Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Taylor Trading Technique

Recommended Posts

Well that is Taylor for you, small wonder folks give up on this methodology:confused:

 

Patience and persistence required but who wants to bother with that?;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you may have misunderstood. I was not being critical of you,:) it was more a reflection on taylor method which so many find difficult to comprehend.

 

However if they had patience and persistence to keep studying the method, it will eventually make sense. Like yesterday when it was a Sell day and the market kept heading north. Similarly there are Buy days when prices keep dropping whole day long;).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... i had friday as a buy day ....

.... instead of a low being made first and early..... the low was made last

.... Taylor has rules for this..... so no problem.....

.... today tuesday was my sell/short day .....

.... instead of a high being made first and early .... the high was made late in the session....

... Taylor has rules for this .... so no problem....

 

.... Taylor has rules for just about everything.... so no problem... as long as his rules are followed......

.... the basic rule is first and early..... otherwise stay out except for reaction plays....

 

.... if it is not first and early.... then wait for the next play on a different day...

.... it seems like no one actually reads Taylor's book (don't mean you Monad or anyone in particular) .... which is a mistake....

However if they had patience and persistence to keep studying the method, it will eventually make sense. Like yesterday when it was a Sell day and the market kept heading north. Similarly there are Buy days when prices keep dropping whole day long;).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... i am not sure about which posts you were referring to in regard to "hi/lo cycle theories" .....

.... if you can be more specific... i can try to comment on it.....

 

.... sorry i didn't mean to ignore your request before... just didn't see it....

 

...and yes i agree... Taylor seems to work better in terms of clarity for me as well.... in an uptrend....

... in the previous down trend.... the only dependable thing was making a high first and a low last..... but the cycle was more erratic...

... Btw could you talk about your hi/lo cycle theories i'm very interested in that kind of thing as it fits in with predicted patterns and my own observations that price has a tendency to turn at certain times during the day.Thanks for keeping this going.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

.... today tuesday was my sell/short day .....

.... instead of a high being made first and early .... the high was made late in the session....

... Taylor has rules for this .... so no problem....

 

Perhaps you can expand on this

 

.... the basic rule is first and early..... otherwise stay out except for reaction plays....

What exactly is meant by reaction plays

 

.... if it is not first and early.... then wait for the next play on a different day...

yes that is where patience comes in:)

 

.... it seems like no one actually reads Taylor's book (don't mean you Monad or anyone in particular) .... which is a mistake....

Understand what you saying, myself have gone through the book over 20times now and with help of WHY? have managed to understand with greater clarity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... if the high is made late in the session.... Taylor says let it go... stay out....

.... when you are looking for a high made first

 

.... a reaction play would be .... if on that same sell/short day .... there is a low made first early in the session....

.... then he says you can go long for a reaction up ..... not a hold/swing play....

.... and vice versa for a buy day .... on a high made first.... a short on a reaction down...

 

.... but reaction plays are not the main part of the plan.... they are more risky....

 

...according to Taylor's method.... if you want to swing.... you have to be safe... and patient..... and only take the best setups

 

.... the only scalping that occurs would be the reaction plays....

 

------------------------------------------------

.... today tuesday was my sell/short day .....

.... instead of a high being made first and early .... the high was made late in the session....

... Taylor has rules for this .... so no problem....

 

Perhaps you can expand on this

==========

 

.... the basic rule is first and early..... otherwise stay out except for reaction plays....

 

What exactly is meant by reaction plays

====================

 

.... if it is not first and early.... then wait for the next play on a different day...

 

yes that is where patience comes in

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

today .... wednesday....

....looking for low made first... instead got a high made first and early....

.... so could be a reaction short.....

 

... the reaction short would be closed... not held.... unless you ... by some other means... know that the swing trend has switched to down....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....Taylor wants us to only take the best setups.... which means a low made first and early....

.... as per his system.... only the reaction short play would be allowed.....

 

.... the low was made late in the session .... Taylor would not take that long.... but.... rather would wait for the next play ......

...... which would be the next sell/short day .....

 

.... if you took the long... it would be based on some other system.....

.... even so .... the session having ended.... you can see that based only on this session.... the reaction short would have amounted to a larger gain than the long entry .....

 

..... for the long entry .... you would have had to time it perfectly .....whereas the reaction short had the usual predictable pivot time of around 10.30am..... which is where you would have wanted to see a low made first..... for a long entry

..... an up trend is indicated by low made first high made last.... so if today was your buy day .... Taylor would have kept you out...

.... however if today was your sell/short day .... the high made first low made last fit your sell day much better.....

 

THKS elovemer, would you go long after the decline, afterall it is a Buy day and a decline is requied from SS day high.
Edited by elovemer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... you could have gone long as per something other than Taylor's system....

.... that would have been a great trade ! ;0)

 

...sandwiched between the 50 and the 100 on the daily.... we are going to move....

THKS elovemer, would you go long after the decline, afterall it is a Buy day and a decline is requied from SS day high.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....look at page 30 for Taylor's specific rules to follow when a high is made first on a BUY DAY....

 

I am looking at chapter 9 "a short sale at high of Buying Day made first".

 

When you said 10.30 time in your previous post, presume it is 10.30 EST.

 

Today it would be a sell day, prices are in a tight range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... i am referring to page 30 ... not chapter 9 .... although that goes with it as well..... have a look at page 30

... the thing about Taylor's book is that he has pieces of everything sprinkled all through the book ... not really separated very clearly..... which is why it can be confusing.....

 

... today is your sell day .... i call it "middle day" so as not to be confused with short sale day ..... can be a chop-fest.... :9(

..... i guess he chose to call it sell day... as a reference to selling out the longs held over from buy day .....

..... "middle day" is a great day to not trade at all.... unless it is a big trend day..... which can happen if the low on buy day comes at the end of the session like it did last time...... check out page 30 which refers to a slightly different situation than what happened on last buy day ....

I am looking at chapter 9 "a short sale at high of Buying Day made first".

When you said 10.30 time in your previous post, presume it is 10.30 EST.

Today it would be a sell day, prices are in a tight range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... sorry... chapter 5...

... where it starts, "when the high is made first on a buying day ...this causes the low.... "

 

....by the way ... on spy.... we have a very good trend line set up on top .... to gauge for a sell point tomorrow... which is my sell/short day .....

 

Have a hardback copy, p30 does not match, what is the chapter , is it No.5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....except for special circumstances which call for higher risk plays....

..... Taylor only enters on a buy day or a short day .....

.... the middle day he only uses to close out positions.... unless it's one of those special plays which are higher risk....

.... i am just referring to the highest probability setups.... low/high made first and early.....

.... that is the highest percentage play available....

 

..... one thing which i think is interesting is when Taylor talks about when a play goes against him.... how he changes his target to a more conservative one.....for example a break-even target.....

..... the reason i think it is interesting is.... i wonder what kind of stops he used if at all....

...... maybe WHY has some insight into this .... where Taylor may have placed his stops if he used them at all.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

..... by the way .....

 

23.75 point decline

41.25 point buy day rally

 

25.5 point decline

31 point buy day rally

 

39.25 point decline

55.5 point rally include the day after... on mid day

 

36.5 point decline

43.5 point rally ....include day after

 

..... included day after on last two.... as low of buy day was at end of session....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you measure the rally only for the Buy day or from the Buy day low to sell day high or Short sell day high.

and the decline as from SS day high to buy day low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... decline.... from short day high to buy day low

.... rally .... from buy day low to buy day high

 

.... last two examples included 2nd day as part of rally also.... as buy day low occurred at end of session....

---------------------------------------------

 

.... by the way .... if you are playing today friday as a sell/short day .....

..... then this is an example of one of Taylor's reaction plays.....

 

..... where the low is made first early in the session..... and you go long for a reaction up...... but you don't hold for a swing play....

.... if you are playing today as a sell/short day .....

Do you measure the rally only for the Buy day or from the Buy day low to sell day high or Short sell day high.

and the decline as from SS day high to buy day low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... 10 AM AND 12 PM PIVOTS for the reaction play on friday .....

.... people talking about reversal ....

 

.... for me .... monday is a buy day .... price is at bottom of channel already .

..... so will look for first and early .... 10am or 10.30am pivot.... for buy point....

 

... my lower cycle ends around end of session on monday .... but even if low is put in toward end of session....

.... and even if a large decline happens monday .... and if that brings price well below its swing channel .....

.... following the system could still mean a large move to bring price up in an attempt to re-enter channel bottom....

 

..... if high is made first and early on monday .... implies that low will be made late in session .... 10.30am pivot high would imply a reaction play down for those who want to go short....

.... .

.... if you are playing today as a sell/short day .....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....ftt does not mean failure to traverse.

the dotted lines are channel lines. centerline.

which conclusion are you referring to ?

 

on upper cycle ... i just try to measure the major turns on a 30 min frame.

in order to have an idea where to expect the next one....

.... and also ... if it comes in early.... then to expect a possible inversion.

.... at turning points on daily or weekly time frame... it is harder to measure because the small frame cycles become so extended......

..... but if the up trend is intact... then it helps to gauge the turns....

 

.... for example... it might help to gauge if the buy point would come later in the session rather than early....so you might still have confidence in a buy point when it is not acting like a buy day....

 

"retest ALT size" is from a previous data set.....

.... that refers to the alternate wave size on a swing time frame... like hourly....

..... if price action holds the ALT SIZE on a retracement.... then proceeds to move above the ALT size..... then many times price will come back and test the top of the ALT as support......

....in the chart shown..... the white line there shows where support should have been..... and support was there as hourly just did a two bar thrust down but quickly rebounded back above the ALT size.....

.... the original ALT retracement wave is not shown on this chart because i was trying to show the cycles... not the ALT.....

 

.... the current swing ALT size is about 39 points on globex.... so if price retraces that much .... and you think the trend has changed .... that point is where the bears have to take it further in order to confirm the trend change or not..... if they can't ... then the trend may continue in the same wave degree

 

.... sorry but none of this has to do with Taylor... except the cycles ... which help to time the buy/sell point.....

 

.... by the way... the SWING ALT SIZE ... was taken from the larger size swing wave retracement up .... in the previous down trend.... now that the trend is up... the same ALT SIZE can be applied to the up trend.... at least until the wave progression changes degree.... to a larger degree.... which would mean a larger retracement size while recovering to maintain the up trend....

.... nothing to do with Taylor here....

 

.... the cycles are what i wanted to show.... two rectangles on upper cycle.... two rectangles on lower cycle.... to measure time....

.... if upper or lower comes in early with a pivot .... then the expectation raises... for a quick move in the other direction before the end of that time cycle....

.... if it comes in near the end of the rectangle on upper as expected.... then you switch to the opposite cyle....lower... and watch to see if it will come in as expected... or earlier......

.... again.... this does not work when the larger time frame (daily weekly) is changing trend because the smaller frame 30min cycles become too extended.... and then don't cycle as much.....

 

What i s FTT -failure to traverse? what are the dotted lines? What is your conclusion based on, with regards to upper cycle? does that mean the upward trend is retracing? What do you mean by retesting ALT size? sorry fo so many questions!:confused:
Edited by elovemer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....for me.... monday is a buy day ....

... which means looking for a buy point with a low made first and early... at or before 10.30am.... somewhere around friday low or a 127% of it

.... for a reaction play short .... a high made first and early .... 10.30am .... or a big gap up

.... to close out on a 50% retrace to the low.....

 

.....others have different counts.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.