Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

waveslider, it looks like that ER 60 Wolfe Wave isn't going to work out, or at least I would have been stopped out by now if I'd been in it. Which raises the question, How well do WW work? As you may know, Tim Morge of medianline.com says he's done careful statistics on his pitchfork setups, and claims that they work pretty close to 80% of the time. Do you know if WW are as good as this? Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know of any stats, but observing them they work with a high probability - IF - the trade is managed well. Same with pitchforks. It's hard to quantify just like pitchforks, since there are various entries/exits that can be used.

Personally, the way I am handling it is by biasing a mechanical system I run to the upside, when above the trigger line.

If I was trading with discretion, I would wait for the trendline break to put on an initial position. Then I would add to that on a pullback.

So if I personally was trading this pattern with discretion, I wouldn't be in yet till that TL breaks. It could still very well work, but the best place to be currently, as far as this trade goes, is cash. This market is oversold and due for a bounce regardless.

I respect Tim Morge's work quite a bit, but I don't think you can quantify pitchforks that well, they are pretty subjective.

If I had to choose 2 methods to trade with discretion, I would use the WW for ranges, and the pitchfork for swinging/trending markets. The most critical thing is risk/trade management by scaling in/out, using multiple time frames.. etc..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Waveslider:

 

I meant to post this last night, but got preoccupied.

 

About the potential bullish ER2 pattern: the ES showed a similar potential the other day but the recent weakness has kept prices below the trigger line for 2 days now. My experience has been that when that happens, the pattern becomes unreliable, ie higher than normal chance of failure. ER2 is also hanging out below the trigger line, although not as drastically as ES.

 

Curious to hear your thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Waveslider, attached is my attempt to recreate bh's ES Wolfewave that looks unreliable. This raises a question I've been meaning to ask---for the very best WW patterns, should the extension of the line segment from point 1 to point 3 hit point 5? In an earlier post (permalink 33 on this tread), you said that my QQQQ daily chart had a point 5 that was "too deep to take the pattern seriously". Maybe that's true here for this ES pattern? More generally, though, should you be able to draw a straight line from points 1 to 3 and hit point 5? Is that part of the WW rules, or even a decent rule of thumb?

 

edit---damn, what happened to my chart? I'll try to post in following message.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a beautiful WW on the ZG daily. Wish I'd seen this in real time. Note that points 1, 3 and 5 form something of an arc. No clue if this is significant in any way, whether it predicts the probable success of the WW pattern or if it's completely random. I'm still researching the Wolfe Wave, so I'm just tossing ideas out as I see them.

5aa70e1e77aa7_ZGdailyarcpattern135.thumb.png.d0effe8a3793cff4a27e2ebf50f9ffe9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tasuki,

On your chart, points 1 and 3 should be connected. Point 5 is a violation of this line, it should at least touch it or the pattern is invalid.

 

I think that the pattern in the stock indices is still valid, but has not yet signaled an entry. There is a lot of volatility here, the purple line on my chart is a point where price should either accelerate to the downside, or reject and begin a move higher. It is an inflection point according to channel trading.

 

When the market moves below the 1-3 line too far, the corresponding target moves in the same direction. Unless price jumps quickly the other way. In that case it will often overshoot it's target, as it did the 1-3 line.

 

In the last chart an important point to note is that the #3 point should be lower than your #1 point, which would make the #5 point below the #3 point.

 

Keep throwing out ideas!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, waveslider,

OK, so the ZG chart (permalink #59) isn't a proper bullish Wolfe Wave, I gather, because point 3 should have been lower than point 1. I seem to be coming up with several "variations" on the Wolfe Wave theme that work out anyway...which makes me wonder how much latitude there is in this pattern.

 

Just sticking with bullish WW for the moment, I gather from what you said above that, if you extend the line segment from points 1 to 3, you should find that point 5 at least touches this downtrendling line, or breaks below it. Here's a question, and I can use the current chart of the ES (permalink 58) as my example--if the price action around point 5 keeps going down and down, as it has been doing this past week, how do you know when you've got a proper point 5? This is actually pretty important, because with a bullish Wolfe Wave, you're supposed to enter your position long after point 5 has been put in. How do you know when it's been put in? How do you know when to safely enter the position?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding your first statement, you are right, there are tons of variations of the WW. The pattern works for a reason, and as you understand that and see why it works, you will be able to isolate the good ones and toss out the bad. It aint easy and there are losers, but with patience and risk control its a solid way to trade - good risk reward profile.

 

For your question - Well, that's where your risk management and trade entry comes in. If you are a visual trader, you may want to at least wait for a downward sloping trendline to break.

 

What you should see as point #5 breaks is as I mentioned before, the action around the 1-3 line. This is an acceleration line. If the pattern is not valid, price should quickly move away from the line, with an attempt to retest from below. If you start getting this volatile sideways chop (as with this pattern) there is a good chance the thing will start working, but first it has to catch everyone off - guard.

 

Could happen today....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was unsuccesful in my attempts to screen capture and post, but again am looking for clarification of your statement below. On the potentially bullish 60 minute ER2 pattern, we have been consolidating below the 1-3 trendline for several days now. Are you suggesting the consolidation below the line suggests the pattern ultimately works?

 

Regarding your first statement, you are right,

What you should see as point #5 breaks is as I mentioned before, the action around the 1-3 line. This is an acceleration line. If the pattern is not valid, price should quickly move away from the line, with an attempt to retest from below. If you start getting this volatile sideways chop (as with this pattern) there is a good chance the thing will start working, but first it has to catch everyone off - guard.

 

Could happen today....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks good. First target I see is the Andrew's line (grey in middle), next the yellow WW line.

 

Price formed a symmetrical triangle over the past few days (thin blue lines), breaking of the green line is further confirmation.

 

Damn, look at the US dollar go! As gold drops... Euro falling, Canadian $ and BP also, yen stays strong..

5aa70e1e972b4_ER2monday.thumb.jpg.8ef88cb6e7e831ea96ba328d786fe700.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bh-trade:

Yes consolidation below that line does work, especially more violent sideways chop. What you don't want to see is a gap lower (below the line) that just keeps running. That means that the 1-3 line is an acceleration line and the 1-3 line is probably the halfway mark to a larger move lower. Multiple touches of the line means the acceleration isn't happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Market touched the green entry line and faded back one more time. Interesting that the Russell is holding its lows while the other indices fall. This is bullish.

 

By taking out Friday's high and low, ER2 is forming an expanding pattern. Monday was not a trend day on the daily chart, this is more sideways action trying to shake people out.

 

I like the looks of a slightly different #1 point on this pattern more and more. The reason is because of the way the 1-4 line matches up with multiple peaks. Andrew's line is still looking good for a primary target. This trade needs to form a higher low, break trend lines , and get over 785.9 level marked in black..

er2monday2.thumb.jpg.4eaff56fb9d34b48e4839d847493b488.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

waveslider, you asked me to throw out more ideas, so here goes. Attached chart probably just displays my ignorance. Is this a WW that failed, or is it not a proper WW setup (and if not, why?). I suspect that point 2 isn't a good point 2 because of the higher prices directly to the left, so it's not really a near term top--or is it? How much of a near term top does point 2 have to be? Are there other reasons why this isn't a good setup (other than the fact it failed--even market geometry patterns fail sometimes)?

5aa70e1fae5dd_putativeWWthatfailedonAUDJPY.thumb.png.10aa80cf3fff43823a18391ba450c06a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tasuki, see how that when price hit that #5 pt., it started accelerating and didn't even look back? Right in those 2 bars where #5 is, the tails hardly overlap - this was a market in motion. What you want is a failure to accelerate - and some sideways action. Aside from that, this was a very valid pattern - good eye!

 

The #2 pt ideally would have been an attempt to move out of congestion and that would have invited some longs that would have got washed by pt. #5. That's part of the psychology I explained earlier. But you got it pretty close! The move from pt2 to pt3 was an expanding pattern indicating a range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

waveslider, thanks SO much for your lessons and your patience. How about this next one (see attached)? This would seem (to me) to have everything going for it:

1) waves pretty even

2) point 1 in a range

3) point 2 definitley was an attempt to break out of congestion and encouraged buyers who undoubtedly got washed out at point 5

4) point 3 lower than point 1

5) point 5 seems, so far at least, to be bouncing off the 1-3 extension line

6) line 1-4 has multiple touches

7) from a fundamental perspective, the semiconductors were the biggest disappointment in the last rally and they are both oversold and underperforming and definitely ripe for a bounce.

 

So, whaddya think? Have I got my ducks in a row this time?

5aa70e1fb80f3_semiweekly.thumb.png.a0a8fb265027c9c64a43794e132eb64d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah I think you got this one nailed. I'm sure there's other confirmation on that chart too. It looks like a pretty major double top on one hand, but its an expanding pattern, so really it's just going sideways with increasing volatility.

If I were in this trade long I would be careful of volatility dying out - there's a chance this is a major top.

Now you understand the pattern. You can start looking for the nuances. For example, I like to see the bars between the 1 and 3 pts. to be more than the bars between the 3 and 5 pts.

I haven't quantified this, but I think it is preferable..

WW is not perfect, but the more you look at them the more you will see the how and why, and begin to understand the psychology and balance in the pattern..

Glad you are learning. Do you trade futures much? I noticed a pretty nice one in ES today. My chart program is crashing a little right now, maybe will post later..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Attached is a five minute chart of today's ES action. There was a semi-OK Wolfe Wave that semi-failed, and I think I know what happened.

Here's my analysis (comments, please):

1) point 1 was within a range

2) point 2 looked like it was going to break out of the range, and sucked in new buyers---notice, however, that it didn't break above the morning's high--it would have made for a stronger pattern if it had.

3) point 3 was lower than point 1, albeit not by as much as I would have liked

4) the line from point 1 to point 4 was a bit steep, methinks.

5) point 5 broke below the line from points 1 to 3, but here's the major weakness of the pattern as it set up--point 5 didn't scare people enough--it held the support line (dotted red line). The pattern would have been much stronger if it had dipped below that support--doubtless lots of traders held on

6) the place to buy would have been the break of the dotted yellow line, and your first target would have been the extension of the line from points 2 to 4 (thin green line). I haven't done a survey yet, but I'm wondering if that line from points 2-4 should maybe always be your first target (take off part of your position?) when trading a Wolfe Wave. Experienced Wolfies, your comments would be appreciated.

7) Ultiimately, the pattern failed to meet its target (the extension of the line from points 1 to 4), but it still went part way. I'm wondering how often my putative first target is hit, and then the price pulls back?

5aa70e1fd5cab_ESWolfeWavesemifailed4.thumb.png.9d527764c846b9d07491778169eddeea.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are right on all points. This was a failed pattern, and that target line was a little too steep - but those ones work some time, just lower probability. Using the top of the channel is a good 1st target, setting remaining position at breakeven.

 

Here's that pattern in ES from yesterday... 233 tick chart

MyScreenHunter.thumb.jpg.7c9f69ccbf05d43b5381a93dfec63dd1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My pleasure posting charts, it's nice to see eye to eye with someone else. I'd put #3 at 3a, since that was the first one. Although the 3c is lower, it doesn't penetrate the acceleration line.

You had to be quick to see this one in real-time, but the way the #4 and #5 pts came so close together, you could see that price was just trying to shake players out. Plus, there was a bullish bias to the day.

 

I'd say the first thing I look for is a point #2 and #3, and to identify that these are occurring in a range. Then wait the trap is set, a variety of things can happen next, but these are the first clues to look for to set up the pattern.

 

Also important is observing volatility in the market. This pattern comes along when the market is trying to shake out short term traders, there should be some other fake-outs nearby. You can see quite a few in the period between points 3 and 4. Then the shake out gets bigger (volatility still intact), and there you are, waiting for the final blast. When Joe trader gets stopped out below the pivot, it's just about time for action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.