Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Taylor Trading Technique

Recommended Posts

i have today wednesday as a buy day....

.... which would make thursday a mid.... and friday a sell

... with monday a buy

..... i am sticking to this cycle until this bull move peters out....

 

... as far as my cycle.... the lower cycle ends thursday morning....

.... if it went down and made an early low.... then you might expect a pop up toward the upper cycle ending....

.... but as we are now.... it looks incapable of making an extreme low by thursday morning as it would have to really crash hard to make a low on 30 min frame....

.... sorry if i can't be of more help to you

..... i am trying to offer what i can in hope that others may do so as well and i can learn something from them :0)

What is TVGR

o.k what is the possible scenario for today, Wednesday 17th Dec 2008,

It would be useful to post prior to todays open.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Eiger

 

I originally started my TTT E-books based on Taylor's 10 day principle. Later while I was doing statistics on everything, I discovered that we get Positive 3 Day Cycles even in this bear markets. Since then when I start a new TTT E-book for a different instrument, I use that criteria to pick which cycle day was the 1st day.

 

A Positive 3 Day rally is calculated from the Buy day low to the SS day high.

 

However to answer your question, once the cycle is set I never change it. I tried that a few times but when even I did it proved to be incorrect for days even weeks. I started with data from Jan 1, 2008 on the US index futures, and the cycle is still correct as of today. It still produces over 85% positive 3 day rallies.

 

The only thing I am experimenting with at the moment is using a moving average for my statistics due to the high volatility of late. It seems to help for some markets more then others.

 

I hope that helped

 

PS These Positive 3 Day Rallies demonstrates the genius of Taylor and how these markets are manipulated.

 

Thank you very much!

 

I thought that might be the case. Taylor, of course, is difficult to read (but not impossible) and I couldn't see anything about resetting the cycle. Angell and Raschke do talk about extending it to 4-5 days, but that has been more confusing than helpful, at least to me. So your insight has high value to me - thanks again :)

 

Since the cycle doesn't change, then that makes the rules much more important than the names of BD, SD, SSD. In other words, the BD, SD, SSD are just what Taylor named them to keep track of where he was in the cycle. We could call them Day 1, 2, & 3. The names BD, SD, SSD are pretty unimportant. It's the rules for each or the days in the cycle that are the key?

 

Is this the way to really comprehend Taylor?

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you very much!

 

I thought that might be the case. Taylor, of course, is difficult to read (but not impossible) and I couldn't see anything about resetting the cycle. Angell and Raschke do talk about extending it to 4-5 days, but that has been more confusing than helpful, at least to me. So your insight has high value to me - thanks again :)

 

Since the cycle doesn't change, then that makes the rules much more important than the names of BD, SD, SSD. In other words, the BD, SD, SSD are just what Taylor named them to keep track of where he was in the cycle. We could call them Day 1, 2, & 3. The names BD, SD, SSD are pretty unimportant. It's the rules for each or the days in the cycle that are the key?

 

Is this the way to really comprehend Taylor?

 

Eiger

 

That is the way I see it also. Names are names I just use that same names as Taylor but I agree that it would be easier with day 1 -2 - 3 for most people to understand.

 

I also agree that Angell and Raschke have a different take on TTT. Angell even got in trouble with LSS as he claimed he traded it in live acct but never did. Well that is if I understand the lawsuit correctly.

 

Anyway I prefer to stick to Taylor and I just added statistics to it which helps in today's markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VJ - He does stick with the 3-day cycle, that's true. He "re-phases" the cycle, though, which I always thought either must extend the current cycle somehow, or left orphans floating around out there:

 

"The rephasing attempts to relocate the three-day cycle when highs and lows don't occur as expected. Very often, a simple technique to find the 'correct' cycle is to push it ahead one day ... by pushing the cycle ahead one day, you can often find the pattern you are looking for ... Once you find the correct pattern, you can expect two or three cycles of winning trades ... (from Chapter 13 the LSS 3-day Cycle Method, G. Angell, Taylor Trading Technique, p. 112.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

richbois,

Can you take from Monday of this week and go through the cycle you talk about,

What day is today, in that 10day cycle and depending on that what can be expected(know we always deal in probabiities) price action wise for thursday and friday.

 

Am still trying to get my head around this 3day and 10day cycles:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
richbois,

Can you take from Monday of this week and go through the cycle you talk about,

What day is today, in that 10day cycle and depending on that what can be expected(know we always deal in probabiities) price action wise for thursday and friday.

 

Am still trying to get my head around this 3day and 10day cycles:)

 

There is no 10 day cycle. The 10 days that Taylor talks about is to start your book. You pick the day with the lowest low during those 10 days and call that your Buy day, then name your other days accordingly. So it will depend when you start your book you could end up with a different cycle then me. That is the most confusing part of Taylor theory, I started my ES book last January and at that time the major low was on Jan 22,2008 and I am still using that as my base. Like I said earlier I then made statistics based on Positive 3 Day Cycle and when I try to change the 1st day of my data to a different day I get lower percentage. That is why I keep my cycles the way they are. If you started a new book today you could use November 21st low as your Buy day which was a Sell day for me.

 

Either way if you trade the logic properly it will be accurate at a high %% of return. That is why some others like Angell re-cycle their days but that only confuses things. When a Day fails to do what it is suppose to do it usualy corrects it self in the next day or two, therefore it is simpler to stick with the original cycle.

 

This week Monday was a SS day. During the overnight session ES rallied to the my projected high and then dropped all day, normal for a SS day High made 1st. It started a rally just before the closed.

 

Tuesday was Buy day, the low was made first on the 24 hour session and we ended up with a gap up for the day session. TVGR took effect and we rallied all day.

 

Today is the Sell day. Sell days have been notorious for being the confusing day. Having reached the average target for a Sell day at the close yesterday, the markets declined overnight and gapped down at the open. TVGR took effect on ES but TF closed the gap at the start. It took half the day to finally close the gap but when ES tried to penetrate the previous day high it ran out of steam and pulled back. TF managed to penetrate and stopped climbing at the projected highs that were sent in the report last night. see picture

 

I hope that helps

5aa70ea2404f9_ScreenHunter_05Dec_1712_12.thumb.jpg.4c0328e3eac6d4e4a9168dad43d650c5.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is the way I see it also. Names are names I just use that same names as Taylor but I agree that it would be easier with day 1 -2 - 3 for most people to understand...

 

 

Hi Rich,

 

Thanks for the clarity on this. It really parts the veils on Taylor. It is now making a whole lot more sense to me. He wrote in a bit of a code, but once you have this clarity, it does open up. Thanks again!

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This week Monday was a SS day. During the overnight session ES rallied to the my projected high and then dropped all day, normal for a SS day High made 1st. It started a rally just before the closed.

 

Tuesday was Buy day, the low was made first on the 24 hour session and we ended up with a gap up for the day session. TVGR took effect and we rallied all day.

 

Today is the Sell day. Sell days have been notorious for being the confusing day.

I hope that helps

 

Greatly appreciate your explanation,

If monday 15th Dec was a SS day as per your cycles, can I start off Friday 12th as being the Buy day and start the cycle from there.

If wed(yesterday) was a sell day, today would be expected to be short sale day I presume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Greatly appreciate your explanation,

If monday 15th Dec was a SS day as per your cycles, can I start off Friday 12th as being the Buy day and start the cycle from there.

If wed(yesterday) was a sell day, today would be expected to be short sale day I presume.

 

That is correct today is SS day however last friday was a sell day not a buy day

 

here is the list for this month for ES the Blue means made Last and Pink is made 1st

 

This cycle is good for the US Index Futures only as other instruments may be on different cycles.

5aa70ea2728a9_ScreenHunter_08Dec_1806_23.jpg.d3d8f79b1ffa6b799168f30d13456bd9.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once agains thanks a bunch richbois, if it pans out today, tomorrow ideally should be a buy day, although quadruple witching could throw it out of sync.

But will follow that through Monday, keeping in mind the holiday season, the bullish bias is there.

 

BTW what is TF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... this part.... i like....

.....good stuff....

.... this thread is going now... this is great.....

 

...also aside from the confusion of Taylor's method.... the rules he lays out.... are useful even without the cycle method....

.... so even if your cycle is off.... you are protected by using his rules to the tee.....

 

-----------------------

Either way if you trade the logic properly it will be accurate at a high %% of return.

That is why some others like Angell re-cycle their days but that only confuses things.

 

When a Day fails to do what it is suppose to do it usualy corrects it self in the next day or two, therefore it is simpler to stick with the original cycle.

Edited by elovemer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Once agains thanks a bunch richbois, if it pans out today, tomorrow ideally should be a buy day, although quadruple witching could throw it out of sync.

But will follow that through Monday, keeping in mind the holiday season, the bullish bias is there.

 

BTW what is TF.

 

TF is the futures contract for the Russell index

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

richbois,

you will have to excuse my questions, I am just trying to gain clarity.

 

From your table 11th Thursday (last week) was a Buying day, however the market opened higher and closed much lower.

 

Then Friday 12th is a sell day but the prices opened lower and ended up higher, so I thought that has to a buy day, i.e low violation, buy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
richbois,

you will have to excuse my questions, I am just trying to gain clarity.

 

From your table 11th Thursday (last week) was a Buying day, however the market opened higher and closed much lower.

 

Then Friday 12th is a sell day but the prices opened lower and ended up higher, so I thought that has to a buy day, i.e low violation, buy.

 

If you have read Taylor, he says that on Buy day we need a Decline from the highs of the SS day. So on Wednesday we closed near the highs and therefore needed a decline on the Buy day, that is why we went lower. Taylor used to highball is book to figure out how much the Decline should be, however with computers today we can use programs like excel to calculate averages and have a better idea of what the move should be. On Friday we violated the lows giving us a chance to buy and then it rallied.

 

Perfect text book Taylor.

 

Most of us are daytraders so we are looking for a direction for the day, and we dont care what the name of the day is, if we need a decline then we short, if we need a rally then we long, it is nearly that simple.

 

Check my website you will find lots of additional info.

http://www.taylortradingtechnique.net

Edited by richbois

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The divergence/non-confirmation between the Russ, S&Ps, Dow and Naz was telling today.

 

In assessing the objective areas, do you pay more attention to the day session data or Globex data?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The divergence/non-confirmation between the Russ, S&Ps, Dow and Naz was telling today.

 

In assessing the objective areas, do you pay more attention to the day session data or Globex data?

 

I find that the 24h globex projections better but the day session open help in deciding what to do in case of gaps that produce violations on Sell days or SS day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.....the cycle sure proved out.... but i was wrong in thinking that it couldn't do it.....

.... i said the cycle ended around 10 am .... the drop really started to go around 11 am

 

....but the drop was not early...... instead it finished right at the end of the cycle.....

..... if it had finished early.... i would say good chance of a pop up

.... as it stands.... i can't say what is the next move.... except to say that the upper cycle is now quite a bit longer than the lower cycle....unless the low is not in yet.....if we continue down significantly from here without an intervening high.....

 

... as far as my cycle.... the lower cycle ends thursday morning....

.... if it went down and made an early low.... then you might expect a pop up toward the upper cycle ending....

.... but as we are now.... it looks incapable of making an extreme low by thursday morning as it would have to really crash hard to make a low on 30 min frame.... :0)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....the first pink rectangle show what happened the last time the cycle went out of whack....denoted by the purple buy day B ...and purple mid day M....

5aa70ea313630_cyclenow.thumb.gif.c72cccf8233ea8c5d687b23ca2a84293.gif

Edited by elovemer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....the first pink rectangle show what happened the last time the cycle went out of whack....denoted by the purple buy day B ...and purple mid day M....

 

Far from me to critisise or claim to understand the way you use and apply Taylor, however the last time that TTT didnt perform according to plan was on Dec 2nd when we had a failled 3 day rally. The effect of that falliure got corrected on Dec 8th when we ended up with a very shallow Decline on that Buy day.

 

Again today so far is showing a shallower decline but this could explained that the markets have turned a bit more bullish as of late

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....i am using my own cycle... no one else's......

..... I have not taken a look at other people's method they are using....

 

....so likewise... i can't comment on what you may or may not be using....

.... but it is great to read your posts... very informative.... thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.