Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Future

Trading Balance: The Best of Both Worlds

Recommended Posts

How many traders rely strictly on technicals in your intraday trading? Many veteran traders like Linda Raschke has mentioned that good traders need to have a balance of both technical and fundamental trading. In this thread, I hope to expand the fundamental side of trading for intraday trading.

 

How many of you read the papers everyday to gain a macro view on the global economy? There is a correlation between various markets. For example, the Nikkei tends to follow the US Markets. Therefore US Market news tend to be a leading indicator for the Nikkei action the following day. It is quite ironic due to the fact that Tokyo/Osaka standard time is approx 12 hours ahead of NY time. Yet investors and traders glue their eyes on the S&P, Dow as if they are afraid to make a decision without knowing what is going on in the US. I am sure Aussie traders or Germany traders have some input on market correlations.

 

Secondly, how good are you at analyzing sectors? Are you aware of interest sensitive sectors? Sectors that ppl flock to when banks/securities sectors are flat or down? The stock market is a giant arena full of hopes and dreams for many investors. Why do US stocks have alot of high flyers? Do you really think it is possible that these companies gain millions of dollars in capital overnight? These are the hopes and dream stocks. Watch for these when all other stocks lag. These are what I like to call pure speculation stocks.

 

Let's take a look at yesterdays action (July 10, 2007). A trader well informed of fundamental news especially with the subprime mortgage panic... would of known that any long setups would of been extremely risky. How many intraday traders actually went long? Did you profit from them? The easy money was on the short side.

 

For intraday index traders, it is extremely important to be well informed of fundamental news behind various sectors, stocks, commodities, currency, etc.. All of these have an impact on index futures. Stocks like Microsoft, Intel, Apple, etc... have a tremendous impact in the minds of traders globally. A rise in Intel can cause global tech sectors to lift. Where tech stocks are weighted heavily in the minds of traders in markets like Tokyo and Singapore... this news can lift the indexes. Hence you want to be focusing on long setups.

 

Please feel free to add your inputs. I am no fundamental expert by any means but hopefully this thread can help traders gain a macro of view of trading because intraday trading can easily get one absorbed too much in tick by tick action. Happy trading. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Future,

 

I was a professional fundamental guy for many years. Good fundamental anlysis works very well over the long-run. Bad fundamental analysis fails miserably. The problem and the benefit with fundamental analysis is the fact that it takes a long time to figure out if you are really right or wrong. This is a benefit because of the the long-term upslope of the market. This is a problem because how do you control losses when something goes against you.

 

Trying to use fundamental information to explain the short-term swings is useless. People that do this are making it up. The market will very often do the opposite of what the fundamental news implies. Other times, it will go in the direction of the fundamental news of the day. Anyone who tries to trade short-term on fundamentals is sure to lose. My short-term trading is 100% technical at this point. All of my trades were on the short-side yesterday and it had absolutely nothing to do with thinking about subprime mortgages.

 

Think about all the major things that can happen that are simply unrelated to anything you can predict. 'Shocks' like natural disasters, political problems, wars, terrorism etc... what the hell do you do when these 'shock' events happen, your portfolio just got nailed, the market is plunging and you fear another big gap down the next day? Well, understanding short-term technical structure gives you a risk-controlled gameplan for any situation -- though many times that simply means sitting out.

 

BTW, I am very familiar with Linda Rashke and she would definitely consider herself 100% technical.

 

One note: I found 'Market Profile' to be a very interesting combination: it is technical in nature but does help you find where the market is finding 'value' -- a fundamental concept.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My view is simple - if you are a technical trader, there's no need for the fundie's to mess with your mind. Reason being that there were good long opportunities on Tuesday that produced profit. I think people forget that you can in fact make money in a downtrend going long and vice versa - mainly due to what I call the 'micro-trends' of the day. Rarely is it a straight shot up or down.

 

So I am going to disagree future as a futures daytrader myself. I really don't care why the markets are moving, just as long as they are. I understand your idea as I used to sell those ideas and theories but in practical daytrading, I don't see how useful fundie's are. In other words, if I am going for 2-4 pts on the ES per trade, I don't believe the overall fundie is going to get me there before a possible stop out.

 

Now, swing trading and buy/hold is a different story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your comments. I would have to disagree regarding this as I personally know of many traders that trade strictly off news, sectors analysis, etc.. which are all fundamental based. What I realized throughout the course of my career is that trading is not limited to but just one style. I used to be 100% technically oriented. I cared less about news as I truly believed everything can be seen in volume and price action. However, after spending time with fundamental based short term traders it was mind blowing. Now, they are mainly stock traders that have deep pockets and are able to diversify their positions throughout various sectors. But one thing is in common. They are able to understand the rotation of money, relative sector strenght extremely well. Hearing them talk is like reading next weeks newspaper. Simply amazing.

 

I am by no means criticizing 100% technical traders. But I have to state that understanding how top Tier stocks are behaving, the flow of money, etc... can really help give short term trader an edge. I think it is important to understand what the big money is. Of course this can be seen in volume. But these hedge fund type guys are holding such a big position that they need to constantly re-adjust their portfolio several times a day. And alot of their decisions is based on fundamentals.

 

Using 100% fundamentals is a sure way for me to lose intraday. This I admit because I am no expert. But having a balance in my opinion is an advantage for any trader. Please feel free to disagree.. or agree :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.