Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Could someone please enlighten me as to the Wolfe Wave numbering for the pivots on the previous charts? That trade may have worked out, but it sure doesn't look like any Wolfe Wave we've discussed in this thread previously.

Taz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Hi Tresor

i think orange pattern was too small(imho).

 

Size does matter in bed. Not in Wolfe trading.;)

Edited by Tresor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Could someone please enlighten me as to the Wolfe Wave numbering for the pivots on the previous charts?

 

Not sure what you mean by ''pivots''. If they mean points (1,2,3,4,5) then they were counted correctly.

 

That trade may have worked out, but it sure doesn't look like any Wolfe Wave we've discussed in this thread previously.

Taz

 

I glimpsed at the pictures in this thread. What you guys discussed previously was not Wolfe. 99% of the charts were wrong. I would have traded maybe 2 - 4 pictures that had been posted so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure what you mean by ''pivots''. If they mean points (1,2,3,4,5) then they were counted correctly.

I glimpsed at the pictures in this thread. What you guys discussed previously was not Wolfe. 99% of the charts were wrong. I would have traded maybe 2 - 4 pictures that had been posted so far.

 

Tresor, respectfully, if you don't know what pivots are, how would you know what a Wolfe Wave is? I don't want to degrade the disussion into an argument, so we can agree to disagree, but I'm not convinced that you are correct. Wolfe Waves work because they reflect the psychology of traders, as I have stated in earlier posts, and the characteristics of Wolfe Waves that mark that psychology do not appear to be present in your charts--but I could be wrong--it would really help if you would annotate your charts with the WW numbering system (for the record, the numbers refer to pivot points).

 

Regards,

Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Tresor, respectfully, if you don't know what pivots are, how would you know what a Wolfe Wave is?

 

I wasn't sure what you meant by pivots. My first EA coded my Mr Clyde Lee was based on pivots.

 

I don't want to degrade the disussion into an argument, so we can agree to disagree, but I'm not convinced that you are correct. Wolfe Waves work because they reflect the psychology of traders, as I have stated in earlier posts, and the characteristics of Wolfe Waves that mark that psychology do not appear to be present in your charts--but I could be wrong--it would really help if you would annotate your charts with the WW numbering system (for the record, the numbers refer to pivot points).

 

Regards,

Tasuki

 

The discoverer of Wolfe wrote on his website that he had never seen a properly drawn / identified Wolfe Wave on any website. And I agree with him. Till now. I posted a few charts with properly identified and properly traded Wolfes.

 

You can now e-mail him a link to this forum and request that his claim is removed from his website.

 

Regarding the psychology of traders you raised (still not sure what you mean by this). You can assess the psychological aspect reviewing (i) the price action and (ii) the volume histogram (which I purposefully did not placed in my screenshots).

 

I can clearly see the psychology of traders in my charts. But again the type of psychology that I look for in a Wolfe and the type of psychology that I may consider essential for a good trade may differ from the psychology you are looking for / you see.

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Do you have Wolfes original material Tresor?

 

No, I don't. And hopefully for Wolfe traders and unfortunately for non-Wolfe traders these will never get published :embarassed:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reason I asked was how you know you have the right 'official' interpretation? :) Not that it matters if it works for you. I guess your take is pretty much the same as WaveSliders? I also guess that many people have based there understanding on Street Smarts and there might be an 'error' in that, though I am inclined to think there is no secret sauce as Wolfe intimates. More likely that he is trying to justify the $3k or whatever the course is/was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Reason I asked was how you know you have the right 'official' interpretation? :)

 

I interacted with a Wolfe master for some time some time ago. You can tell that you have the official interpretation when 100% of your trades hit EPA. Mine success rate is only 80%, which means I still do not have all the answers. But it is enough to tell a Wolfe from a non-Wolfe.

 

More likely that he is trying to justify the $3k or whatever the course is/was.

 

Frankly, $3k is a good price. If any of you ever take his course, let me know. I will then like to purchase the materials from you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Epa?

....................

 

Estimated point of arrival, i.e. line 1 - 4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Figured it was something like that, thanks.

 

So the guy was hitting that 100% of trades, O' Rlly? Bset trader in the history of the world ever then :D Or 100% of the trades that didn't get stopped in which case he let trades go to target or go to stop which is certainly valid management.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
So the guy was hitting that 100% of trades, O' Rlly?

 

This is what Wolfe is all about.

 

Bset trader in the history of the world ever then.

 

He would say he is only a modest student of markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is what Wolfe is all about.

 

 

 

He would say he is only a modest student of markets.

 

So he never has had loser? Ever? Wow must be great to use 500:1 leverage on every trade with no fear of loss. He might say he is only a modest student of the market, though I wonder why he would feel the need for modesty having reached absolute perfection? I guess at some stage soon he will turn into a ball of radiant light and 'ascend'. As you might tell I am sceptical of anyone that claims 100% profitable trades. I might have to spend that 3k pretty small price for immortality :D

 

Hope you will forgive my scepticism and sarcasm Tresor I still enjoy your posts and charts :) Seriously I am not saying absolute perfection in trading is impossible just that it would need almost divine powers to achieve. Of course if he has made 5 trades in the last 7 years or something then it is just a statistical wrinkle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Hope you will forgive my scepticism and sarcasm.

 

Scepticism wellcome. Sarcasm forgiven ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Wolfe :crap::crap:

eminisp500

 

You should use only bar charts or candlesticks, otherwise you will not see the precise tops and bottoms. And no other indicator than volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

Here is something that I do not trade yet. But am thinking of trading. I also post this Wolfe in a rotated version so that you could get the idea of it.

 

So far all such Wolfes that I observed would have been a success if traded.

5aa70fa3008f3_advancedWolfe.thumb.png.bedd6fab39fb6bff4b24914bfb2b3b2b.png

5aa70fa306280_rotatedadvancedWolfe.thumb.jpg.f40dfbace7a45558fb1a7ab962db3cdc.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how about posting some live examples instead of just hind sight. Should be easy enough for you to find one we can all watch play out.

 

PS I think you should call your pattern something else since it is not a WW as Wolfe himself taught.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
how about posting some live examples instead of just hind sight. Should be easy enough for you to find one we can all watch play out.

 

PS I think you should call your pattern something else since it is not a WW as Wolfe himself taught.

 

As I mentioned, I am not trading this pattern yet. Only thinking of trading it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Waveslider pointed something out to me that I am inclined to agree with. There is a real issue with point 1. Even Wolfes charts have inconsistencies. Well perhaps not inconsistencies but enough alternate ways of placing them to make consistency in application difficult. I loked for an example and here is the first chart that I came across on Wolfes site, I can see how he has constructed it but there appear to be 3 or 4 (or even more) methods that he uses that result in different 1 points with quite different 1-4 projections. I guess the thing is to always use the most conservative (which is recommended anyway).

chart.jpg.17cdf64ad1f033e082a87d2fa1c0a144.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Waveslider pointed something out to me that I am inclined to agree with. There is a real issue with point 1. Even Wolfes charts have inconsistencies. Well perhaps not inconsistencies but enough alternate ways of placing them to make consistency in application difficult.

 

To determine point 1 one has to train one's eye. Wolfe charts are very consistient; the problem is that a person with untrained eye and without knowledge of what to look for in later waves (between points) will not know how to properly determine point 1. Point one can even be an imaginary one placed in a weekend gap or without easily noticeable anchorage. I hoped to show you such a Wolfe in trade but have not seen such a Wolfe for the last few days.

 

Will try to post it in a few weeks after I am back from my vacations :)

 

In the meantime have such Wolfe from the Wolfe website.

Point1.gif.e94a3731502617f6bf738dba5a98d19c.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To determine point 1 one has to train one's eye. Wolfe charts are very consistient; the problem is that a person with untrained eye and without knowledge of what to look for in later waves (between points) will not know how to properly determine point 1. Point one can even be an imaginary one placed in a weekend gap or without easily noticeable anchorage. I hoped to show you such a Wolfe in trade but have not seen such a Wolfe for the last few days.

 

Will try to post it in a few weeks after I am back from my vacations :)

 

In the meantime have such Wolfe from the Wolfe website.

 

We have a different definition of consistent, to me 4 or more completely different ways of doing things is not my definition of 'consistent'. Particularly when the last one is some 'imaginary place'. For example the chart I posted why use that point 1 rather than one of the alternate methods? The sceptics would say is because it's easy to pick point 1 once you are at the target!!

 

I have spoken to a couple of guys that have the course and the problem is that the examples (including the faxes) are pretty much always hindsight with little 'hard right edge' informaion of how and why to place point 1's

 

Enjoy your break Tresor, look forward to seeing some charts when you return. It will be good to discuss the hows and whys of point 1 placement (preferably before we are at point 5!!!) There where some at the start of the thread I am sure :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
We have a different definition of consistent, to me 4 or more completely different ways of doing things is not my definition of 'consistent'. Particularly when the last one is some 'imaginary place'. For example the chart I posted why use that point 1 rather than one of the alternate methods? The sceptics would say is because it's easy to pick point 1 once you are at the target!!

 

BlowFish, you never define point 1 before point 4 is hit. I enclose a screenshot of GBPJPY with almost perfect Wolfe with imaginary point 1. The reason I did not take this trade is because I did not like the volume histogram that I observed from imaginary point 1 to point 4 and later. Had he volume been correct I would have traded this one.

 

I have spoken to a couple of guys that have the course and the problem is that the examples (including the faxes) are pretty much always hindsight with little 'hard right edge' informaion of how and why to place point 1's

 

I have no idea what the course looks like. My rules for defining point 1 are very consistient. I am posting two pages of my recent trades (sorted in order of closed positions) so that you could see that trading Wolfe can be consitiently profitable, if traded correcty. And you can make many trades during one day. This is a profit statement of my cousin's account who funded his account a few days ago. Since then I traded his account for the purpose of learning young rascal how to trade :D Details are of course hidden.

 

Enjoy your break Tresor

 

Got a new board to test :cool:BATALEON SNOWBOARDS | Triple Base Tech, the best thing to happen to snowboards since edges.

GBPJPY.thumb.png.bb71209ec8e42a0cea42957a976dcdd4.png

5aa70fa4415a4_PLAa.png.ad6cd3c2c007a53067f3e14bc696ca4c.png

5aa70fa445888_PLAb.png.7e79190f65f99f02d4c836121a138b1b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.