Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

walterw

Playing with the VMAR`s open research

Recommended Posts

  Sparrow said:
Now here is the nicer version of the bands

 

Enjoy

 

yes, very nice Sparrow very good looking indicator... had been testing ccit3 and works ok as well...

 

So now I will get inspired and prepare the final template for this...

 

The nice edge we get on NT apart of this nice variations on the vma`s is the tick charts... can make timing very competitive... also nice for scalping on some volatile pairs like eur/jpy...

 

Thanks for this contributions Sparrow ¡¡ cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  unicorn said:
Sparrow

 

will you please elaborate in the form:

 

signal vmar_2(ema_periods, adx_periods, stoch_periods);

and

rainbow base vmar_2(ema_periods, adx_periods, stoch_periods);

 

Unicorn.

 

Maybe I did not phrase my question clearly.

Please explain the quantities that the question marks refer to.:confused:

 

by the way,

;)"nice chart, what are the parameters of the adx_periods, the stoch_periods and the ema_periods?" ;) hehehe

 

cheers

Unicorn.

5aa70e186455d_ninja2.png.cc872f9497f24802def00d12950859ff.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  unicorn said:
Maybe I did not phrase my question clearly.

Please explain the quantities that the question marks refer to.:confused:

 

by the way,

;)"nice chart, what are the parameters of the adx_periods, the stoch_periods and the ema_periods?" ;) hehehe

 

cheers

Unicorn.

 

Difficult one except for the FantailVMA1: ADX:5, EMA:3, MA:2, Stoch:5

Usually the parameters are arragended alphabetically so i'd go with:

 

ADX:5, BandIncrement: 4, BandEMAMin:2, BandEMAMax:100, EMA:5, MA:2, Stoch:5

 

When I'm debugging I am usually not in the best mood, so take it easy on me.

 

Would have been easier to ask Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great job Sparrow ¡¡

 

 

now the rainbow doesnt plot anything... maybe I am not using the correct inputs to it... no hurry on that Sparrow as I am also creating a rainbow out of the bands indicator... thanks so much for this ¡¡ cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be that the rainbow has a bug, if so could you please go to the main control of NT

->Tools->Output Window

On the chart open the indicator list.

If you get a lot of stuff on the window, please send it to me.

 

If it's just a configuration thing, here's how it work, in the Plot's section of the indicator there are values like this:

 

Band01

Band01Color

Band02

.

.

.

.

.

 

It draws a band when at least a value in band01 and band02 is present, and band2 must be higher than band1.

Btw you can disable the price markers in the indicator configuration, if you're using lines to print the rainbow.

 

Maybe my explanation isn't necessary, posted it just in case.

 

You could also try to change the FillType to Line, which will less likely produce an error.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks familiar walter, great that it works :D.

I hope the calculations are correct, which is the more important part.

 

Removing the price markers will make the chart even a bit better, easily done as described before.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Blu-Ray said:
Looking good there Walter, would you be able to put it onto a template?

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

 

Flash ¡¡

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3758&stc=1&d=1193960649

 

 

jejejje.... flash flash ¡¡

 

 

 

I will post a template when I get an argument arround this....

 

It stimulates pure net scalping.... thats what circulates on my veins ¡¡

 

Cheers from the on high dopamine Chimp... jejeje pure inspiration ¡¡

flash.thumb.png.a8c93e1373f53636788e048d63422399.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  walterw said:
I will post a template when I get an argument arround this....

 

It stimulates pure net scalping.... thats what circulates on my veins ¡¡

 

Cheers from the on high dopamine Chimp... jejeje pure inspiration ¡¡

 

 

Cheers Walter, much appreciated, Nice work Sparrow and Unicorn :cool:

 

Just an observation, the candle formations are much clearer on the 11 tick compared to the 1 min chart.

 

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Blu-Ray said:
Cheers Walter, much appreciated, Nice work Sparrow and Unicorn :cool:

 

Just an observation, the candle formations are much clearer on the 11 tick compared to the 1 min chart.

 

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

 

 

well 11 tick is really a great edge for scalping.... on this chart its similar too the 55t on currency futures like Unicorns chart...

 

my ultimate wish eventually would be to have adxvma6 from Pyenner coded into NT... as I believe it has been the greatest masterpiece Bruce has developed so far... I imagine that line on a 11T chart here would be simply awesome...

 

Now what I see here its a scalpers haven... will probably need to start a new thread for what I see here... I dont want to mix aproaches... but its just great...

 

clean cristal clear charts... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Sparrow said:

Here's also my first attempt of the sniper fx cci, i dunno if it is correct, hope someone can verify it. I used someone else's T3, dunno how well the results match up.

Sparrow

The MT4 version of sniper malfunctions on live ticks.

Sniper ran into the 8 array limit that MT4 imposes so he used variables for e1 to e6 (I think thats it) when he should have used arrays e1 etc.

Without arrays it does bar by bar okay but does not handle life ticks.

I think he used a repaint loop to correct the bar data. The live tick problem showed up when I removed the repaint step.

I think if you use arrays for e1 etc as for normal emas, it should fix the live tick problem and remove the need to repaint the most recent bar.

I still need to get past the 8 array limit before I can fix it in MT4.

Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  PYenner said:
Sparrow

The MT4 version of sniper malfunctions on live ticks.

Sniper ran into the 8 array limit that MT4 imposes so he used variables for e1 to e6 (I think thats it) when he should have used arrays e1 etc.

Without arrays it does bar by bar okay but does not handle life ticks.

I think he used a repaint loop to correct the bar data. The live tick problem showed up when I removed the repaint step.

I think if you use arrays for e1 etc as for normal emas, it should fix the live tick problem and remove the need to repaint the most recent bar.

I still need to get past the 8 array limit before I can fix it in MT4.

Good luck

 

Tough nut to crack Bruce,

 

the NT code uses 7, funny the fxst3cci doesn't use EMAs on the es.

On NT some things are incredibly easy to do, you won't be burdened by many restriction. The language is more complex but also more powerful.

 

And sometimes I could just hit my head against the next wall:crap:, because something doesn't perform as expected, it's not all a piece of cake.

 

Hope you'll have a great idea and that code will work like a charm :D.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparrow... there is one little glitch on the rainbow indi and also happens with the bands one, that may require eventually some consideration... when I load template again.. he doesnt remember the colors... kind of fancy glitch.. lines dont get ploted until you asign a color and fills look all gray...

 

sorry about that... apart from that glitch, everything is ok... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys (and the rare woman ),

 

Sorry, I wasn't aware of the problem, even coded an indicator some time ago that that has the same bug. Using colors in NT without lines/bars is very uncommon and it really takes some effort to get the colors saved.

Fortunately a guy at NT already did this before, otherwise it would have taken me days.

 

Hope everything is fine now, happy researching/trading.

VMABand_v1.3.zipFetching info...

VMARainbow_v1.1.zipFetching info...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CCI_T3_1.mq4

This is a version of Sniper using arrays for e1 to e6 instead of variables.

It confirms that arrays should have been used for the emas although the difference will only show up on live ticks.

 

This left the MT4 version without enough arrays to show the histogram lines, so what you get instead is a rainbow sequence of lines showing how the cci input signal gets progressively smoothed and delayed by the emas.

 

If NT has only 7 arrays then it looks like some of the later emas might be omitted, freeing up enough arrays to allow use of histo bars, same goes for an MT4 version, but is a more leading version of Sniper needed as it will also have more noise?

 

Judge from the rainbow lines...

Black line is the regular Sniper output.

Red line is e1 input, yellow is e2 etc thru to black.

 

If Sniper is going to get ported to other platforms, it might be worth going for arrays to guarantee stability on ticks, but reducing the number of arrays so that the common platforms can all still do histo bars.

Sniper.thumb.PNG.557ce1a2ca51f0116e795d26699a4ec6.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bruce, Congrats on solving the tough problems with the Sniper CCI.

I might have not phrased my NT stuff clearly, NT has an unlimited amount of arrays.

 

I did a 1:1 translation of Bruce's code of the ADXVMA to NT.

Things could be simplified using more NT indicators, Bruce should be much better at that.

 

Hope I got it right, have fun.

 

Cheers

ADXVMA_v1.0.zipFetching info...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Sparrow said:
Bruce, Congrats on solving the tough problems with the Sniper CCI.

Hope I got it right, have fun.

Looks like I didn't get it right...

Got the line sequence mixed up somehow.

So I will pull the attachment and have another go.

Back to the drawing board...

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CCI_T3_2.mq4

This time..

I am trying to avoid having MT4 diseases passed on to other platforms.

Sniper ran out of arrays so he cheated and used variables for the T3 ema's.

Result was that it malfunctions on live ticks, so he used a repaint step to correct the bars, but not the ticks.

 

If Sniper is going to be ported to other platforms then it has to use arrays for the emas. But then MT4 is unable to do arrays plus histo bars.

 

One option is to do without histo bars on MT4.

This is the other option, drop e6 which is the slowest of the ema's.

Result is a bit more leading than sniper and a bit more noise.

But if b=0.4 is used (default is 0.618) then you get something close to sniper but with no MT4 foulups to be passed on to other platforms.

It also won't be exactly T3 anymore... so you don't exactly win.

 

Whatever goes down, I hope other platforms will stick to using arrays so that the tick problem does not spread beyond MT4.

 

Another option would be to leave the MT4 version of sniper as it is, with tick problems, but just make sure that other platforms do it properly with arrays.

 

So, this version has arrays, but with e6 deleted in order to have histo bars.

 

If other people see other options then now might be a time to sort it out.

 

Whatever

Cheers all.

CCI_T3_2.mq4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Blu-Ray said:
Bruce

If you are thinking of moving over to Ninja Trader, the language looks very similar to MT4, so it might not be as much of this :bang head:

Cheers

Blu-Ray

Blu I have a foot in both camps now and you know :confused:

I like MT4 a lot but the diy indicator stuff seriously sucks and lack of English documentation is a major part of the problem.

 

There are some seriously good looking MT4 things coming out of Russia, like fast fourier transforms but again, no english versions, :confused::doh:

 

I seem to be the only twit trying to program in MT4.

I'm not a whiz bang programmer, just a hacker, slow poke whatever.

I could surely have used some company from someone who knew something about MT4. But I don't even know how many people even want to stick with MT4.

 

I do want to look at volume and volume based charts.

So that means either NT or excel. Bought excel to do analysis, havn't used it yet. Just got NT demo going, I think:confused: At least it has better documentation than MT4 at first glance.

 

I don't think Sparrow will need help from me, I'm too slow.

So, maybe I can take a holiday anyway.

I would be happy to see the bulk of the development being done on NT or whatever fills the need.

 

I lost a week chasing around for an answer to the array shortage, googling programs to see how to do subroutines etc basic stuff but where is it documented? Cant be repeating overheads like that. If it can't be done in MT4 in a realistic "competitive" fashion, then I'm inclined to vote with my feet and move to NT or excel.

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.