Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Taylor Trading Technique

Recommended Posts

....a comment about accumulation....

....williams accumulation indicator on daily chart showed big upwards divergence.... why?

.... because despite price action moving lower in the previous week.... this downward movement was not reflected in [close-open] .... which reflects pro activity....

.... if price is moving down... but pros are still buying....

.... or if futures open way down... but pros are still buying....

...edit...you can see this easily looking at an hourly chart...of trading hours only.... by just drawing one line for each day connecting the close and open of that day.... if price is going down over time.... while the trend lines are all sloping up...it could be accumulation....

... especially if price is not going down (that much) over time....

Edited by elovemer
edit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....on that M pattern bottom on the daily chart.....

....the last cycle on the bottom is the last two legs of that M

....in this pic.... tomorrow's close would be the end of that length of time....

....if we get a new high.... we will have an upper cycle length to work with....

....(edit)....since this is the lower cycle....there is nothing saying that we should get a new high in this time.... rather it suggests that we should get a low in that time.....

 

.... if the high comes later.... until it comes... we are still trending.....

....as we were trending when the lower cycle kept extending longer and longer....

cy.thumb.jpg.e5e55abc86207b08aa6c2408a17e8995.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....while the method has been difficult to apply lately due to such great volatility...

....i believe that today.....thursday.... will be a good point to begin a book

...the last cycle on the bottom....on 30min chart.... instead of coming in early.... came in a little late....

....as one cycle usually comes in early.... signifying that the cycle has switched sides.....

 

..... usually the cycle does not come in late....especially after the cycle has alredy been getting extended longer and longer....

...anyway.... we now have a very long upper cycle in place....and a longer lower cycle in place....

..... these should be good reference points during what appears to be an extended up move coming.....yet to be confirmed....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....with the volatility... i have not been able to apply the method reliably....

 

.... and my cycles.... stopped working because they keep getting longer and longer... to me that represents longer term change....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When in a bear market look to short on high made first on buy days and on Shortsell days. Look for buying day violations to happen more often for taking QUICK long positions but do not stay in them long. Sell them at or just before the previous days (i.e. buy day's) low.

 

Or use the 3 day method and short on succesive buy days until you get your line shorted then cover on succesive buy day lows or even short sell day lows.

 

Remember in bear markets you must take advantage of the odds in your favor and use Taylor for more shorting opportunities. And in bear market you will see succesive BV's.

 

In bull markets you will see higher buy day bottoms (usually profitable) and more penetrations of the target prices (objective points per Taylor) so naturally the odds favor using the system for long positions.

 

Taylor can be used for daytrading, very short-term swing trading, or longer term swing trading. The strategies employed for each type of trading are unique.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the interesting comments, have read your posts closely, you clearly have good understanding of TT method. I am still in the learning part, would you take the trouble to show some charts appropriate to those comments as I am still confused about buy and sell days etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a guy offers TT service on an excel spead sheet. The additional works he does is applying statistical model to each buy/sell level. Thus you can see when price moves to certain number the change of the next direction gets increse or decrease.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hakuna could you explain more in detail about where the confusion is concerning the buy...sell days??? Taylors method is NOT a charting method. It is purely price driven with built in cycles that he discovered in most stocks and futures. While charts are a reflection of price IF one uses charts then one falls into looking for chart patterns to try and determine the day of the cycle. I refer you to page 7, 3rd par. in his book. Many attempt to look at charts to determine the cycle and end up confused or just giving up.

 

The heart of Taylor is the very short term manipulation of the markets by the deep pockets. This is done over 3 day cycles because IF a stock went straight up and straight down all the time the risk would be too great for folks to buy into it. Any movement (up or down with a few exceptions) must be sustained by support and resistance areas. It is a mechanism to make the market more orderly. Taylors contention is that this "orderliness" is accomplished in 3 day cycles.

 

Tom Williams method in VSA can be useful as a preliminary scanning of interested stocks...futures. His method gives techniques for spotting the footprints of the "smart money". It is useful to take note of the footprints they leave and then plug those particular stocks into Taylors system. Williams method is a charting method of looking at individuals bars to spot the foot prints. I don't think it necessary to buy the software for Williams method however, if one wants to shell out the cash I don't see where it could hurt. Williams method does take into account volume. I see it as another tool to spot the action of the deep pockets. Manipulation of the markets is the heart of Taylor. His contention is this manipulation is done in cycles. The names of his days are simply his way of making sense of it all. You could name the days anything. He has rigid rules to follow for each day. His rules protect you on abnormal days and give you a view before the markets open. His system is all about "anticipating" what the market will probally do based upon what smart money is doing and based upon what day of the cycle the stock is in. I hesitate using the word "predict" because it makes some folks so mad they can't see. While no one can't predict exactly what the market will do it is possible to anticipate what it will "probally do". This is so because if manipulation is done systematically and orderly and IF manipulation is daily then cycles will develope. The cycles can be used to "anticpate" the probable next move. Of course it isn't 100% but it is accurate enough to make money. The rules are for when the system is "off".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks WHY?

o.k on a practical level, friday was an upday, so that presume would be labelled as Buy Day.

 

Today therefore expect a Sell day and tomorrow a Short sale day, hope I am on right track so far.

 

Looking at US session only ES gaps up and has hit 910, Is that high made first on a sell day ie. high violation of buy day.

 

Just trying to get used to the terms and correct designation of up and down days.

 

Perhaps you could take the trouble to help out and follow this through for a week or so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is what Rick said;

""Posted - 12/08/2008 : 17:28:59

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Today was a Buy day. We failed to get a Decline today which has only happened a few times this year. This is very unusual and demonstrate that the trend may be switching to more of a bullish trend. At the open I was looking for an excuse to short however within 1 hour of the open TVGR took effect, prompted me to look for longs."

 

Disclaimer: I don't use numbers and I don't like excel, so I have no clue about this method. I just pass along the ideal of adding the statistical component to the method because it makes more sense than just some wild guess of 'today is buy/sell/sell short day'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...IT IS GREAT ... that some folks are posting here now...

.... here is my screen shot...

.... see what you can see

...three things going on in this shot....

.... time cycle, price retracement size, and 3 day method

..... see what you can see.... or ask questions.....

 

.... thanks to OP and all posters.... hopefully this thread will get somewhere....

5aa70ea0e061d_CYCLENOW.thumb.gif.896f19feb4f352d97fe3fb8c9e7bbc0d.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today was a Buy day. Again today we had a shallow Decline. We did have 60% of the low made first, We gapped up, TVGR took effect and we reached the projected highs.

 

That was the comments in tonight's report

5aa70ea1c56b4_RecapDec_16.thumb.jpg.4b2fc08122bf7eb4617e86b94a92746d.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....sure... the horizontal rectangles represent time between last lows...or highs...respectively

....the low one came early.... so it bounced up to finish at the high at end of upper cycle

..... that is time

..... then... the vertical rectangles represent the BIGGEST .... retracement... on the up move

.... so in order to remain bullish.... it needs to not retrace more than that amount... it didn't

.... then the 3 day method..... you can see.. BMS .... buy,mid,sell,buy ... never ending....two days were out of whack due to retracement pattern.... they are in grey color

  Shamal said:
can you make some attempt to explain please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....forward.... the lower cycle ends thursday morning.... so you might expect some downward gravitation toward that time slot....

  elovemer said:
....sure... the horizontal rectangles represent time between last lows...or highs...respectively

....the low one came early.... so it bounced up to finish at the high at end of upper cycle

..... that is time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHAT IS TVGR

 

In simple language, does that mean sell off into Thursday,

 

what is the scenario for test, probable test of high/low of Tuesday,

as I type, ES has gone down to 890, so possible gap down on opening,

 

hence on a practical level what setups to expect via Taylor method and what action would you take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  HAKUNA said:
WHAT IS TVGR

 

In simple language, does that mean sell off into Thursday,

 

what is the scenario for test, probable test of high/low of Tuesday,

as I type, ES has gone down to 890, so possible gap down on opening,

 

hence on a practical level what setups to expect via Taylor method and what action would you take.

 

This Rule is cited from Victor Sperandeo’s book: Trader Vic II: Principles of Professional Speculation, pg. 231

 

The Trader Vic Gap Rule (TVGR)

 

"If there is a gap, and it is going to reverse, it will do so 10-15 minutes after the opening 95% of the time. Please believe me on the odds, they are real. If the market continues in the direction of the gap after 10 to 15 minutes, it is a strong sign that the move will continue for the rest of the day, closing in that direction as well. Even if the market reverses after the 10-15 minute period, if it fails to fill the gap, odds are that the market will close in the direction of the gap."

 

 

This is the comment included with the report, my customers received last night for today's trading

 

"Tomorrow is Sell day. We already achieved the average rally. We have a 50/50 chance of making a higher high, however we do have 60% chance of making a lower low."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rich,

 

I appreciate your statistical approach to Taylor.

 

As I am beginning to understand TTT, I am seeing that Taylor traded phases (BD, SD, SSD) within a three-day cycle that seems to repeat itself (cycle).

 

He had different rules for each of the phases, depending on how the market played out. Thus, for example, you looked to BUY on a LOW MADE FIRST on a BD, but would look to SHORT on a HIGH MADE FIRST on a BD.

 

He had developed clues for how the market might trade tomorrow (e.g., if on a BD the market closes poorly, the next day could see a violation of the BD low) and rules for how to trade that.

 

He also had ways of calculating levels of penetration and lengths of advances and declines, which I think he used to keep himself in tune with the trend.

 

Overall, a pretty comphrehensive and rather ingenius system.

 

One question I have I am hoping you can shed some light on: Do you ever reset the cycle once you have established it?

 

Taylor talked about using the last 10 days to create the book, and that is pretty straightforward. You would have 3 cycles within that period. Once the BD, SD, SSD cycle is set, do you ever change it? Would we today still be using the same cycle if we had set that cycle last June, say, or does it need to be reset from time-to-time?

 

Thanks for the help,

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Eiger said:
Rich,

 

I appreciate your statistical approach to Taylor.

 

As I am beginning to understand TTT, I am seeing that Taylor traded phases (BD, SD, SSD) within a three-day cycle that seems to repeat itself (cycle).

 

He had different rules for each of the phases, depending on how the market played out. Thus, for example, you looked to BUY on a LOW MADE FIRST on a BD, but would look to SHORT on a HIGH MADE FIRST on a BD.

 

He had developed clues for how the market might trade tomorrow (e.g., if on a BD the market closes poorly, the next day could see a violation of the BD low) and rules for how to trade that.

 

He also had ways of calculating levels of penetration and lengths of advances and declines, which I think he used to keep himself in tune with the trend.

 

Overall, a pretty comphrehensive and rather ingenius system.

 

One question I have I am hoping you can shed some light on: Do you ever reset the cycle once you have established it?

 

Taylor talked about using the last 10 days to create the book, and that is pretty straightforward. You would have 3 cycles within that period. Once the BD, SD, SSD cycle is set, do you ever change it? Would we today still be using the same cycle if we had set that cycle last June, say, or does it need to be reset from time-to-time?

 

Thanks for the help,

 

Eiger

 

Hi Eiger

 

I originally started my TTT E-books based on Taylor's 10 day principle. Later while I was doing statistics on everything, I discovered that we get Positive 3 Day Cycles even in this bear markets. Since then when I start a new TTT E-book for a different instrument, I use that criteria to pick which cycle day was the 1st day.

 

A Positive 3 Day rally is calculated from the Buy day low to the SS day high.

 

However to answer your question, once the cycle is set I never change it. I tried that a few times but when even I did it proved to be incorrect for days even weeks. I started with data from Jan 1, 2008 on the US index futures, and the cycle is still correct as of today. It still produces over 85% positive 3 day rallies.

 

The only thing I am experimenting with at the moment is using a moving average for my statistics due to the high volatility of late. It seems to help for some markets more then others.

 

I hope that helped

 

PS These Positive 3 Day Rallies demonstrates the genius of Taylor and how these markets are manipulated.

Edited by richbois

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.