Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Taylor Trading Technique

Recommended Posts

WHY?

As per 305(richbois) post, 6th Jan 2009 was a Sell Day, which would lead to 8th Jan Thur being a Buy Day, 9th Jan Friday as a Sell Day and yesterday Monday 12th Jan as a SS day.

 

I have attached a SP CASH chart for 8th Jan-12th Jan, Buy Day, Sell Day and SS day.

Here it is the reverse of the situation of what you have just explained. The Low of SS day being lower than the Low of Sell day.

Could you comment on these 3 days.

 

Also today in this sequence (could be different as per your calculations) Today would be a Buy Day. Now the various scenarios described under Buy Day, this would fall in category (b)

i.e Low being made last on a SS day, hence look for low made first on a Buy day within first 2hrs to go long. Am I on the right track.

5aa70ea7ccacf_chartSPCASH.png.a4b43266f9aa18070f12a28eef475e8c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  monad said:
WHY?

As per 305(richbois) post, 6th Jan 2009 was a Sell Day, which would lead to 8th Jan Thur being a Buy Day, 9th Jan Friday as a Sell Day and yesterday Monday 12th Jan as a SS day......

 

I have attached a SP CASH chart for 8th Jan-12th Jan, Buy Day, Sell Day and SS day.

Here it is the reverse of the situation of what you have just explained. The Low of SS day being lower than the Low of Sell day.

Could you comment on these 3 days.

 

Also today in this sequence (could be different as per your calculations) Today would be a Buy Day. Now the various scenarios described under Buy Day, this would fall in category (b)

i.e Low being made last on a SS day, hence look for low made first on a Buy day within first 2hrs to go long. Am I on the right track.

 

Monad,

 

First, I am not sure just how Rich calculates the cycle but following his calculation here are my comments.

 

jan 8 - I would have probably grabbed the 8 to 12 point opportunity that presented itself early in the session simply because I am a believer in taking any decent profit the market gives me. However, per Taylor if I would have desired I could have held all day and sold the next day close to the open and I would have grabbed a few more points.

 

Jan 9th - Sell day according to Rich and you..Early in the session a BV was made. Since it is a sell day my only opportunity to take a position (as per Taylor) is to take a long position on a BV. No short-selling is to be done on a sell day. So, I would have entered long early in the session near the bottom of the BV (tape reading would determine my entry) and I would have exited on the first rally back up thru the previous days low (which would have been around the 898 area). If the intraday tape indicated to me that the rally off the BV would be continuing up, I might would have held longer and captured more by selling out near the close. Taylor says when on a selling day the when the high is made first and penetrates the previous days high and sells off closing low (thus creating a BV) then th indications are for a lower opening on the next day i.e. the SS day.

 

Jan 12th - SS day per Rich according to you...This a a case of a failure to penetrate. Normally, this is a risky trade to go short on (you can understand more about this type of senario on page 48 of his book). Generally, it is best to "pass trading" on this sort of action. However, if you don't mind taking more risk then early in the session on the first rally back off that quick decline (that took place right after the opening) IF the rally stops (and it did...see second paragraph) then you are allowed to put out a short sale providing the trading range at the top of this rally narrows down and makes few transactions. It did this, so, if you were so inclined you could place your short sell at this point but I would watch it closely. Any decline of any consequence that starts would be my covering point and by all means be flat at the end of the day.

 

Jan 13 - buy day according to Rich and you. Yes, I would watch for an early decline and watch the tape and once it appears to stop I would look at going long. However, since we are in a decline IF no rally of any consequence is forthcoming, after taking my long position, I would grab whatever profits the market gives me. On the other hand if the rally back up is strong I would hold for more points but be ready to jump ship. If, it opens and trades up immediatley and penetrates the previous days high (SS day) then you have a shorting opportunity. So,depending on how the markets play out today you could go long (odds favor at least some sort of decline first). If so, one could go long then on any rally back up sell the long. Then, IF within first hour or two it trades up one could short it once it gets tanks at the top, after selling out the long position. If, after the open it trades up and penetrates the precious days high then the tactic is to short it near the top (tape reading again for entry). And then on any decline cover the short and after that IF still within first hour or two one could possibly look at reversing and taking a long postion.

 

The point is that there are 2 possible opportunities that present themselves today. Short and long. Either order depending on what the market does within the first 2 hours. Odds favor some sort of early decline then some rally but I have some doubts as to how much rally. To me it appears there will be some sort of decline early creating a long position then a rally back and IF that rally proves out to be weak..narrow range...tanking...there is a possible shorting opportunity. I say this because the bigger picture indicates we are in a decline. And the low close yesterday indicates weakness still in the market I would expect a lower low to be made today than yesterday. Again, the tactics taken depend on the actual market action of the day within the framework of the 3 day cycle and Taylors rules for employing the tactics for each day of the cycle. Again Taylor is discretionary trading within a framework of 3 day cycle and specific rules to follow for each day of the cycle. When daytrading his method the goal is to capture "small but sure" profits. That is, to get at least a fair portion of the days move without getting whipsawed around. Once must be content with a slice of the profit and forget about what the market does after one exits. I gotta run as I some things to do...we will see how the day turns out.

 

PS... I am in no way suggesting or advising anyone to follow what I comment on here. These comments are simply informational and my opinion. Nothing more. It is NOT specific trading advice.

Edited by WHY?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far the scenarios have played out well WHY?

 

Attached: Cash chart and also that of Globex plus Day session (ESmini futures)

 

The market dipped below SS day's low before rallying, providing the long opportunity and then hit resistance around 873 affording a shorting opportunity.

5aa70ea7df0b8_SPCASH.png.f9322ce439ea7c6ee2bba591b6781c69.png

5aa70ea7e2d41_GLOBEXANDDAYSESSION.png.0ba8fe12f16b8bba3453207555283db3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer how I got on the cycle I have.

 

I started my trading book on ES last year at the end of January and used as per Taylor the last 10 days and found the lowest low that being Jan 22, 2008.

 

rest is history.

 

 

Today when I start a new book I use a different method then that prescribe by Taylor but it often results in the same cycle.

 

My method today is that I take as much data as I want (usualy 6 months) and try the 3 possible scenarios with the 1st day of data. The cycle that will give me the highest ratio of Positive 3 Day Rally is the one I choose.

 

If I was to start a new ES book today I would end up on the same cycle and since I have over 100 instruments to follow and new ones to create every so often, I found that this method has worked the best for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Shamal said:
Monad, richbois, WHY?

 

Today based on all your analysis would make it a sell day, the markets are selling off big time. Anybody care to elaborate.

 

As WHY? pointed out in one of the posts, in a bear market or a strong downtrend, expect BUY DAY VIOLATIONS and caution on any long trades which need to be exited quickly , the rallies are short lived which will be indicated by tape reading or price/vol, i.e less vol, narrow range bars etc.

Today is a classic example.

 

Anyway WHY? may have more to say on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks monad for the info.

 

the main price moves did turn out that way. there is obviously lot going for this methodology. I posed this question in the chatroom today, not many takers in there, they claim they trade mainly market profile, price/vol,

Dbphoenix who is very much Wyckoff man, is doubtful if there are any cycles in the market at all.

Overall it appears most shun away from Taylor, wonder why? from the posts on this thread especially those of WHY?, there appears to be logic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Shamal said:

Dbphoenix who is very much Wyckoff man, is doubtful if there are any cycles in the market at all.

 

I wouldn't go that far. It just doesn't have anything to do with my trading.

 

Whatever works.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That does not automatically mean that these cycles as per Taylor do not exist in the market.

I was skeptical myself at first, had the book for a few years now, have made attempts to read and then given up many times, finally decided to have a real go, that effort together with the various posts here made me realise there is much more to this method than meets the eye.

However am not surpirsed that most would want to throw in the towel for it is not easy reading at all, you just have to read the reviews on Amazon.com. Those who have persisted have seen the light of the day and consider it priceless, those who haven't announce it is obsolete and irrelevant.

As WHY? has explained in detail, understanding Taylor method allows you to have strategies in place for the trading day, then one has to employ tactics via tape reading, price/volume etc to implement the strategies for each specific day. This way the trader has a specific plan for the day with the trading rules laid out by Taylor and not end up shooting from the hip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  monad said:
Also if a low was made before lunch on a Sell day, which has just happened, a long can be taken but once again not held too long.

 

:2c:

This BV made before noon gave one the opportunity to go long, grab a few points, and get out before the days close. In a break to the downside like this you do not try to sell your long you just bought at the previous days low (buy day) but you would sell on any rally back TOWARDS the buy day low that gives you a profit. Odds are the rally would not make it back to the buy day low. This is an extreme example of how you go long in a selloff and make money using taylors rules.

 

Now if you were trading the 3 day method and took a long postion yesterday on 1-13-09 holding it overnight what would have happened right after the open today?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHY?

 

getting back to my post 313, would appreciate if you could spare some time to add/modify etc, for I am really beginning to understand Taylor now, thanks to you. You have dealt with the Buy day.

 

2. SELL DAY: Again both long and short trading possible.

 

a) High made last on Buy day: Look to short on penetration of this high or failure to penetrate.

b) Low made last on Buy day: look for long opportunity at open , however if prices drop below the low then that is B.V and hence the long should not he held too long, target would be around the low of buy day. Next level would be the High of Buy Day if uptrend continues. Many times the prices rise even further and a High is put in last on Sell day.

c) If flat close on Buy Day, again, wait for tests of the low of the buy day before considering long.

 

3. SS DAY: According to Taylor strictly no longs on this trade, however if I understand you guys correctly, both longs and shorts can be considered depending on previous days action.

 

a) High made Last on Sell Day: Look to short on penetration or failure to penetrate.

b) Low made Last on Sell Day: Note if B.V has occurred, then longs can be taken with similar target as that on sell day.

c) Flat close on Sell Day: both longs and shorts possible on open??????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Shamal said:
snip

 

Overall it appears most shun away from Taylor, wonder why? from the posts on this thread especially those of WHY?, there appears to be logic.

 

I think because his original work was not particularly well written (so I hear) and this seems to result in confusion in the reader more often than not. I don't know whether the principles are straightforward and unambiguous once deciphered, I have bought his book but haven't read it yet. Actually this thread might well spur me on to get round to it!

 

To me a method that introduces a timing component is of interest as a complementary approach to price based work.

 

I wonder can Taylors work be broken down in to a reasonably concise set of principles?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why not give it a shot Blowfish, yes it is not an easy read, effort and persistence required as Monad says.

 

surpised at Db's remarks on "Whatever works", am sure read somewhere on his forum

"Nothing works by itself , you have to make it work". Just because it does not fit his style of trading does not mean it has no value to another trader.

 

Read the book, then put your questions to richbois and WHY? for clarification, the way the response has been from these guys so far, you will begin to see merit in this method. From what I have learnt, you have to completely ignore Linda Raschke and G. Angell's version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly plan to, actually now would be a good time with a couple of experts on hand :) As was noted it seems to not be a widely followed technique, so a good opportunity. I have to be in the mood for deciphering maybe this weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
I certainly plan to, actually now would be a good time with a couple of experts on hand :) As was noted it seems to not be a widely followed technique, so a good opportunity. I have to be in the mood for deciphering maybe this weekend.

 

It is not widely followed because it is not about signals or latest hype, it is creating a book as richbois and WHY? have outlined, then setting about identifying the cycles and then working out strategies for each day in advance. The strategies are then implemented via tactics determined by tape reading i.e intraday price action depending on whether a high or low is made first and when.

The primary confusion as you will see if you read this thread from beginning is regards the terminology Buy Day, Sell Day and SS day. You could use day 1, 2 and 3 if you wish (refer to the book). This means you could be shorting on a buy day and going long on a sell day. This confuses most people and they give up as there is a tendency to read todays action, brand that as a buy or sell or ss day and then fit it into the cycle. That will as WHY? has pointed out will not work. But once you put in the hard work you will be pleasantly surprised.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  monad said:
WHY?

 

getting back to my post 313, would appreciate if you could spare some time to add/modify etc, for I am really beginning to understand Taylor now, thanks to you. You have dealt with the Buy day.

 

I am extremely busy the next few days but will post as I am able and will deal the other 2 days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  WHY? said:
Now if you were trading the 3 day method and took a long postion on the S&P emini march yesterday on 1-13-09 holding it overnight what would have happened right after the open today?
I was wondering if any of you out there reading Taylors book and IF you were using what Taylor called his daily method of trading (not the 3 day method mentioned above...that was an error on my part that should read daily method of trading) what do you think would have happened if you went long on the on 1-13-09 (buy day), held overnight (allowed in Taylors daily method of trading) and then sell off came the next day 1-14? Have any of you been able to extract from his book his rules about what would have happened to you in such a senario IF you followed his rules? The lesson is pretty important. Look at pages 35, 37 and 38 of his book.

 

In addition, what about today 1-15-09 according to the "count"we have been taking it would be an SS day. A day for shorting however, it was failure to penetrate the high of the sell day. Failures to penetrate can be read on pages 47 and 48.

 

BTY we should see something of a rally on 1-16-09 in the S&P. I would say we should see a bit of recovery from this decline.

Edited by WHY?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHY?

 

I have the e-book, and the pages you refer to do not match, would appreciate if you point out the chapter.

 

Anyway from what I have learnt, 13th (Buy Day) followed 2 days of B.V ie. 9th a Sell day and 12th a SS day.

Hence the market is weak. There was opportunity to short early and then late afternoon, to go long. However the price behavior suggested that the rally is not going to last long. As I am strictly intraday, there was no choice but to exit with whatever profit the market gave.

If the long had been held overnight well....................time to bang the head against the table/ the computer or kick the dog:) as it is against the rules laid out by taylor.

 

As for yesterday 15th a SS day, yes it was failure to penetrate, early opportunity to short on early rallies which fizzled out at the top, double bottoms put in before lunch and during lunch, ideal longs, once again would not hold it overnight, price action dictated exit around 3p.m EST when the bonds closed.

:2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... I am so glad this thread is still going so i can learn ....

... bickering comes and goes... but the good stuff stays.... thanks everyone....

 

.... here is a chart which shows the last lower cycle.... and how close the low came to the end of the cycle.....

CYCL.thumb.GIF.018f1f2939f85ba6cbc18b656f4b1a58.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  WHY? said:
I was wondering if any of you out there reading Taylors book and IF you were using what Taylor called his daily method of trading (not the 3 day method mentioned above...that was an error on my part that should read daily method of trading) what do you think would have happened if you went long on the on 1-13-09 (buy day), held overnight (allowed in Taylors daily method of trading) and then sell off came the next day 1-14? Have any of you been able to extract from his book his rules about what would have happened to you in such a senario IF you followed his rules? The lesson is pretty important. Look at pages 35, 37 and 38 of his book.

 

In addition, what about today 1-15-09 according to the "count"we have been taking it would be an SS day. A day for shorting however, it was failure to penetrate the high of the sell day. Failures to penetrate can be read on pages 47 and 48.

 

BTY we should see something of a rally on 1-16-09 in the S&P. I would say we should see a bit of recovery from this decline.

 

1. Taylor instructs that " a flat or weak close on a Buy day indicates that short interest is no hurry to cover and hence B.V is expected", hence any longs taken should be exited on the same day.

 

2. Moreover "flat or weak closes usually occur in downtrending market. hence all the rules are in place to close out the long position.

 

3. As you say and Hakuna also spotted 15th provided the opportunity to short on early rallies on small time frame where the tanking process you described could be clearly observed. The prices on ES declined rapidly to ~815 (approx buying objective) , where longs were in order(10.40ESt), the rally then faced resistance from previous swing low around 825, still 10pts in it for the long trade.

 

4. Then the decline led to another low during lunch and as Hakuna pointed out, formed sort of double bottom which was much clearer on the Nasdaq along with the price/vol action. Not stictly Taylor who advocated long before lunch but tape reading indicated such an action then, hence a long opportunity was there, again to be exited by the end of the day as the downtrend is still in place and the close on this SS day is just above the open. On candlestick charts it is ideal hammer indicates buying pressure is winning.

 

5. Today 16th is a Buy Day, as we are starting from a downtrend, if the market opens high, it can be shorted but not held too long as shallow retracement can be expected. Then it is a question of watching the highs to see if there is consistent failure to penetrate.

:2c:

Edited by monad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I my way of looking at Taylor, Yesterday 1/15 had an 85% chance of gettting back to the Buy day low of 857 (Globex Session). After reaching the projected lows, It gave it a go but didnt reach it during the normal session. It reached it overnight and when we opened today we had a gap up above the SS day high and knowing that we need a Decline and that occurs 95%+ of the time, short was the only option, at least until a decent decline is in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  richbois said:
I my way of looking at Taylor, Yesterday 1/15 had an 85% chance of gettting back to the Buy day low of 857 (Globex Session). After reaching the projected lows, It gave it a go but didnt reach it during the normal session. It reached it overnight and when we opened today we had a gap up above the SS day high and knowing that we need a Decline and that occurs 95%+ of the time, short was the only option, at least until a decent decline is in.

 

That would be consisent with your discovery of the Positive 3 Day Rally, Great short setup today and the bounce I expected during lunch from the support level around 830 put in late yesterday on ES. which incidentally is also a 62%fib level of low of yesterday to high of today.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.