Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

ES Trading for 10/1 thru 10/5 2007

Recommended Posts

my post-mortem using a concept I presented in last weeks thread.

 

The 15-min LBR 3/10/16 'slow line' is a nice way to think about the TREND of the momentum. In general, I try to keep my long/short bias not with the trend of price -- but with the trend of the momentum. Momentum is generally a leading indicator to price -- but the slow line is a lagging indicator to momentum -- so you have to think about it dynamically rather than waiting for it to actually cross zero.

 

Yesterday had 'ABC up' pattern into heavy resistance at 1558.00. A failure there could set in motion a downward auction -- as the trend in the 15-min momentum was poised to flip downward. This is what happened overnight.

 

My twist on the LBR oscillator is to use the 5-period 15-min stochastic. You can see it is low right now so its difficult to short down here. You can see it was HIGH yesterday afternoon --- this was the spot to short -- so here you had to ANTICIPATE the downward auction to begin with the failure at 1558.00. The late 'ABC up' pattern was a bull trap and the failure there sows the seeds for a hard flush down.

 

Helps me to understand structure if I try to explain it in writing so that is the reason for this post. I find that thinking hard about the 15-min 'slow-line' keeps you in-step with the intermediate term direction of the market. Then you find set-ups that are consistent with that bias. that is one key way I like to think about it anyway, would love to here comments on this.

5aa70e0c0436e_Oct315-MinSlowLine.thumb.png.3bbc5bc89e559749fd8c03ed30148660.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting stuff. I've never watched anything else for a trend. Today's got me all wacked out on the shorter time frames. 15min ES looks like a bull flag, though.

 

es_15min___es___15m__15_minutes__session_5-20071003-115021.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But now ES is running into that 58.00 level already on a 10 point range. Volume's "OK" but I don't think it'd have the steam needed to break through that heavy level right now. Plus 200% IB lies up at 59.00 and that's a potential area for the ES to show some resistance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sweet overnight trade dogpile.

I didn't even bother watching things much today, started painting my house..

Totally no clue on this type of day yet. Although now in retrospect it looks like we just started auctioning into a lower bracket than yesterday.

 

Maybe with that volume distribution the last 2 days a long if we get down to the 1546/7 area might be nice if it can't break it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, built lower value 2 straight days and formed a fat volume distribution ('b' profile) low in the range (1549-51) with a big PVP built at 1550.75... My initial bias will be long for tomorrow.

 

trying something new by simplifying the high-volume areas. this just takes the PVP for the day as a proxy for the high volume zone. you can see how we have built lower value 2 straight days. Taylor concept would be to look for a test of the previous day low to go long (could be a higher low or a lower low than previous day) -- just looking for some kind of morning test down to then go long. If it tests up first, then we will look for resistance in that 57.50-58.00 zone and not enter any longs if disadvantageous position relative to those levels.

 

So those are the 2 key zones:

1546.50 on the downside (todays low)

1557.50 on the upside (Tuesdays PVP)

 

The next level down would be 41.75 from 9/27 should we get a bearish day.

5aa70e0c54e27_PVPWatch.png.91b7a6846cc34f3ef123d3f3b011c534.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree for the most part. I'll be looking long if we're able to break that flag pattern that has set up. That would give me cause to believe price could break 58.00. We could, of course, just gap up to there tomorrow, but I feel more like there's a slow bleeding weakness in the markets and if there is an up-day tomorrow, it's not going to be lasting too long.

 

There's also a good chance of just rotational trading until Friday's jobs number (I hate economic data for that reason....it can slow things unnecessarily) and there is a great range set in place for that to happen between 45 and 58. I wouldn't expect either of those 2 areas to be broken tomorrow, but would expect something to happen on Friday.

 

Either break I could see as valid, as price is holding up at the highs pretty nicely, though still is showing a potential to roll over. If price is to come back into the range set in place between 9/19 and 9/28, then I'd be watching for price to fall back to the lower end of that range around 35.00.

 

 

 

es_mp___es__30___market_profile_-_last_36_days-20071003-190331.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well, we have traded up overnight and will open at a level that will begin to build higher value than previous day. That said, we are overbought and so I will still wait for a good swing down to go long -- which might take a while.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol Tin, yah agree, open was in no man's land.

 

can see how the market twice traded down near 47.00 area yesterday --- it did not form a tail or reject this 47.00 level -- thus can be reasonable expectation that it might exlpore down there again --- ie, below the 49.00-51.00 high volume zone. will see if we get buyers down there after exploring that area? that is my expectation for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thought on the picture I posted opening up in "no mans land"...

 

Price has these low volume nodes because no one wants to do business at those prices. If business wasn't done there before, good chance it won't be done there in the near future either. Price could have just as easily started to auction up into the smaller HVN and highs from yesterday and start to break this flag pattern on the 30min....but didn't. Is price trying to seek out a little bit more buying action at the lows to push higher? Or is price just really not wanting to be up there before the report tomorrow....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dogpile, I looked at that thread with getting stopped out yesterday very quickly...I didn't realize that had just happend to you. That was BRUTAL.

 

I was just looking to take a long at 48 but it bounced off much to fast. 4th time we bounced off that but $tick was pretty neutral that time. I'm only looking to fade $tick extremes going the other way at 48 and 55, or go with direction if we break 48 short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

appear to be balancing now. we formed a higher low and traded up thus the taylor bias played out --- I didn't trade it.

 

49.00 to 51.00 has been a high volume zone and we have now traded back down towards that level with VWAP ~1551.75 --- slightly above yesterdays closing VWAP and above yeterdays 1550.75 PVP. Thus we are building value about equal to yesterday so far -- slight upward bias but could go either way.

 

Hopefully, we get a clean break and this mornings test-up can serve as a 'high made first' selling tail and we can get some downside continuation. this would be consistent with what looks like an 'uncompleted bottom' yesterday where the market did not put in a good buying tail type of rejection. we did make a higher low today which would be viewed as bullish but that trade ran out of gas and have since pushed back below VWAP.

 

attached is the noon-time volume distribution. not much to say other than the morning test up could be seen as a selling tail by the end of the day.

 

either way, we need some renewed momentum away from 50.75

5aa70e0c665ac_Oct412pmVolDistribution.thumb.png.2d50fe4217836a6c1c9eb4f5fb2f65a4.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh man, that volume distribution sucks. Had my price levels set right at no volume. .5 too high on both sides. Fading the high $tick at 10:50 at 1554.5 would have worked perfectly but I was waiting for 1550. Looking for the same setup again at 1554.5 but won't play a breakout if it occurs above that. Hopefully things pick up after lunch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no secret that we are in a coil. can see it well in the 15-min chart. this is a John Carter 'Mastering The Trade' Set-up (chapter 10) applied to a 15-min chart. The indicator puts up a red bar at the bottom when the 2.0 std dev bollinger bands compress inside the 1.5 Keltner Channel (both are set to trailing 20-bars in timeframe) . This kind of compressed range sets the market up for a hard directional push.

5aa70e0c83be7_Oct4BBSqueeze.thumb.png.6d1219734fdc3347624cbdb5f11d0863.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And I get to be driving to Vermont tomorrow while there's FINALLY going to be some action... :) Life's wonderful like that sometimes eh? hahaha

 

Best to you trading tomorrow, oughtta be fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well the after/overnight market killed that one. seems like there has been some very nice trends there lately.

 

interesting to see if this sets up a trend day, trend day high seems kind of extreme if this hold though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dogpile said:
no secret that we are in a coil. can see it well in the 15-min chart. this is a John Carter 'Mastering The Trade' Set-up (chapter 10) applied to a 15-min chart. The indicator puts up a red bar at the bottom when the 2.0 std dev bollinger bands compress inside the 1.5 Keltner Channel (both are set to trailing 20-bars in timeframe) . This kind of compressed range sets the market up for a hard directional push.

 

I think in real practice, John Carter and his partner, Hubert Senters use a different setting for the BB. (1.5 SD and 15-bars) I am not sure what the real difference is ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.