Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

OAC

9/11 - A Planned Demolition ???

Recommended Posts

I disagree though, I mean if you look at it as the best way to hurt us would be to cause constant terror. What would the market look like today if we had been hit with random attacks on malls over the past few years? If people had been afraid to shop...it would be devasting, insanely easy and impossible to stop.

I don't buy the conspiracy theory stuff because it tries to explain too much. To me its like its trying to describe what someone looks like by the shadow that they casted.

For what waveslider posted, I think clearly our government has nothing to do with the people at this point. 200 years is too long for a democracy to last, especially once becoming the most powerfull nation. Its hard to buy we live in a democracy if the line goes vice president bush, president bush, president clinton, president bush, president clinton.

A great book to read is Propaganda - The Formation of Men's Attitudes by Jacques Ellul. Which is about state of the art propaganda technique in the 50s, i'm sure its much more refined today. If you read that book the news becomes pure comedy, its such obvious nonsense.

 

 

He doesn't want to do something like that, it would represent desperation on his half. He wants his group to come across as organized and have the ability to lay out well planned attacks that would lay more fear than a simple bombing in a mall. Anyone can bomb a mall, and he's smart enough to figure that out. But not everyone can plan an attack of the same caliber as 9/11.

 

That would be something in Iraq because most of that is Sunni vs Shiite no Al Qaeda vs USA. Again, three bombs going off at the same time in Baghdad still isn't as complex as 9/11. Osama is a smart man, look at his family. I don't think he'd want to carry out small attacks when he could just deliver one massive blow.

 

Thats my take on it at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hahah, I still can't believe you don't know Tony got whacked. It was the best ending ever. David Chase said he had wanted the black screen to be 30 seconds long but HBO thought that was over kill.

If I thought Tony didn't get whacked I would probly have burned my Sopranos dvds because it would just be so pointless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No way, I argued my position there on message boards so many times after that aired I just have no interest at this point. You get it or you don't.

I think possibly Entourage got whacked for me after the final this season. They don't even bother to follow up story lines. Like that one bitchy chick when they skinny dipped should have become Turtles Girlfriend...That show is so beat beyond Ari.

You ever get into curb your enthusiasm? New stuff last night I missed, that makes up for everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ehhh, it just bugs me a Soprano fan can not see this.

I have the ending as divx, I've watched it over and over. I missed it the first night, read all the the theories then when I actually watched it I had no doubt that tony got it. I actaully got tears in my eyes when I watched that the first time, I didn't think anything on film could ever do that to me. It took out the ending of Twin Peaks, I didn't think anything could ever do that.

Your missing it, there is nothing more to say. Try to watch it with your ideas suspended, then tell me what makes more sense.

 

"You probly don't even hear it when it happens".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, it would make sense if we weren't looking right at Tony when the screen went blank.

 

You're right about Entourage, but like I said before it's good to watch for pure entertainment.

 

If they had shown Medow opening the door then cut to black maybe it would have been more obvious i guess. Too obvious though, the last scene being Medow would be terrible. Same deal,you want to keep that line of thinking going but its on Tony's face. Tony was the whole show...I love that scene, just try to watch it like how i describe because to me you are just missing out.

I agree with Entourage, as long as they don't kill Johny Drama I'll watch.

 

You must have HBO on demand, watch the first episode of season 6 of Curb Your Enthusiasm. Larry David came out with a vengence, 3 years to think of ideas, I died laughing. Down with Seinfield.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Continuing the discussion of the 9/11 attacks. Here's a "fact" that seems to argue against the idea that it was an inside job planned by the Bush Adminstiration:

On the latest tape that Bin Laden released (which apparently was authenticated as really Bin Laden), he BRAGS about knocking off the twin towers. Now, I don't speak his language, so maybe he wasn't actually bragging (he could have been talking about the weather for all I know), but it was reported that way on the news. IF someone who can actually speak his language could verify that this is what he was saying for a fact, then we would appear to have a very convincing argument that the Bush Admin. did NOT pull the job, because one cannot think of a man like Bin Laden cooperating with the US government. Does anyone have an argument to refute my logic?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Continuing the discussion of the 9/11 attacks. Here's a "fact" that seems to argue against the idea that it was an inside job planned by the Bush Adminstiration:

On the latest tape that Bin Laden released (which apparently was authenticated as really Bin Laden), he BRAGS about knocking off the twin towers. Now, I don't speak his language, so maybe he wasn't actually bragging (he could have been talking about the weather for all I know), but it was reported that way on the news. IF someone who can actually speak his language could verify that this is what he was saying for a fact, then we would appear to have a very convincing argument that the Bush Admin. did NOT pull the job, because one cannot think of a man like Bin Laden cooperating with the US government. Does anyone have an argument to refute my logic?

 

 

No, I agree...but also remember that the Bin Laden family and Bush have been in cahoots in the past over oil. No shit. Wouldn't that just be a big act to pull off if the whole cops and robber thing was just a front and a game?

 

I do not think that is the case at all..but I also know that anything is possible. We could very well have been sold out as a people by some irresponsible and selfish asshole...we forget today that only 300-500 years ago...this type of thing was commonplace....selling out countries and thrones, etc for personal gain....in the grand scheme of things...300-500 years ago might as well have been yesterday...we shouldn't be so arrogant as to think it couldn't happen.

 

Again, not my personal opinion of what is actually going on, but this is something that is a possibility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No way, I argued my position there on message boards so many times after that aired I just have no interest at this point. You get it or you don't.

 

I'm with you Darth - I've argued my point/ideas on this topic so many times that to dive into it again here or anywhere for that matter doesn't interest me. I think it's a very interesting topic; however, I'm not about to get into it again. I was on a board where we were discussing this and no joke - I was posting as quickly as possible and just trying to keep up with the new posts. It was crazy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Bush was in cahoots with Tony Soprano necessarily, but I think that the administration may have chosen to ignore some warning signals with the knowledge that it could lead to some major terror act.

 

Recently there was a story of an FBI agent who, while tracking a suspect in august before the attack, came across documents which included western union numbers to the perpetrators.

 

This was not the only case, I recall reading several stories where CIA and FBI reports were basically ignored.

 

I realize there are thousands of threats each week to deal with, but you gotta believe some are much more credible than others. Like some Arabs taking flying lessons and quitting before the lesson on "how to land".

 

Bush didn't engineer it, but it was in his interests to allow an attack coming from a Muslim nation so that he could blame the middle east and have an excuse to set up shop in Iraq. And take a crack at the job his dad failed at.

 

What gets me most about this stuff - regardless of who did it - is the attitude of the Bush's and others who say "we will not leave until we are successful".

 

How long does this attitude last when you are trading futures!? We traders know the importance of cutting losses, sacrificing ego and pride, and most importantly -SEEING OBJECTIVELY. This bull-headed stubborn attitude is very childish, and we should expect more from our leaders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

personally, I don't even think Bush is behind policy decessions let alone planning 9/11.

To me he's just the black sheep frat boy of the family who had the right name and family connections to have a great political career. There is no way Cheney or any of his fathers friends can even care what he thinks.

 

I actually feel bad for Bush, it has to be a tough position to be in. A stand in president with no real power who gets to read what an idiot he is for decissions he's not even making day in and day out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you haven't seen "history of oil" by Robert Newman here is the link.. He is brilliant and funny..Although it is comedy show, it will give you real prospective of last 100 years of middle east...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5267640865741878159&q=history+of+oil&total=837&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

enjoye :)

 

p.s. it offers explanation why we are there...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
personally, I don't even think Bush is behind policy decessions let alone planning 9/11.

To me he's just the black sheep frat boy of the family who had the right name and family connections to have a great political career. There is no way Cheney or any of his fathers friends can even care what he thinks.

 

I actually feel bad for Bush, it has to be a tough position to be in. A stand in president with no real power who gets to read what an idiot he is for decissions he's not even making day in and day out.

 

Yeah he always has such a confused look on his face....reminds me of my dog when I pretend to throw the ball down the hallway but really keep the ball in my hand....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WTC rebuilding faces delays, report to show: source

Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:26am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Rebuilding at the World Trade Center site will take longer and cost more than previously projected, a report from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is set to say on Monday, a source familiar with the contents said.

 

The Wall Street Journal reported on its Web site on Sunday that rebuilding of the Trade Center won't be completed until the middle of the next decade and will cost up to $3 billion more than planned, citing people familiar with the matter.

 

The paper reported that The Freedom Tower, an office tower controlled by the Port Authority and under construction, had been targeted for completion by the end of 2011. Now, the tower is likely to be delayed a year, the paper said.

 

The paper said major components of the project will be delayed one to three years and will cost $1 billion to $3 billion more than the current estimate of $15 billion, citing people familiar with the project.

 

The source who spoke to Reuters said the report won't detail dates or specific costs, but will note that some of the Trade Center project dates will be moving back and that there will be some cost overruns.

 

The Port Authority is responsible for building the largest projects at Trade Center site, where nearly 3,000 people died in the September 11, 2001 attacks.

 

The projects the Port Authority is building are: One World Trade Center, the Freedom Tower, and The World Trade Center Transportation Hub, according to the authority's Web site.

 

+ + +

 

BTW what are 'decessions' ? :doh:

 

I happened to have had a conversation with a former ambassador in the Bush administration about 6 months ago regarding among other things - Bush's intelligence. This man thought Bush was far from being an idiot. Did he tell me any great 9-11 stories or any other juicy tidbits, of course not. Just that his opinion plain and simple, which may not be what most believe, is that Bush is no dummy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

Given the recent volatility in this sector....

 

The History of Oil

 

[gvideo]-5267640865741878159[/gvideo]

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.