Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

james_gsx

YM, ES and DJIA Analysis

Recommended Posts

Well, thanks to GE this short is looking awfully nice so far. We'll see how today ends, but if we can end on a fairly large red bar, that will be a nice move in the direction of the trade.

 

ENTRY: 72.75 (AGGRESSIVE) OR 69.5 (CONFIRMATION)

CURRENT PRICE: 45.00 = +27.75 OR +24.5 ES PTS

 

@ $50/PT = $1387.50 OR $1225.00 PER CONTRACT TRADED

And that folks, is real money in the bank.

 

There's no 'is this a real sell signal' or junk like that here. We'll leave that to other parts of the forum.

 

;)

 

Note - I did NOT take this swing trade. I wish I did now, but I did not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  james_gsx said:
More money is being made in the CL thread ;)

 

ES day trading, energy markets swing trading, ES swing trading, I can smell the hedge fund money now :o:cool:

 

You said it James.

 

There's potential in the air... I can smell it. :)

 

Oh wait, that's just Cleveland weather. :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't get me started on weather :angry:

 

Four days ago it was 70, the next day it snowed. Then it went back to 70 the next day, so what did it do yesterday? It snowed like 4 inches! By the end of the day all the snow was melted and was cloudy!

 

This fund is going to be run on the beach in the Cayman islands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  james_gsx said:
Don't get me started on weather :angry:

 

Four days ago it was 70, the next day it snowed. Then it went back to 70 the next day, so what did it do yesterday? It snowed like 4 inches! By the end of the day all the snow was melted and was cloudy!

 

This fund is going to be run on the beach in the Cayman islands.

 

Wow, you got snow. Just comfortable here.

 

A fund that is run where it is about 70 degrees all the time and comfortable sounds perfect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
Well, thanks to GE this short is looking awfully nice so far. We'll see how today ends, but if we can end on a fairly large red bar, that will be a nice move in the direction of the trade.

 

ENTRY: 72.75 (AGGRESSIVE) OR 69.5 (CONFIRMATION)

CURRENT PRICE: 45.00 = +27.75 OR +24.5 ES PTS

 

@ $50/PT = $1387.50 OR $1225.00 PER CONTRACT TRADED

And that folks, is real money in the bank.

 

There's no 'is this a real sell signal' or junk like that here. We'll leave that to other parts of the forum.

 

;)

 

Note - I did NOT take this swing trade. I wish I did now, but I did not.

 

With a little over and hour left, the short is making more money!

 

Current price: 37.00 = +35.75 OR +32.5 PTS

 

I personally would not feel comfortable holding over the weekend, so an MOC on most/all of contracts would be appropriate here.

Congrats to anyone that took this gorgeous short opportunity!

 

Note - this was the follow through that we were looking for. It took 4 days to get there, but the move we wanted appeared in a gift from GE this morning.

 

But, this damn candlestick analysis can't possibly work. :roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
With a little over and hour left, the short is making more money!

 

Current price: 37.00 = +35.75 OR +32.5 PTS

 

I personally would not feel comfortable holding over the weekend, so an MOC on most/all of contracts would be appropriate here.

Congrats to anyone that took this gorgeous short opportunity!

 

Note - this was the follow through that we were looking for. It took 4 days to get there, but the move we wanted appeared in a gift from GE this morning.

 

But, this damn candlestick analysis can't possibly work. :roll eyes:

 

Ok, nice trade there. Will run the #'s later, but the bearish follow through I was looking for finally took place today.

 

I would MOC that trade b/c of the weekend. The charts do not say that, it's a personal preference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
  brownsfan019 said:
Oh yeah - no bugs. So we have to find somewhere that is about 70 or so year round, little humidity and no bugs.

 

And no state income tax, either.

 

Sounds like Florida is a good place to start....

 

-fs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It certainly turned out to be a pretty nice setup but the exit is the key to how much is 'banked'. I guess there is an argument for not watching intraday so you don't get wiggled out early as I am sure I would have). There was quite a lot of heat early in the trade. I'm interested if people would still hold or exit and why? I guess you are assuming exit here? Presumably today was a wide candle but would be interested in your rationale? Wouldn't want to loose it all to a big green bar Monday :) That to me would be of more value than how much coulda woulda shoulda been made.

 

I was short the FTSE this morning and just about to cover for a few points cause it just wasn't moving off resistance Actually it was much like the daily ES before we got the break but on a low tick chart just going sideways right under resistance. Then bang off she went with barley a retrace and a very easy trade to hold. I had a look at the news to see what was going on, I knew there was something up somewhere! Gotta learn patience almost threw it away! :crap:

 

ES wasnt bad later in the day but I didnt have the stomach for those larger retraces so actually did worse exiting and re-entering than if I had just sat tight after the early morning congestion. That's a topic for another day.

 

Anyway the crack came and I stuck with it better than I might have thanks in part to discusiing things in this thread :thumbs up:

 

 

And for some bizarre reason I thought it was Thursday and almost ended up holding the weekend :doh: as its not I wish you all a good weekendl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blowfish you bring up some great points. There were many ways to trade this setup and it all really comes down to your plan. As noted earlier, I took the first spinning top and exited right after the opening bell due to the 15 min chart. But it really comes down to your own plan. But the candles DID tell us that price was being rejected at resistance.

 

I won't lie, this was one of those awkward trading moments. No one really knew what was coming next. We stuck to our charts that said down, and eventually we got that move. Just goes to show that you don't need to know what will happen next, but if you stick to your plan and use probabilities to your advantage you will come out on top. In this case, we came out on top.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
Why must there be only one exit?

 

Exactly it just comes down to your plan. If you can only trade one contract you may take a more conservative approach to lock in the profits - maybe not. You could also scale out depending on various factors.

 

Candles don't provide price targets or anything like that, which is another reason why some don't like it. But if you use an oscillator, support/resistance, whatever then you can probably make it work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
Why must there be only one exit?

 

I certainly didn't say there must be only one exit :) I would imagine peeling some of at each layer of support would make sense, particularly if you get a hammer there. Certainly need some criteria for exit though.

 

EDIT: James it's tough when you drop down closer to the action, zooming back out again can be a problem. The same pitfalls can exist when you drop down to say a 1 minute chart to finesse an entry of a more 'major' daily S/R. (well to me they are as I get drawn down the rabbit hole often as not) A great trader I knew called it tickittis. Mind you trading off the hourly was tikkitis to him he liked to focus on the monthly...gave him time to think he always said).

 

I can't recall (and too lazy to fire up charts) but I think it did poke up before it went down? I guess waiting for that last test/upthrust has a lot of merit.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
I certainly didn't say there must be only one exit :) I would imagine peeling some of at each layer of support would make sense, particularly if you get a hammer there. Certainly need some criteria for exit though.

 

Yes, there need to be criteria for exits. But the nearly universal problem that beginning traders have with regard to exits is a desire to trade all in then all out. Add to that the fact that they are nearly always trading with one contract or one lot, and you have a doomed setup.

 

The solution to exits is a simple one: trade as if you were trading five contracts or five lots and abandon the idea of being able to exit with all of them at the exact top or bottom. The goal is to make money, not to prove to oneself what a superior trader one is.

 

Then determine in advance where each of those contracts will be sold. For example, if one is trading support and resistance, sell the first contract at one or the other. Sell the second contract, for example, at the lower high or the break of the trendline, whichever comes first. Sell the third at whatever you didn't sell at for the second. Sell the fourth, for example, at a breach of the last swing low. Leave the fifth, for example, at breakeven.

 

Then sell the first contract at whatever point you predetermined and paper trade the other four. Do this for several months. When it becomes second nature, carry the second contract for real. Sell the first and second contracts at your predetermined points. Paper trade the remaining three.

 

And so on.

 

Simple.

 

No wringing of the hands, no thumb-twiddling, no head banging.

 

Send the thank-you gifts via PayPal :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice short Brownsfan - hopefully was of value to a few people!

 

Keep up the good work.

 

I actually bought the close of the ES @ 1335. Expecting a bounce Monday. See how we go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
It certainly turned out to be a pretty nice setup but the exit is the key to how much is 'banked'. I guess there is an argument for not watching intraday so you don't get wiggled out early as I am sure I would have). There was quite a lot of heat early in the trade.

 

What exactly is 'a lot of heat early in the trade'? The 2nd trade (1st one stopped) had practically ZERO heat. I'll put a chart up below for your viewing.

 

  Quote

I'm interested if people would still hold or exit and why? I guess you are assuming exit here? Presumably today was a wide candle but would be interested in your rationale? Wouldn't want to loose it all to a big green bar Monday :) That to me would be of more value than how much coulda woulda shoulda been made.

 

I would consider an exit at 4:14pm EST on Friday due the weekend. Since I am not swing trading live, it's hard to say for sure what to do here.

 

  DbPhoenix said:
Why must there be only one exit?

 

There doesn't have to be. As my initial trade plan showed, there were multiple exit zones. See chart below.

 

 

 

 

And here's the chart:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=5980&stc=1&d=1208017032

 

 

According to the chart:

 

1) We'd like to see 1320 retested. Expect a bounce here unless the bears can really push it through.

 

2) As with most WRB's - expect some pause on Monday due to a long, prolonged move the preceding day. If you look at the above chart and find the WRB's, you'll see most times that the next day or two is what we define as 'chop' or indecision. It's common after a big move that we see a day or two of everyone taking a breath and seeing where the next move is. As a any day-trader will attest to, that is very common on the intraday moves.

 

3) If 1320 can be broken, we have our choice of when/where to exit the trade.

 

My concerns for holding the trade overnight at this point would be:

 

1) Holding into a weekend.

 

2) Holding after a nice red WRB. As we've seen too many times price will just chug along after an extended move like that.

 

Therefore, closing the entire trade or most of it at MOC on Friday was a good play in my eyes. I'm a bit more cautious than some, esp on swing plays, so time will tell what the appropriate move should have been. But, no looking at hindsight charts here - all in real-time baby. ;)

 

Summary:

 

ENTRY: 72.75 (AGGRESSIVE) OR 69.5 (CONFIRMATION)

EXIT MOC: 35.50

 

PROFIT IF TAKEN AT MOC: +37.25 OR +34

 

$ BANKED IF MOC: $1862.50/CT OR $1700.00/CT

 

(ALL FIGURES ARE GROSS)

 

AS ALWAYS, PLEASE DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK BEFORE PLACING ANY REAL MONEY ON THE LINE. YES, HERE WAS A VERY PROFITABLE TRADE BUT IT DOESN'T ALWAYS WORK LIKE THAT.

5aa70e550cc3d_TLES.png.17c6701d4a65c5259d86f0ac7ad533b4.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
Oh yeah - if you are sending $ to DB for some nice 'thought' posts, then feel free to send 25% of the profits booked on this trade in real-time. Send me a PM for my email address to send profits too.

 

;)

 

Damn right! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brown thanks for the write up. Might ask are you a 're-enterer'? If you entered on the first arrow when we first started talking about this would you re-enter on the second one if stopped out? or do you tend to put your stops further than the traditional '1 tick away from the last swing high' and hold tough until bar close? Would you employ the same tactics for a swing as you do intraday? Guess it's hard to say for sure if not a swinger.

 

BTW why did you not pick the day before the second arrow? That seemed like a great candidate but would also have had heat. Looks almost identical tbh. The devils in the detail and just trying to to really understand that.

 

I guess James should be in for 25% too :) though we could all just take the trade next time and all be paid :) . Personally I often risk 10 points intraday on a string of trades so putting that all at risk on a single swing just requires a shift in focus. Every now and then I am tempted to 'swing on the side' :o Actually I now have a spreadbet account for this purpose I can 'play' for say £5.00 a point a 'just for fun' amount. Paying a tick or two spread is no big deal if you are swinging and it is tax free too!

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Brown thanks for the write up. Might ask are you a 're-enterer'? If you entered on the first arrow when we first started talking about this would you re-enter on the second one if stopped out? or do you tend to put your stops further than the traditional '1 tick away from the last swing high' and hold tough until bar close? Would you employ the same tactics for a swing as you do intraday? Guess it's hard to say for sure if not a swinger.

 

Great questions. I would simply have been stopped on the 1st and looked to re-enter on the 2nd based on my trading style currently.

 

  Quote
BTW why did you not pick the day before the second arrow? That seemed like a great candidate but would also have had heat. Looks almost identical tbh. The devils in the detail and just trying to to really understand that.

 

Correct - another possible short, I did not put the arrow b/c it did not confirm (close below the low the following day). So if entering via our aggressive style, that would have been the 2nd short. Good eye. ;)

 

  Quote
I guess James should be in for 25% too :) though we could all just take the trade next time and all be paid :) . Personally I often risk 10 points intraday on a string of trades so putting that all at risk on a single swing just requires a shift in focus. Every now and then I am tempted to 'swing on the side' :o Actually I now have a spreadbet account for this purpose I can 'play' for say £5.00 a point a 'just for fun' amount. Paying a tick or two spread is no big deal if you are swinging and it is tax free too!

 

Cheers.

 

You got it! It would be nice to create small, close group of traders that are using the same ideas to make money together. It would probably require a move OFF of a public forum, but who knows where this could go. I know myself and James trade very similarly now and it would be nice to get a few others that are similar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:

According to the chart:

 

2) As with most WRB's - expect some pause on Monday due to a long, prolonged move the preceding day. If you look at the above chart and find the WRB's, you'll see most times that the next day or two is what we define as 'chop' or indecision. It's common after a big move that we see a day or two of everyone taking a breath and seeing where the next move is. As a any day-trader will attest to, that is very common on the intraday moves.

 

My concerns for holding the trade overnight at this point would be:

 

2) Holding after a nice red WRB. As we've seen too many times price will just chug along after an extended move like that.

 

 

So far, Monday has gone according to plan. No real trend moves, just nice, easy bounces that are easy money-makers.

 

As of 2:20pm EST we've had 2 real attempts to push price higher and the bears pushed it right back down. A test of the LOD (25.75) would be very favorable for the swing trade bearish position. We'll see if it can test that low here before the EOD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

According to the chart:

 

2) As with most WRB's - expect some pause on Monday due to a long, prolonged move the preceding day. If you look at the above chart and find the WRB's, you'll see most times that the next day or two is what we define as 'chop' or indecision. It's common after a big move that we see a day or two of everyone taking a breath and seeing where the next move is. As a any day-trader will attest to, that is very common on the intraday moves.

 

My concerns for holding the trade overnight at this point would be:

 

2) Holding after a nice red WRB. As we've seen too many times price will just chug along after an extended move like that.

 

It's almost as if you could design a system around that information...

 

hmmmm......

 

:hmmmm:

 

 

Where's Walter when you need him!?!? :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.