Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Taylor Trading Technique

Recommended Posts

...mitsu......

....i have no idea who you are ...... i could care less about anyone's character on any forum.....and don't know what forum you are referring to....and don't care at all.....

... having said that... thanks for the encouraging words.....

 

.....about cycles and inversions.... they don't really have to do with Taylor's method.... just something i came up with and i guess many others have come up with the same type of thing before me .....better to not worry about them and just keep things simple....

.... i just use them myself... but i don't recommend anyone else to use them.....

 

.... about today ... it was a buy day for me .... instead of getting what i wanted.... got a gap up and go..... Taylor says STAY OUT..... unless previously entered long.....

.... my next short day is monday ..... so that is my next play......if a high is made first and early.....

 

.... about my cycles.... the lower cycle ended...... the next cycle to finish is the upper cycle......

.... since price came in early on the lower cycle.... and therefore inverted by running the other way fast..... it is up in the air as to whether the upper cycle end will pull price upwards or downwards.... at least that has been my experience.....

..... but the next lower cycle should pull down......

 

..... if no one else wants to join the discussion or post...... that is pretty pitiful.... :0)

.... the fact that no one is interested in the Taylor method... makes it that much more appealing to me......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I went short at 809 (cash) as it was the high on monday.I figured we wouldn't close higher than that. Also figured we would close up on the day but that futures overnight will cause the market to open down weds and for weds to be weak on a short sale day.If we had closed higher i would have averaged in there,and if there was a new high made first,added again to the position-more risk,i know,and lots of assumptions,but so far it's working- futures are negative tonight

Thanks for the chart but i don't really understand what i'm looking at. Eg,what does DP mean,what is bdl at the bottom there,what is ph,how is the ma calculated?

 

EDIT oK,i see from ttt.net DP is decision point and bdl is buy day low,correct? That still leaves ph and ma calc

 

Sorry I missed your question

 

 

There is a possibility of 9 lines for the 24 hour session and 9 for the day session and they are labeled as follows:

 

TTT MAp is the possible Penetration based on the new Moving Average Recap sheet

TTT MA is based on the MA recap sheet and represents either the possible Decline level on a Buy day, possible Rally level on Sell day, possible 3 day rally on SS day

TTT MAv is the possible Violation based on the MA recap sheet

TTT p is the possible Penetration based on the regular Recap sheet

TTT is based on the recap sheet and represents either the possible Decline level on a Buy day, possible Rally level on Sell day, possible 3 day rally on SS day

TTT v is the possible Violation based on the regular recap sheet

TTT PH is the Previous day's High

TTT PL is the Previous day's Low shown on Buy days and SS days

TTT BdL is the Buy Day Low shown on Sell and SS days

 

Any of these labels followed by a "D" indicates numbers from the Day Session.

 

 

MA is for Moving Average.

 

I have 2 recap sheets 1 is based on data from Jan 3,2008

tha second is based on data of the last 20 cycles. about 3 months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...... today friday was my middle day ..... low made first at 10.45am .....

.... high at the close matched up with end of upper cycle.... though that cycle did not predict a high or low....

... my cycle which may differ from others.... is for a short day on monday ....

.... so will look for a high made first at 10.15--10.45 am

 

.... or else a reaction long on a low made first at the same time.....

....next cycle to end is lower cycle ... ending at 3pm on tuesday ....

..... about today ...

...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys,

 

I haven't been keeping up so well with this thread but wanted to contribute and see if there is synergy.

 

I like Taylors method -- but its just a piece of how I think during the day.

 

One thing I ask about is the 'price targeting' of exits vs the variance of getting 'in the money' and then a reversal occurs causing a loss --- and how to quantify this so that your results are consistent -- variance is minimized --- but that your are also participating nicely when you catch a 'taylor type of swing' (ie, a big one).

 

So that is a question, do you go by the past cycles 'median' and use limits at that price??

 

I have spent some time working on 'range' and came up with some ideas -- using the implied volatility 'forecast' that is in the options market (VIX) to quantify expected volatility. I am still working on this but have so far found some interesting things. For instance, over the last 252 trading days (1 year) -- the market has formed RANGE of better than 0.8x the 1-day implied vol forecast 85% of the time. Said another way, convert VIX into a 1-day forecast and compare that to the final range on the next day.

 

The reason I like this conceptually is that implied volatility is always a near-term forecast that is based on real money. It is not historical -- it is forward looking --- this is important distinction vs only using historical data.

 

Why is this useful to Taylor practitioners? Because, if you establish a Taylor type of low or high made first -- then you can instantly calculate a price target the other way for that day --- with various degrees of confidence based on however you feel about it. ie, if a low is made at 800, and implied vol predicts 20 pts of range --- you 'could' say you have 85% confidence that price will trade to 816 (800 + (20 * 0.8))... if you like the set-up a TON, you could say -- hey, this is a 'top quartile' type of situation and therefore target something more like 30 pts off the 'Taylor low' (low + (1.5 * the VIX implied range forecast). Thus, in the previous scenario, you could arrive at a 'stretch target' of 830 (800 + (20 * 1.5)) -- assuming that you are right and the 'Taylor Low' holds. (note I am arriving at these 'confidence intervals' based on past market behavior -- and then making mental adjustments based on how conservative or aggressive I want to be -- ie, I know its very high odds to get X points of range and lower odds to get X+Y pts of range, so there is a trade-off: take the high-odds lower point gain -- or play for aggressive gain and be willing to accept some added variance in your results when it doesn't do the lower odds move).

 

Anyway, just sharing an idea -- so that I am contributing something.

 

This chart quantifies the relationship I am talking about (to be used as a starting point from which to work, this is not a science). To read, take example of RANGE getting to 1.0x the implied vol forecast -- The market gets 1.0 or greater ~62% of the time over the last year (1 - the 38.1% figure listed on the chart at the '1 level'). Another example, the market gets 0.8x or better ~85% of time (1 - the 15.08% figure listed at the 0.8 level) etc...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10048&stc=1&d=1238856370

5aa70ec0bd09b_April32009.thumb.png.4bf16f2a669ef45267469ebe6522e30e.png

Edited by Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frank,

Interesting analysis,

 

What tactics you employ for entry and exit on intraday basis, ie. technical analysis, multiple timeframes , patterns, price derivatives etc. Presume you trade ESmini.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

55 point decline

buy day rally 11.5

63.25 point thru next buy day high

total rally

1.15

 

23.75 61.75 2.6

=================

25.5 62.75 2.46 first cycle

===================

39.25 61.25 1.56 second cycle

===================

36.5 43.5 1.19 third cycle

===================

======================

 

55 point decline

buy day rally 11.5

34.75 point thru sell day high

47.75 total rally

- 1.15

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What tactics you employ for entry and exit on intraday basis, ie. technical analysis, multiple timeframes , patterns, price derivatives etc. Presume you trade ESmini.

 

I just try to look through the noise to determine what I think the 'higher timeframe' players are doing and join in for a piece of it. Synchronizing the daily rhythm with the intraday high/low 'made first' are key in this. I do use some oscillator and price patterns to try to help find trades around this and I am always trying to quantify biases that can help in this regard through the use of statistics (ie, such as quantifying the relationship of VIX and intraday range).

 

One thing of secondary importance to me is the label of the days -- ie, buy day/sell day/ss-day. While many days do become clear-cut with labels, I find the market profile 'auction' to be a better way to think about the same thing Taylor was doing with his 3-day labeling system. But I view the Taylor technique and market profile as entirely complimentary to each other -- not that one is better than the other, they are both very useful.

 

Taylor was all about 'positioning and re-positioning' himself using the high and low violations (or the 'failures to penetrate') to guide his bias. I find this to be an extremely useful construct.

 

The issue I bring up is that of how to balance consistency with playing for occassional big profit. We can all agree that today (monday morning) is likely a good time and location to try a short (high violation after extended up move) --- but where to exit should this prove true and why??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...once again ....didn't get much of a high made first...

.... but the high made first would have to be the 10.00 high.....

....edit... my next lower cycle ends tomorrow at the close....

Edited by elovemer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...once again ....didn't get much of a high made first...

.... but the high made first would have to be the 10.00 high.....

....edit... my next lower cycle ends tomorrow at the close....

 

.... they stole our short day .... with the big gap

 

... and it looks like they might steal our buy day ..... with another gap up.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so true elovemer.

 

here are all the 'close to close' changes for ES this year (ranked from high to low) -- you can see how its not so common to get huge point moves vs the previous close -- so the location for shorting today was tricky with the gap. in shorting, you would be implicitly betting on getting a large move vs previous close -- if you expected continuation down that is... a high violation/high test would have allowed much better location for the market to 'start high' and would allow more profit room to the same level/zone --- 815-820.... shorting was fine -- but had to keep expectations in check and respect the lack of continuation below the previous days low...

 

we ended up right in the lower middle of the std dev bands at 9.75 pts (all numbers are in absolute terms fyi)

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10075&stc=1&d=1239051678

5aa70ec1e330a_April62009TrailingClosetoCloseChange.thumb.png.ef1fc8553477bc4b8b2605f36f0f2841.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Enjoy reading the posts and seeing how everyone trades TTT.

 

Here's my take on TTT:

 

Today (monday 4/6) was short sell day by my calcuations. Taylor says the objective is to sell at, near or slightly above, below yesterday's (Friday 4/3) high of 844.50. Market traded to 848 pretty quickly at the open of the overnight session. This was the clue to look to short at the objective. Nice run down with a decent close in the middle of the range today. For tomorrow's buy day, not sure if market will trade under the objective of today's low-given the nice recovery late today in price. Will watch to see what happens and look to go long tomorrow, per Taylor's rules.

 

It seems like a lot of you don't use the overnight session, but wait for the morning opening. Any thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

..... on the possible high made first....

... that cycle inversion may have meant something more ....

 

.... again... next cycle to end is lower cycle.... which ends at the close

....they didn't steal the buy day this time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted to discuss one concept that I think helps 'quantify' Taylor.

 

Taylors concept of 'high made first' and/or 'low made first' is quantifiable. If you think of the daily taylor rhythm in quantifiable terms, it become easier to understand, at least for me.

 

From studying the time of days that the 'made first' occured (low for day if low first, high for day if high first), it turns out that the market makes its high or low for the day 45-50% of the time in the opening 30 minutes. This is a very powerful tendency. If you add in the next 30-min zone (the classic 'opening range'/'initial balance'), then its about 65%. Toss in the next 2 30-min timezones (first 2 hours of day) -- then you capture ~75-80% of the days.

 

Thus, if you 'define' the upcycles and downcycles as movement relative to the opening 2-hour range, you have somewhat re-created taylors system for the intraday market. So look at this past week -- Tuesday made a 'high first' and a 'low last' -- the cycle was therefore down. This cycle does not mechanically 'switch' until a morning high is taken out. Now, price tested the Tuesday low on Wednesday for 'low first' -- and it did so in the opening 2 hours -- then the high was taken out for 'low made first' --- this signals that the market is in an up-cycle until a 'morning low' is violated to the downside. On Thursday the market gapped up and put in its low in the opening 30-minutes, which it will do nearly 50% of the time.

 

I find this to be a very useful framework to stay in the rhythm of the Taylor cycle. The market remains in an up-cycle until a 'morning low' is taken out, at which point the intraday statistics point toward a down-cycle.

 

This framework can be used within a buy day/sell-day/ss-day daily count -- or it can be used on its own. But either way, you know that you are on the side of the statistical tendencies if you use this as a 'mental guide'.

 

Just my 2 cents on making Taylor concepts easier to understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting take, Frank, Perhaps you can follow it up in forthcoming days to better illustrate the concept. Anything that enhances Taylor is worth pursuing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here is a quick glimpse from recent days. the arrows mark (with hindsight) the important high or low that was 'made first'. obviously, in real-time trading you will have to be making a judgment of whether its high or low first and then proceed accordingly -- your judgment might be right or wrong but there are other concepts to help guide you on that -- this is just to demonstrate that an important high or low is 'often' made in the first 2 hours of the day --- with particular emphasis on the first 30 minutes. the first 30-minute bar is very important (as I will show later) in that if a high or low is NOT made in the first 30 minutes, then the odds of a large move away from the previous days close drop in a big way -- and you need to proceed cautiously once price has moved AWAY from the previous close. As you can see on Thursday, the low WAS made in the first 30-minutes and price closed FAR away from the previous close, which is consistent.

 

Note how on March 27th, March 31st, April 3rd, April 7th and April 8th -- price did not make a high or low in the opening 30-minutes and its as if there is gravity of the previous close not allowing price to close TOO far away from the previous close.

 

One other thing -- a key question which is kind of market profile based but fits in here --- is the market showing 'urgency' vs the previous days range early in day (in first 30-minutes)? This is the 'don't get run over' indicator -- ie March 30th and April 1st -- and April 2nd and April 9th to a lesser extent. On these days, market is showing that it has no interest in staying near the previous days high or low. This price action is a strong indicator that something unusual is going on. The point of this comment is just to show importance of the opening 30-minute bar -- not only in its necessity to create a large move vs previous close -- but also interpreting strong action early in day vs the previous high or low as a 'Taylor signal' that an important high or low was just made. (Huge gaps do make this tougher to actually trade in reality).

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10123&stc=1&d=1239452864

5aa70ec340d19_IntradayHighLowFirst.thumb.png.f58d44c3b74f4e4416c86b5909e6b2cf.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

......................

........................

.......................

........................

i wanted to discuss one concept that i think helps 'quantify' taylor.

Edited by elovemer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frank,

In Taylor the emphasis is on whether or not the objective is made FIRST or LAST.

 

i.e on a BUY day, buying objective(LOW) is made FIRST if their is a decline from SS day high to that Low, however if the LOW is made LAST on the BUY day, then that would be Buying objective made LAST.

 

Similarly on say Short Sale Day, ideally the selling objective (HIGH) should be made FIRST for shorting, however if the day ends on the HIGH, then that would mean the Selling objective has been made LAST, one would not short then but wait for the BUY day.

Hope I am not beginning to write or sound like Taylor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Monad,

 

what I am showing is that statistically speaking -- you can/should be actually looking for the 'made first' objective in the first few 30-min bars. Not only this -- but you can quantify how often it begins its move in each period. This is highly complimentary to taylors 'rules'.

 

For example, if you are thinking of 'buy day' the next day --- ideally you would like to get into the 'buy objective' price zone (which is a violation or test of previous days low) during the first few 30-min bars -- because this is the most likely time of day, statistically speaking, for a 'key low' to be made (made first). if price instead 'starts high' and is trading down with momentum in B, the odds may be higher on 'Buy Day/High Made First' -- because this is consistent with the statistical tendencies.

 

again, this is not a 'system' within itself -- its just some added information when trying to come up with your 'overall read' of the situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frank,

I see what you are getting it, and it would be a good idea to follow up in the days to come, i.e as the market unfolds day by day. That way I guess you get a better grasp of the perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.