Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Bubba, couple of questions:

1) your chart says, "Tradestation chart" but the symbol is wrong for it to be TS. It should be ESH09, not ES H9. Only reason I'm asking is to figure out what sort of charting you're using. Would that be Multicharts, perchance? Just curoius.

2) I've got a Gartley indicator on my Tradestation chart, and it's not picking up the Gartley that you're showing. I think that point C is too low for a traditional Gartley...but then again I'm no expert. BTW, I'm counting my points the "traditional" way for Gartleys (X-A-B-C-D). The attachment to this post shows the Inputs for my Gartley. Does yours look anything at all like this?

 

I just realized that my post is doubly off topic. Oh well. I won't make a habit of it.

Tasuki

5aa70eb27f909_GartleyInputs.png.bcad27eb3eea2529563b96796997b62d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tasuki - i use tradestation 2000i. the symbol is the proper setting for my setup with IB data feed. that's the difference.

 

i suspect our gartley indicator is the same. here's my parameters. i'm even worse on these than i am w/ WWs. :)

parameters.png.f7503fecc0c217e6c80d5f393e34394b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are @YM Wolfe Waves (Not perfect but potential WW).. The first Chart (12.40p) I traded today (not because of WWs) but I watched it unfold in RT. I like certain aspects of WW and its predictability so far....

 

Regards,

Suri

WW_Feb180918.gif.b4749aea4bea37af1646cf5ecc13a9cb.gif

YM_WW_Feb1809.gif.855107ad08cc9c2dd4706e4e4b83e222.gif

Edited by suriNotes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here's what i think is a pretty classic WW.. but again, take it w/ a grain of salt :)

 

nice descending wedge w/ well proportioned swings.

 

(now, i better get out my "Trade Chart Patterns Like a Pro" and study that ABC.)

 

/just noticed i labeled point 3 as "2".. gawd, sry

NQ4600v.png.9c2739e04c10a2a6be75274dda5c434e.png

Edited by bubba

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here's the follow up on last nights ww. text-book example maybe? maybe one of the seasoned WW'ers will comment..

 

/fixed the labels too

target.png.d6ff7bc0cf9bd89f6f5d6fbf06657382.png

Edited by bubba

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bubba,

 

Here is @ES X5 Pattern formation...

 

Usually in X5 patterns, the retracement of "B" gives a clue of what type of Pattern it may be forming. There are other rules it may have to form. But when "B" is retraced beyond 61.8% (Gartley), it may be suggesting a potential Butterfly or Crab pattern.

 

In this chart, B is 71%, suggesting may be a Butterfly (near 127% to 684) or Crab (near 162% to 614).

 

BTW, thanks for your kind comments about my book.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

 

noticed this pattern when i got home this evening. i haven't seen 1 of these on the daily before. anyone considering buying this low? i don't know about this 1

:confused:

 

(not that i KNOW about any of them of course)

suriStrings3.gif.3172dff6d12098572cb4adff6c85a89f.gif

Edited by suriNotes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gold's Wolfe Wave with ABC Bullish Pattern Update...

 

Regards,

Suri

 

 

Here is Gold's Wolfe Wave pattern to watch...

 

First Chart from Jan. 24th, 2009.

Second chart is an Update on Feb. 10th, 2009.

 

Regards,

Suri

GOLD_WW_ABC_Feb2009.gif.308f9f083ced39bf48b4c1f53c76b756.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi bubba,

 

Here is @ES X5 Pattern formation...

 

Usually in X5 patterns, the retracement of "B" gives a clue of what type of Pattern it may be forming. There are other rules it may have to form. But when "B" is retraced beyond 61.8% (Gartley), it may be suggesting a potential Butterfly or Crab pattern.

 

In this chart, B is 71%, suggesting may be a Butterfly (near 127% to 684) or Crab (near 162% to 614).

 

BTW, thanks for your kind comments about my book.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

thanks for the chart and explanation Suri.. very helpful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suri -

WW works best in choppy sideways markets - not trending. The run from 4 to 5 was too long. The move from 4-5 should be short and violent - scaring out the people who bought at pt. 4.

 

This is a chart of SPY 20 min.

 

There is a potential WW forming that could work nicely. Note pt 2 is a major high. Lots of overlap in the waves which means range. The move to pt. 5 is beginning rapidly, will momentum continue tomorrow morning?

 

The danger in this trade is the higher time frame - this is the top of a huge range, and a large channel. The peak last week formed at a perfect timing pt - (see the conversation on Andrews pitchfork where we marked the recent top).

 

If last weeks peak was the top, then the next andrews line points steeply down.

 

In the case of WW, the higher time frame always overrules. This one you have to be careful on and watch closely as the purple 1-3 line is broken.

5aa70ec7f02db_ScreenHunter_02Apr_2214_55.thumb.gif.0d160830b95a2fedf9684257110e7cc3.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wave slider i want to thank you for this great thread

 

here i m posting two WW of same security of different time frame in all the criteria both look good but in opposite nature

what is your view about the same i will update as they unfolds

 

first one is 15-min & second 5-min

 

if something like this happened which you prefer

I am daytrader i like WW because of its high RRR(risk reward ratio)

5aa70ec8066cd_nifty15-min.JPG.f2689b295ab6e5a92bccfe3d246d5972.JPG

5aa70ec80a11d_nifty5-min.JPG.a786cc47fb18e50de12d47c6146c8aa5.JPG

Edited by taq

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad this thread got this pattern in my head - did anyone else catch this classic one today in ES?

It was good for about 6 points, just picture perfect trade.

 

Taq-

 

look for ranging situations. The 1-3 lines you draw are very steep.

 

Also use the pivot low/high instead of vaguely drawing through bars. It is important to realize why the pattern is working and see the psychology of the crowd.

 

I don't think those patterns you sent are valid. Study the pattern I have here...

5aa70ec82e178_ScreenHunter_02Apr_2317_32.thumb.gif.ee7d54e2e429626587d7d5fd4e793a51.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

also the updated chart of NIFTY (NSE India) Index future

 

we are strugling to cross point 2

let us see how it unfolds

5aa70ec848087_nifty15-min24-04.JPG.3b4632638dd02e42d339a66c32fcc84f.JPG

Edited by taq

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suri,

I think you're still missing the psychology of the WW. I think I've gone over some of this somewhere in a previous post on this thread, but a brief example---point #2 is supposed to the lowest low or highest high for quite some time---it's a "fear-factor" pivot that drives traders to unwillingly get out of their positions at exactly the wrong moment.

Whenever I'm looking for a WW, pivot #2 is the "sore thumb" I look for--it sticks out as plain as day. I don't see that "sore thumb" look in the potential WW you have shown for the ES.

Hope this helps,

Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with you Tasuki, these are not wolfe waves. The reason for the pattern's success is the psychology, as you stated. There has to be strong participation "washing" people out and getting them positioned on the wrong side of the mkt.

Pt. #2 (bearish scenario) should look to bulls like a bottom. Pt.#4 should look like a higher low potentially giving a confirmation of a bottom.

Then it all falls apart and the wolves take over (supposedly).

 

Most important is that this pattern happens in a ranging situation- a trend on a higher time frame negates the pattern....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tasuki and Waveslider,

 

I agree with both of you... I was bit doubtful of WW and need to know

lot more about WWs. But I also had other reasons to trade this pattern.

Perhaps this could be a variation of a Broadening Pattern??

 

See how overall the pattern resulted. I will post few other pics and

how the setup was anticipated. I did have help from

ABC Bearish/H&S Setups (from previous posts) also.

 

Thanks for your insights.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11384&stc=1&d=1245106255

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11385&stc=1&d=1245106255

ES_WW_Trades.gif.23a54978f15cb676404d0ad1ee274dfc.gif

TrendAnticiaption.gif.3dabe3af6739387f2bcb895afb35237e.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.