Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Crude Oil (CL) on Globex

Recommended Posts

Has anyone traded or looked at the CL, Crude Oil Physical Delivery contract? This puppy can move. Contract info: http://www.nymex.com/CL_spec.aspx

 

It caught my attention recently b/c I used to trade the QM (miny on Globex) and slowly the volume just died. I wasn't willing to daytrade something with so little volume. And I thought oil was out of my trading life.

 

Until I found the CL. I was able to find it due to the massive data available through Open ECry to their customers. I enjoyed trading the QM as it always provided a completely different instrument from the indexes to trade.

 

I know others here have asked about contracts that can move or just something to consider outside the indexes and the CL is a possible option. The volume is decent for an oil contract and can provide a nice contract to trade that does not move based on the US indexes.

 

Some highlights of this contract:

  • Tick value = $10.00/tick USD
     
  • Trading is good till 2:30pm EST. It is still open after 2:30, but due to the pits closing, the electronic contract dies as well. Kinda nice if you don't want to work will 4:15pm! ;)
     
  • This thing will react to the weekly oil inventory numbers, so I suggest knowing exactly when this report is (usually Wed @ 10:30am EST).
     
  • This is a PHYSICAL contract, which means if you hold until settlement, it is NOT settled in cash. It is settled in REAL oil. In other words, do not hold into expiration.
     
  • Speaking of expiration, the contract expires MONTHLY. I have an alert on the 3rd Wed of the month to watch volume rollover. Again, exit all trades of the current month by the 3rd Fri of the month. I would not suggest holding this contract overnight anyways, so if daytrading, you should be out of all positions by the close.
     
  • This puppy can move, so please watch before trading real money.
     
  • Most brokers/charting have this contract as the CL.
     
  • Commissions can be higher than other contracts. Open ECry has been very competitive with me for CL trades. One issue I have found is that some brokers do not clear the Nymex/Globex trades, so your broker will have to route the order to another broker and of course, this adds on cost to you.

 

Here's some charts for anyone interested, esp if you do not have the data feed currently.

ALL charts are 5 minute charts.

 

7-20-07

attachment.php?attachmentid=2026&stc=1&d=1184965347

 

7-17-07

attachment.php?attachmentid=2025&stc=1&d=1184965334

 

7-16-07

attachment.php?attachmentid=2024&stc=1&d=1184965334

 

7-11-07

attachment.php?attachmentid=2023&stc=1&d=1184965334

 

Again, due your own due diligence before trading the CL, but it's worth a look in my opinion! :thumbs up:

5aa70de71ddd4_CL7-11.png.1291ef6ac93f9afcf76c5769dbdb8674.png

5aa70de7227ca_CL7-16.png.0186f7336a94b69027785a45656bbf55.png

5aa70de726ffe_CL7-17.png.fb894221d5c67b1eee25b536bda803b4.png

5aa70de72bab0_CL7-20.png.036d57f2e778844b2d2f54afd29c37d9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's enough liquidity to trade QM with 1 or 2 contracts no problem. If you're trading more than that then it's cheaper to trade CL. Oil definitely responds well to bread and butter technical analysis. The Wednesday inventory numbers are read out on NewsStrike which is always useful. I should think most retail brokers will automatically close out your position for you before expiry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There's enough liquidity to trade QM with 1 or 2 contracts no problem. If you're trading more than that then it's cheaper to trade CL.

 

If I am reading my chart correctly, it looks like there was 13,000 TOTAL traded today and about 20,000 for a good day. If so, no thanks, even with 1-2 lots. CL today had 241,000. Slight difference.

 

Oil definitely responds well to bread and butter technical analysis.

 

Good observation notouch. That's kinda what grabbed my attention! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The spread is usually no more than one tick and there's plenty of bids and offers so if you want in or out you can get in or out at a reasonable cost. I will be moving to CL though once I'm more confident about the long term profitability of my set ups.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got screwed up big time on QM some time ago due liquidity. I should say it was my fault as I went in kinda heavy loaded. CL is nice and tops sometimes over 300k contracts a day( back when I stopped trading currently I have to see). Along with DAX is at the top of my list.

 

Inventories and good ol' S/R lines is all I use to trade this baby...sweet trades

 

Good choice brown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

QM on tradestation orders have been receiving complaints so it might be better to go to another broker. I heard the slippage was a problem and occasional charting problems. That was about 6 months to a year ago, that may have changed already. I haven't traded QM or CL...yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Has anyone noticed the overnight S/R as significant factor morning trades?

 

Is this contract traded in a different exchange besides Nymex? If so, it might be a good idea to observe the overnight S/R for those exchanges as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

London exchange, under Brent. This is the most important market in terms of volume, NYMEX comes second. But TS doesn't support this product so I can't really see much. But thanks for reminding me, I should look elsewhere for charting this product.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you talking about QM specifically or in general? On ER2 I never had problems, I compared them side by side orders and matrix quotes with Infinity, were the same. As for QM, TS forums had a few threads with delayed quotes and fills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you talking about QM specifically or in general? On ER2 I never had problems, I compared them side by side orders and matrix quotes with Infinity, were the same. As for QM, TS forums had a few threads with delayed quotes and fills.

 

In general. I am on the hunt for a new chart software and I heard horror stories about TS execution. But it was back last year. I am currently on a tryout with sierra charts and so far so good. I know TS has many goodies and I've been thinking about trying them out to see how it goes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

feb - check out MultiCharts as well. And they recently starting supporting data from Open ECry as well. So if you are a client of OEC, you can take the data they provide to customers and plug into MultiCharts, therefore eliminating the need to pay for data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
feb - check out MultiCharts as well. And they recently starting supporting data from Open ECry as well. So if you are a client of OEC, you can take the data they provide to customers and plug into MultiCharts, therefore eliminating the need to pay for data.

 

Thanks a lot brown and sorry for hijack your thread. I'vebeen using transact for years and have no compliants whatsoever, but I am willing to change for the sake of having better charts. Have you any experience with open Ecry??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

Does anyone still trade the mini-crude QM if they can afford to trade the main CL contract?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if i had the resources, i'd dump QM right away. the spread makes short term trading a bit more difficult. on a tight budget i'd stick with QM, because you can establish more positions for scaling in and out of the trade.

 

i'd love to swing trade CL when it turns down, of course who knows if that will happen this year but it's more likely than not. has anybody got an idea how to find out when the right moment would be to go short?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does anyone still trade the mini-crude QM if they can afford to trade the main CL contract?

 

Sure do - I trade both. I mainly trade CL but many times QM too. For instance, sometimes I don't have as much confidence in the market conditions so I use QM in those situations. Liquidity isn't an issue for me - i can get in & out fast with QM and almost never get slippage on stops. QM is great for my use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd love to swing trade CL when it turns down, of course who knows if that will happen this year but it's more likely than not. has anybody got an idea how to find out when the right moment would be to go short?

 

I personally wouldn't short CL at these levels. There's no indication that the oil bull market is over, and while you may get some down days, or even a pull back to 70, it really would be a gamble in my opinion, for a swing trade.

 

Some oil guy on CNBC said today that the long term picture for oil is down, because of OPEC's announcement today. If anything these were to be bearish implications, but the bears couldn't keep it down. We still had a higher close....on and on they said it was bearish bigtime, news from the pit.

 

Tommorows an important day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.