Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Could someone please enlighten me as to the Wolfe Wave numbering for the pivots on the previous charts? That trade may have worked out, but it sure doesn't look like any Wolfe Wave we've discussed in this thread previously.

Taz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Hi Tresor

i think orange pattern was too small(imho).

 

Size does matter in bed. Not in Wolfe trading.;)

Edited by Tresor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Could someone please enlighten me as to the Wolfe Wave numbering for the pivots on the previous charts?

 

Not sure what you mean by ''pivots''. If they mean points (1,2,3,4,5) then they were counted correctly.

 

That trade may have worked out, but it sure doesn't look like any Wolfe Wave we've discussed in this thread previously.

Taz

 

I glimpsed at the pictures in this thread. What you guys discussed previously was not Wolfe. 99% of the charts were wrong. I would have traded maybe 2 - 4 pictures that had been posted so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure what you mean by ''pivots''. If they mean points (1,2,3,4,5) then they were counted correctly.

I glimpsed at the pictures in this thread. What you guys discussed previously was not Wolfe. 99% of the charts were wrong. I would have traded maybe 2 - 4 pictures that had been posted so far.

 

Tresor, respectfully, if you don't know what pivots are, how would you know what a Wolfe Wave is? I don't want to degrade the disussion into an argument, so we can agree to disagree, but I'm not convinced that you are correct. Wolfe Waves work because they reflect the psychology of traders, as I have stated in earlier posts, and the characteristics of Wolfe Waves that mark that psychology do not appear to be present in your charts--but I could be wrong--it would really help if you would annotate your charts with the WW numbering system (for the record, the numbers refer to pivot points).

 

Regards,

Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Tresor, respectfully, if you don't know what pivots are, how would you know what a Wolfe Wave is?

 

I wasn't sure what you meant by pivots. My first EA coded my Mr Clyde Lee was based on pivots.

 

I don't want to degrade the disussion into an argument, so we can agree to disagree, but I'm not convinced that you are correct. Wolfe Waves work because they reflect the psychology of traders, as I have stated in earlier posts, and the characteristics of Wolfe Waves that mark that psychology do not appear to be present in your charts--but I could be wrong--it would really help if you would annotate your charts with the WW numbering system (for the record, the numbers refer to pivot points).

 

Regards,

Tasuki

 

The discoverer of Wolfe wrote on his website that he had never seen a properly drawn / identified Wolfe Wave on any website. And I agree with him. Till now. I posted a few charts with properly identified and properly traded Wolfes.

 

You can now e-mail him a link to this forum and request that his claim is removed from his website.

 

Regarding the psychology of traders you raised (still not sure what you mean by this). You can assess the psychological aspect reviewing (i) the price action and (ii) the volume histogram (which I purposefully did not placed in my screenshots).

 

I can clearly see the psychology of traders in my charts. But again the type of psychology that I look for in a Wolfe and the type of psychology that I may consider essential for a good trade may differ from the psychology you are looking for / you see.

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Do you have Wolfes original material Tresor?

 

No, I don't. And hopefully for Wolfe traders and unfortunately for non-Wolfe traders these will never get published :embarassed:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reason I asked was how you know you have the right 'official' interpretation? :) Not that it matters if it works for you. I guess your take is pretty much the same as WaveSliders? I also guess that many people have based there understanding on Street Smarts and there might be an 'error' in that, though I am inclined to think there is no secret sauce as Wolfe intimates. More likely that he is trying to justify the $3k or whatever the course is/was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Reason I asked was how you know you have the right 'official' interpretation? :)

 

I interacted with a Wolfe master for some time some time ago. You can tell that you have the official interpretation when 100% of your trades hit EPA. Mine success rate is only 80%, which means I still do not have all the answers. But it is enough to tell a Wolfe from a non-Wolfe.

 

More likely that he is trying to justify the $3k or whatever the course is/was.

 

Frankly, $3k is a good price. If any of you ever take his course, let me know. I will then like to purchase the materials from you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Epa?

....................

 

Estimated point of arrival, i.e. line 1 - 4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Figured it was something like that, thanks.

 

So the guy was hitting that 100% of trades, O' Rlly? Bset trader in the history of the world ever then :D Or 100% of the trades that didn't get stopped in which case he let trades go to target or go to stop which is certainly valid management.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
So the guy was hitting that 100% of trades, O' Rlly?

 

This is what Wolfe is all about.

 

Bset trader in the history of the world ever then.

 

He would say he is only a modest student of markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is what Wolfe is all about.

 

 

 

He would say he is only a modest student of markets.

 

So he never has had loser? Ever? Wow must be great to use 500:1 leverage on every trade with no fear of loss. He might say he is only a modest student of the market, though I wonder why he would feel the need for modesty having reached absolute perfection? I guess at some stage soon he will turn into a ball of radiant light and 'ascend'. As you might tell I am sceptical of anyone that claims 100% profitable trades. I might have to spend that 3k pretty small price for immortality :D

 

Hope you will forgive my scepticism and sarcasm Tresor I still enjoy your posts and charts :) Seriously I am not saying absolute perfection in trading is impossible just that it would need almost divine powers to achieve. Of course if he has made 5 trades in the last 7 years or something then it is just a statistical wrinkle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Hope you will forgive my scepticism and sarcasm.

 

Scepticism wellcome. Sarcasm forgiven ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Wolfe :crap::crap:

eminisp500

 

You should use only bar charts or candlesticks, otherwise you will not see the precise tops and bottoms. And no other indicator than volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

Here is something that I do not trade yet. But am thinking of trading. I also post this Wolfe in a rotated version so that you could get the idea of it.

 

So far all such Wolfes that I observed would have been a success if traded.

5aa70fa3008f3_advancedWolfe.thumb.png.bedd6fab39fb6bff4b24914bfb2b3b2b.png

5aa70fa306280_rotatedadvancedWolfe.thumb.jpg.f40dfbace7a45558fb1a7ab962db3cdc.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how about posting some live examples instead of just hind sight. Should be easy enough for you to find one we can all watch play out.

 

PS I think you should call your pattern something else since it is not a WW as Wolfe himself taught.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
how about posting some live examples instead of just hind sight. Should be easy enough for you to find one we can all watch play out.

 

PS I think you should call your pattern something else since it is not a WW as Wolfe himself taught.

 

As I mentioned, I am not trading this pattern yet. Only thinking of trading it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Waveslider pointed something out to me that I am inclined to agree with. There is a real issue with point 1. Even Wolfes charts have inconsistencies. Well perhaps not inconsistencies but enough alternate ways of placing them to make consistency in application difficult. I loked for an example and here is the first chart that I came across on Wolfes site, I can see how he has constructed it but there appear to be 3 or 4 (or even more) methods that he uses that result in different 1 points with quite different 1-4 projections. I guess the thing is to always use the most conservative (which is recommended anyway).

chart.jpg.17cdf64ad1f033e082a87d2fa1c0a144.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Waveslider pointed something out to me that I am inclined to agree with. There is a real issue with point 1. Even Wolfes charts have inconsistencies. Well perhaps not inconsistencies but enough alternate ways of placing them to make consistency in application difficult.

 

To determine point 1 one has to train one's eye. Wolfe charts are very consistient; the problem is that a person with untrained eye and without knowledge of what to look for in later waves (between points) will not know how to properly determine point 1. Point one can even be an imaginary one placed in a weekend gap or without easily noticeable anchorage. I hoped to show you such a Wolfe in trade but have not seen such a Wolfe for the last few days.

 

Will try to post it in a few weeks after I am back from my vacations :)

 

In the meantime have such Wolfe from the Wolfe website.

Point1.gif.e94a3731502617f6bf738dba5a98d19c.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To determine point 1 one has to train one's eye. Wolfe charts are very consistient; the problem is that a person with untrained eye and without knowledge of what to look for in later waves (between points) will not know how to properly determine point 1. Point one can even be an imaginary one placed in a weekend gap or without easily noticeable anchorage. I hoped to show you such a Wolfe in trade but have not seen such a Wolfe for the last few days.

 

Will try to post it in a few weeks after I am back from my vacations :)

 

In the meantime have such Wolfe from the Wolfe website.

 

We have a different definition of consistent, to me 4 or more completely different ways of doing things is not my definition of 'consistent'. Particularly when the last one is some 'imaginary place'. For example the chart I posted why use that point 1 rather than one of the alternate methods? The sceptics would say is because it's easy to pick point 1 once you are at the target!!

 

I have spoken to a couple of guys that have the course and the problem is that the examples (including the faxes) are pretty much always hindsight with little 'hard right edge' informaion of how and why to place point 1's

 

Enjoy your break Tresor, look forward to seeing some charts when you return. It will be good to discuss the hows and whys of point 1 placement (preferably before we are at point 5!!!) There where some at the start of the thread I am sure :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
We have a different definition of consistent, to me 4 or more completely different ways of doing things is not my definition of 'consistent'. Particularly when the last one is some 'imaginary place'. For example the chart I posted why use that point 1 rather than one of the alternate methods? The sceptics would say is because it's easy to pick point 1 once you are at the target!!

 

BlowFish, you never define point 1 before point 4 is hit. I enclose a screenshot of GBPJPY with almost perfect Wolfe with imaginary point 1. The reason I did not take this trade is because I did not like the volume histogram that I observed from imaginary point 1 to point 4 and later. Had he volume been correct I would have traded this one.

 

I have spoken to a couple of guys that have the course and the problem is that the examples (including the faxes) are pretty much always hindsight with little 'hard right edge' informaion of how and why to place point 1's

 

I have no idea what the course looks like. My rules for defining point 1 are very consistient. I am posting two pages of my recent trades (sorted in order of closed positions) so that you could see that trading Wolfe can be consitiently profitable, if traded correcty. And you can make many trades during one day. This is a profit statement of my cousin's account who funded his account a few days ago. Since then I traded his account for the purpose of learning young rascal how to trade :D Details are of course hidden.

 

Enjoy your break Tresor

 

Got a new board to test :cool:BATALEON SNOWBOARDS | Triple Base Tech, the best thing to happen to snowboards since edges.

GBPJPY.thumb.png.bb71209ec8e42a0cea42957a976dcdd4.png

5aa70fa4415a4_PLAa.png.ad6cd3c2c007a53067f3e14bc696ca4c.png

5aa70fa445888_PLAb.png.7e79190f65f99f02d4c836121a138b1b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.