Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Option plays on swing trades

Recommended Posts

Here was something in the recent Futures Magazine about a possible option play. I actually liked it so much that I made a copy. I didn't realize they also post the articles online as well. The idea is simple, which I like.

 

http://www.futuresmag.com/cms/futures/monthly%20issues/Issues/2007/10/Editorial/Options%20Strategy/OCT07OptionsStrategyJohnson

 

Stock Replacement Strategy

10/1/2007

By BILL JOHNSON

 

Most stock investors firmly believe that options are high-risk investments, only suitable for unrefined traders. But holding expensive stocks through turbulent markets can prove to be an even less civilized approach. October has historically been a dangerous month for equity investors and several analysts say this October may be historic in that regard. Using options, namely the stock replacement strategy, can tame the wildest of risks.

 

Before we describe the stock replacement strategy you must understand one critical point: Options represent tradeoffs in risk and reward. They are not superior or inferior to stock, they present a different set of risks and rewards and it is up to each investor to determine which is right for him.

 

This strategy is designed as a substitute for purchasing shares. It provides nearly the same profit if the stock price rises but only exposes you to a fraction of the downside risk. To understand the tradeoffs, you must understand the risks and rewards of each strategy.

 

Assume you are bullish on Chevron-Texaco (CVX), which is trading at $90. If you purchase 100 shares of stock, it will cost $9,000 and you will earn dollar-for-dollar if the stock rises but lose dollar-for-dollar if it falls.

 

The important point is that the profit and loss profile for a long stock position is a straight line. It shows that you continue to profit as the stock price rises but accept a large, unknown downside risk for that opportunity. While it’s true that the maximum loss is $9,000 at a stock price of zero, the chance of that happening is remote. So aside from that one known value we don’t really know what your losses could be. You’re investing in the face of uncertainty.

 

We can improve the risk-reward profile by using the stock replacement strategy. This strategy buys a deep-in-the-money call with a delta in the range of 0.80 to 0.85.

 

An option’s delta shows how sensitive an option’s price is for the next dollar move in the underlying stock. If you buy an 80-delta call for $10 and the stock immediately rises $1, the call will be worth $10.80.

 

Delta does not stay constant though. If the stock continues to rise or as expiration nears, the delta eventually rises to one, which means the option eventually behaves like shares of stock. But right now, you’re capturing 80% of the stock price increase. You have nearly “replaced†the upside potential of the stock with an option. However, your downside exposure is greatly reduced.

 

Let’s assume the March ’08 $75 call (239 days until expiration) is trading for $17.10 and has a delta of 0.80. This call gives you the right to purchase 100 shares of Chevron-Texaco for $75 at any time through expiration. Because it controls 100 shares of stock, you will pay $17.10 * 100 = $1,710 to buy the option. This is certainly much less than the $9,000 you must pay to buy the shares. By purchasing this call, your profit and loss profile looks much different as shown by the red line in “A better way.â€Â

 

For all stock prices above $75 at expiration, the profit and loss diagrams for both strategies run parallel and nearly overlap; they are separated by the small amount of time premium paid for the option. There is virtually no difference between the two strategies if the stock price is above $75.

 

But look at the difference in risk for all stock prices below $75. As the stock price falls, the long stock position continues to lose but the option’s maximum loss remains at $1,710. You have sacrificed a small amount of potential profit in exchange for a fixed maximum loss. It’s a sensible tradeoff in risk and reward.

 

What about dividends? Chevron pays 58¢ per quarter so the stock buyer collects $174 over the next eight months. By using the stock replacement strategy, you have only spent $1,710 rather than $9,000, which means you have $7,290 sitting safely in cash. At 3% interest, you’d earn $145 through the same period. Although less than $174, you didn’t spend $9,000 to get it. This strategy can therefore create synthetic dividends  even if the stock doesn’t pay one.

 

Risk creates fear, which paralyzes decisions. To improve your investment results, you must tame the risk. The stock replacement strategy is just one of many option strategies that allow your fears to escape. And this may be a particularly good time to employ added downside protection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good article. Also, an important thing to consider is getting out of any option plays a week or so before expiry. Gamma exposure that late in the game can drive the delta way higher/lower therefor increasing your risk exposure if something terrible were to happen to the underlying.

 

Gamma basically is the strength of the delta. Delta tells you how much your option is going to move in accordance to the underlying instrument. When the gamma is bigger, the delta will move in accordance. Bigger delta, bigger move in the option when the underlying moves.

 

I got nailed on gamma exposure during Oct 2006 expiry and lost a good amount of money. Granted, I was on the wrong side of the trades to begin with (novice) and had I closed out the position a week earlier...my life would be a bit different right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Option question - so let's say we find a good underlying to play. How/where are you going to look for the option info? Just straight from your broker, the charting software or a separate website? Where are you going to find the IV, greeks, etc.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
Option question - so let's say we find a good underlying to play. How/where are you going to look for the option info? Just straight from your broker, the charting software or a separate website? Where are you going to find the IV, greeks, etc.?

 

I get it right from my thinkorswim platform. They've got it all laid out really nicely along with the greeks for your whole portfolio, so you can see if you're ultra short theta and collecting lots of premium, or if you've got a big gamma exposure over your entire portfolio. For instance...

 

pos_statement-20071011-125317.jpg

 

 

So i can see in an instant where my achilles heel is. In that software you can also plot your greeks against a stock or index. Beta weighting it. So for every dollar DJX moves, my BHI position will increase xxxxx theoretically.

 

We can certainly start another thread discussing all that is the greeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, also...I didn't really answer your whole question. If you've got a software that has access to the option chains, then it should be able to plot implied vol for that particular instrument. ToS does this right on the chart:

 

pcu_break-20071011-125122.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to swing etf's options before I switched to futures. Now this was just my experience, I would get into a position it would make a small correction then move in my intended direction yet do to bad fills and other factors the premium would rarely mak it back to my initial investment where as the futures prices at the same move would have made solid pfofits. Just a thought before you switch instruments, besides over the last year your insight has become respected by myself and many others. Good luck and am looking forward to the swing Thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if you comments about insight being respected was directed towards me or brownsfan, but I'm gonna take it as a compliment to both of us...why not :)

 

As for what you said....yes, you're exactly correct in that an option can just erode as the instrument moves in the expected direction and you will not make money. That's why it's so important to understand the concepts of volatility and understand how much time premium you're paying for and knowing how much time you're going to give that instrument to hit it's intended target.

 

If the premium is real high (IV is way up) then you're gonna want to sell a bull put spread or something of the like. If premium is really low and you expect a move, buy the options outright. Plenty of people that do that and make money...they just know when the right time to buy is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh the comment was for you, no disrespect to browns fan he's top notch, and your right about option timing, thats exactly why I perfer to trade futures it a little more forgiving in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good points ck. There is an issue with options in that you can lose money even if your analysis was correct about the underlying stock/etf. That was probably the biggest reason why I stopped trading them and moved to futures as your comments have shown. And that is probably why I've always been hesitant to get back into the options game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But, with the right knowledge in your toolbelt, options can be a great way to make money. Just always gotta know if you're getting a good price for your options, and not just buy calls or puts based on the underlying without knowing the volatility behind them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess a discussion on Blach-Scholes would be good for options trading. Options are a complicated instrument to trade, however if used correctly can be very rewarding. I personally don't like them too much. The time wasted in searching out options on stocks is highly time consuming, even with a sniffer out there working for you. My 2c though :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a great example of how buying calls can go wrong....

 

calls_lose-20071026-123352.jpg

 

This is all inside a spread I've been holding and I'm watching value go down when it should be going up...thinking, what the heck is going on here? Note how the calls I bought (far OTM strikes) are holding less value than the ones I sold, but the price of SPY has been going up. Interesting to note how this can happen when volatility goes down. I sold these when IV was around 22.5% and now is at about 20%. Am I currently getting hurt by that? Absolutely. But the time premium should erode here quickly on that sold call giving me what I need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play options all the time, but mostly to protect profits, minimize downside risk when holding long stock positions, and to fund those protective puts by being short well out of the money calls. I occassionally will play straddles into earnings if the price is right, GS straddles have been nice gains 5 of the last 6 quarters.

I think of them as another arrow in my quiver. I do not believe the risk reward sets up well for most swing trades. If the trade goes against you it can result in a bigger loss than holding the stock, and the time constraints can work against you as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.