Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

momentom

MP and Currencies

Recommended Posts

Anyone successfully using MP with currencies?

 

How do you organize your profiles? 24 hour or just the time zone you trade. Currency day is really three days so how do you look at it? What is the real VA and POC?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use European hours only. The overwhelming majority of currency trading takes place in London so when looking at value it makes sense to look at it from the perspective of London traders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been reading up on Dalton's book and I myself had the same question. It seems a logical choice to use London session as a starting point. But we can't ignore the other volume areas that may play a crucial role. In simple S/R, Tokyo and NY highs and lows play an important part of the price action movements so I think it's tricky using MP with currencies. I think Dalton used bonds are the main instrument as an example but he did use currencies and used the entire session (24-hr format). I'm testing out a few ideas right now so we'll see how it goes.

 

Notouch, you see any edge in using MP for London session only?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes because the London value area often comes into play in the following London session. For example if price gaps higher it may test the previous day's VAH. I tried it on a 24 hour time frame and found it quite useless because price during the Asian session in particular just trades in a narrow range with very little volume giving the impression that value is being created in that price area but in reality it's just because so few trades are taking place. Even where there is a trend in the Asian session causing a gap this gap will usually be partially or totally filled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just wondering if you have tried using VOLUME based MP... TPOs dont work because it gives the same weight to low volume session ( like asian) based on time@price as it does to EU or US session.

Note: I am not trading currencies, but was helping another trader doing research/testing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

torero, as far as I know, there is not central clearing house for forex, no common quote system. One is trading via broker, which provides, sw, quotes and liquidity for traders that participate with them. Setup is similar with "bucket shops" from the days of old ( Jesse Livermore). The only volume you could possibly see is the local shop volume. The system is setup as inter-banking system, and forex traders are small, very small fraction of the volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nick, I trade forex so I'm aware of the fact there is no volume. The tick is the best substitute, PP himself uses this to best gauge the volume as close as possible. I think it's the really the only chance of getting something out of forex. However, I'm trying incorporate tick charts into my trading but so far, the best is the time charts (15-,60-,240-min and higher charts). I can only assume Anna-Marie and her colleagues don't use volume to trade, am I correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to apply MP to currency futures (EUR, GBP) which I'm starting to study. I see discussion started on whether the 24hr or a specific time zone is the preferred profile setup. I chose to start with the 24hr format but segment the profile to reflect my time zone (PDT start of RTH with capital 'A' period). Asian and London has already completed and are lower case. This setup "isolates" my time frame part of the profile. This is just a start of my observation but it appears 24hr POCs get respect. Has anyone else continued to study MP and currencies?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could look into Ensign, as they have price histogram....

 

They use price over time instead of volume, which is still a very good indication of AMT.

 

Works for forex too....as it doesn't rely on volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Reaver for your input. I'm using an MP EasyLanguage "plug-in" to my MultiCharts software. Early on in this thread there was discussion on what was best to use as a base timeframe. I think it drilled down to London or 24Hr. I think MP with Currencies (Forex or Futures) is an interesting discussion which could be expanded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Reaver for your input. I'm using an MP EasyLanguage "plug-in" to my MultiCharts software. Early on in this thread there was discussion on what was best to use as a base timeframe. I think it drilled down to London or 24Hr. I think MP with Currencies (Forex or Futures) is an interesting discussion which could be expanded.

 

No problem. Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love using MP for futures and I'm interested in incorporating it into Forex trading. I think I will use the London open to US equity market close for my profile...2am EST to 4pm EST. Its a rare occasion that the Asian market time frame offers anything significant.

 

I use MetaTrader4 for my Forex charting and there are a few MP indicators out there, but none of them are desirable since they don't have Value Area or IB data, so I've been charting it manually for the time being on Excel which is a chore to say the least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My software squawks about being more than 24 hrs when I try to set London open through US close. I also have a spreadsheet so I may set it up there for comparison. Since I only look at the Euro and Pound futures, London close (as mentioned early on in the thread) might be a setup too because of the London/Euro/US overlap. BTW, there was a nice pullback trade off the 24Hr VAH in the EUR today.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

btrader2, do you calculate the VAH and VAL using 24 hour info or your customized period? I know there is a site out there that calculates VAL, POC and VAH when you plug in the data, but I'd prefer to have Excel do that for me, especially since I watch 10 currencies and don't feel like plugging in numbers for the rest of my life! The problem is that I can't figure out the calculations on Excel...not even sure its possible...but if it is, can someone here let me know how?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bronxterp,

 

For currency futures I have my symbols set to GLOBEX for FX futures which is 17:00 to 16:00 Central. The calculations for VAH, VAL, and POC is done by the MP software I have for the MultiCharts charting package I use. You may want to look at a charting package that has MP included since you are looking at 10 currencies daily for MP analysis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
btrader2, do you calculate the VAH and VAL using 24 hour info or your customized period? I know there is a site out there that calculates VAL, POC and VAH when you plug in the data, but I'd prefer to have Excel do that for me, especially since I watch 10 currencies and don't feel like plugging in numbers for the rest of my life! The problem is that I can't figure out the calculations on Excel...not even sure its possible...but if it is, can someone here let me know how?

 

Hi bronxterp,

I suggest you'll have a look there:

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/6/mp-on-excel-1306-8.html

the spreadhseet might be useful to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.