Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

james_gsx

YM, ES and DJIA Analysis

Recommended Posts

I'm going to let this work. I am looking to enter @ the close of the spinning top, so I need a little down move. I may get a nice fill here or be stuck watching...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4686&stc=1&d=1199767045

 

 

Looking to enter @ 12867.

IF it triggers, stop will go out @ 12781 (one tick from low of spinning top).

 

No profit target out there right now. I'll see how this looks tomorrow morning.

 

PS

I think I blurred out the important stuff, but if you see something, please let me know.

5aa70e3126ac7_tlymtrade.png.4ae33d6edcb492046d4e01d58b0dcf61.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

note - proper trade planning would have entered @ the close of business on 1/7/08. That is what 'proper planning' would have done. So, I may not get the fill that I should have, but that's ok. James and I will work this trade live and see how it goes.

 

Anyone else in?

 

:cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I just entered after the market closed is quite simple, I wouldn't enter otherwise. I need to accept the fact price might move around and I could take a slightly bigger hit but I'm willing to take that if it means I actually take the trade. That's my biggest problem... I don't take trades. I didn't do all of this work to be an analyst. Next time I'll try to enter at a better price, but for now I've done all the necessary homework and it's a matter of just doing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  james_gsx said:
The reason I just entered after the market closed is quite simple, I wouldn't enter otherwise. I need to accept the fact price might move around and I could take a slightly bigger hit but I'm willing to take that if it means I actually take the trade. That's my biggest problem... I don't take trades. I didn't do all of this work to be an analyst. Next time I'll try to enter at a better price, but for now I've done all the necessary homework and it's a matter of just doing it.

 

There you go, that's what this is about.

 

Whether this trade works or not is irrelevant, even though it may not seem that way when looking at your P&L. Placing the trade is a big step. Now let it work and do it's job. Some work, some don't. That's part of the game.

NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS, YOU CANNOT GET TOO COCKY OR DISCOURAGED AT THE OUTCOME OF THIS ONE TRADE.

 

PS

You have my email address if you need it tomorrow. If you want my cell, send me an email as I will be trading intraday tomorrow and rest of the week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
Off to bed here... :sleep:

 

We'll see what the overnight session holds for this trade. Still working the mentioned limit order.

 

Well, no fill here and this thing could be running away.

 

I was tempted to grab some before off to be and I should have now in hindsight. James is currently up approx 19 pts on the trade during the overnight session. Not too bad so far.

 

This brings up a very interesting observation on my end - while looking at after the fact charts, you cannot assume you always got a fill since the mini's trade round the clock. In other words, the preferred entry here was at the close on 1/7 and you needed to pull the trigger right @ the close or right at the open at 4:30pm. By the time I got to the party, price had pulled away and very well may not come back to my entry price now.

 

This is a potential problem for a number of reasons for any swing trader:

 

1) At some point you have to decide if you want to chase or not. If you chase, the stop just got bigger.

 

2) If the trade works and you are not in the trade due to poor planning, it will bite you in the butt real quick. The word bitter comes to mind.

 

So our little exercise here has proven so far that you have to be ready to act when the time comes. If James and I had found this sooner, there may have been a shot to get my preferred entry. Now, James is in profit while I was sleeping and now I have to decide whether to chase or let it go and wait. I think I may chase. :roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the NQ would have been the better trade, could have set the target right around 2,000 and would have already been out.

 

Edit: I got out, the internals were disagreeing with my position. The TRIN has been climbing higher and is now above 1.0, the ticks are spending more time below 0. Price hit yesterdays high then sold off. These were good enough reasons for me to sell and lock in my profits. NQ and ES are looking similar, if we rally into the close and I leave money on the table then it's a lesson learned. I know I'd beat myself if I let a winning position turn into a loser while seeing solid reasons to exit.

Edited by james_gsx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  james_gsx said:
Looks like the NQ would have been the better trade, could have set the target right around 2,000 and would have already been out.

 

Edit: I got out, the internals were disagreeing with my position. The TRIN has been climbing higher and is now above 1.0, the ticks are spending more time below 0. Price hit yesterdays high then sold off. These were good enough reasons for me to sell and lock in my profits. NQ and ES are looking similar, if we rally into the close and I leave money on the table then it's a lesson learned. I know I'd beat myself if I let a winning position turn into a loser while seeing solid reasons to exit.

 

The ONLY debate I have here James is that you are using INTRADAY data to dictate your DAILY trade.

 

I'm long and we'll see how it goes. As I told you in the chat room, we need some afternoon bulls to step in or this may be one of the failures. Stop not in danger (yet).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey fellas hows it goin!?! Been a while since I been back here. Long holidays and all after finishing uni. James is orange now! hehe. How's everyone doing in their trades? I'm hopping back onto the trading bandwagon come next week after some long well deserved rest. What a time to come back in! Wish I'd been short from a few weeks ago.

Lets start some analysis tomorrow!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the entire Thread. Very impressed with the two main contributors, keep up the good work ( my expectations were exceeded ):

 

Here is my Trade for Monday,

 

Buy STOP 1412.75 and Limit Buy 1400.25 ( In case the 1400 Level is Tested first during GLOBEX.

 

If Filled at 1412.75, Stop Loss : 1363

If --------1400.25, ----------: 1363 Below March 14, 2007 Low

 

SETUP:

 

  • 1. Nine Points Bullish Hammer -30min
  • 2. Banking Sector ( $BKX ) Weekly Bullish Hammer at RSI=30 Upcross
  • and STO Upcross
  • 3. SP500 Daily: Vol. Osc. at -84% Extreme Historical Reading
  • 4. SP500 60min: Vol Osc. at -1% rising from -10%
  • SP500 Weekly: Extreme High Volume Bullish Hammer
  • ( shadow twice the body)
  • 5. NASDAQ 60min: Series of six consecutive Lower Dojis and Vol. Osc at -15% Divergent to Lower Prices
  • 6. Nasdaq Daily: Vol. Osc. at - 66% Extreme Reading
  • 7. VIX Daily : Inside Day Bearish Doji and Crossdown of STOCH.
  • 8. NYSE Advance/Decline Divergence

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4740&stc=1&d=1200172749

5aa70e32deafe_ESH8-30min-CANDLES-Jan-11-Friday-BUYSignal.thumb.PNG.9d502d55232ce713f7a0feb181a66818.PNG

5aa70e32e477e_BankingSector-WEEKLY-Candles-STO-RSI.thumb.PNG.b0c50e6028133fb0fc08a878894db4f1.PNG

Edited by Ronin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Ronin said:
Read the entire Thread. Very impressed with the two main contributors, keep up the good work ( my expectations were exceeded ):

 

Here is my Trade for Monday,

 

Buy STOP 1412.75 and Limit Buy 1400.25 ( In case the 1400 Level is Tested first during GLOBEX.

 

If Filled at 1412.75, Stop Loss : 1363

If --------1400.25, ----------: 1363 Below March 14, 2007 Low

 

SETUP:

 

  • 1. Nine Points Bullish Hammer -30min
  • 2. Banking Sector ( $BKX ) Weekly Bullish Hammer at RSI=30 Upcross
  • and STO Upcross
  • 3. SP500 Daily: Vol. Osc. at -84% Extreme Historical Reading
  • 4. SP500 60min: Vol Osc. at -1% rising from -10%
  • SP500 Weekly: Extreme High Volume Bullish Hammer
  • ( shadow twice the body)
  • 5. NASDAQ 60min: Series of six consecutive Lower Dojis and Vol. Osc at -15% Divergent to Lower Prices
  • 6. Nasdaq Daily: Vol. Osc. at - 66% Extreme Reading
  • 7. VIX Daily : Inside Day Bearish Doji and Crossdown of STOCH.
  • 8. NYSE Advance/Decline Divergence

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=4740&stc=1&d=1200172749

 

9:05pm - GLOBEX Filled : LONG 1412.75

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.