Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

ES Trading for 10/1 thru 10/5 2007

Recommended Posts

This thread is to discuss market structure and trading for the week of Oct 1 - Oct 5, 2007.

 

Friday potentially started a 'down auction' with a morning high put in after a reversal day on 9/25 began an 'up auction'. That said, Fridays volume distribution shows buyers interested in the 1537.00 to 1540.00 zone. It was last day of the 3rd quarter so this makes the read on this a little difficult.

 

Thus, we have a selling tail above 41.00 and then a 'symmetrical distribution' after the morning move down. We closed in a 'balanced' state.

 

We have a case of sector rotation where nasdaq stocks have been marching up while other sectors chopped around last week (XLF/XLE).

 

Investors Business Daily tracks 'distriubtion days' -- defined as days where the nasdaq drops -0.8% or more. Note how common these days are on the volatile nasdaq index. We have now gone 9 days without a distribution day and are due for one this week.

5aa70e0b02b5f_Sep28TaylorChartandBalancingLevels.thumb.png.983b02b247eaafe42f60f7de4b013c0c.png

5aa70e0b070b2_Sep28FinalVolumeDistribution.png.1df0092546931525d1b00c8e246025c8.png

5aa70e0b0d5bc_Sep28ChartofQQQQdistributiondays.thumb.png.139d129c3ad7561d033daa2dfefc44d0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Overlapping/lower value for Friday and the peak volume price was below the value area for thursdays trading. Volume also increased with a fair amount of volume happening to the downside. Just hoping this week isn't sleep just waiting for the jobs number Friday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

powerfull open.

i think i'm done reading/watching anything that would give me a directional bias. i had been looking for the breakout to go long above 1545 since thursday, then watched that MP/COT video in the DOM thread this morning and it biased me i should be looking to short at that area. enough of that, that was just stupid. be interesting to see if we start a new balance area here and previous resistance becomes support.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am always uncomfortable buying at high levels after a big rush up. Always have been and have missed moves because of it. The way I see it, after a big rush up, there's not always enough juice to push it higher for the amount I'd want to take out of it. The bullish thing is that it's consolidating at the highs, so just correcting by time instead of price. I wouldn't be suprised if price broke out to the upside for some more gains, but I'd be long, cautiously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is a bullish day but short-term location is tough.

 

significant volume has occured at 1548.25-50... implying some patient, responsive sellers at/above this level. tough to expect MORE momentum away from this level -- but that doesn't make it a good short given the theme for the day.

 

As I write this, market has built now 56k contracts at 48.25... This is often a significant-enough amount to mark a peak for the day...

 

Someday, the 15-min chart will correct and offer a buy zone.

5aa70e0b46397_Oct11109amESTProfile.thumb.png.c146a3faa8ec73ee38f9d7f66667e3d9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sweet chart dogpile. actually i can't rememer now if Jerry stays out of trades when price is that close to the PVP but there is good skew but that doesn't seem to be working.

i guess this is pretty straight up open drive. to advanced location for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

skew doesn't really matter when it's a trend day. this is the reason you don't short -- we busted through those 48.25 sellers with new initiative buying.

 

'trend days' are rare and only happen a few times a month. but this is exactly the reason I have begun trading a mechanical daily strategy in another account. Range expansion off of opening price after a short-term downswing is an extremely powerful set-up. trend days are difficult to trade as the strategies appropriate for a trend day (buy and hold) are not good strategies for the other 18-odd trading days of the month...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, location for me today was realll tough. I ended up grabbing a small short on the NQ cause I wasn't seeing what I wanted on the ES. Trend days are the toughest for me to trade by far, nothin like a nice volume big swing day to make ya feel good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

volume distribution shows trend day -- but price found some selling at 1558.00 level. there should be some residual upside momentum/buy pressure today. I will be looking long if we should get a good downswing.

 

attached is the final volume distribution for Monday

5aa70e0ba96ec_Oct1FinalDistribution-trenddayquestionable.png.40ae8c66756e30f279fa8765a023be55.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thinking of doing a late-day short today for an overnight hold

 

we formed a big volume bar at 58.00 yesterday.

we have actually built value (VWAP) below that level today.

we just made a lower high to that level and a lower high to the opening price

(opening price is often a magnet such that it could be underlying weakness if don't make it back to that level 1559.25)

VIX is above yesterdays high

NQ is due for a trend day down

NQ could also close with a 'cap' pattern today if it closes < 2135.25

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

took a late NQ short --- holding overnight -- hopefully INTC or somebody doesn't do anything positive this afternoon.. with some luck, maybe somebody pre-announces a negative quarter.

 

market looks set-up for a good flush down tomorrow. wanted to be there in case it happens overnight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
market looks set-up for a good flush down tomorrow. wanted to be there in case it happens overnight.

 

If you might...would you mind going over why you feel it's setup for a good flush down? And, how do you manage your stops with overnight trades? I've never held a futures contract over night and have no clue how to deal with stops in that situation. I assume your stops are wider than normal for an overnight play?

 

Thanks Dogpile, I appreciate it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, I hold a smaller position overnight and play for a larger gain.

 

since you have to ride through the european hours, this makes overnight trades tough as most of the time you will see 2-way action... so I try to be selective on overnight holds. Usually, I am shorting a lower afternoon high or going long a higher afternoon low. I will use a smaller position and my initial stop will be near the swing high/low. If the market moves in your favor in the hours after the close but before european hours, I will move my stop to breakeven -- or take a partial profit and set my stop for remaining such that I have a free-ride.

 

Factor1 why a flush down:

 

Nasdaq is generally a difficult market to 'hold' -- because it has so many shakeout days. What I use to think about this is: any time the days low is less than the previous days close by -0.8%, that is a 'distribution day attempt'. It doesn't have to close that low, just has to go there intraday to shakeout some of the longs. Note the attached chart shows how frequent these are. We have now gone 11 days without such a day.

 

Factor2 why a flush down tomorrow is a decent bet:

 

Yesterday we had a psuedo trend-day up. It ran into a wall at 1558.00 where a lot of volume traded. Today, we built value below 1558.00 and made a lower high in the afternoon (afternoon lower high failed right at 1558.00).

 

thus, I feel we are due for a down day and the market profile seems to confirm that.

 

I could be wrong but I feel it is worth a shot. If we do gap down -- the reward could be large if we do a distribution day.

 

On the other hand, I could be right and still stop out due to overnight noise. Such is life.

 

Also, the market could gap up and then do a distribution day down -- that would mean I stop out but I can then trade that pattern tomorrow live.

 

Thus, the overnight play is kind of a hedge. Very often my thinking going into the next day plays out in the overnight market with a gap and I am then screwed as I didn't catch the move. I use a smaller position so that if I stop out, its not that big of a deal. And ideally, you can take your stop to breakeven and get a free ride on the potential for the move down.

 

I shorted NQ near 36.25. My stop is 38.25 now - the afternoon high. 2 pts maximium risk for potentially 10+ pts down. If the market can trade down before Europe opens, I will take stop to breakeven --- if that stop gets hit and we gap down anyway -- well, then I am sh_t out of luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the blind squirrel stumbled on to a nut last night, thanks TinGull.

 

so I rolled out of bed at 4:30am California time. I come down to my computer and see no positions on the top of my screen ('position graph bar' on Tradestation). great, I stopped-out... nope, turns out the computer needed a re-fresh. I stick a limit order in to cover and it fills like 1 minute later. I had no coffee in me yet and was still sleepy. Pure luck - check out the luck of the timing of when I woke up.

5aa70e0bd6733_Oct3NQCover.png.8f0f6db6355044609ae9af8cab24ae7e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.