Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

walterw

Playing with the VMAR`s open research

Recommended Posts

Hello PYenner, after trying more harder and harder, still do not understand how to construct a VMA:confused:

 

I really want to be able to have this FantailVMA on Ensign Software but I need to understand how can I add a variable moving average in my chart before being able to add it to the ADX.

 

If you dont mind, can you share with me how you come to construct the VMA. What is the formula to create it?

 

Thank in advance and sorry if it appear as a dumb question as I am really not well versed in computer programming

 

Sincerely

 

Shreem:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What I dont understand is what data he uses when you load the indicator from scratch again vs the real time thing... why does it get so slopy on rt ? dont want to sound annoying... hope I dont spell any bad word here... jejeje

 

Bruce, would you be interested to see what I am doing on paralel with cci ? and my ideas about a possible ultra modern oscillator... just ideas here, dont want to be annoying... anoying people get others anoyed and then the anoyed want to get the anoyer anoyed too.. so this anoyed people are so anoyed they just anoyedly keep anoying each other... isnt all this phrase anoying jejeje ... I think today trading got me anoyed ¡¡¡ cheers Walter.

On historical data it gets only one price to read per bar, the close price.

On a live chart, a 5 pip candle has 5 choices per bar.

So on a live chart it is following the ticks, faster than the bars,:o

 

The slowest line will often be 2 or 3 bars later, to the right.

One reason for attempting a binary version was to minimize the time delays that are built into the vma formula.

The binary version has no vma to slow it down 2-3 bars, but so far it doesnt do long HEs either...

 

You dont annoy me Walter, MT4 does, lots of things frustrate.

I need to get some trading done, make some $, coz nothing but indicators for a month. When I have a live trade and do other stuff, I can forget about the trade!!!! So need to do a bit of both.

The first problem I have with CCI is that it seems to be unsymmetrical or non-linear or something, when the price goes up in two steps the same size CCI shows the first rise big and the second rise looks small, danger danger non-linear not good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello PYenner, after trying more harder and harder, still do not understand how to construct a VMA:confused:

 

I really want to be able to have this FantailVMA on Ensign Software but I need to understand how can I add a variable moving average in my chart before being able to add it to the ADX.

 

If you dont mind, can you share with me how you come to construct the VMA. What is the formula to create it?

 

Thank in advance and sorry if it appear as a dumb question as I am really not well versed in computer programming

 

Sincerely

 

Shreem:)

We all learn programming languages as we need them.

 

All of the MT4 files are txt files, you can open them with Notepad or word processor or Meta Editor in MT4 and try to follow what the code is saying.

 

VMA is very similar to the formula for an ema.

 

Sma formula can look like this-

SmaResult[]=(1-k)Oldprice[] + k*NewPrice[]

[] means a storage array, one price or result is stored for each bar on the chart.

k is called the weighting, in this case it is fractional between 0-1.

When k=1 you get SmaResult[]=NewPrice[]

When k=0 you get SmaResult[]=Oldprice[]

When k=0.5 you get an average,EmaResult[]=0.5*Oldprice[]+0.5*NewPrice[].

So its an average, that one looks like a simple average of prices from two bars, 50:50.

 

The Sma formula can also look like this, but now k is no longer fractional here-

SmaResult[]=((1-1/k)Oldprice[] + NewPrice[])/k

(This k behaves like a bar count).

k=4 is like a 4 bar average because

SmaResult[]=3/4 * Oldprice[] + 1/4 * NewPrice[]

The result is 3 parts OldPrice and 1 part NewPrice similar to a 4 bar average.

This k is often in integers, but there can be decimals like k=2.5.

 

Ema can give more weight to recent data- (with k fractional)

EmaResult[new]=(1-k)EmaResult[old] + k*NewPrice[new]

This is a running or moving average, the numbers stored in EmaResult[] can be mostly older prices (slow average) or mostly new prices (fast average) depending on the weighting k. k=1 gives fast average, stays close to new prices, this is like laddering. K is fractional here.

k=0 gives no change with new prices, like horizonal effect.

 

So the Chande VMA formula looks like Ema formula-(with k=VI fractional)

VMA[new]=(1-VI)VMA[old] + VI*NewPrice[new]

VI is the input signal, it provides variable weighting.

VI=1 is laddering, ignores old prices, follows new prices.

VI=0 is horizonal, ignores new prices and stays with-

VMA[new]=VMA[old]

 

Bemac used a 2 bar ema of the Chande formula, VMA4 uses the Chande formula with three different emas applied to it. Yeah it got more complicated.

 

But for feeding a signal into the Chande VMA formula, the input VI= "Volatility Index" has to move between zero and one. So many forms of indicator are not suited to giving 0-1 output and something has to be changed to give 0-1 output for sending to the VMA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Walter

 

Use FantailVMA4Turbo and FantailVMA3 as indicators to compare #3 with #4.

Dont use FantailVMA4 as an indicator, it is not indended to be added as an indicator, it is only there to make fantail lines.

 

I started this confusion sorry.

Better luck with 4Turbo.

Turbo4versus3.thumb.jpg.bee27bc3a309a47133bb94e09914bb45.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
would you be interested to see what I am doing on paralel with cci ? cheers Walter.

 

Walter

 

I would be interested in your thoughts on incorporating cci into this method, as I, like yourself, am a big fan of cci.

 

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How to use the three VMA4 files-

 

The files are used in a different way from the past in order to have the 3 vma lines with or without the fantail.

 

To use the fantail-

First add FantailVMA4.tpl as a template,

then add FantailVMA4Turbo.mq4 as an indicator to get the vma lines.

 

To use just the vma lines without a fantail-

Add FantailVMA4Turbo.mq4 as an indicator.

 

Don't add FantailVMA4.mq4 as in indicator in either case as it will only give you the first yellow line of the fantail...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Walter

I would be interested in your thoughts on incorporating cci into this method, as I, like yourself, am a big fan of cci.

Blu-Ray

 

Blu-Ray

I will attempt to "translate" VMA4 into VT type statements that may be more useful for others to follow than the MT4 version.

But I won't be attempting to actually code it on VT.

 

I ended up doing three vma lines so it got more complicated instead of less complicated.

 

I still have more to do on vma, months maybe.

Although vma4 seems like the first "trader friendly" version, I feel like I have only got to the start of understanding how it works, certainly not near the end, not nearly mastered yet.

 

Would also like to get an excel version running, but where is all the time supposed to come from?

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello PYenner, thank you very much for your excellent explanation about how to construct the VMA. This is very helpful and will I start from there in trying to code it for Ensign Software.

 

You are right, coding certainely take a lot of time and it is a big learning process all by itself.

 

Sincerely

 

Shreem:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great explanations Bruce ¡¡... I know we all suffer here from the same problem "lack of time"... forget about cci... I think vma optimizations as you are doing is the way at this point.

 

 

Blu-Ray: some time today I will post some charts with the cci adding... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
uups forgot to upload chart... I will have to :zzz::zzz:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=3091&stc=1&d=1190679672

 

cheers Walter...

 

Walter

The fastest line should be to the left, closest to the price.

Then blue a bit to the right, the yellow further right.

I see you changed the colors to make fastest yellow.

I used red because it needs caution, can change direction, zigzag.

 

Doesnt matter so long as it works for you.

Darn, also meant to attach fantail to slowest line so it doesn't block the view of the price action so much, looks like I automatically put it on the fastest line. Oh well.

Lack of sleep.... just caught up, zombie stuff.

 

 

This chart is : fantailvma3 template plus fantailvma4 standalone line (red)...

 

I know Bruce it was not your intention to give this type of use to this line, but I find it a nice clean "signal" line to the vma3 baseline (yellow)... all experimental here.... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know Bruce it was not your intention to give this type of use to this line, but I find it a nice clean "signal" line to the vma3 baseline (yellow)... all experimental here.... cheers Walter.

Yes experimenting is a good way to discover things...

But my head kinda overflows ya know, need 50Gb more ram or something...???

So long as the dam doesnt break and let it all flood out...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Blu-Ray

I will attempt to "translate" VMA4 into VT type statements that may be more useful for others to follow than the MT4 version.

But I won't be attempting to actually code it on VT.

 

I ended up doing three vma lines so it got more complicated instead of less complicated.

 

Thanks PYenner, that would be much appreciated, as then I should be able to code it into TS.

 

Blu-Ray: some time today I will post some charts with the cci adding... cheers Walter.

 

Thanks Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so glad Bruce not to be Anoying ¡¡ thanks for telling me that... you know you have a first seat on the "Tokyo Gang"...

 

my question here... fantailvma3 inputs :

 

ADX_Length : 2

Weighting : 2

 

is there a chance this inputs could get to a minimum of 1.5 ?...

 

is that actually posible... I really dont know how the formula works, thats why I ask.... thanks Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello PYenner, thank for the input about a possible coming version of FantailVMA4 for VT statement. I will certainely look into that and see how to get it coded in Ensign.

 

Sincerely

 

Shreem:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my question here... fantailvma3 inputs :

ADX_Length : 2

Weighting : 2

is there a chance this inputs could get to a minimum of 1.5 ?...

The weighting does go down to 1.0

but ADX_Length has to be integer and two is the smallest possible.

It needs to be tweaked on the inside before it can go faster or slower properly.

 

VMA4 runs three versions of (almost) VMA3, one for each line, each adjusted for the speed of its line.

VMA3 does do smoother lines than VMA4.

I don't yet know how to do a single VMA that will adjust over the full range from very fast to very slow. It would be nice to have that so a fantail of vma lines can be called from a template.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The weighting does go down to 1.0

but ADX_Length has to be integer and two is the smallest possible.

It needs to be tweaked on the inside before it can go faster or slower properly.

 

VMA4 runs three versions of (almost) VMA3, one for each line, each adjusted for the speed of its line.

VMA3 does do smoother lines than VMA4.

I don't yet know how to do a single VMA that will adjust over the full range from very fast to very slow. It would be nice to have that so a fantail of vma lines can be called from a template.

 

ok I believe I understand something there...

 

you mentioned Bruce vma4 was using close... and vma 3 high and low... if that is the case can a version of vma4 use also high and low an still be a little more tighter than vma 3 ?.... thinking in loud voice.... thanks Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vma4 was using close... and vma 3 high and low... can a version of vma4 use also high and low an still be a little more tighter than vma 3 ?.....

Yes, think its a little slower but not much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Walter

Looks like vma4 is overkill.

Faster than it needs to be.

Better to have stronger HE like vma3

and go back to using Hi and Lo.

What do you think?

 

I completely agree... unfortunately vma4 its to noisy... actually vma3 has this properties... if you could find a midle one between vma3 and vma4 (little tighter than vma3 but not so noisy like vma4) we would be complete... thanks a lot Bruce ¡¡ cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Walter and PYenner,

 

I've been playing with the timing some and I thought I'd offer this for your consideration. Seems to have potential... figured you wouldn't mind since this thread is for casting about ideas.

 

What I've done is add a dinapoli ma to the charts (3 sma, shift 3, close)

 

I am thinking Walter's notion of the HE in combination with his idea of determining trend / trade direction works very well.

 

My thought is this for now - trade in the direction of trend and use the HEs and 3 sma and we might have a solid entry/exit potential.

 

The charts I am posting are of the VMA1 and VMA3 both on five minute charts with the 3/3 sma.

 

Again, not trying to deflect your thinking here...just sharing an idea.

 

Please ignore the candle formations if they're distracting. I just like the visual.

 

Regards

audusd5.thumb.gif.2e4a3843d8880f7873394cd8c239d518.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sundowner

I will need to come back to this later.

My head is too full now.

Can see the potential and yes candles need work yet too.

Thank you and don't be discouraged if I skip past this for now.

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.