Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

walterw

Playing with the VMAR`s open research

Recommended Posts

>>I take my hat off to Bruce for doing such a great job on the MT4 system as it looks awful to program on.

 

Thanks Blu-Ray but I keep finding mistakes in nearly all my programs.

Don't have the patience or the focus that I used to have.

 

Walter

I expect the live bars/missed ticks problem exists only on MT4.

Their implementation of an indicator package can't be considered fully successful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ADXVMA6Tick1.mq4

These are 2 of the fastest lines I can get out of vma6.

They provide a very short term trend definition for use as an aid to scalper exits.

Although the picture shows them in a full screen, they would normally be used in a 1min chart which is tall and narrow and zoomed right in.

There can be less than 1 pip of price difference between the two lines, so the chart needs to be tall, but like a tick chart it does not have to be very wide.

The only difference between the two lines is that the setting of VImax=0.6 affects only the second line (preset to yellow but you can alter the colors).

 

If you want more gap between the lines, reduce VImax to 0.5 but it will also make the second line slower.

 

If you want a faster comparison, set VImax to 0.7 or 0.8 but there will then be less visible gap between the two lines.

Tick.thumb.PNG.9b566f51540bc011162c76a311b9bfff.PNG

ADXVMA6Tick1.mq4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it matters, the settings for the fastest line are-

ADX_Bars=2

WeightDM=1.1 (unstable with 1.0)

WeightDI=1.0

WeightDX=1.0

ChandeEMA=1.0

 

Fancy stuff all off.

1.0 ema means no smoothing, no ema.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Blu for posting the cci charts, they have some potencial there, I imagine making the inputs adjustments required... using the latest vma formulas from Bruce and you would have some piece of oscillator there...

 

About Ninja, It would be interesting if you check their language... thanks for your good will Blu-Ray cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ADXVMA6Tick1.mq4

These are 2 of the fastest lines I can get out of vma6.

They provide a very short term trend definition for use as an aid to scalper exits.

Although the picture shows them in a full screen, they would normally be used in a 1min chart which is tall and narrow and zoomed right in.

There can be less than 1 pip of price difference between the two lines, so the chart needs to be tall, but like a tick chart it does not have to be very wide.

The only difference between the two lines is that the setting of VImax=0.6 affects only the second line (preset to yellow but you can alter the colors).

 

If you want more gap between the lines, reduce VImax to 0.5 but it will also make the second line slower.

 

If you want a faster comparison, set VImax to 0.7 or 0.8 but there will then be less visible gap between the two lines.

 

 

So now Bruce we could say we have a tight one... I will like to see him performing also arround the new signal lines I am creating with adxvmatest2 /3...

 

What do you think about Blu-Ray`s cci`s ?

 

I did test and NO plotting issues on adxvmatest 1/ 2/ 3... the chimp is testing inputs jejeje... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the plotting issues came from my mistakes, some come from MT4 missing ticks. I have not used the fix because it only corrects bar data after it has become historical, it still does not give you valid live tick data to trade with.

I have been trying to be tactful, but basically if MT4 cant provide reliable tick data then bottomline- it is unreliable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Some of the plotting issues came from my mistakes, some come from MT4 missing ticks. I have not used the fix because it only corrects bar data after it has become historical, it still does not give you valid live tick data to trade with.

I have been trying to be tactful, but basically if MT4 cant provide reliable tick data then bottomline- it is unreliable.

 

Well so far so good... when I reload this indicators they look the same to what real time showed... so at this point I would say its ok...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My approach with cci will be similar to adx-

Pull it apart, try to make sense of each bit and how the bits work together,

what works for us and what works against us?

Somehow I need to get a normalized signal out of it, then things can be done with it.

 

Unfortunately I had the thought that price versus volume would also give something like HEs and laddering.

Dude. I need to live like 300 years to think about all this stuff....

 

Still got things to learn/do with adxvma yet and trying not to go off track from that yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dude. I need to live like 300 years to think about all this stuff....

 

QUOTE]

 

Our banana republic island could come handy uhu ? take your time Bruce I think we got quite far man... I am working on a series of setups with new vma`s will start new thread soon... cheers the Chimp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tried a similar approach with 20 bar settings, the "5min definition" thing.

Both set to 20 bars but yellow one has VImax=0.8.

Notice the agreement on trend definition from 2 different methods, R over Y and Magenta crossing.

 

Not finding much use for the fancy stuff so far.

definition.thumb.PNG.0b9e68e06609b6a6b88d87707c424f97.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blu-Ray ... I was looking your chart from yesterday... have some questions and requests... whats your rainbow and faster line on the price pane ?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3445&stc=1&d=1192550814

 

could you post a chart with a cci 6 and smaller vma settings like 16 or 8, even 4 to see what tight response cci could have on smaller inputs ? ideal would be to see several panes of cci with diferent settings...

 

have you checked ninja stuff ? hope I dont drive you nuts... cheers The Chimp..

5aa70e1184973_blu-raychart.thumb.png.de780baf1c8282ca92dfab987d749694.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Blu-Ray ... I was looking your chart from yesterday... have some questions and requests... whats your rainbow and faster line on the price pane ?

 

could you post a chart with a cci 6 and smaller vma settings like 16 or 8, even 4 to see what tight response cci could have on smaller inputs ? ideal would be to see several panes of cci with diferent settings...

 

have you checked ninja stuff ? hope I dont drive you nuts... cheers The Chimp..

 

 

Walter

 

The Fantail is a VMA1 with the yellow line a VMA3.

 

Here goes for the charts, same time period all with 6 period cci:

 

1st: VarMA_Length 4, ADX_Length 8

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3450&stc=1&d=1192572632

 

2nd: VarMA_Length 8, ADX_Length 16

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3451&stc=1&d=1192572632

 

3rd: VarMA_Length 4, ADX_Length 4

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3452&stc=1&d=1192572632

 

4th: VarMA_Length 8, ADX_Length 8

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3453&stc=1&d=1192572724

 

 

5th: VarMA_Length 16, ADX_Length 16

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3454&stc=1&d=1192572724

 

 

With regards to Ninja, the language looks very close to MT4, which looks a minefield. I'm currently trying to code that ccivma into MT4 but so far just coming up with a load of errors :crap: ( Oh how I love TS :cool:)

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

aud486.thumb.png.ee680add1b2410db7cafa9ad76f14dbd.png

aud8166.thumb.png.ee68f25951276a9eee8c5926e8e0918f.png

aud446.thumb.png.45950c0e17e1d2329a4788e7288a227d.png

aud886.thumb.png.f628b042c165335865b83211f1dfcdbd.png

aud16166.thumb.png.a014623eeb93e2fbac5f922ef78886c1.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much Blu-Ray for posting this charts... it is clear that this is the oscillator of the future... I always dreamed with this type of oscillator...

 

we will have to bribe Bruce with some nanas to get this programed into mt4 jejeje or offer him some higher ranks on the republic...

 

what I basicly see is the clean and leading properties of vma on a very nice clean and leading oscillator... just beautifull ¡¡ cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ADXVMA6Tick2.mq4

Intended to be used with Tick1.

Where Tick1 gives something like a "1min trend signal" (what do you call it?),

Tick2 gives something like a "2.5min trend signal".

 

Now a warning, take the Tick2 trend signal with a huge pinch of salt,

it will NOT tell you which direction the price is going to break in,

completely unreliable because of the odd time delay used.

 

Using Tick2 will be about art not science, but with practice and patience it looks like it can be a useful guide for scalps and possible ladder steps.

Recommend demo scalping at first, not real $.

 

There is a picture titled "Tick2" in a previous post showing behaviour on a weak trend but it needs live practice imo.

 

There are user settings in Tick2 so you can experiment with multiple copies set to different speeds.

ADXVMA6Tick2.mq4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I understand... been trying to get those lines today, just couldnt... would charts on posts 362 and 363 also be tick 2 ?

 

also white and magenta lines on post 371 are ? nice clean medium term Bruce... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very good trend definitions there, even this evening I had been testing tick 2 wich is also outstanding...

 

I just aded to your definition template the tick 2... look how nice it gives pure centrifugal trends and centripetal refreshing ones...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3458&stc=1&d=1192589541

 

 

Now for timing we should seriously had to consider getting those cci`s Blu-Ray coded... are they to hard to translate into MT4 ? what I notice is that we need some kind of oscillator that could make the timing readings more simplified.. are we to far from making this possible Bruce... dont want to be anoying... cheers The Chimp.

trends.thumb.png.977d3233b269d9de0cf15538f8d4dd48.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just aded to your definition template the tick 2... look how nice it gives pure centrifugal trends and centripetal refreshing ones....
Yes I tried playing with some 20 or 30 emas in there, at first it looks promising, then it looks useless. It would be good to have a band, lines on both side of the price, we have only one line from vma "5min", a question is... could a "mirror image" of the "5min" vma line be added on the other side of the price, so we have a sort of bb effect? Perhaps a 20 ema on one side and a reflection of 2O ema on the other side, or modify a bb?

Now for timing we should seriously had to consider getting those cci`s Blu-Ray coded... are they to hard to translate into MT4 ?

I see only a couple of possibilities for an oscillator type display, whether it is adxvma VI signal or a CCI type signal, a trade signal needs to start and end on the zero centre line crossing in an oscillator pane. Whether VI or CCI, the signal will have to be processed to get that effect. Adx is better understood than cci.

I cant offer you what you ask for, I can only ask you to choose between the two choices that I understand.

what I notice is that we need some kind of oscillator that could make the timing readings more simplified.. are we to far from making this possible

An oscillator needs to go from -1 to +1, the VI signal from adxvma might be displayed like this. This would be the quickest place to look for a quick fix. Cci will take as long as it takes, I have no idea how long that will be, there are many cci possibilities, it will take time to work thru them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CAV1.mq4

CCI_ADX_VMA

Set to its fastest settings.

Settings similar to "5min" might be 20,20,20,20,20,10, 0.4, ignore the rest.

Using the cci signal as the input instead of price.

Lambert made the cci formula non-linear which is probably why the first half of a ladder shows up well (ok), but the second half shows only weakly (not ok).

CAV1.mq4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.