Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

SMH semiconductor ETF, Weekly chart.

 

We are buying this based on technical signals, but the WW pattern is there too.

 

It's right on the line, at an inflection point. Breaking out on the TRIX pattern daily chart, weekly at TRIX support and turning up. Looking at the weekly chart volume has declined. Holding in a mild parallel channel uptrend.

MyScreenHunter.thumb.jpg.7f3715368c6b5d1027dece7746f02154.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here's an update of the Es daily patterns i had posted recently. the bearish wedge has been breached/ invalidated. the bullish scenario is still intact however - and not far from point 5. also, it has a familiar 'Gartley' look, that could be forming as well.

 

(the failed bearish WW formation is what i had thought OAC was referring to

in a previous post. after re-reading his comment, it's obviously something entirely different.)

ES_Dailey.png.c3c37c7a6849e9659ed88731b1538971.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Similar to what bub saw in the ES. Three Wws in the attached png. The second one worked, will the current and third (numbered) bullish Ww work? After today, countertrend traders could be few and far between.

5aa70e3022fe7_WwES2008-01-04_193627.png.b400f1a67f610eef394ecbbca5a0b401.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think we have one here boys and girls... everyone else must be seeing this as a double bottom (Using the end of Nov. lows).

 

My only concern was the momentum that built on the movement from point 4 to point 5. I think it will be a tough crawl back up.

 

Here's my chart of the SPY, 60minute chart. I threw in the Andrew's chart for perspective...

 

I'm long again.

MyScreenHunter.jpg.3700df2603233f0478080b7a710db2d8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dang that looks like a nice place to get long. how would you play it, on such a big timeframe? i think i would zoom to a fast chart - pick a nice spot hopefully.

i guess thats the generic play tho...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a good question bubba. This is still a high risk entry that hasn't confirmed a higher movement. I am following a system that buys weakness, it will exit relatively quickly on strength here based on the daily time frame. In the past I have had over 75% profitable trades using this methodology.

As far as trading off the wolfe wave, I would wait for an impulse move higher and then pullback.

 

Looking at the S&P 100 (OEX) it looks a little more like a descending channel. I will look to take some off at this Andrew's line >> >

MyScreenHunter.jpg.eeaa5ad173577f4e3751cb72bb15ecb6.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here's a small timeframe ww in progress.

AH tho - hate messin with 'em in AH.

 

it is with the trend, which brings up another question.

are WW's with or against the overall trend significant?

2300v_ES.png.2c48237697ade3b28cc9bec896f6c0c9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I see that too. What I think a lot of people are looking at is the gap down on 1/04.

 

Gap analysis has been around for a long time and people look for the gap location to mark the 50% point of a move. If you measure it out we are about there now.

 

This gap location is the current balance pt of the market.

 

The risk reward is skewed to the upside currently, in my opinion...

 

Hey that was a nice intraday one you noticed, bubba! Were you able to get a trade out on it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  waveslider said:
Hey that was a nice intraday one you noticed, bubba! Were you able to get a trade out on it?

 

nosir, i watched it abit tho - you could have captured a point or 2 maybe, but the pattern reversed pretty quickly. it would be rare for me to put a trade on in AH. honestly, it's rare i put any trades on. work most every day, plus - being a N00b, gawd.. but i'm working on it

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ES 1200 anybody?

Looks like every bearish Ww EPA is hit and every bullish Ww rejected. There is a convergence of some bearish Ww EPAs from all the way back in 10/17/01 There has got to be some buyers there, you think? :)

5aa70e351d420_WwES1200anybody2008-01-21_191714.thumb.jpg.943278c21ac303296316530e2d71e8eb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  thrunner said:
ES 1200 anybody?

Looks like every bearish Ww EPA is hit and every bullish Ww rejected. There is a convergence of some bearish Ww EPAs from all the way back in 10/17/01 There has got to be some buyers there, you think? :)

 

The term Wolfe Wave came from the gentleman who originated it: Mr. Bill Wolfe. For many years, he had a course on his website selling for $3000 and I believe still do.

My friend took the course and I had the previlege of peeking at it at one time. I can tell you that he hardly uses the EPA, and most of his 1-3-5 lines are nearly horizontal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me clear some of the confusions that may be out there. There is a difference between the 1-4 target line and the EPA. EPA is defined as the apex of the 1-4 target line when we 've arrived at the ETA which is the point where 2-4 line intersects the 1-3 line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Thrunner, OAC - -

 

OAC has a great point about the lines being horizontal - -the pattern should occur in a real sideways range. OAC, I like your avatar shot. - have you ever been surfing?

 

Thrunner - - OAC is right about the ETA component, it is very faulty - not really worth watching in my opinion. Right of you to notice that when WWs aren't working, there is a strong trend intact and the mini-rallies that never reach targets are just providing fuel for a further move in the trend direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bubba said:
here's a pretty acceptable WW (at least to me) in progress as i type.(

 

bubba, I'm trying to reproduce your chart, but I can't get it to work. I've got Tradestation, but I can't find any setting for "Vol Bars". To me, volume bars in Tradestation are "Share" bars", and if you start with "Format Symbol" then go to settings, and click "volume" you get a chart that is labelled as "Share Bars". Furthermore, on the ES, 137 share bars would be WAY too fast to be useful. So, PLEASE tell me what you're doing to get "137 Vol Bars" on Tradestation? Could this be a new feature in version 8.3? (I'm still back on TS version 8.2).

Please explain!

 

Thanks, Taz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bubba said:
w/ ts2000i 137v = 13,700 volume bars.

sorry for the confusion Tasuki.

 

Thanks, Bubba. I didn't know the old 2000i terminology.

Out of sheer curiosity, why pick the number 13,700? Anything special about that setting?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe, nosir.. i just pick a speed that is slow, medium, or fast basically. a chart that reflects the rhythm i'm looking for.

i never bought in to the 'special' number theory. but what do i know? not much really..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey tasuki, I don't know if you are aware of this but there is a setting I just found under format symbol that asks whether you would like to you trade volume or tick count for tick volume. Just thought I'd pass that along

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.