Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

Daily Charts Are Meaningless...

Recommended Posts

I stopped using daily charts a while back and must say -- its been a really nice adjustment.

 

In a nutshell, daily charts give you a bias that you just shouldn't have.

 

Admittedly, I do use info from the last 2-4 days but for that I do not need a daily chart -- I can use 15, 30, 60 and 120-mins charts just fine to get the pertinent information.

 

I think there is some use in weekly charts -- but daily charts have been rendered meaningless by too many people using them --- just my opinion ---discussion/agreement/disagreement welcome...

 

Set yourself free and don't even look at a daily chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dog,

In context of an active day-trading setup, I agree 100%. This was part of the discussion I was having with BlowFish in another thread. I agree with you completely b/c you hit the nail on the head - you could get a bearish 'feel' from the daily, pass on all long trades, and depending on how you trade, those could be very profitable trades.

 

Obviously as a swing trader, the daily/weekly, etc. are incredibly important. But as a day trader (one who does not hold positions overnight), I think the daily, weekly, etc. are useless. And the main reason is that throughout the day, there's plenty of opportunities to go short or long and to eliminate those b/c of a bias you have off the daily does not work for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course for intraday positions they really don't do you much good. But they give you a feel for the market, at least for me. I feel more "in tune" with the market if I know where it's been and where I feel it's going. Of course that doesn't make me biased on where to place my trades, but I like to have a heads up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  james_gsx said:
Of course that doesn't make me biased on where to place my trades, but I like to have a heads up.

 

James,

If you can ignore the daily or weekly feel and still daytrade, I say more power to you. I find that if I see a long or just feel bullish looking at the daily or weekly, I have a much harder time taking shorts intra-day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dogpile said:
I stopped using daily charts a while back and must say -- its been a really nice adjustment.

 

In a nutshell, daily charts give you a bias that you just shouldn't have.

 

Admittedly, I do use info from the last 2-4 days but for that I do not need a daily chart -- I can use 15, 30, 60 and 120-mins charts just fine to get the pertinent information.

 

I think there is some use in weekly charts -- but daily charts have been rendered meaningless by too many people using them --- just my opinion ---discussion/agreement/disagreement welcome...

 

Set yourself free and don't even look at a daily chart.

 

Huh? In another thread, you mentioned that you use the Taylor Technique for your daily bias, but you don't use a daily chart? I think a daily chart and Taylor go hand-in-hand. :confused:

 

Personally, I rely on the daily chart for "bigger picture" stuff - to identify balance areas and other key levels that higher timeframe traders/investors may be looking at (especially confluence areas where levels from the daily and intraday charts line up). It's when multiple timeframes come together that you get really dynamic moves. I also examine the weekly and monthly charts, but they aren't as granular as the daily chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<I think a daily chart and Taylor go hand-in-hand. >>

 

I actually do use a daily chart for the Taylor stuff --- busted... but taylor bias only uses last few days (generally 4 days) -- and looking at a daily chart is tough not to get some overly bullish or bearish bias that extends back further than 4 days... if you are a short-term trader, it is very easy to get a bias looking at a daily chart which might show the last 60-100+ days of trading -- a time-period that has cost me money over the years -- so I try to just block it out best I can and focus on lining up the last 2-4 days and the intradays...

 

I do see some use in weekly charts actually for bigger picture stuff -- I just think the daily timeframe is the most difficult timeframe of any to make money from looking at... classic MACD & MACD histogram, 3/10 oscillator, ADX, stochastics are all (more than) useless on the daily timeframe, in my view... will often just lead you to a bias that will lead you astray...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it sounds like you don't require much from the daily chart - you only need to determine the Taylor bias off of the last few daily bars. That makes sense to me. However, it's not clear why the weekly charts would help you when the daily charts do not, beyond the last few bars. That is, how do the weekly charts affect your trade decisions? Also, why wouldn't you use the trend in the daily chart to increase your trade size when price moves in that direction in the lower timeframe charts (i.e., the one you trade off)? This doesn't mean that you can't take countertrend trades (scalps) relative to the daily chart though. I hope I don't appear to presumptuous with my questions, I just want to better understand your position on daily/weekly charts. :)

 

EDIT: The trend in the daily chart is also important to the Taylor Technique; for example, if the market is in a trend according to the daily chart, you will often tend to get two buy days or sells days or so instead of one. That is, the swing cycle is shifted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<why wouldn't you use the trend in the daily chart to increase your trade size when price moves in that direction in the lower timeframe charts (i.e., the one you trade off)? >>

 

I guess what I was trying to say but didn't come out and say was --- I have a slight bias towards fading any trend that develops on a daily chart. I don't believe in sustainable trends on the daily chart -- I believe in choppy daily action...

 

Now, don't get me wrong -- I DO believe in trends on intraday charts so I will take full size for an intraday trade even if it lines up with a daily trend --- having said that I want to fade the daily trend. So effectively, the daily just has no bearing on my trading.

 

<<how do the weekly charts affect your trade decisions? >>

 

they don't currently. But when stepping out to this timeframe -- the indicators seem to want to speak to me. always playing around -- check this one out (buy weekly macd histogram upturn that occurs during traditional seasonal strength for second half rally --- sell Jan 31st):

 

http://bp1.blogger.com/_5h-SWVGx6Ms/RtpeUx72PHI/AAAAAAAAAZs/r0h8QTBaKho/s1600-h/MDY+Seasonal+MACD.bmp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dogpile said:
<<why wouldn't you use the trend in the daily chart to increase your trade size when price moves in that direction in the lower timeframe charts (i.e., the one you trade off)? >> ..........

 

 

 

Suppose I trade 3 contracts on a trade if it is in tune with the daily chart. That is, for example, the daily trend is up so I trade 3 contracts when going long. On a short signal I only trade 1.

 

1. Subconsciously I have told myself to trust my long signals 3 x's as much as my shorts. Conversely, I have told myself to distrust my short signals in such a way as to trade 1/3 the position.

 

2. If I am 1/3 less confident in my short signals, why am I taking them at all? If I believed it to be a good trade, then it should not be relocated to a lesser position size. Hence I have already added a negative bias to my trading and a self-fulfilling prophecy.

 

3. If you can't trade with the same size on both signals, why trade the lesser one? You are setting up a hierarchy for trade signals. But why trade anything less than the top of the ladder? Need more trades, or more money? TRADE MORE MARKETS. And trade them only in the direction of the trend.

 

This is the problem, form my point of view with using a daily chart to trade smaller timeframe intra-day. If you believe that trend is one of the small edges afforded the retail trader, it makes little sense to go short when the daily trend is clearly up.

 

But we know that an up trend can have down days. It can have down weeks for that matter. It takes away ones ability to make money if he is only trading on the side of the daily trend. Movement is important and that movement can be counter to the larger daily trend and still be tradable.

 

I prefer to keep my trend-frame small: 15 mins. and my trade-frame smaller: 5mins. I can thus trade counter to the larger daily trend, while still acknowledging the power of trends and fractal market structure.

 

As for the daily chart, its use in intra-day trading should be confined to support/resistance levels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  PivotProfiler said:
Suppose I trade 3 contracts on a trade if it is in tune with the daily chart. That is, for example, the daily trend is up so I trade 3 contracts when going long. On a short signal I only trade 1.

 

1. Subconsciously I have told myself to trust my long signals 3 x's as much as my shorts. Conversely, I have told myself to distrust my short signals in such a way as to trade 1/3 the position.

 

2. If I am 1/3 less confident in my short signals, why am I taking them at all? If I believed it to be a good trade, then it should not be relocated to a lesser position size. Hence I have already added a negative bias to my trading and a self-fulfilling prophecy.

 

3. If you can't trade with the same size on both signals, why trade the lesser one? You are setting up a hierarchy for trade signals. But why trade anything less than the top of the ladder? Need more trades, or more money? TRADE MORE MARKETS. And trade them only in the direction of the trend.

 

This is the problem, form my point of view with using a daily chart to trade smaller timeframe intra-day. If you believe that trend is one of the small edges afforded the retail trader, it makes little sense to go short when the daily trend is clearly up.

 

But we know that an up trend can have down days. It can have down weeks for that matter. It takes away ones ability to make money if he is only trading on the side of the daily trend. Movement is important and that movement can be counter to the larger daily trend and still be tradable.

 

I prefer to keep my trend-frame small: 15 mins. and my trade-frame smaller: 5mins. I can thus trade counter to the larger daily trend, while still acknowledging the power of trends and fractal market structure.

 

As for the daily chart, its use in intra-day trading should be confined to support/resistance levels.

 

Aligning trades using multiple timeframes increases the probability of a trade versus taking a scalp trade that may be based on a single timeframe only. Why would I take a scalp trade or a less probability trade? Because based on research, the scalp trade may still have an edge, but it may not be as high as a trade that is taken with the longer timeframe trend. So I adjust trade size to compensate. For example, I would expect more profits from a trend day down that is with the longer term trend than a trend day down that is against the longer term trend. Anytime trade conditions and a trader's odds improve, whether it is by using multiple timeframes or because of increasing market volatility, for example, I will step up the leverage in my trading. I believe that knowing when to use more leverage is an important skill used by professional traders. It's sort of like doubling down in Blackjack when the odds are more in your favor. During the month of August, I definitely increased my trade size in general because of increased volatility. Increased volatility generates more profitable trades for me so I acted accordingly. I increased trade size within my risk parameters. I'm glad I did because August was my most profitable month this year thus far. I definitely operate from the point of view that most of my profits come from a few trades. How you use the daily charts is dependent on your trade plan, my point was that using the daily chart is usually advantageous, unless you are a scalp trader that only uses order flow. I use the daily charts to determine short-term to intermediate-term market condition and for support/resistance levels. But there are many other ways that it can be used profitably. For example, Dogpile uses the daily charts with the Taylor Technique. To each his own. There is no right or wrong way here. My point was that for most traders, the daily chart should be consulted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.