Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

ES Trading for 9/24 + Rest Of Week

Recommended Posts

Higher timeframe (15 min) is at 20min EMA, closed gap, and went up on lower volume. Not looking too promising for the long side. We may chop around here between 1524 and 1530. We'll see...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yea...I just dont see the sellers yet. There is a tad more excess for longs to be concerned about than cheering on on the 5min chart anyways...but nothing thats making me excited about either direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the ES starts to trade below 1526, that would be a preliminary signal that control is transitioning to sellers. Confirmation is provided when the next time period (F) prints below 1526 accepting those prices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just watching the craziness, no trades yet... almost took a NQ short.

 

Just noting this 'PVP flip' --- just happened. Jerry discusses this phenomenon but I don't really 'get it' yet.. Just noting it for now.

 

note: a PVP flip is when the highest volume price changes. We had 28k contracts trade at 21.50 this morning. now we have 32k+ traded at 26.75.

 

VWAP on the day is ~1524.75 so far. If price trades down, the average price will be lower than the highest volume price and implies a 'negative skew'...

5aa70e08e22fa_Sep24ESPVPFlip.thumb.png.66983e631ff90cc19b163dd56166189f.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the ES starts to trade below 1526, that would be a preliminary signal that control is transitioning to sellers. Confirmation is provided when the next time period (F) prints below 1526 accepting those prices.

 

According to Market Profile, control has transitioned to the seller.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my thinking so far is that we effectively formed a fat profile of price acceptance around 31.00 yesterday. There was a break lower overnight but this has been rejected as price returned near 31.00. Thus, we are pinned up under resistance but have already tested lower. Thus we probably need to see a new 'balance' develop. This appears to be occuring now with my standard deviation bands contracting and nearly 40k contracts building at 25.50...

 

Price is being 'accepted' below yesterdays closing VWAP level but I don't know how important this is now because that trade played out overnight as we went down -10 off that 31.00 balancing -- my crude gauge for a good move after a balancing.

 

Thus, I would like to see some renewed momentum one way or the other and then play the first flag off of that for a low-risk, high-reward trade. Directionally, I am kind of neutral. Wish I had better conviction but just gonna try to go with some renewed momentum and hope for some trending action away from 25.50...

5aa70e08e8fb7_Sep24ES1215ESTUpdate.thumb.png.33811f13d1ac85d1a460f625770eb93e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As you pointed out Dogpile, value is being built lower. This is bearish on a longer timeframe. If the ES trades above value, I will probably look to short. Things can change, but I'm looking for a short below 1524 or a short at 1531 or so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this reminds me of that other thread you started with stats about high or low being made in first 30-mins vs my post about pre-lunch high/low made (meaning in the 10am-12pm timeframe).

 

so far, we made low for day in first 35-mins, potential high for day made before lunchtime.

 

>40k+ contracts traded at 25.50 -- there are buyers out there... I hope we go down and stretch the range out which might make tomorrow a buy from lower levels on a Taylor buy day... Just think momentum has to be renewed as I don't see continuation selling here just yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
this reminds me of that other thread you started with stats about high or low being made in first 30-mins vs my post about pre-lunch high/low made (meaning in the 10am-12pm timeframe).

 

so far, we made low for day made in first 30-mins, high for day made before lunchtime.

 

>40k+ contracts traded at 25.50 -- there are buyers out there... I hope we go down and stretch the range out which might make tomorrow a buy from lower levels on a Taylor buy day...

 

I hear you and would agree that price can migrate in any direction at this point. So you think odds are that we'll have a Normal Variation Day and that the day's extremes have been pretty much established? This is a very real possibility for today based on the odds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<So you think odds are that we'll have a Normal Variation Day and that the day's extremes have been pretty much established?>>

 

I don't really have a bias here. a test down could be ABC down and therefore be a buy. a test up could make a lower high and get rejected back down. Nevertheless, just going to try to find a clean entry and go with the momentum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update,

 

market attempted an upside breakout... I bought and held for an hour but it didn't have legs and instead built a big PVP at 1526.75 (60k+ contracts) while volume overall has died. Net net, I made a trivial amount. Difficult structure.

5aa70e08f07b4_Sep24Structure1418pmEST.thumb.png.6585efe2ea6f614d3747ccc534cf0bad.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
this reminds me of that other thread you started with stats about high or low being made in first 30-mins vs my post about pre-lunch high/low made (meaning in the 10am-12pm timeframe).

 

Have you guys ever tried to incorporate an opening range breakout strategy into your trading? I know in Marc Fischers book he mentions basically the same thing as far as the open and the high/low for the day. It seems like those ideas should be able to fit in with market profile/daltons openings quite well, somehow.

 

out of curiousity would todays open be considered an open test drive?

 

The wrest of the day just seems like a mess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Opening Range Breakout is a very old, tired strategy... Everybody and their grandmother knows it. Just doesn't seem like something so well-known could still work very well --- but I haven't tested it so I don't know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We may chop around here between 1524 and 1530.

 

Man, we traded in this range practically all day. Very boring trading day. One small trade today and that's it.

 

Things can change, but I'm looking for a short below 1524 or a short at 1531 or so.

 

Never really got a trade opportunity. We traded up to 1531.25 a little after 4pm EST, but I didn't take the trade because it was too late in the day for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Opening Range Breakout is a very old, tired strategy... Everybody and their grandmother knows it. Just doesn't seem like something so well-known could still work very well --- but I haven't tested it so I don't know.

 

LBR's Short Skirt trade may be worth a try after a strong ORB,

but it is only a scalp trade. I did one during the last Fed Day

and it turned out to be more than a scalp. You just have to

trail your stop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Final Volume Distribution For Tuesday Sep 25, 2007

 

PVP was 1526.75 with 74,508 contracts traded there

 

After an Excess Low was put in on a gap down, the profile became symmetrical with final VWAP (26.75) = PVP and price just above this --- with significant 1531.00 resistance just above. Volume was weak after a strong start.

5aa70e092b222_Sep25FinalvolumeDistribution.thumb.png.944c35c31b2debc8c8ff5a869c5b1b8c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought we might analyze the ES market in a different way and see if taking this bigger picture approach coinsides with others' thinking about potential future market activity.

 

I would like to see if there is any interest in discussing the ES market within the context of what Steidlmayer calls the four steps of Market Activity, which basically describes the steps of going from a balanced market to a trending market and then back to a balanced market. The four steps of Market Activity (as described in Steidlmayer on Markets) are:

 

  • Step 1: Series of prices in one direction.
  • Step 2: Trade to a price to stop the market.
  • Step 3: Develop around that stopping price.
  • Step 4: Move to efficiency (retracement).

I have attached two charts which area hopefully self-explanatory. According to the second chart, if my breakdown of the 4 steps is accurate for the ES, the ES is currently in step 3, which means that the ES may trade between the high volume area between 1538-1541 and today's low (buying tail) around 1520 prior to moving to step 4. This also agrees with Dogpile's high volume areas that he posted earlier.

ES-Step3.thumb.GIF.70fbe820abeab64998d0500558cab982.GIF

ES-NextStep.thumb.GIF.8745f581685216e5175933c6fa1bfa5b.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do any of you follow Art Collins's free daily commentary and analysis at: http://www.tigersharktrading.com/authors/15/Art-Collins

 

I only started looking at it since beginning of the week, and his indicators for the equity markets have been quite bullish. Yesterday we broke down from the composite value area of the previous 4 days and the market had refused to go down any further. So far so good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<Do any of you follow Art Collins's free daily commentary and analysis at: http://www.tigersharktrading.com/authors/15/Art-Collins>>

 

yes, I followed those after I first read his book about 9-12 months ago. I then joined a free site where I could chat with Art and did this for probably 8-10 weeks or so (site doesn't exist anymore). I learned that Art doesn't really use those czar-chart readings for his actual trades.

 

I wrote strategy after strategy integrating those various 'biases' that he talks about -- I couldn't seem to get higher than around a 55% win rate and they always had big drawdowns -- albeit profitable (most of his work involves daily charts). This eventually led me to the conclusion that you will basically never get a really good system based only on daily charts.

 

That said, there are some powerful ideas in his book. I have just set up another futures account to trade a strategy I wrote that is derived from one of his book strategies -- with a few of my own things added-in. I figure I will trade smaller contract size in this account, set the orders up in the morning and then focus on my trading account for the rest of the day. I am doing this because the strategy results are just incredible historically. I am willing to accept some drawdowns in this account -- even though the historical strategy results don't really show that. I will assume that 'future is not necessarily like past' and that there will be drawdowns --- this is the reason for smaller contract size. Although I didn't code it, I have a 'mental switch' that will turn the strategy off if the market just grinds higher for months on end. I feel like we just had a good market correction ('volatility storm') and therefore that now is not the worst time to begin a mechanical strategy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.