Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Mortgage crisis in the US...

Recommended Posts

I'm sure everyone has read about the mortgage 'crisis' that is hitting the US, but I take a step back and say 'no kidding!'.

 

Allow me to explain...

 

About 3-4 yrs ago I purchased the house I currently live in. Interest rates were so incredibly low, it was great. IF YOU HAD A BRAIN. Low teaser rates were advertised EVERYWHERE - tv, radio, internet, etc. - with these low teaser rates that common sense would tell you could not stay that low. I remember seeing ads for 2%. TWO PERCENT.

 

Now, anyone with a little common sense SHOULD have thought... wow, great rate, but WHAT'S THE CATCH? Well, the catch, as we all now see is that these rates are skyrocketing on people.

 

Here's the gotcha - people were taking loans with monthly payments that they could barely afford at the TEASER rate. Now, with everything that is going on in the mortgage biz, people are freaking out.

 

I bring this up, b/c the local paper here in Cleveland finally ran a story on it. It was FRONT PAGE. Here's the link to the story - http://blog.cleveland.com/plaindealer/2007/08/mortgage_mess_hits_home.html

 

I just sit here and think... what did you people think? Your rate was going to stay at 2% or 3% for the life of the loan? Give me a break. The paper is trying to play this up like it's the mortgage co's fault, and while they are to blame as well, there is some accountability needed here. If you get a teaser rate, whether it's a credit card or home loan, you need to read the fine print. End of story.

 

Anyways, looks like there will be some nice home bargains in the Cleveland area soon. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep.

 

That is why one should generally make it a practice to actually read a contract in a business transaction involving hundreds of thousands of dollars.

 

I hate when people try to seek someone to blame for them being an idiot.

 

Everyone makes mistakes, and when you do, it's YOUR OWN FAULT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brown....i'm curious about this situation in the states right now. Are home values actually going down? Or is this mainly a problem with the mortage companies. I wonder if this problem would spill over into the Canadian real estate market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
Unfortunately Nate, it's much easier to just point the finger at someone else.

 

Yeah you're right about that.

 

It is the same mentality that allows one to break into someone else's home and get attacked by their dog and sue for damages....and win....

 

The victim mentality/entitlement complex runs rampant these days.

 

:frustrating:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  The Bear said:
Brown....i'm curious about this situation in the states right now. Are home values actually going down? Or is this mainly a problem with the mortage companies. I wonder if this problem would spill over into the Canadian real estate market.

 

Bear,

The biggest issue right now is people's mortgage payments going up more than they anticipated (or even considered to begin with) and now their payments are going up more than they can handle. Property values are suffering as a result since now is a 'buyers market'.

 

It's an interesting situation to say the least and will be a good one to watch going forward. Some in gov't are calling for the federal gov't to step in and stop this mess from getting worse. I'm not sure what they can do to fix this, but it's bad.

 

Time will tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi browns,

 

How exactly does this work when mortage rates are going up for home buyers. Was the 2% not a fixed rate but an interest rate adjusted floating rate? Was there any deals at that time when mortage rates were fixed?

 

I know a few people straight out of college about 2.5 years ago who purchased a home in Chicago on a 30 year loan. Im curious to know what happened to buyers like them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

James,

Most of these buyers received a 'teaser rate' - a very low rate that was set for a short period of time (usually no more than 5 years) and after that teaser rate was adjusted 'accordingly'. Well, if you got a 2% rate, I can pretty much guess which way that rate is going when it needs to 'adjust', right? And these adjustments are causing people to be late on the mortgage or just unable to meet the new payment period. Which of course then leads to foreclosures and the domino effect from there that we are seeing now.

 

Most of these mortgages here are referred to as a ARM - Adjustable Rate Mortgage. Even in the name of the loan it tells you what may happen. :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I should note that the ARM is just one option available when getting a mortgage. Not everyone in the US has one, just those that were looking for a very low monthly payment @ the start of their loan. I just have a simple 30 yr fixed payment. Difference being that I was paying more initially than those with an ARM and now my term and rate looks like a bargain to those with an ARM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It basically was a chain reaction in the hot markets. Rates got so low it brought in more and more buyers, then speculators then at a point I imagine property out west got so out of hand that people would not have been able to get in the house without an arm. You also have to figure that if you bought a house in 2003/04 in these markets you were probly up 100% by early 05. I'm sure that gave people confidence that even if the rate went up they could just sell at a profit.

 

Not everywhere experienced this though. In western ny here property really hasn't gone up much at all. a starter home out west is 500k, that puts you in the biggest houses around here.

 

i wish i had bookmarked it but i found a double wide trailer for 200k on here a few weeks ago :)

http://www.seattlepowersearch.com/

 

Most arms were 5 years, considering the big buying spree didnt happen until 03/04 we havent even started the resets yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  darthtrader said:
Most arms were 5 years, considering the big buying spree didnt happen until 03/04 we havent even started the resets yet.

 

Great point Darth.

 

This is just the start. It really is going to be interesting to see what happens - either the gov't steps in as many are begging them to do (not sure how though) or we see A LOT of foreclosures.

 

From a possible money making opportunity though... those with cash and good credit will be king here. Looks like there could be a possible housing upgrade in the brownsfan019 household possibly... :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol yeah I agree....rates are dropping right now, at least where I work...just checked.....

 

 

Houses are popping up for sale like crazy in Pensacola FL....It is nuts...

 

My strategy:

 

Roy Jones, jr lives here...and if I am lucky, maybe he got an ARM and is gonna have to drop the ball on this one....

 

oh yeah. ;) like Brownsfan said..there may be an upgrade in the near future. lol

 

but something tells me Roy Jones, jr didn't finance under an ARM...or maybe at all.

 

*sigh* back to the ol' drawing board I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I might stir the pot here a little.

 

First off I do agree that you should read a contract, and yes you should certainly employ common sense when obtaining a loan for any amount of money BUT....

 

Don't you find it interesting that these lenders actually thought they would lend money to underfunded, uninformed, ill advised people and thought that because the going was great and the housing bull would carry on forever that they would win out big with their bait and switch style teaser rates?

 

Perhaps I'm laying it on too thick but I say "boo hoo!" You want to take a gamble at the upper end of a housing bubble/boom and then when the market closes in on itself and THAT SAME sub prime market YOU HAVE BEEN EXPLOITING collapses you want to complain?

 

We all know about risk/reward, supply/demand, fear/greed manias and depressions in stock and futures markets, how is this different than someone with more money than intelligence over-leveraging themselves at the top of a huge bull market?

 

Now I should note that I do not think that people were "victimized" or that they should be taken pity upon. My point is that in the context of lenders, that if you play with fire you run the risk of burning yourself...

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  MrPaul said:
I thought I might stir the pot here a little.

 

First off I do agree that you should read a contract, and yes you should certainly employ common sense when obtaining a loan for any amount of money BUT....

 

Don't you find it interesting that these lenders actually thought they would lend money to underfunded, uninformed, ill advised people and thought that because the going was great and the housing bull would carry on forever that they would win out big with their bait and switch style teaser rates?

 

Perhaps I'm laying it on too thick but I say "boo hoo!" You want to take a gamble at the upper end of a housing bubble/boom and then when the market closes in on itself and THAT SAME sub prime market YOU HAVE BEEN EXPLOITING collapses you want to complain?

 

We all know about risk/reward, supply/demand, fear/greed manias and depressions in stock and futures markets, how is this different than someone with more money than intelligence over-leveraging themselves at the top of a huge bull market?

 

Now I should note that I do not think that people were "victimized" or that they should be taken pity upon. My point is that in the context of lenders, that if you play with fire you run the risk of burning yourself...

 

:)

 

I totally agree.

 

Lenders sure wouldn't have been crying if the market hadn't collapsed and people were eventually paying 13-14% on their mortgages...

 

They took a risk, and unbelieveably foolish one at that, and it blew up in their face.

 

Ya gotta pay the piper sometimes.

 

If I were to open a restaurant and do stupid business practices and I went under, then hey too bad...nodody's gonna help me out, I get to go back to working for someone else...as is the supposed nature of capitalism....but for some reason when these predatory lenders start to suffer for their misdeeds...they call on the government like they were some philanthropic group that fell on bad times....

 

Maybe it has something to do with the ungodly amount of money they funnel to the government in lobbying and campaign contributions each year....

 

This whole thing is just a mess...everyone involved should just own up to their responsibilities and move forward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.