Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tasuki

Squawk Box?

Recommended Posts

Just curious if anyone uses a squawk box service---if so, how useful have you found it? Does it work only for scalping, or can you judge with any reasonable accuracy where pivot tops and bottoms will be put in, and if so, what do you listen for?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It takes time to determine if it's useful. I heard Hanz mentioned it take getting used to to learn the noise level and cues to pick up to bring benefit to trading at least 6 months. I've never used it so I have no direct comment on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think being on the floor is better than half-ass noise only and no visual cues which are the most important from what they say. Like poker I reckon, hearing what your opponent is just not as good as seeing how his hands or eyes twitching when a certain hand comes up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The one thing I found is that you can get caught up in the excitement of the action from the announcer's voice and that's not good. You want to feel like you are in the pits, since it sounds like you are, and if the announcer is yelling that Merrill is buying heavy, you want to buy with Merrill! Well, as you can imagine, that type of trading is a quick way to blow your account out. I remember one day about the squawk - I was talking with a trader friend thru instant messenger and he had just gotten the squawk thinking it was a needed tool. I was doing my trading and he IM's me saying buy es! Big buyer! Merrill Lynch!

 

About 30 seconds later price dropped hard.

 

I asked how that long went.

 

Well, you know what his reply was.

 

So we all know trading is hard enough, but here's how that quick 60 seconds or so played out with the squawk:

 

:D

 

:rofl:

 

:(

 

:hmpf:

 

:doh:

 

:crap:

 

 

Point being that I found the squawk to mess with your emotions way too easily, esp in the beginning. It's a new toy and when you hear the guy yelling that Merrill and UBS are buying, you want in! The problem is that you have no idea what they are buying, when they are buying and if they even got filled to begin with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
The one thing I found is that you can get caught up in the excitement of the action from the announcer's voice and that's not good. You want to feel like you are in the pits, since it sounds like you are, and if the announcer is yelling that Merrill is buying heavy, you want to buy with Merrill! Well, as you can imagine, that type of trading is a quick way to blow your account out. I remember one day about the squawk - I was talking with a trader friend thru instant messenger and he had just gotten the squawk thinking it was a needed tool. I was doing my trading and he IM's me saying buy es! Big buyer! Merrill Lynch!

 

About 30 seconds later price dropped hard.

 

I asked how that long went.

 

Well, you know what his reply was.

 

So we all know trading is hard enough, but here's how that quick 60 seconds or so played out with the squawk:

 

:D

 

:rofl:

 

:(

 

:hmpf:

 

:doh:

 

:crap:

 

 

Point being that I found the squawk to mess with your emotions way too easily, esp in the beginning. It's a new toy and when you hear the guy yelling that Merrill and UBS are buying, you want in! The problem is that you have no idea what they are buying, when they are buying and if they even got filled to begin with.

 

Nice demonstration brownsfan:D

 

But very valid point....in many of the older trading books, they speak of the danger of sitting around the broker's office listening to the gossip....it can really make you second guess yourself and get caught up in the excitement. Kind of like the same way people get wrapped up in bright blinking lights at a slot machine...rationality goes right out the window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know some folks who have used and it seems to help so that's great, but for me I think it is distracting. Especially if you are trading a system you developed and backtest and have put into live action. If you "start taking positions" or "not taking positions" or based on the audio, then you are not sticking to your setups and sort of flyng by the seat of your pants IMO. After all your backtesting did not consider the audio. I mean maybe I should try hooking the audio output up to an audio meter and start testing to see at what decibel levels price starts to react and I could come up with a setup from it hahaha. :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  stanlyd said:
I know some folks who have used and it seems to help so that's great, but for me I think it is distracting. Especially if you are trading a system you developed and backtest and have put into live action. If you "start taking positions" or "not taking positions" or based on the audio, then you are not sticking to your setups and sort of flyng by the seat of your pants IMO. After all your backtesting did not consider the audio. I mean maybe I should try hooking the audio output up to an audio meter and start testing to see at what decibel levels price starts to react and I could come up with a setup from it hahaha. :o

 

I intend to try and use it when I get to trade full time. I can't run squawk at work and expect to get a check there. LOL

 

I don't intend to really use squawk to get in a trade though it could be used for confirmation of the pressure of the direction/reversal I suppose. I think I would use it more for knowing when a pullback might be turning into a rollover and when to exit. And also at key levels I would try and note the volume level from the action much like the tape is used.

 

This all in theory as I haven't applied it yet so anything could happen, but I will give it a try. I think it's like any other market tool, you just have to learn how to filter it but the noise levels are showing raw emotions IMO.

 

If it's not useful I'll be glad to save that $75 per month anyhow. :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After following the squawk for just a short while, here are my initial thoughts:

1) The big boys (Merrill, Goldman, Deutsche Bank, etc.) can be wrong, or they may be doing some sort of fakeout that you're not privy to--conclusion: don't ever trade based on what the squawk caller says the big boys are doing.

2) Sometimes the caller says something really valuable, such as "the locals are going to whack the eminis" and then you probably can trade on that--this happened last friday, and the caller was dead on the money.

3) If you get a good caller, there is alot of information they transmit if you know what to listen for---e.g. Ben Lichtenstein's Q&A session has been invaluable in this regard.

4) There is a certain sophistication to the noise levels in the squawk. Here's one valuable tip: if price is coming up to strong resistance, and then pierces through with a SUDDEN burst of noise in the pit, then you're best bet is to fade the move. If, however, the noise builds slowly, then the probably favors a true breakout.

Taz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Prop shop I used to work at had squawk but I found it a noisy nuisance. I can recall numerous times the announcer would shout "paper coming to buy" and the market would tank or head fake everyone. Combine that noise with 100 screaming/talking traders/CNBC/ telephones/and the people next to you yakking about their new boat and it was a miracle I made any $. Pit noise is of limited utility and this business requires laser-like focus to succeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tasuki said:
After following the squawk for just a short while, here are my initial thoughts:

1) The big boys (Merrill, Goldman, Deutsche Bank, etc.) can be wrong, or they may be doing some sort of fakeout that you're not privy to--conclusion: don't ever trade based on what the squawk caller says the big boys are doing.

2) Sometimes the caller says something really valuable, such as "the locals are going to whack the eminis" and then you probably can trade on that--this happened last friday, and the caller was dead on the money.

3) If you get a good caller, there is alot of information they transmit if you know what to listen for---e.g. Ben Lichtenstein's Q&A session has been invaluable in this regard.

4) There is a certain sophistication to the noise levels in the squawk. Here's one valuable tip: if price is coming up to strong resistance, and then pierces through with a SUDDEN burst of noise in the pit, then you're best bet is to fade the move. If, however, the noise builds slowly, then the probably favors a true breakout.

Taz

 

 

Thanks, great tips. I was looking at using traders audio when I'm ready to benefit from it. Glad to hear some good remarks on them. :)

 

I want the pit noise more so than the caller I think. For the exact reason you said, to fade emotions on key level breaks. Just like I'll watch the tape and see if the big blocks step in or if its all noob emotional buyers. :o

 

And would you say on continuations you want the noise to blast and the pullbacks to be soft volume?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mcichocki_ said:
Thanks, great tips. I was looking at using traders audio when I'm ready to benefit from it. Glad to hear some good remarks on them. :)

 

I want the pit noise more so than the caller I think. For the exact reason you said, to fade emotions on key level breaks. Just like I'll watch the tape and see if the big blocks step in or if its all noob emotional buyers. :o

 

And would you say on continuations you want the noise to blast and the pullbacks to be soft volume?

 

mc - It sounds like you are new to trading if I recall from your posts. I am going to suggest this - forget the pit noise. You do not need it, esp in the beginning. I think you are going to waste a lot of time and money trying to hear what the pit might be telling you through an internet connection. As others have pointed out, those that do trade for a living, this noise is just that - noise. And part of your trading plan will be to filter the useless noise out. Creating additional, unnecessary noise for yourself is just adding another hurdle.

 

If you really want to feel the pit, you need to be there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
mc - It sounds like you are new to trading if I recall from your posts. I am going to suggest this - forget the pit noise. You do not need it, esp in the beginning. I think you are going to waste a lot of time and money trying to hear what the pit might be telling you through an internet connection. As others have pointed out, those that do trade for a living, this noise is just that - noise. And part of your trading plan will be to filter the useless noise out. Creating additional, unnecessary noise for yourself is just adding another hurdle.

 

If you really want to feel the pit, you need to be there.

 

 

Thanks for the input, I'm still a long ways away from bothering with pit noise.

I'm actually about a few weeks away from going live on the YM. I've been pretty consistant on profitable paper trades with Ninja and OEC demo accounts. I'm not lookin to run before I walk, that you can be sure of. :o

 

I trade from work so the noise isn't an option even if I wanted it to be. When (not if, but when) I trade from home for a living then I may add things like noise. ;)

 

Thanks again for the insight, especially your candle threads. :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The funny thing is, the first time I took a free trial on a squawk service, I found it to be incredibly distracting. This second time, however, I understand my own signals well enough that I'm more relaxed, and I like to study the tug of war at support/resistance areas. To do this well, you really need to stay glued to the charts, and the squawk gives you another dimension to the action. It's actually pretty much fun, but you have to enjoy the battle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  torero said:
I think being on the floor is better than half-ass noise only and no visual cues which are the most important from what they say. Like poker I reckon, hearing what your opponent is just not as good as seeing how his hands or eyes twitching when a certain hand comes up.

 

I agree 100% with no visual aid it becomes a distraction

 

There's a lot of body language in the pit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well for most it's a love hate thing. One you must use squawk for added info that's it. Like a indicator on your screen do you trade every indicator once it goes in a buy zone? No you don't. In response to the friend that said go long...because paper was buying. yes paper was buying but once the demand was gone it will sell off. everyone finds a niche, a way to trade if i am short and i here locals starting to jump in then paper I know i'm in the right direction. But sometimes what you don't hear is just as important as what you do. If nothing is going on, good idea to maybe not take a trade.

Jon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I listen to a squawk box on the web, it's the TOS broadcast if you have the TOS platform you can see charts & listen, the guy that does the talking does a few ES trades, a few stock daytrades & tells you why he took the trades, he's a very good trader & I have learned a lot from listening. Shadowtrader is what it's called, Brad does the talking now, Peter Reznicek started it a long time ago & Peter taught me to b consistent & discplined. Both Peter & Brad renforce good trading habits & spout off good info on a daily basis. The best thing is they're not selling anything & it's free. here's a link where you can listen from 9:15 -11:30 1:30-4:00

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I noticed this thread and I can offer a couple of comments

 

First, the only service I would us is TradersAudio. Ben is main guy there, he has experience, and his comments are accurate.

 

Second, the squawk is a tool and like any tool, what you get out of it depends on your skill level and your temperment. Its not for everyone. If you are a new, you may want to go to the website and look at the FAQs before you try it. As some folks have pointed out, it can be distracting and it takes a while to learn to decode the language. I have some comments about this on my thread "Ideas for Struggling Traders" where I "translate" part of a session so that new traders can see what is going on....

 

Hope that helps a little bit

 

Good luck

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tasuki said:

1) The big boys (Merrill, Goldman, Deutsche Bank, etc.) can be wrong, or they may be doing some sort of fakeout that you're not privy to

 

Or the more logical conclusion that they are simply using the derivative to hedge their underlieing position so then while they "seem" to be on the wrong side, the trade is doing exactly what they want it to do...

 

Personally, I've never heard or read a former pitt trader that now trades behind a screen say that the squawk is even valuable let alone essential...If its not of use to them, doesn't seem worth my time to bother with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.