Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jperl

Trading with Market Statistics VII. Breakout Trades at the PVP

Recommended Posts

  Dogpile said:
is it fair to say that PVP is really a proxy for peak volume area? I mean, if you have a cluster of huge volume in one area -- but the PVP happens to be slightly higher in another area, it would seem to me that the cluster of huge volume is more important than the particular PVP... is that right?

Well, if your intent is to integrate over a small price region, where the integration is consistently done for the whole distribution, then that is another interpretation for the distribution. But that's not how I look at it in terms of determining the types of trading zones. The PVP is whatever it is. It's possible for the PVP to oscillate back and forth between the two peaks, but to do that requires price action to oscillate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jerry,

 

How did you determine the breakout would be to the upside when the 4 bars back hit the high around 13230ish. I would usually consider that a flush and would have a hard time playing that particular breakout trade. Also, what timeframe are you using in your videos? Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
Hi Jerry,

 

How did you determine the breakout would be to the upside when the 4 bars back hit the high around 13230ish. I would usually consider that a flush and would have a hard time playing that particular breakout trade. Also, what timeframe are you using in your videos? Thanks

 

Hi James,

Chart is a 2 minute chart of YM.

To answer your question, breakout trades are dangerous to take under any circumstances. As you indicated, you noticed four bars back, price action broke out above the 1st SD and then failed to continue. Second breakout could have failed also. Tough call. I usually don't take breakouts. But if I do, I will move my stop to breakeven quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jperl said:
Hi James,

Chart is a 2 minute chart of YM.

To answer your question, breakout trades are dangerous to take under any circumstances. As you indicated, you noticed four bars back, price action broke out above the 1st SD and then failed to continue. Second breakout could have failed also. Tough call. I usually don't take breakouts. But if I do, I will move my stop to breakeven quickly.

 

Thanks Jerry. I agree breakout at those points are extremely dangerous. I have been whipsawed heavily many times and now fear of taking these trades. I had thought maybe there was something you were seeing that led you to determine a breakout to the upside. Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi traders,

 

I asked the following question:

(In connection with the market profile and the poc)

 

-What pvp to choose if there is in some (2 or more in the same intraday volume distribution)?

That it closer to the middle of the distribution as for the poc?

 

byebye

Alex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Râlex said:
Hi traders,

 

I asked the following question:

(In connection with the market profile and the poc)

 

-What pvp to choose if there is in some (2 or more in the same intraday volume distribution)?

That it closer to the middle of the distribution as for the poc?

 

byebye

Alex

 

When two humps form in the volume distribution, watch carefully. The peak in the second hump may become the new PVP. At that point in time, the character of the price action can change abruptly. If I am in a trade when that happens, I will usually exit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jperl said:

 

When price action is near the PVP, price is sandwiched between the VWAP and an SD or betwen 2 SD's. You might notice that price will tend to oscillate back and forth for a while between the VWAP and the SD, across the PVP line or oscillate between the 2 SD's. The market is thinking. Do I want to go back to the safety of the high volume zone where most of the trading has taken place or am I adventurous and want to discover new territory in the abyss of low volume. Just wait. Wait for the market to decide what it wants to do, before you decide what you will do.

 

 

Hello Jerry;

 

when skew exists and price breaks through the sd1 curve against the skew, we enter a trade against the skew.

( price < sd1 < pvp < vwap

OR

price > sd1 > pvp > vwap )

 

 

I have the following questions:

 

what is the appropriate course of action when the pvp is between the sd1 curve (first standard deviation) and the sd2 (second standard deviation) curve and price breaks through the sd2 curve?

i.e. when

price < sd2 < pvp < sd1 < vwap

OR

price > sd2 > pvp > sd1 > vwap

a) we enter a trade against the skew

b) do nothing

and why?

 

Additionally, what is the appropriate course of action when the pvp is between the sd1 curve (first standard deviation) and the sd2 (second standard deviation) curve and price returns to the sd1 curve

a) we enter a trade against the skew

b) do nothing

and why?

 

Thank you.

Unicorn.

5aa70e3ad2e07_NQ06-02-2008.thumb.png.27928b7d7964a0275ac53df02402a3ae.png

Edited by unicorn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  unicorn said:

I have the following questions:

 

what is the appropriate course of action when the pvp is between the sd1 curve (first standard deviation) and the sd2 (second standard deviation) curve and price breaks through the sd2 curve?

a) we enter a trade against the skew

b) do nothing

and why?

 

Unicorn,

I discussed this in the first post of this thread. It doesn't matter where the PVP is located(between SD and VWAP or between two SD's), the result is the same.

You have three choices:

a) do nothing. If you are novice this is what you do.

b)play the oscillations between the two SD's. This is what you do if you are a scalper

c)Wait for a breakout out of the PVP zone(the regions between the 2 SD's)

 

As I indicated in the first post, this is a difficult trading region, but can be very profitable if you get it right.

 

 

 

  unicorn said:
Additionally, what is the appropriate course of action when the pvp is between the sd1 curve (first standard deviation) and the sd2 (second standard deviation) curve and price returns to the sd1 curve

 

 

Same answer as above, you can play the oscillation back to SD2 or wait for a breakout back to the VWAP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Jerry,

I'm not sure if this would be the thread or not, but any chance you could post a little "trader bio" on how your trading evolved from when you started and what eventually led you to these ideas?

I'm still slowly integrating your ideas into my style and something like that would be quite interesting/inspirational.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jperl said:

As I indicated in the first post, this is a difficult trading region, but can be very profitable if you get it right.

 

Same answer as above, you can play the oscillation back to SD2 or wait for a breakout back to the VWAP.

 

Thank you Jerry;

 

I do have another question, posted due to its relevance in section X, position trading.

 

Take care.

Unicorn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  darthtrader said:
Hey Jerry,

I'm not sure if this would be the thread or not, but any chance you could post a little "trader bio" on how your trading evolved from when you started and what eventually led you to these ideas?

I'm still slowly integrating your ideas into my style and something like that would be quite interesting/inspirational.

 

I've already posted this in the "Trading with Market Statistics V:" darth.

The specific post is here .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jerry,

 

Do you always deploy the Shapiro effect (excepting break outs)? My thinking is this:- if the bar that touches your your entry 'line' is long you might add 1/2 SD risk and reduce your potential profit by 1/2SD risk or even more. It's the old traders dichotomy trade location or confirmation. I guess one option is to use slightly smaller bars maybe 1 minute. Any thoughts?

 

I think I may have mentioned this before but going through the videos it struck me again that the extra risk and lesser reward can be quite costly to buy some conformation.

 

Edit: With the recent volatility we have seen this maybe less of an issue. It is noticeable in the videos though.

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote
Hi traders' date='

 

I asked the following question:

(In connection with the market profile and the poc)

 

-What pvp to choose if there is in some (2 or more in the same intraday volume distribution)?

That it closer to the middle of the distribution as for the poc?

 

byebye

Alex[/quote'] if there are 2 boobs in one day ,you bet that it returns to the cleavage,deepest spot between the 2 nips,on a bar chart that would most likely be a gap fill,that shows a market imbalance and both buyers at upper nip and sellers at lower nip feel they were wrong and a high percentage of the time it goes back to the middle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
  ammo said:
if there are 2 boobs in one day ,you bet that it returns to the cleavage,deepest spot between the 2 nips,on a bar chart that would most likely be a gap fill,that shows a market imbalance and both buyers at upper nip and sellers at lower nip feel they were wrong and a high percentage of the time it goes back to the middle

 

You're, ummm, talking about MP right? :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Hi Jerry,

 

Do you always deploy the Shapiro effect (excepting break outs)? My thinking is this:- if the bar that touches your your entry 'line' is long you might add 1/2 SD risk and reduce your potential profit by 1/2SD risk or even more. It's the old traders dichotomy trade location or confirmation. I guess one option is to use slightly smaller bars maybe 1 minute. Any thoughts?

 

I think I may have mentioned this before but going through the videos it struck me again that the extra risk and lesser reward can be quite costly to buy some conformation.

 

Edit: With the recent volatility we have seen this maybe less of an issue. It is noticeable in the videos though.

 

You're quite correct blowfish. Any kind of confirmation scheme, reduces reward and increases risk. As to whether I use it or not, it depends on what kind of trading I'm doing. For position trading, I do use it. For scalp trading I don't. For everything in between, I will use it on a fast time scale chart (such as a 15 or 20 sec) to gauge entry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  ammo said:
if there are 2 boobs in one day ,you bet that it returns to the cleavage,deepest spot between the 2 nips,on a bar chart that would most likely be a gap fill,that shows a market imbalance and both buyers at upper nip and sellers at lower nip feel they were wrong and a high percentage of the time it goes back to the middle

 

Ammo, you present an intriguing scenario which needs to be investigated further. The question is: Can the shape of the volume histogram be used to determine price action? You've presented one example, but there are many more. For instance, in your terminology, what happens if there are 3 boobs? How about 1.5 boobs, where 1 boob is larger than the other? How about a p or b shaped histogram, where the boob is split in two? There are clearly many examples. Perhaps you should start a new thread on this subject?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

jerry thats really as far as i've gotten with mp,on a 3 boob day ,we had 2 in the last 10 days,7/7 and 7/14,1 retraced all the way to cleavage under the first boob at 64,and the second one went back to just under the 1st cleavage off the bottom,1238,they were both down days. These are not to common,they show up in these market turning whipsaws ,i do use the p and the b patterns,the only thing i'm bringing up is the cleavage,its always there and no one has given it a fancy 3 letter term ,meanwhile i've been making a good coin on the return to it since i started using mp. Thats all i watch,p and b patterns,nips and cleavage, and when we retrace as we did recently i use the nips and cleavage and daily lows as points to get out of longs,mon,7/7 was a 3 boob day,we retraced from 1240 ,bottom of 3rd down boob to 1265,cleavage under 1st boob of day.the cleavage there is 61-64.Thats a retracement thru all the nips and cleavge so far,The next res if we go higher is the p shape on wed,7/7,the nip on that day is 72-3 and the high for that day is 78,if you combine this with daily trendlines,you will find more res there which is a good confirmation.I find mp useful for this last explanation and mostly for scalping,the small gaps and ledges and cleavage it leaves are great

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jerry,

 

This thread and the next one (Counter trend trades in a symmetrical distribution) are pretty important imo. Even Newbie could benefit by passing on trades that might find themselves back at the PVP.

 

I attach a screen shot from your first video. It shows what I believe is a valid SD1 trade. Two questions.

 

1) Is there anything that might tip you off that price might be heading back to the PVP?? on this chart I think not, maybe the last few days or last weeks stats or other HUPs might have held clues.

 

2) If price finds it's way back to the VWAP and you already have a contract on from SD1 would you use the shapiro effect at the VWAP? I might be inclined just to pull the trigger. If price zooms through as it did here would you be inclined to think OK we are done with this trade lets close it out?

 

There is another difficulty with averaging in (apart from accepting the risk) and that is psychological. If I already have a position and that is short I find that this can give a 'bias'. Actually the bias is justified probably as the scew is in our favour (VWAP<PVP) and the trend is in our favour (Price<VWAP) furthermore we have a plan to add 1 contract at the VWAP.

 

I realise of course that how a trader deals with this situation is largely up to them but any words of wisdom would still be welcome :)

 

Finally thanks for continuing to 'support' these threads.

Cheers.

Nick

Edited by BlowFish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:

I attach a screen shot from your first video. It shows what I believe is a valid SD1 trade. Two questions.

 

1) Is there anything that might tip you off that price might be heading back to the PVP?? on this chart I think not, maybe the last few days or last weeks stats or other HUPs might have held clues.

 

You are correct. From this chart alone there is nothing that would tip you off about a short failure. Which is why I introduced the concept of HUP. If there were a HUP just below the short entry, you might have passed up the short trade.

  BlowFish said:

2) If price finds it's way back to the VWAP and you already have a contract on from SD1 would you use the shapiro effect at the VWAP? I might be inclined just to pull the trigger. If price zooms through as it did here would you be inclined to think OK we are done with this trade lets close it out?

Here is where trade management becomes important. If you were a NEWBIE, you most likely would set a stop at the VWAP and be stopped out.

If you were a more advanced trader, you might pull the trigger at the VWAP and enter a second contract short PROVIDED doing so was still within your risk tolerance.

The other scenario and one that I have never discussed but probably should have is as follows:

You enter the short trade based on the Shapiro effect. But then the trade starts to fail. If price moves above the high of your entry bar, reverse the trade and go long. A very aggressive trader would not only do this but also increase size.

Keep in mind all of this is possible PROVIDED you are within your risk tolerance.

You can see how using risk tolerance rather than stoplosses gives the trader considerably more flexibility.

 

  BlowFish said:
There is another difficulty with averaging in (apart from accepting the risk) and that is psychological. If I already have a position and that is short I find that this can give a 'bias'. Actually the bias is justified probably as the skew is in our favour (VWAP<PVP) and the trend is in our favour (Price<VWAP) furthermore we have a plan to add 1 contract at the VWAP.

 

Yes, the psychological aspect of the trade is one that is difficult to control.

Everything seems to be in your favor for the short, and your emotions tell you that this trade can't be wrong.

In fact you must think differently. When you enter the short, the first thing that you must do is decide exactly what you will do if the trade moves against you. Will you wait for the price action to move to the VWAP? Will you reverse the trade? Will you increase size?

The easiest thing to do is set a stoploss and forget about it. In my opinion this will never lead to profits.

Active management is the key to a successful outcome of every trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  dbntina said:
Everyone,

 

I have the two eld's complete that will plot the tick by tick pvp on a minute based chart using ADE (Kudos to BAMBOO..Thanks :) in Tradestation and it is integrated so that you can see the VWAP and SD bands with the tick by tick PVP all on one chart.

 

I do not want to post indicators here because I just don't want to be that formal and try and support a bunch of questions, etc. It works fine for stock indexes but for some reason different computers with different versions have to make slight modifications to a section of the code dealing with the minmove keyword.

 

The code is set up for price increments less than a point. It would be easy to modify the code for other prices...but I am not trying to create professional level software for all situations right now. Just creating accurate code for following JPERL's threads currently in ES and NQ.

 

So I don't feel comfortable posting the code for all futures...stocks etc. But if you are a tradestation user and you would like the code...email me here and I will send it to you.

 

The code is keeping track of volume at every price on a tick by tick basis so would not be hard to plot trendlines as a histogram so eventually I will go there but I don't know how soon I will get to it.

 

Cheers :D

 

 

Hope it helps,

 

dbntina

Hi Dbntina,

Would appretiate the ELD code for PVP. Have coded something myself but still buggy.

Looks like this method must be quite mature by now. How have you been doing with it.

Trading eminis for 12 years.. always fun to try new things.

Cheers

Bruce

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sbatrader said:
I use Interactive Brokers. Anybody out there knows how to plot Standard Deviation (SD) on the charts on the IB platform? Thanks

 

I'm not aware that IB provides SD for anything. VWAP may be available as and algorithm.

Check the help file in IB for VWAP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sbatrader said:
I use Interactive Brokers. Anybody out there knows how to plot Standard Deviation (SD) on the charts on the IB platform? Thanks

 

bollinger bands is based on SD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.