HIGH made FIRST on a BUY day which can be shorted

 

Then to cover and go long as both short and long are allowed on a BUY day.

 

2. OTOH if it was SS day, after a weak close on 2/16 (sell day), would it then be o.k to short the HIGH made FIRST on a SS day, the only trade for the day as only shorts are taken on a SS day.

 

Generally speaking pre market or pre day session opening should be used for mostly for indicating what the day session will open at. Therefore, it is best not to trade in the premarket. I wouldn't say never do it but it is best to see what the market does at the open of the regular trading session.

 

Would it be ok to short 2/17 if it was a buy day on a buy day made first? The problem is you don't know in this case IF it is the high made first or the low made first. In a weak market like this only allowing some time to go by will one be able to determine which was made...the low or the high. Taylor says a short sale on high made first on a buy day is generally a "weak" short sell. He also says NEVER short on a buying day when the low is made first by "opening down" p 42 as there isnt enough certainty to make a profit because of the spread not being enough. On page 43 he says a high made first on a down opening on a buying day would be of no interest to us for short selling as this could cause the low to be made last.

 

Page 28 pdf version of the book says: "Now, we go back to the close of the Short Sale Day and we find that it was a 'flat' closing, then from this indication we expect a lower open on the Buying Day and so far this would cause the low to be made first and is a stronger indication when made early in the session that a rally would start from this low and hold the gains for a strong closing".

 

Remember, the decline is from the SS day high to the buy day low except on those occasions where the decline continues on the sell day causing a BV. With this in mind one could see that if today were a buy day (2/17) that it opened weak and the slide would be down.

 

Taylor says buying low points made first on a buy day are usually profitable except in declines where a steep downtrend has begun.

 

In summary IF 2-17 were a buy day and a down opening I would leave the short side alone and wait until the last possible time before noon to see IF any low made holds or is supported and then look at going long. However IF by the end of the day it looks like it will close weak then the best thing for me to do would be to sell it out any long I may have taken with a small gain or loss as NO rally was forthcoming from the low made first on the buy day. On a buy day of one goes long and the low closes flat then one is on the wrong side of the trend. Get out.

 

Of course this is different IF it is in an uptrend. Failures to penetrate previous days high early in the session in an uptrend can possibly be a shorting opportunity. Remember, the Taylor game was to catch the larger trend of the day. And of course it isnt 100% but his rules protected one when the system was wrong about the price action.

Edited by WHY?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One must always remember that you are playing for the odds in your favor. Taylor had ideal setups and there are less than ideal setups. Ideal setups put the odds in your favor. Less than ideal are more risky but many times still tradeable. Much depends on how much risk one is willing to take. In the end it is discretionary. The system gives you a framework for trading. Exact entry and exits and the decision to make a play or not are purely discretionary.

 

Thus on shorting a a buy day high made first AFTER it trades close to or penetrates the high of the previous day (the SS day) puts the odds in your favor. Shorting a high made first on a down opening on a buy day that does not penetrate the high of the previous session or come close to penetrating it is LESS than ideal and more risky. The trend can turn fast back up. IF I traded such a senario (and I probably would not but would pass) it would be with eyes glued to the screen and I would probably be out of the postion with a quick but smaller profit and try to not plan on capturing any larger move as the odds are against me.

 

On any given day there is a main trend and many cross currents. Sometimes a couple of main trends. Trying to short or go long on cross currents is what Taylor tried to avoid. Not that it can't be done but his game was to try a catch a goodly portion of the main trend of the day. That was it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at a chart of todays price action from the perspective of it being a buy day Taylor would have probably skipped any shorting and went long around 11:20 or so and out that afternoon with a 4 or 5 point gain as the rally back was weak.

 

From the perspective of it being a sell day today 2/17 (2nd day of the cycle), the entry and exits would have been about the same time as the above. That is just how price action panned out today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... by a one day shift of my original count.... with down swing trend

....feb 10 was sell.... with SMBS cycle.... with today tuesday as buy day .... and tomorrow wednesday as next sell day....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great insights WHY? on BUY day nuances under ideal and non-ideal conditions.

 

Earlier Hakuna inquired about a statement from Taylor. I am somewhat curious, it appears a typo error, however you know more about this stuff than most.

 

"On page 72 in the "Pertinent Points" Chapter the following is stated:

 

"There seems to be about two swings a week, one Upward and one Downward. In the Bull movement, the one downward will be longer and is the swing that causes the failures to penetrate the Selling Objectives and the cause of Buying Day Low Violations."

 

Should'nt it be Bear movement instead of Bull movement?

 

From what you have posted earlier in post 451, It sure looks like a typo error.

 

Weak closings forecast failures to penetrate ‘top side’ on the rallies after declines, while strong closings forecast failures to penetrate ‘down side’ on the declines after rallies. p47

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the count you guys are taking today 2/18 it would be a SS day. The Taylor play today would have been the shorting shortly after 11 a.m. and covering this afternoon.

 

By my count today 2-18 was a buy day and the Taylor play would have been going long around 10.a.m and exiting around 11 a.m.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  WHY? said:
By the count you guys are taking today 2/18 it would be a SS day. The Taylor play today would have been the shorting shortly after 11 a.m. and covering this afternoon.

 

By my count today 2-18 was a buy day and the Taylor play would have been going long around 10.a.m and exiting around 11 a.m.

 

In your post of 256, you mentioned:

 

"When in a bear market look to short on high made first on buy days and on Shortsell days. Look for buying day violations to happen more often for taking QUICK long positions but do not stay in them long"

 

1. So a short could also have been taken at the open on 2/18, on a SS day. The shorting opportunity after 11a.m would be a retest of that opening high and also premarket high of 795 level.

 

2. For Buy Day, a short was also viable on the open followed by a long as per you post of 256.

 

2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  WHY? said:
By the count you guys are taking today 2/18 it would be a SS day. The Taylor play today would have been the shorting shortly after 11 a.m. and covering this afternoon.

 

By my count today 2-18 was a buy day and the Taylor play would have been going long around 10.a.m and exiting around 11 a.m.

 

In your post of 256, you mentioned:

 

"When in a bear market look to short on high made first on buy days and on Shortsell days. Look for buying day violations to happen more often for taking QUICK long positions but do not stay in them long"

 

1. So a short could also have been taken at the open on 2/18, on a SS day. The shorting opportunity after 11a.m would be a retest of that opening high and also premarket high of 795 level.

 

2. For Buy Day, a short was also viable on the open followed by a long as per you post of 256.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....if swing trend shifts back to an up trend here....which i think it could....

.... then i keep my original count...... with today thursday as middle day .... and friday as sell day .... BMSB cycle

  elovemer said:
.... by a one day shift of my original count.... with down swing trend

....feb 10 was sell.... with SMBS cycle.... with today tuesday as buy day .... and tomorrow wednesday as next sell day....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  monad said:
In your post of 256, you mentioned:

 

"When in a bear market look to short on high made first on buy days and on Shortsell days. Look for buying day violations to happen more often for taking QUICK long positions but do not stay in them long"

 

1. So a short could also have been taken at the open on 2/18, on a SS day. The shorting opportunity after 11a.m would be a retest of that opening high and also premarket high of 795 level.

 

2. For Buy Day, a short was also viable on the open followed by a long as per you post of 256.

 

I need to look at a chart to respond to what you are saying here. I dont trade the emini. I am just posting stuff here for the benefit of those here who trade it since this is the instrument posters here seem interested in. Therefore, I don't have any good charting software for futures...etc as I trade stocks and don't need it. Can you post a 5 min chart for the emini between 9:30 a.m Eastern time and 11:30 a.m? IF I were trading the emini per taylor I would be interested in the price action from 9:30 a.m. onward. If you can post a chart that would help. thanks

Edited by WHY?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHY?

 

Here is the 5min chart:

 

As you can see the market gapped up on the open, so being a SS day, guess it would be o.k to short. The next opportunity came after 12 when it tested the opening High.

 

However if it was BUY day then the long was around 10a.m as you pointed out.

5aa70eb33c041_eminifor18thFeb.png.d4aa819b849ee443f4b92886c993ff94.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Monad. I ask because when I look at those free chart sites on the net they show 9:30 near the low of that first drop. Again I have not traded the emini for years so i have no reliable charting system.

 

If your chart is correct then yes shorting a buy day or shorting a SS day was there at the open however the charts I have access to seem to differ from your chart. Also, going long was there later in the session per my buy day count. That long could have been sold same day as I mentioned or held overnight and sold today per taylors rules. However, most of you guys seem to be strict daytraders trying to adapt taylor to multiple entry/exits during the day so you probably wouldn't have held overnight. For Taylor daytrading could be held overnight. I suppose he was technically wrong on that description. About the discrepancies in the free net charts and your chart well i don't know why they differ but they seem to differ. On your chart you are showing the open at 9:30 a.m. ET correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes WHY? 9.30EST.

 

Your comments "By the count you guys are taking today 2/18 it would be a SS day. The Taylor play today would have been the shorting shortly after 11 a.m. and covering this afternoon.

 

By my count today 2-18 was a buy day and the Taylor play would have been going long around 10.a.m and exiting around 11 a.m."

 

I presume the times you mentioned are chicago time CST. but the chart should be the same ie. 18th Feb, Wednesday.

Edited by monad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today is a Buy day based on Richard's TTT excel spreadsheet.

Since I also had a potential wave count showing end of a big wave 3 end I was able to buy near the first TTT target around 744.3.

5aa70eb400cff_ES03-0924_02_2009(15Min)MTP.thumb.gif.13040821302170430c26eb7814ae2368.gif

5aa70eb40813f_ES03-0924-02-2009(1min)MTP.gif.9e38cadd2f8fbb3e27749215444dc371.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.