Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

I hope the someone selling it goes by the name of Clyde Lee because it sure looks like his indicator from a few years ago.

 

i found this pic of a WW on ebay.(someone selling a WW indicator).

anyway, do you consider it a WW? if so, how would you play it?

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not technically, because the #3 pt. is above #1, but who cares - it worked. You have a good eye for them hubba bubba. All we're looking for is a failed pattern, in this case a failed descending triangle. Wolfe adds the price target for the failure.

It's usually hard to find a true ww on a trending day. I think it's more likely to see a failure like the one you found.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, that was regarding bubba's post of the ES chart. Whats that weird red bar covering a critical pivot point?. Looks like a junk indicator, number 2 point is wrong, and it looks like the #5 point never actually met the upper red line.

I think it's hard to code this indicator. Probably the best would be jan arps, I think he calls them fox waves or arps waves, duh....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a WW indicator - think I found it here actually. but, it's not dependable

as i'm sure you guys know. it will find some, but plots some awful 1's too. i've been working w/ the trendlines-auto in TS. it makes for a messy chart, but seems to help me recognize a ww in the making. actually, i 'seeing' them better nowadays.

thanks waveslider, for the indicator :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

would like to hear what you guys think of this one. very high time frame..

i thought it was interesting.

* have another question plz. when you say "just looking for a failed pattern", is it the failure of the

2-4 trendline after point 5?.. meaning, the break out of the wedge? if so, does this mean you don't

take the entry at point 5?

 

sorry - i kinda barged in yalls thread. i'm merely a novice, wannabe thusfar.

5aa70e286cccc_176500v_ES_WW.thumb.png.ae385310c7d0e4076ffe354c22807d9d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bubba, feel free to barge in any time! Regarding the "failed pattern" that waveslider mentioned in permalink #103, the pattern is the wedge formed by the trendlines from pivot points 1-3-5 and 2-4. When that wedge fails, we take the trade in the direction of the failure.

 

The chart you posted gives a perfect example. You have the 1-3-5 line in red and the 2-4 line in blue, and the two lines form a rising wedge. If/when that wedge breaks to the downside, we take the trade.

 

For future reference, bubba, please include all necessary details of the chart you're posting:

1) contract name (or symbol, if it's a stock)

2) timeframe (or tick-frame if its a tick chart)

3) X and Y axes--at least you did get these into the chart, but I still can't figure out what contract or timeframe.

 

It's a courtesy to your TradersLab friends to tell us what we're looking at--many of us like to pull up the chart on our own software platforms and see what else we can see---sometimes that can be very helpful both to us and to you, if we report back that we've found something interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Tasuki,

here's a better shot of the chart. for some reason, i felt i needed to conserve

screen space on the last 1.

* notice the display reads "1765 vol bars". in TS2000i, this =

176,500 vol bars. at least thats my understanding.

es_176500v.png.38d3860741e9ac4a8d122184b17580cf.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful chart, bubba. Geez, that 2000i is one strange program. I've got a copy but I can't get it to work for some reason. The unlock code somebody gave me isn't right, or more likely I don't know how to use it.

 

Seeing your chart makes me want to figure out how to use 2000i because a 176,500 volume bar chart is completely and utterly impossible with Tradestation 8.2, and since I just love volume bars, I'd love to get such a longterm chart (goes back over a month!!!) with plain volume bars.....you see, I've learned something by being able to see the whole chart...thanks for reposting.

 

The thing that looks strange about your Wolfe Wave is that the 1-4 line (the white line) is nearly flat. I'm no WW expert, but something about that doesn't look right. If it IS right, then your chart is predicting that the ES will revisit 1460. Well, let's see what happens!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I Think what Tasuki was referring to was accessing volume bar charts that go back longer than 30 days, can't do that in anything newer than TS2000i because TS became it's own data vendor over the last several years. In the somewhat good ole 2000i days they were just a charting platform and 3rd party data provided the tick data via something called the global server. Now TS has chosen to only keep 30 days of tick/volume data in it's server database so can't do volume charts further than 30 days back.

 

Not hard to get the volume bars tasuki.. FOrmat symbol, select volume under interval, then the number of shares..

Isn't that what you want?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i suppose there are a few advantages w/2000i. prolly not that many lol.

fwiw, i purchased mine on ebay, making sure i was getting an original disk.

wanted a standalone product on the cheap and it's worked out well..

 

but if i might ask, would you guys consider that longer term pattern? also, i get the impression that some prefer to wait for the entire wedge to fail or the breakout of the wedge. i was thinking w/ wolfe's, the entry was at point 5.

or maybe the 1st reversal bar at 5. thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, bh, I was thinking that TS wouldn't even accept a volume bar setting of such a large number, 176,500. I was mistaken, however, because I just tried it on my TS 8.2 and it actually worked. To my utter amazement, I asked for 60 days of data, and (strangely) I got three months of data. Well, color me amazed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This on on the 233 tick of ES I had my doubts on - - still don't know if that target will be achieved, maybe in afterhours. The way this market is going, the pull back is going to be a gap and run the other way.

 

The pattern worked better in ER2, though the target wasn't too great.

 

ER2's leadership began to falter today, leads me to think this rally is likely done.

 

Also, all of my systems are flashing sell signals today, confirming

MyScreenHunter.jpg.98ef27907e667936b06aaf98921a1479.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Waveslider: curious what would make you state what you did below. Also, would you be willing to share the underlying logic of your systems or do you keep those proprietary?

 

This on on the 233 tick of ES I had my doubts on - - still don't know if that target will be achieved, maybe in afterhours. The way this market is going, the pull back is going to be a gap and run the other way.

 

The pattern worked better in ER2, though the target wasn't too great.

 

ER2's leadership began to falter today, leads me to think this rally is likely done.

 

Also, all of my systems are flashing sell signals today, confirming

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

found the same pattern that Waveslider did.

the good news:

-found it in progress

-made a few ticks (sim)

the bad news:

-quit trade too soon(congestion @2-4 line)

-this indicator seems to plot pattern after it's near completed.

:\

2min_es_wolfe.png.e440f262d308ee51249196fd3f2351cd.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This on on the 233 tick of ES I had my doubts on - - still don't know if that target will be achieved, maybe in afterhours. The way this market is going, the pull back is going to be a gap and run the other way.

 

 

Actually your Wolfe chart looks more like a Gartley to me.:\

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That one in ES today is one of the most classic ones I've seen. The one in the pound was nice too..

but that one in ES was awesome. I especially enjoyed the quick movement from point 4 to 5, and how pt. #2 was just so obvious.

I took a piece out of it, but can't say I would have held on throughout the whole move if I was trading just the pattern.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparrow, it will help you if you start labeling your charts with the numbers of the points. The last one you posted was not a valid pattern as you represented it, or it might have been if we could have seen what you saw. I didn't see it.

I have gotten lazy with marking the pts since it was just me and Tasuki here for a while.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments waveslider, I've practiced a bit and find it more easy to spot the pattern already. I think the one starting at 14:29 on the same chart was valid though.

 

Looking for expanding wedges/triangles helps a lot.

 

Reminds me a bit of NQoos wedge setup but it is not the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.