Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

thetradingdoctor

Deception In The Markets ( and in life!)

Recommended Posts

Lord only knows what the next fad will be....they are already trying to kick up the next wave of houseflipping due to the mortgage bust...they are saying this is the worst downturn ever...LOL...I'd like to direct their research to South Florida in the late 20's early 30's...

 

It's funny how the flavor of the week changes so fast but people still line up for it.

 

I think that article said that that woman lost $100,000 and her husband didn't know yet! Ouch. Talk about awkwardness at the dinner table. ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That lady and the other 2.5B were trading forex.

So my guess is that any futures losses would be on top of that...?

Long overnight without a stoploss, so the equity limit was the stop loss for that lady, 1% left. Probably overtrading too.

Hard lesson in trusting the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a quote from Stalin to the effect that he couldn't have done it without a horde of willing little helpers.

 

I see a guy like Richard Nixon and I wonder how the land of the free produced such a twisted individual who would have been right at home at Stalin's right hand.

 

Same goes for Hoover, the old FBI guy?

 

So that lot confuses me.

But the problem is that the older I get the bigger the corruption snowball gets.

 

Man, its in the boardrooms of the ordinary Blue Chip companies, "brainy" people, "successful" people, "whos who" and yet so many are twisted dirty little "Stalin helpers". Do they really have any smarts at all?

 

I will never understand those who mistake a bully for a strong man...

 

Some quotes from Stalin-

Death is the solution to all problems. No man - no problem.

Gratitude is a sickness suffered by dogs.

I trust no one, not even myself.

Everyone imposes his own system as far as his army can reach.

History shows that there are no invincible armies.

In the Soviet army it takes more courage to retreat than advance.

The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.

One death is a tragedy; a million is a statistic.

The only real power comes out of a long rifle.

We don't allow our enemies to have guns, why should we allow them to have ideas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's like the chaos theory...like Pyenner said...every day the corruption snowball seems to get bigger.

 

It's really crazy to see what is happening in the news everyday....Politicians getting charged, having to resign, all that stuff. Strange days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There has always been corruption in the markets and in life. One of the things that has happened over the past years is that the media has exploded.

There is more and more competition for attention--24 hours news channels and the internet with everyone clamoring for attention. In the news, there is a saying "If it bleeds, it leads." This means that the more horrific the news, the more people want to watch it. I am actually getting a little sick to my stomach writing this.

 

There seems to be no limit to man's inhumanity to man and to all sentient human beings. There does not seem to be enough of anything. We want it all and we want it now. The more shocking the better. The more extreme the action or the sport, the better.

 

We ask for this by listening to it, by seeking it out, by watching it or paying for it. We get what we ask for.

 

There is great evil in this world. There is also great good. The good does not get noticed, as it is foreshadowed by the evil. I don't know what all of this means, but it does seem that bad actions are rewarded with publicity and good actions go unnoticed or with only brief mention.

 

I think it is important for us to try to insulate against the mediocrity and sensationalism of the media. I think it is important not to make heros and heroines of people behaving badly. I also think this is almost impossible to achieve. We are living in a world of almost instantaneousl global information.

 

What is the solution? Run away and hide? I don't think so. Create ones own microcosm where one can selectively let in or let out what what wishes?

Maybe. Can it be done?

 

And yes- a bully is not good news. Unless there is a significant positive effort on the part of each following generation, the bully will propagate.

 

Those of a religious bent say that we are near the end of days and all of this hideously bad behavior reflects that. I don't know. It seems more like we are in the roaring 20's where anything goes and shocking is a state of mind that wants more and more shocking.

 

How does this relate to the markets and trading? Cons, games, the plunge protection team, the working group on financial markets, scandals, the rich getting richer, the poor getting poorer. Today I saw where the CEO of Jet Blue just bought a 10 million dollar condo in NY where property is going for $6,000 a square foot. We are looking to make a few dollars from a Jet Blue trade. The CEO is clearly quite happy about that--thank you very much. Does being the markets make one more cynical than most? I am beginning to think that this is the case, but would love to hear your thoughts.

 

 

 

Thanks!

 

Doctor Janice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
but would love to hear your thoughts.

 

 

 

Thanks!

 

Doctor Janice

 

Hi Janice, I do have my thoughts on all this, but it may sound at first glance like "religious" content and I dont know if this complies into TL`s posting rules, ironically I do not consider myself a religious man but more of a Bible beilever and practicioner... so if "faith" can be commented here and not religion... I would be more than glad to share my thoughts on why humans are having this conduct, where are they headed and what could be the hope for the ones who believe in God... I can testify that there is a diferent superior paralel quality of life for those who experience what I personally did experience on my faith... so its not religion what I can comment here, but my faith experience, wich is far FAR diferent to any poor religion... would love to comment, but need to know if its possible... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Walter. I will leave this decision to James re: posting here. Please feel free to communicate with me directly at: janice@thetradingdoctor.com as I am always eager to exchange ideas with intelligent life in the universe.

 

I encouage every one of you to evolve your thinking away from Mediocristan to higher and higher levels. It will help your trading enormously and get you out of the herd mentality.

 

That said, and back to the topic of money and deception:

 

I just saw this from American Banker. I do not have a subscription, so here is the essence. There is so much money floating around that it sometimes seems almost incomprehensible to envision:

 

===============================

AML Fines Mount: Root Causes and Next Steps

Trend toward higher penalties seen likely to remain intact

 

American Banker | Wednesday, September 26, 2007

 

By Cheyenne Hopkins

 

WASHINGTON  Almost six years after the USA Patriot Act toughened banks' anti-laundering requirements, large banking companies continue to face massive fines for failures in their programs.

 

 

"But the biggest fine is likely still to come. ABN Amro Holding NV, which was fined $80 million in December 2005 for problems in its anti-laundering system, disclosed in April that it may receive a second penalty of nearly $500 million. Such a fine not only would obliterate the record for a laundering penalty, but it also would be well over the combined amount regulators have assessed against banking companies for laundering problems since 2001."

 

And...in the continuing saga of Uncle Ben and his feeding the masses ( and the gold markets!) here is news of the latest 38 billion hot off the printing presses:

 

Brother Ben, will you lend another $38 billion? After all, that is what you lent this morning to your friends.

http://www.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE Almost $20 bilion was collateralized with mortgage backed securities. A month ago, they were only accepting treasuries as collateral.

 

Yikes and Thanks!

 

Doctor Janice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More deception. This time, it's Discovery Channel's "Wild Man." There is no end to the deception....

 

Discovery's "Wild" man tamer in new episodes

Tue Sep 25, 2007 3:20am EDT

By Andrew Wallenstein

 

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Discovery Channel on Monday aired re-edited versions of its reality series "Man vs. Wild," acknowledging that elements of one of its most popular show were faked.While the series claims that "Wild" star Bear Grylls braves the great outdoors, it emerged during the summer that he sometimes spent nights in a motel when he was depicted sleeping outside, or received off-camera assistance in constructing rafts or bridges that he was shown crafting alone.

Facing a public relations nightmare, Discovery was forced to acknowledge that "some episodes were not natural to the environment."

 

On Monday, following an exhaustive internal investigation, Discovery aired four consecutive episodes from the first season, accompanied by a disclaimer. Other clarifications came in the form of new voice-overs from Grylls and excisions of dubious footage.

 

Beginning with Monday's rebroadcasts, "Wild" will now feature a disclaimer that runs both in the introduction and in the middle of each episode that reads: "Bear Grylls is trained in extreme survival techniques. He and the crew receive support when they are in potentially life-threatening situations, as required by health and safety regulations. Professional advice should be always be sought before entering any dangerous environment."

 

In an episode airing Monday set in the Scottish highlands, Grylls feasts on a rabbit he claims to have caught in a trap he set. But in the re-edited episode, the voice-over makes clear that his crew provides the rabbit for him.

 

"My trap didn't catch anything overnight, but I've been brought a rabbit to tell you what to do if you're luckier than me," Grylls says in the voice-over.

 

In another part of that episode, the location of one scene shot relatively close to civilization is specified as such.

 

Interesting that his name is "Bear!"

 

Thanks!

 

Doctor Janice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<disclosed in April that it may receive a second penalty of nearly $500 million>

Sounds like the govt is happy to tax the offending, meaning there is no real offence. Happily profit sharing.

 

I don't have an answer to the bigger questions.

Middle America has shown some values, yet it seems unlikely the next generation will share the same strength of values.

 

Is degeneration into hardship the only way to learn values?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I find your post of an affiliate spam link in your message, quite deceptive, and against forum rules, I should think...

 

Plus it crashed my browser (Firefox 2.0) when I tried to exit it - with numerous unwanted pop-ups to boot.

 

This is just the type of behavior that James, et al, is trying to curb on this forum, given the recent shenanigans of another vendor a few days ago.

 

Speaking of deceptive...pot meet kettle. Ain't that right Cooter...I mean Forsearch???

How's this for digging up an old thread and bumping it? LOL

 

"Res ipsa loquitur"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.