Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Taylor Trading Technique

Recommended Posts

  Shamal said:
Having studied the posts on this thread and some taylor, I find the following very confusing: both you and richbois have mentioned that the book can be started by taking 10days data and marking the lowest low and go from there.

 

If 3 people started such a book in different days or months they are going to end up calling a particular day either as buy, sell or ssday, hence their strategies will be different for that day.

 

1. How is this going to work out as each has different scenarios to apply.

2. From posts here and in taylor, the market cycles are explained in terms of market manipulation by those who obviously have deep pockets to do that, with the above 3 differing days for each trader, it just doesn't make sense.

 

would be grateful if this can be explained.

Your confusion is understandable. I m quite sure Richbois has a different viewpoint on it than I do but what I have done is built into my software a calculating mechanism whereby I calculate the "count". I will not divulge just how I do this as that is my secret. I also have recycling mechanism built into the software to allow me to recycle the days under certain conditions (which I also won't reveal) to take advantage of aberrations in the market.

 

I am sure that if Taylor lived in the era of computers he also would have come up with a better mens of "starting" the count. Suffice it to say; it can be done. That is all I will say about it. Sorry I can't help more in this area but those are 2 of the secrets of my software. Hope you can understand my position. But I might add if one will take the time to think through it there are ways to better a starting point for the "count" than the way Taylor did it. He had to do the best he could with what he had to work with back then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHY?

 

actually I was not looking for any info. on the software but if I understand it correctly anybody in this and age who does not have your kind of software and has created a book or if say 3 people have created their books at different times would all end up with a cycle which would not truly reflect what is going on in the market ie. manipulation., hence taylor method would be invalid. am I right.

 

I have reframed the question in the previous post,

 

""Having studied the posts on this thread and some taylor, I find the following very confusing: both you and richbois have mentioned that the book can be started by taking 10days data and marking the lowest low and go from there.

 

If 3 people started such a book on different days or months they are each going to end up calling a particular day either as buy, sell or ssday, hence their strategies will be different for that day. for example tomorrow each would have a different day.

 

1. How is this going to work out as each has different scenarios to apply.

2. From posts here and in taylor, the market cycles are explained in terms of market manipulation by those who obviously have deep pockets to do that, with the above 3 differing days for each trader, it just doesn't make sense. as the cycle that each of the trader who created the book at different times is understood to be different but the manipulators are not changing according to who created the book.

 

perhaps you can comment on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Shamal said:
WHY?

 

actually I was not looking for any info. on the software but if I understand it correctly anybody in this and age who does not have your kind of software and has created a book or if say 3 people have created their books at different times would all end up with a cycle which would not truly reflect what is going on in the market ie. manipulation., hence taylor method would be invalid. am I right.

 

I have reframed the question in the previous post,

 

""Having studied the posts on this thread and some taylor, I find the following very confusing: both you and richbois have mentioned that the book can be started by taking 10days data and marking the lowest low and go from there.

 

If 3 people started such a book on different days or months they are each going to end up calling a particular day either as buy, sell or ssday, hence their strategies will be different for that day. for example tomorrow each would have a different day.

 

1. How is this going to work out as each has different scenarios to apply.

2. From posts here and in taylor, the market cycles are explained in terms of market manipulation by those who obviously have deep pockets to do that, with the above 3 differing days for each trader, it just doesn't make sense. as the cycle that each of the trader who created the book at different times is understood to be different but the manipulators are not changing according to who created the book.

 

perhaps you can comment on this.

 

Yes this is what Taylor explains in his book and you are correct that 3 different cycle could be in place based on when you start your book.

 

When I started my ES book I used the 10 day low principle. I then looked at the last 30 days and saw that it was the same low. Later in creating averages and studying the cycles I found that there is high odds for a Positive 3 Day Cycle. I then put my cycles to the test and found that the cycle created by the January low of 2008 was the same as the one that my highest Positive 3 day Rally Ratio would give.

 

Since then, when I create a new book for a different instrument, I use the HIGHEST ratio I get by cycling the data through the 3 permutations.

 

This issue of having 3 possible cycles for the same instrument as been a bone of contention for ages. That is probably why Raschke, Angell, Why? and myself came up with ways to deal with it. Some prefer to adjust the cycle as needed, I prefer to leave mine as is once it is started.

 

Since I strongly beleive in the Positive 3 Day cycle, as this confirms what Taylor was preaching, that the markets are manipulated. My results prove that most instruments have a 80%+ Positive 3 day rally since January 2008.

Most markets have dropped 50% during that period and I still get Positive 3 day Rally, I think that is a good proof.

 

Also I have numerous other averages to confirm the cycles. Obviously I may have to keep some private not to destroy the business I am in.

 

I hope that helped.

 

More info maybe found at http://www.taylortradingtechnique.net

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today was the confusing Sell day. Every one made the projected average rally and tried to make new highs and failed. However they refused to go lower also.

 

Tomorrow is SS day. Taylor would not be looking to long on SS day and would wait for a test of the Sell day highs to short. The FOMC meeting may be the catalyst that may take us out of this tight range we have been trading in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Shamal said:
WHY?

 

actually I was not looking for any info. on the software but if I understand it correctly anybody in this and age who does not have your kind of software and has created a book or if say 3 people have created their books at different times would all end up with a cycle which would not truly reflect what is going on in the market ie. manipulation., hence taylor method would be invalid. am I right.

 

I have reframed the question in the previous post,

 

""Having studied the posts on this thread and some taylor, I find the following very confusing: both you and richbois have mentioned that the book can be started by taking 10days data and marking the lowest low and go from there.

 

If 3 people started such a book on different days or months they are each going to end up calling a particular day either as buy, sell or ssday, hence their strategies will be different for that day. for example tomorrow each would have a different day.

 

1. How is this going to work out as each has different scenarios to apply.

2. From posts here and in taylor, the market cycles are explained in terms of market manipulation by those who obviously have deep pockets to do that, with the above 3 differing days for each trader, it just doesn't make sense. as the cycle that each of the trader who created the book at different times is understood to be different but the manipulators are not changing according to who created the book.

 

perhaps you can comment on this.

 

While you are technically correct on your assumptions I am not sure that it would matter that much. Taylor "clocked the market" by measuring rallies declines...etc high lows, lower lows, higher lows, lower highs, higher highs, penetrations and failures to penetrate..averages of such numbers..etc. Regardless of whether you call the days... buy day, sell day, SS day or day 1, day 2, day 3, or any other name what is really important is the rules that govern each day. And the fact of a tendency for the market to have these 3 days cycles sometimes stretched out to 4 and 5 days.

 

I would say two different people could take different "counts" on the same instruments and as long as they followed the entry and exit rules and looked at all the declines..rallies..averages...etc that they could still both make money using Taylor.

 

Even though my software makes ajustments in the count from say a strict Taylor count I find that within one to 3 days, or so, it tends to recycles me back to Taylors count anyway. And I could probally have made money by not recycling the days, anyway. However, the advantage of recycling is that it may give me more than one way of making money on that day. If recycling changes say a sell day to a buy day then I could potentially have 1 shorting opportunity and 2 long opportunites on the buy day but if kept as a sell day only potentially have 1 long opportunity. So, recycling gives me an advantage for the immediate moment. It is really just tweaking Taylor.

 

Taylor taking the low of 10 days as a starting point made sense to him because it was the low of (3) 3 day cycles and theoretically that would be a good starting point for a buy day or a long possibility.

 

I would suggest since you don't have software to make any adjustments just take the count as Taylor did. It will work, I think you will find out. Apparently, it did for him! Or do it as Richbois says which I think is a reasonable and probally a better approach to the problem. He has been quite generous with his info considering he runs a subscription service.

 

Again, while I don't know Richbois nor do I subscribe to his services (I have my own software for Taylor) I would still recommend that if a person doesn't want to try and figure Taylor out subscribe to Richbois services. He has done the hard work. I can see from his posts he understands Taylor well. And his subscription fees are reasonable in my opinion. I did take a look at his web site. That would be the easiest way to get started with Taylor.

 

I really wouldn't worry about others having a different count from you. Just jump in and try Taylor. Remember, the manipulation exist regardless of whether it is a buy day..sell day...ss day. While it is true that you employ different tactics for each day and are looking for certain manipulations for each day it is also true that Taylor developed a complex sort of way of making adjustments when days are less than ideal and his rules cover those less than ideal days. Hence two different people could be on say the ES and one have a "buy day" for tomm and the other a "sell day" because of having started the count on different times. However, because of the complex rules Taylor developed IF the buy day count person played by the rules for that day he would come out ok and if the sell day played by the rules he would also come out ok. I know this sounds as if it invalidates the concept of the 3 different days but the rules for each day handle ideal...less than ideal days..etc. A less than ideal buy day "could" theoretically look like an ideal sell day as the market unwinds. So, the person playing it as a buy day would follow the rules of a less than ideal buy day. And the person playing it a sell day would play by the rules of an ideal sale day. Both would come out in the end. Why? Simply because Taylor "clocked price" around certain objective points and declines...rallies..and averages of such.

 

The important thing to remember is that a 3 day (and sometimes 4 or 5 day) cycle exists and if one uses certain tactics and rules he can take advantage of the days.

 

Don't worry about what count others have. Just follow Taylor. You will soon "see" the cycle.

 

Hope I haven't only muddied the water more with this post.

 

Why?

Edited by WHY?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to you both WHY? and Richbois for taking the trouble to expand, has cleared away lot of my confusion on this method.

will try it out and see for myself how it works in realtime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

great explanation richbois and WHY? had a similar problem with taylor initially myself as well ,took a while , lots of effort, to get my head around it.

 

Best to start your own book and proceed from there, If somebody is really bent on tweaking or rephasing perhaps it can be done after a few inside bars, the breakout bar may be considered as day 1, violation of high of that day, day 2 and so on.

However if the rules for each day are employed suppose it really does not matter as WhY? explained.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.....sorry... the lines don't matter...

... i just wanted to show my buy,mid,sell cycle......

  Shamal said:
elovemer,

there are so many lines on this chart, I have no idea what all this means, perhaps you could outline in simple English.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today was SS Day. As mentioned in Friday's report we had good odds of making it back to the Buy day lows. Although NQ made it and TF came close, today was ok to take longs when we had a chance. Matter of fact both opportunity were nice trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... on my cycle... not anyone else's...

... it will be interesting to see if wednesday sell day high can break the 876 swing high or not... (using buy/mid/sell/buy cycle)

... one possibility is to look for possible failure to break 845 channel center line which is also my break price on daily chart 3 price break

  elovemer said:
3 days.. 3days

... 3 days

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... yes it is WHY ....

... Taylor's terminology is confusing to me so i changed it....

... his "sale day" is my MID .... his "short sell" is my SELL....

.... without comparing my cycle to anyone else's... i will be looking for a high penetration on wednesday for a short early in the session....

.... on wed... if high is not made first.... then i will be looking for a high made first on thurs which is my next buy day..... to short a reaction down....

... i agree that 876 looks unlikely to be broken on this 3 day cycle.....

.... hopefully we can at least get a 61% at 849.5

 

.... thanks again to all posters.... i am learning a lot from this thread....

  WHY? said:
Tape says it is unlikley it will break that swing high on wed. In your count what you label a Sell day is really a SS right??? Or is that incorrect?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... if the same day decline off of the 849.5 short is large.... then close out the short to lock in the gain......

.... if it works out.... then next play is to buy a low made first on thursday.....

  elovemer said:
...

.... hopefully we can at least get a 61% at 849.5

.... thanks again to all posters.... i am learning a lot from this thread....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHY?

what is the day as per your software today. and how would you read todays price behavior in relation to yesterday's and based on that what can be said about possible outcome for tomorrow. Not asking for recommendations or anything like that, merely looking to understand taylor method.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have the info entered into my software as I have to enter futures data by keyboard. I have the software automated for stock data but not for futures. May I make a sugggestion? Why don't we all agree to track for a few days the Mini S&P March contract and I will enter the data into my program that way we will all be on the same page.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An other nice example to show reversals at 3 differents fib extention and a TS4, right at the TTT projection number to the tick

 

That decline took us down to the next DP at 826 not a bad trade

5aa70eae4ac4c_ScreenHunter_06Feb_0412_05.thumb.jpg.43e4ee4d5b1177a9f9e818c155551bf9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Richbois labeled monday as an SS day....tuesday a Buy day and Wed and today (2-4-09) a Sell day. However, for Elovemor monday was a buy day....tuesday Sell day (mid in his terminology) and wed today (2-4-09) an SS day (or Sell day in his terminology).

 

 

It opened made high first and traded down. The play by Elovemor data would have been to short it and cover same day after the decline or even wait and cover tomm 2-5-09. The play by Rich's data would have been to sell any longs from previous day. Since no shorting is allowed on the second day of the cycle (per Taylor) one would not have shorted if using Rich's data. Neither could one have went long on today 2-4-09 on Rich's data as the rules don't allow taking a long position on the second day of the cycle unless a BV (buying day violation ) is made and made early in the session. That is, it would have had to make a lower low than yesterdays low and it would have had to do that early in the session to be able to take a long position today. Since that didnt happen, IF one was trading by Taylor rules and using Rich's "count" all one could have done today is sell longs from tuesday (if held overnight from tuesday).

 

This all is providing I understand the sequence of their counts.

Edited by WHY?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I have Rich's count correct 2-5-09 will be a SSday. The strategy for that would be to short on a high made early in the session that penetrates or comes close to penetrating the hiogh of 2-4. However, it closed a bit weak so the odds are for more decline first on 2-5. Thus in Rich's count we will probally have a failure to penetrate the high of 2-4 on 2-5. The only option is a shorting option per Taylors rules on 2-5 IF using Rich's count. But that has to be made first to be a valid option. IT still could be but the odds favor it won't.

 

If trading by Elovemors count 2-5 will be a Buy day. The play is long on a low,made first. This is a likely senario for tomm. 2-5-09. However, if it were to open and trade up fast then one would look to short early in the session once it tanks. The potential exists to go long first and if still early in the session on could even short it but the second trade would be a riskier trade. On a buy day you generally only short when the high is made first and go long when the low is made first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  WHY? said:
I don't have the info entered into my software as I have to enter futures data by keyboard. I have the software automated for stock data but not for futures. May I make a sugggestion? Why don't we all agree to track for a few days the Mini S&P March contract and I will enter the data into my program that way we will all be on the same page.

 

Good idea, think instead of mixing up days, why not stick to today as a SELL day (strictly Taylor) and go from there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I agree with what WHY? posted as his knowledge of Taylor is excellent, I am a day trader and as such I use Taylor as 1 more tool in my box.

 

If Taylor dictates not to short (or long) on a certain day, I have found the the areas of support or resistance that is produced by my system more often then not produce nice trades. Like today I knew that I had all the possible highs for the day and they came to within a few points of each other. I had average Rally and average Penetration al at the 849-850 area.

 

Then when I had all the fibs on my charts and get the same area, for me that is a good low risk trade to take.

 

Even in the email to subscribers last night, I pointed out that these numbers were so close, because that dont happen very often.

 

I hope that explains my reasoning for the trade using Taylor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.