Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jperl

Trading with Market Statistics. IV Standard Deviation

Recommended Posts

  tucciotrader said:
ok, well, I thought you as well had coded something because I have gone thru the whole thread and have read your question about wheter a the vwap was supposed to be computet with all the bars or the bars so far...

 

ok, I'll give that section a look

 

Yes I have, however as there is a working copy published in the indicator section and because I think the algorithms I developed have some intrinsic value I decided not to publish them. (though you will find some of my code in dbntinas PVP indicator anyway:))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tucciotrader said:
yeah, I found tha code by dbntina (vwap, sd and pvp), really a great piece of code! Still looking for the volume profile histogram though

 

I have found out PVP and VWAP does not work (don't plot, or return 0) with a single tick-by-tick trading day...how many past trading days are required in order to work??

 

I'm on Multicharts + ZenFire and the data vendor only returns todays data...

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have found out both pvp and vwap need one previous trading session at least in order to work. Having said that, I'd like to show you what I came across today: in the first picture atatched I can get the regular vwap and pvp (don't take much notice of the staring time of the trading day, I am having issues with backfilling from ZenFire to Multicharts!). In picture the second picture you can see how the vwap was postponed...I can really understand why. Yet, the vwap and standar deviation still make sense...

 

ant idea?

 

thanks

volumeprofile_1.PNG.a789d618edf39911f39250d53d336a0f.PNG

peak-volume-price.PNG.06eae750dc0a2b500f9a18192cea84f4.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tuccio. On study properties try setting "max bars back that study will reference" to zero or 1 if it wont accept zero. The study should start working with current days data only I am not sure why it requires yesterdays too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

 

i was studying this code. vwap should reset each day is it corret or is better avoid the reset?

 

 

 

inputs:

StartTime( 930 ),

StartMonth( 1 ),

StartDay( 1 ),

StartYear( 2009 ),

UpperPctDisp( .1 ),

LowerPctDisp( -.2 ) ;

 

variables:

StartCalcDate( 0 ),

VolumeValue( 0 ),

MedPrice( 0 ),

PV( 0 ),

CumulativeVolume( 0 ),

CumulativePV( 0 ),

Started( false ),

Denom( 0 ),

KeyCumVol( 0 ),

KeyCumPV( 0 ),

MidasValue( 0 ) ;

 

if CurrentBar = 1 then

StartCalcDate = ELDate( StartMonth, StartDay, StartYear ) ;

 

{ Midas Calculation }

if (Date >= StartCalcDate and Time >= StartTime)

or Date > StartCalcDate

then

begin

VolumeValue = iff( BarType <= 1, Ticks, Volume ) ;

MedPrice = MedianPrice ;

PV = MedPrice * VolumeValue ;

CumulativeVolume = VolumeValue + CumulativeVolume ;

CumulativePV = PV + CumulativePV ;

end ;

 

if Started = false and ( ( Date >= StartCalcDate and

Time >= StartTime ) and ( ( Time[1] < StartTime or

Date[1] < StartCalcDate ) or Date[1] > StartCalcDate ) )

then

begin

Started = true ;

Denom = 1 ;

KeyCumVol = CumulativeVolume ;

KeyCumPV = CumulativePV ;

end

else if Denom >= 1 then

Denom = CumulativeVolume - KeyCumVol ;

 

if Started then

begin

if Denom > 1 then

MidasValue = ( CumulativePV - KeyCumPV ) / Denom

else if Denom = 1 then

MidasValue = MedPrice ;

 

Plot1( MidasValue, “Midas” ) ;

Plot2( MidasValue * ( 1 + UpperPctDisp / 100), “UpBand”);

Plot3( MidasValue * ( 1 + LowerPctDisp / 100), “DnBand”);

end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all.

 

Just finished reading this thread - part IV, got 7 more to go. :)

 

Got a couple of questions please if anyone could assist:

 

1. Can this strategy be applied to trading stocks, especially US stocks?

 

2. Anybody knows whether some kind person has managed to program these indicators (PVP, VWAP, SD etc) for any of the free charting software out there like Tradelink or Ninjatrader? I think Tradelink uses easylanguage, though not 100% sure.

 

Many thanks

Dan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your welcome.

 

Is it my imagination or is there a bit of heavy handed moderation going on here? Oh well no big deal. Having said that there is a real danger of alienating and ultimately loosing users, most people do not like to be censored particularly if it is just a bit of idle banter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:

 

Is it my imagination or is there a bit of heavy handed moderation going on here? Oh well no big deal. Having said that there is a real danger of alienating and ultimately loosing users, most people do not like to be censored particularly if it is just a bit of idle banter.

 

I hope not. I'm of the opinion that its absolutely ridiculous to ever delete any posts unless something very offensive and disruptive is going on, and even then its not a sure thing. Trying to go through some of dbphoenix's posts on t2w is an absolute nightmare when post #s are referenced and no longer match up because of deleted posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

I have read right through the "Trading with Mkt statistics" thread, all parts....what i still can't seem to fathom is the definitive formulas to use for the std dev. As everyone codes in different programs, could we not just have it stated explicitly by Jerry (or someone who has the exact same algorithm for coding it as him) but in layman terms without ANY specific program related syntax e.g. for vwap it would be:

 

VWAP = [(SUM(PiVi))/Vtotal]

 

where

 

Pi = Price of each bar in distribution (Either; (O+H+L+C/4) or use the closing price of bar)

Vi = Volume of each bar in distribution

Vtotal = Total Volume for whole distribution

 

At the moment, there seem to be so many conflicting ideas and formulas for the Std Deviation parts that I don't know which to use when coding that part of the process. I'm doing it in CQG which brings it's own issues of using different syntax than what some of you guys use, so if it could be spelled out completely in english as above has been for VWAP it would be appreciated. That way, it should be easier to just code it in whatever platform each person uses.

 

Thanks

TMc1908

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  robertotrader said:
Try to contact CQG about the VWAP pac, they developed it but I'm not sure that their SD bands are correct.

 

Thanks Roberto, contacted them and they've been helpful...however, was wondering if anyone could cast their eye over the code and just confirm that there are no glaring errors. It seems to be correct to me, just slightly puzzled as to how it is actually acting on my chart though as it seems to be fanning out i.e. they appear to expand and contract similar to a bollinger band (but not as obviously) which I never expected to be honest

 

On CQG there are curves for each of the 7 lines, but code all the same on each bar last line has different DevMultiplier option and either add or subtract. The below is code for 1st Deviation line:

 

Vol1:=IF( HasVal(Vol(@)) AND Vol(@) > 0, Vol(@), 0) ;

priceX:= IF(price = 1, Close(@), IF(price = 2, High(@), IF(price = 3, Low(@), IF(price = 4, Mid(@), IF(price = 5, HLC3(@), IF(price = 6, Avg(@), IF(price=7, Open(@), 0) ) ) ) ) ) ) ;

 

Bars1:=IF((BarsSince(HasVal(@)=0,1,10000) WHEN BarIx(@,StartOfDay)=0)> 0, BarIx(@,StartOfDay)+1, BarsSince(HasVal(@)=0,1,10000)) ;

 

VWAP1:= Sum(priceX* Vol1,Bars1)/ Sum( Vol1,Bars1);

 

Variance1:= Sum( (Vol1/ Sum( Vol1,Bars1))* Power((priceX-VWAP1),2.00000),Bars1);

 

StdDev1:= SqRoot( Variance1);

 

VWAP1+(StdDev1*DevMultiplier1)

DevMultiplier1 is an on chart option where you can specify what multiplier to use

 

ON CQG there are curves for each of the 7 lines, code all the same, just different DevMultiplier option and either add or subtract. The below is just for the 1st Deviation line as an example

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.