Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

One I'm watching right now is PNRA. So far, it's in a seemingly phase 1 (accumulation phase) on the daily charts. Right now it's at the upper range of it's bracket and IV (implied volatility) has been slowly creeping up. Definitely more OI (open interest) on the call side of the equation in the NOV out-of-the-money (OTM) calls, and even more in the jan 55's. Not a huge move from where it is right now (48.95) but it is showing some interesting volume action. Here's the daily on a far out look:

 

chart_station_-_parallels_desktop-20071011-091959.jpg

 

Now, upon closer inspection...we've got a higher low occurring in the range as well as abnormal volume happening at the lower bracket extremes. Volume yesterday increased on PNRA while overall markets saw some anemic action, and price did pop 1.58% while the major markets saw a draw down. Volume is increasing as we target the upper bracket extreme, though not so overly huge to lead us to be curious. I'll be watching for a break of this range above 50 bucks and look to buy a pullback to the top of it. Perhaps a call spread to limit my risk upon entry, then if it works in my favor, look to buy more.

 

chart_station_-_parallels_desktop-20071011-092451.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hahahahah! Well, PNRA got nailed like the rest of the market today for whatever reason. Never triggered in the buy area, so no harm no foul. But I agree...I watched a thing on Panera this morning and the closest one to me is an hour away. I used to live right down the street from 2 of them!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL man I am glad I have to drive through bad traffic to get there or else I'd be fat as hell! ha ha drool drool

 

I have to shut up now I am getting hungry and they're closed.

 

Okay now as far as what you're using to determine phase, so I can be on the same page...what are the phase definitions (cliff notes version is fine)...I got my phase info from Stan Weinstein and Chuck Dukas, and it doesn't seem like I am looking at it the same way as you.

 

May have already been mentioned, but what charts are you using? They are sharp! Is that IRT?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fellas,

Figured if I was going to consider some swings again, mind as well start here.

 

A longer-term look at PNRA:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3346&stc=1&d=1192163820

 

 

 

And then zooming in to the recent action we see:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3347&stc=1&d=1192163831

 

 

Notes:

After I did the longer-term look, I saw that we are right at a resistance zone in my opinion.

I then took the longer-term look in closer to see how recent action has been.

I meant to put volume on as well, but I did that after taking the screenshots and now see 2 higher volume red spinning tops right at a resistance zone.

Looks like a good short to me, looking to cover some/all at the next support area at 46 or so.

 

So now I could play this by shorting the underlying or buying a put. For right now, those are the available plays for me. I know there's a ton of stuff you can do with options, but not right now.

 

For our tracking here, I am going to play this two ways:

 

1) Short at the open on Friday (really not happy about shorting on a Fri with a hold over the weekend likely. we'll see). Stop would be placed a few ticks above the high of these spinning tops and above this resistance zone.

 

2) Purchase a put and based on the post here, I am looking for a deep in the money call with a delta of .8 - .85. Tin - can you find me one or two that fit this profile? I still need to find a website that has this info for free, so if anyone has some links, please share. I haven't traded an option in so long that I have no idea where that's listed and it's late here and I should be :sleep:

 

Sometime Fri I will update the trade to see where we shorted and what put we bought if Tin or Reav can find me one.

 

For this trade we will assume 100 shares for sake of keeping the math easy on me. ;)

pnra.png.e0d44a9c4a8def9d09704154c0891542.png

pnra2.png.1dd8f9eefdd3a1f985e537d57ed67456.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoops my eyes were playing tricks on me, those are the same definitions I was thinking of. LOL

 

Brownsfan, I know nothing about options, makes my brain go numb....but I'll see if I can track down what you're looking for. I think if I paid attention long enough it would all make better sense...so that is why I am here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good zones. I was looking for PNRA to break, but with the market doing its thing yesterday...couldn't quite break it.

 

Your chart....I don't have 2 days in a row of a red spinning top on any of my dailies for PNRA...

 

I wouldn't be so quick as to take a short by buying a put outright here just looking at the volume of this down day. Overall market volume was UP for the day while PNRA had a lower volume down day. If PNRA was to break the lows of yesterday on higher volume looking at a 30 minute chart, then a bear call spread could be initiated on the NOV calls. If you are bearish, then far month puts have a bit less premium in them to buy. FEB 50's have a little open interest there now, so if you're just buying a couple contracts that'd be fine to be able to make sure that strike still trades.

 

I would look more for initiating a bear call spread by selling the NOV 50 and buying the NOV 55. The implied vol is in an uptrend right now about to hit it's highs this far in the past few months near 50...so premium could be built up for earnings coming out on the 23rd of this month. Whispers say .37 cents, estimates at .36 cents...I love Panera, used to eat there all the time so they have my money and should have yours!! GiddyUP! (That was sooo Pete Najarian)

 

Anyhow...I wouldn't be a seller of PNRA right now, bottom line. By selling that call spread as prices traded last night, you'd risk 3.60 for making 1.34 with about a 60% chance of it expiring worthless so you can collect your whole premium. Basically a 37% return with a 60% chance at that. Thats the best return on next month options right now for PNRA, so if that doesn't suit your taste, I'd stay out and look for something better.

 

http__www3.stockfetcher.com_-_stockfetcher_2.0_-_preview_edition-20071012-074245.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tin - that's weird about the charts being different. I just grabbed that from quote.com and sometimes their stuff doesn't line up with the others.... Maybe that is including some post/pre-market as well? No idea since I haven't traded stocks in awhile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the chart again. This time the 2nd spinning top is now removed. Gotta love free charts.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3351&stc=1&d=1192199434

 

Based on the red spinning top at a resistance level, I would still short PNRA and/or buy a put at today's open. I realize it's 10:30am now, but the analysis was fine even with that error from quote.com.

pnra2.png.c92adfe01436d133dc76031098545ca9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yup, those look right now. A short could be in order, I just wouldn't take it, personally. I see a higher low and a slightly higher hi, so I'd look for a more higher odds trade to the upside at some point in the future. That's just me, though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my view tin, I see a good risk/reward trade.

 

Today's open was 48.68.

 

Stop was placed above the high of the spinning top, so just above the 50.00 level would be good in my opinion. Have to watch those round, even numbers in stocks.

 

Assuming we are short at the open, risk was $1.57sh (assuming stop at 50.25).

 

Looking to cover some/all of the position near 46.00, which would result in a profit of at least $2.68/sh.

 

Risking 1.57 to make at least 2.68 = 1.7 risk/reward. I'd love to see it at 2.0 or higher and it could get there if it breaks thru that first support level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh Reaver...I didn't mention...those are TeleChart charts. I'm really debating between them and StockFetcher right now, cause I can use SF on my Mac, and be completely Mac.

 

Good to go. Thanks for the info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:) We'll see what happens come next week I guess. You could very well be right. Has been in a down trend for the past year...With volume terribly weak all across the board today, it's not boding well for the bulls as it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yea, I might need to start thinking a bit simpler....I like you're thinking style

 

Tin, there's a fine line between being too simple and over-thinking things. We've all been there. For me, standard candlestick analysis works well on daily charts. The smaller the timeframe you go however, the weaker they become on their own. That's something I've learned over the years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not in it...the IV is sitting too high for me to want to get in on a single leg position, and the calls weren't giving me enough premium to collect much of a credit for the risk exposure...so I sat tight on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tin,

We'll see how this works out. Right now, we are getting a nice bullish engulfing but it's still early. My daytrading side says get out or at least move the stop to a more protective level.... the swing trading side says just look at the daily, right?

 

Time will tell.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3446&stc=1&d=1192550726

pnra.png.8410206899410e6f381f4daf088f1231.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive certainly been watching this one. Interesting the strength so far in the stock on an otherwise crappy day for the major markets. Volume will tell me at the end of the day, too. I wish I could just use candles like you, but I somehow gotta see volume all the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like PNRA is finding some sort of support on the window. Looking at the chart, the window is not very big at all, but nonetheless, it is still valid. At least IMHO, it is valid till we get a close below it.

 

If this day finishes out a bullish engulfing I would argue that this is a good time to go long.

 

Here is the chart:

16kq6n9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive still got an alert set to wake me up if it goes over 50. I still stand on my original thoughts regarding the trade of going long a break above the box formed from 40 to 50.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.