Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jperl

Trading with Market Statistics. IV Standard Deviation

Recommended Posts

Soultrader,

 

I used to track POC but I find that particularly for the S&P's, the VWAP is the key level to think about. the concepts are similar though.

 

I have spent a lot of time trying to fit PVP into something useful for me but I just don't think it adds much to my set-ups so I am not using this. my advice would be to start with just watching VWAP and learn to see how price reacts to it. there is a ton of good information by watching how it responds to a test of VWAP or a break away from VWAP. I find it fascinating to watch the action the S&Ps have relative to VWAP.

 

the one set-up that is very useful is that when PVP = VWAP in the middle of the day, think of it state of near-perfect 'balance'.

 

other than that, I only look at PVP in context of overall profile shape.

 

here are some notes from todays action.

5aa70e00b91bb_sep12ES.thumb.png.cc0083b53e60dc7023c7ad8599e0b89b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Dogpile said:

the one set-up that is very useful is that when PVP = VWAP in the middle of the day, think of it state of near-perfect 'balance'.

 

This unfortunately is a misleading statement.

Near perfect balance would be price = PVP = VWAP.

 

Very often when PVP=VWAP, price action can be far from the PVP, even as far as the 3rd Standard Deviation. That's not a balanced market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jerry,

 

I am still a little confused on what VWAP, SD, and PVP you use. Is the PVP the previous day PVP? Or do you use the current day's PVP. Also is this also the case with the VWAP and SD?

 

If applying historical data in combination with todays VWAP, SD.... is this 2 days back? Or do you use a continous VWAP and SD for the entire contracts lifetime?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I can answer that and I am sure I will be corrected if wrong but for everything except position trading (the very last thread) the developing profile for today is used. So basically you have nothing until the first tick at 9.30.

 

In the series on scalping Jerry suggests a way for jumping right in if you are keen for action!

 

Cheers,

 

P.S. are you in China yet Jerry? Hope you are enjoying yourself where ever you are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pretty clear that the vast majority of what jerry has written about has used current days pvp, vwap, sd.

 

so at the beginning of the day, you have an especially undeveloped data set. after that, the data set will gradually mature to the point where VWAP esentially gets to where its going - as incremental volume becomes less and less important to the VWAP calculation as the day goes on since you are building a larger and larger volume base on the past (ie, VWAP will change a fair bit from 10am to 1pm but will not change so much from 2pm on unless you are in a very, very strong trend). the idea is that it is profitable to make trades looking for statistical extensions/retracements based on the current data set -- while fully realizing that the data set is dynamic and will very often have different statistical characteristics as the day goes on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
I think I can answer that and I am sure I will be corrected if wrong but for everything except position trading (the very last thread) the developing profile for today is used. So basically you have nothing until the first tick at 9.30.

 

In the series on scalping Jerry suggests a way for jumping right in if you are keen for action!

 

Cheers,

 

P.S. are you in China yet Jerry? Hope you are enjoying yourself where ever you are.

 

Thanks Blowfish,

 

This will indicate that a trader using this methodology must wait until the VWAP, SD, and PVP becomes clear? The SD usually takes all morning before widening up for the Nikkei. This is why I was thinking of applying this technique for the afternoon only.

 

However, I am trying to figure out a way to play the open. For example, if price is below the previous day VWAP and PVP go short, etc.... Im curious to here any comments on such strategy. Perhaps add a few filters like candle patterns, etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<For example, if price is below the previous day VWAP and PVP go short, etc....>>

 

no idea how the nikkei trades but if it is the first down day after a series of up days, then I like this thinking. if price is below the previous day vwap but the last few days have all seen lower and lower VWAPs -- then price might be expected to start low (morning low) and trade to an afternoon high in a reversal day.

 

but in general, VWAP > VWAP[1] or VWAP < VWAP[1] is an important thing to monitor, in my opinion. if 'building higher value' --- look to go long after a downswing completes and vice versa... this can really keep you from fighting the markets theme for that particular day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dogpile, Im actually going to look into this behavior and jot down some notes and ideas on it.

 

I have another question regarding the SD. How narrow is narrow? It appears that Jerry would take trades with risk:reward ratios of slightly below 1.0. I personally do not take these type of trades even if Im scalping. If scalping the minimum I aim for is a 1:1.5 risk reward ratio. I understand that these risk:reward thinking is not entirely correct as it is geared for newer traders. However, I just never found myself worth taking a trade with so little reward opportunities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<I have another question regarding the SD. How narrow is narrow?>>

 

I will let jerry answer that particular question since I don't use SD at all -- but here is a comment.

 

I use a set number of points from VWAP as kind of a ballpark number to consider -- and try to think more in terms of strength (momentum/volume) of that particular move more than anything purely statistical based on historical data. The market is dynamic and while statistics are crucial to understand -- I don't want to get TOO caught up in statistics as I think there are better ways to do it. but to each his own. jerry very likely has a ton of nuances to his approach such that when I see some of his trades --- I find that we are actually often making very similar trades -- but we are getting there in totally different ways. thus, jerry has figured out through experience how to get a ton of information looking purely at the statistical distribution -- stuff that I just can't see when looking only at a distribution of prices.

 

I know some traders where some combination of oscillators just speaks to them and I just don't get how they do it -- but they do. this is kind of how I think of jerrys approach. he is pulling more out of it then I can certainly see. he has likely been able to do this because he has learned all these little nuances that go along to his approach. kind of like in poker -- there are all those situations that you have seen many times if you have played a lot of hands but each particular situation is actually a very rare thing --- so you get good once you have seen enough hands to build up a library of all those rare but cumulatively important situations -- that is the difference between profit and loss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
Thanks Blowfish,

 

However, I am trying to figure out a way to play the open. For example, if price is below the previous day VWAP and PVP go short, etc.... Im curious to here any comments on such strategy. Perhaps add a few filters like candle patterns, etc...

 

Both Blowfish and Dogpile have correctly stated when to use today's distribution and when to use yesterdays.

Since today's distribution has not developed yet at the open, use yesterdays distribution and simply add on to it as the morning price/volume data develops. I do this for position trades as described in [thread=2423]part X[/thread]. You can then switch to today's distribution at your convenience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
I have another question regarding the SD. How narrow is narrow? It appears that Jerry would take trades with risk:reward ratios of slightly below 1.0. I personally do not take these type of trades even if Im scalping. If scalping the minimum I aim for is a 1:1.5 risk reward ratio. I understand that these risk:reward thinking is not entirely correct as it is geared for newer traders. However, I just never found myself worth taking a trade with so little reward opportunities.

 

To restate this question, how large does the SD have to be before you enter a trade?

If you are only using today's distribution, then at the open, the SD is virtually zero. As more price/volume data is added, the SD grows. What's nice about watching this is you can see how the volatility is changing as the day continues. First growing, possibly leveling off, then growing again, then reaching some kind of stasis.

So when should you first consider taking a trade? My rule of thumb is, don't trade until the range of the bars on your chart are less than 1 standard deviation. If the high of a bar touches 1 SD level and the low of the bar touches a second SD level, then the bar range is too large to consider entering a trade on that time frame. You either need to wait until the bar range gets smaller, or go to a faster time frame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  NAVEEVIa said:
Can somebody please advise me on this code.

I am a newbie to Easylanguage.

I am using this code on mullticharts

Comments appreciated

 

Naveen

 

 

vars: vwap(0),

pv(0),

Totalvolume(0),

Barfromstart(0),

Squareddeviations(0),

Probabilityweighteddeviations(0),

deviationsum(0),

standarddeviation(0);

If date > date[1]

then

begin

Barfromstart=0;

pv=AvgPrice*volume;

Totalvolume=volume;

vwap=pv/totalvolume;

end

else

begin

Barfromstart=Barfromstart[1]+1;

pv=pv[1] + AvgPrice*Volume;

Totalvolume=Totalvolume[1] + Volume;

vwap=pv/Totalvolume;

end;

deviationsum=0;

for value1= 0 to Barfromstart

begin

Squareddeviations=Square(vwap-avgprice[value1]);

Probabilityweighteddeviations=volume[value1]*Squareddeviations/Totalvolume;

deviationsum=deviationsum+Probabilityweighteddeviations;

end;

 

standarddeviation=SquareRoot(deviationsum);

plot1(vwap);

plot2(vwap+standarddeviation);

plot3(vwap+2*standarddeviation);

plot4(vwap-standarddeviation);

plot5(vwap-2*standarddeviation);

 

 

Hi,

that code works properly for me, I see we are all worried about VWAP to be plotted in Tradestation; but my real concern is how to plot PVP, if I use AVGprice function I never have "round" prices to work on so how can I say what price showed the maximum volume in the day?

Bye

Smodato

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  darthtrader said:
hi, check out the thread in Trading Indicators. Blowfish looks like he should have everything pretty much nailed down at some point as far as matching Jerry's videos.

Thanks for the suggestion, unfortunately I did not get the PVP code there, furthermore other codes I found are ELD format and using Prosuite 2000i I cannot read them, please see this attachment and maybe someone can read it and post it here in order for me to "transport" it into prosuite 2000i.

Thanks, bye

Smodato

MARKETPROFILE.ELDFetching info...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Howard Arrington just told me he is including SD as a built in study in ensign to be released today in the nov 8th beta.

 

Looking forward to seeing this.

 

In his words.....

 

"VWAP with standard dev band based on price-VWAP is now a built in study in the 11-08 beta to be released later today.

Enjoy. You can do away with the DYO for VWAP now."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  mmaker said:
Howard Arrington just told me he is including SD as a built in study in ensign to be released today in the nov 8th beta.

 

Looking forward to seeing this.

 

In his words.....

 

"VWAP with standard dev band based on price-VWAP is now a built in study in the 11-08 beta to be released later today.

Enjoy. You can do away with the DYO for VWAP now."

 

Glad to hear it. It was only a matter of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it not make more sense to convert the VWAP bands into an oscillator. Here is essentially what it would look like:

 

http://www.charthub.com/images/2007/11/09/VWAP_Oscillator.png

 

This way, you have one histogram, instead of 5, 7, 9 lines overlaying your candles. The histogram tells you how many standard deviations price is above or below the VWAP. I'll add this oscillator option to our next release (I/RT 9.0).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  LS_Chad said:
Would it not make more sense to convert the VWAP bands into an oscillator. Here is essentially what it would look like:

 

http://www.charthub.com/images/2007/11/09/VWAP_Oscillator.png

 

This way, you have one histogram, instead of 5, 7, 9 lines overlaying your candles. The histogram tells you how many standard deviations price is above or below the VWAP. I'll add this oscillator option to our next release (I/RT 9.0).

 

That's fine for the forward candles, (the ones all the way to the right). However the oscillator gives the wrong impression about where price has been relative to the standard deviations in the past, due to the fact that the standard deviation lines are renormalizing with each added data point.

For example from 12:20 to 12:50, the lows of all the candles touched the 3rd standard deviation price which kept renormalizing to a lower price.

The oscillator on the other hand gives the impression that none of those candles touched the 3rd standard deviation until about 12:40

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
Thanks Blowfish,

 

This will indicate that a trader using this methodology must wait until the VWAP, SD, and PVP becomes clear? The SD usually takes all morning before widening up for the Nikkei. This is why I was thinking of applying this technique for the afternoon only.

 

However, I am trying to figure out a way to play the open. For example, if price is below the previous day VWAP and PVP go short, etc.... Im curious to here any comments on such strategy. Perhaps add a few filters like candle patterns, etc...

 

Hi Soultrader,

 

I used to use several current day volume based studies on the Nikkei but found that the opening print often ends up distorting the information for most of the morning as you have commented on above. I ended up changing the studies to tick based or time based. Maybe take a look at those for alternatives.

 

My best regards,

MK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting you should say that MK. I have recently adjusted my Volume bars to self-scale for the last 20 bars but I exclude the opening bar and, for SPI, include all bars after the close of the cash market. This makes Wyckoff style volume use much more effective.

 

How are things going? (pm me :))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Sorry to bump this old thread but I've been reading this entire series of threads and am trying to follow along.

 

I'm using SierraChart and have loaded the VWAP but I can't figure out how to get the SDs loaded. When I add the SD study and base it off of VWAP, I get new lines that are very close to the VWAP. I've attached a pic to show what I'm talking about.

 

My options for the SD study are:

Top Band Input Data

Bottom Band Input Data

Length

Multiplication Factor

Moving Average Type

 

Any ideas on how to correctly set this (or code my own SD formula is this one is wrong) are appreciated. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The default multiplication factor is 1.8, which is what was used in my screenshot above.

 

When I calculate the SD of the VWAP manually I get values like .05. Hardly useful when the YM moves in 1 point increments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that in fact you don't want to calculate SD of the VWAP itself. You want to calculate SD of VWP (Volume Wiighted Price, i.e. a price distribution where probability of each price is defined by volume traded at that price). VWAP (Volume Wieghted Average Price) is the mean of such a distribution.

I don't use Sierra so I am unable to help you. But search Wikipedia for Standard Deviation, Variance and Mean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.