Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ant

ES Analysis for 8/30 (in hindsight)

Recommended Posts

In this post http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/6/interesting-initial-balance-statistic-978-4.html#post18089, Dogpile asked:

 

curious what your 'post-mortem' on 8/30 is ant? how do you think about the structure for that day in context with previous action?

 

So here is my analysis. My analysis on the ES for the trading session of 8/30 is as follows. First, I look at the daily chart and identify high/low volume areas, balance areas, and other key reference levels. So for 8/30, I keyed on the high volume area around 1464.75-1468.75, the balance area between 1484-1434.50, and the swing high at 1510.50 as a potential trade destination. I also noticed that there an internal trend within the balance area, auctioning for the lower balance area extreme to the upper. See the chart below.

 

ES1.thumb.GIF.648d992b7be33fd611f6aef11a44e402.GIF

 

Next, I focus on the daily Market Profile graphics. From the daily chart, I identified that the short-term market condition is balance (trading range) since we have a balance area from 1484 to 1434.50. The buying tail from 8/28 drew my attention because usually a "Tail" ends one auction and starts a counter-auction. That is, the buying tail of 8/28 indicated the end of the down auction that started on 8/27, now I was expecting an up auction on 8/29. I'll skip some of the details with the spike on 8/28 since it isn't that pertinent for trading on 8/30. Lastly, I keep in the back of my mind that the spike on 8/29 basically closed the gap formed during the 8/28 opening and also closed within the high volume area highlighted in the daily chart. The volume during the spike wasn't that impressive either. After a spike, the question becomes will value follow price or will price revert to the mean (POC)? 8/29 left a bunch of single prints from the range extension. See the chart below.

 

ES2.thumb.GIF.b716923e0a48996b7b5c2ffc121e7c56.GIF

 

Prior to the regualr trading session of 8/30, I take a look at the overnight session to see what happened and where the market may open. Nothing to note from the overnight session at this point.

 

Now, the trading day starts on 8/30. Here is what I was paying attention to... The previous day's high and the high volume area. If we can cleanly take out those levels, I would look to get long. But the market gapped down and opened at the VAH of 8/29. At this point, I am looking for a volume or momentum divergence to get long. See chart below.

 

ES3.thumb.GIF.c4af631c9a5981e4a46871ac043049cd.GIF

 

I use the 400 and 1600 tick charts and the 5 and 15 min charts for entry. On the 1600 tick chart, I identify a momentum divergence (using the 3/10 oscillator) at the previous day's VAH. See the chart below. I put this together with the fact that we started an up auction within the balance and immediately think to get long with a target of the previous day's high or high volume area as seen on the daily chart. Note that on 8/30 the ES is "one timeframing" from 9:30 to 11:30am EST so I don't even consider fading at this time. "One timeframing" is when each bar fails to take out the previous bar's low and often puts in a higher high (I look at the 30 min chart here). This indicates high confidence amongst the buyers. I will only consider fading once the auction ends as signaled by a tail or the previous bar low being taken out, like what we saw after 11:30.

 

ES4.thumb.GIF.987058117a41efc43a27e0f17d9a5cf0.GIF

 

As the ES moves above the previous day's high and high volume area, the move does not appear to convincing to me because of volume. See chart below. You can also see a momentum divergence in the chart above. If we re-enter the previous day's range, then this is telling me that buyers may be losing confidence and I would start thinking about getting short. I would use the previous day's POC and/or the start of the spike of 8/29 as a potential target, which serves as support. I won't go much further then this, but the market started to balance for the rest of the day providing fsome fading opportunities. Keep in mind that this all may seem complicated, but it really isn't because I have a trade plan and use a systematic approach. I do this everday during my trade preparation. I'm just trying to be thorough in my response, which requires a lengthy post. I also have all of my charts viewable on one screen so I am able to pick out these developments.

 

ES5.GIF.141c6e3920ea9634f8b14ab93eb063b1.GIF

 

By the way, trading on 8/30 resulted in a symmetric Market Profile graphic and established higher value. This is positive for the bulls. Pay attention to value and not price. On 8/31, the ES was balanced again and put in higher value. Although it stopped at the upper extreme of the balance area at 1484.75, we could see a break out of that balance area and a play for 1510.50. I haven't done my analysis for 9/4, but this is probably what I would be looking for. With a symmetric, balanced day like 8/31, one should trade with the directional move away from balance (up or down).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with your thinking here. very bullish pattern (ABC down with a buy div after a strong afternoon trend up = 'power buy') -- the tricky part of 8/30 was that it bottomed almost exactly on the open... trading at this time can be a humbling experience as many days will just chew you up trying to enter a position around there -- whether in a support zone or not..

 

very nice analysis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

August 30th is a really interesting day to study closely...

 

Here is some of my insight:

 

a few factors to think about, IMO -- best shown in context of what are 'higher conviction days' (8/28 and 8/29).... see attachment for visual aid.

 

8/28 showed very strong conviction to downside as measured by the down-up volume ratio at the top of the attached chart. moreover, all volume was occuring below the previous days closing VWAP. here you have a very bearish combination of high down volume/low up volume all occuring at lower prices (vs previous day closing VWAP).

 

8/29 morning session showed very little down-volume (consistent with the gap up) -- but the volume was occuring below the previous days VWAP -- this can be considered a mixed situation with not much selling going on but you could still consider it a bearish consolidation due to where it was occuring -- it has trapped bears below vs previous day close -- this is bullish.. . but in general, trading that occurs below previous days closing vwap should be considered a negative factor among the positive factors that are emerging. thus we have a mixed reading at first glance.

 

price attempts to push below VWAP but peters-out early in the 8/29 day -- another sign that sellers aren't showing conviction. pattern-wise, you have a higher low and a 'bear trap' that has formed off the 8/28 closing 'excess low'...

 

I have added ants 5-min volume indicator at the bottom as well. here you can see how price pushes up on good vulme and then the volume on the mid-day pullback occured on low volume and that price found support at VWAP... effectively, you have a triangle here -- and price eventually auctions up hard out of this mid-day 'balance'... up volume is strong and vast majority of trading has occured above current-day VWAP and all trading above previous day low. moreover, I posted one of my favorite 'oscillator patterns' here:

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/attachments/6/2587d1188439940-potential-afternoon-es-action-8-29-15-min-first-cross-buy.png

 

thus, you have very strong afternoon trend up and a key rejection of the previous days closing price -- IBD calls this day a 'follow-through day' and the kind of day that often ends major corrections (to be determined though).

 

on to the day for comparison...

 

8/30: very interesting day to study. price gaps down but stays above previous days closing vwap. any big gap will skew the upside/downside volume indicator so you have to monitor action and not rely too much on this indicator. ant analyzes this day very well. you can see how price moves up immediately off the open (after the globex 'abc down'/1600t buy divergence). price holding above previous day VWAP is a clue of 'positive consolidation' going on... Responsive buyers come in and push price up above VWAP where it continues up. as price extends above previous day high, can see the up/down volume ratio trending in the right direction but is not in 'high conviction' mode --- where the ratio would certainly be well above 2.0.... Again, a triangle forms mid-day and price breaks below VWAP for an attempt down. volume never really picks up though and the sellers exhaust themselves after a decent move down. net net, the day ended down on a close to close basis but built higher value and the attempt down that peters out is a positive sign that there just aren't many sellers around -- that was a good chance to break lower --- and it ran out of gas --- closing essentially right on the VWAP level.

5aa70df9d9aa1_ES8-30VolumeAnalysis.thumb.png.19e7f068b87151279a11f39c6be10800.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.