Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

James - I would suggest that any time a new vendor is posting on TL - whether by request of you or not - you introduce them to the forum. In this thread - http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f37/afraid-of-failure-1993.html - I can see where the concern would come from when there's a new thread by a vendor, in this case Joe Ross. The immediate concern by many traders is what is the motive of this person posting here. It's a fine line obviously, but as TL grows, many more vendors will want in on the action. Not too mention, from your biz perspective, you should be monitoring all activities by such vendors on your forum. This site is not free to run, so if someone wants to 'advertise' here (directly or not) you should be compensated.

 

I would suggest some sort of intro from you regarding the vendor to the forum to help avoid threads becoming a discussion of what motive(s) this vendor may have, even if those motives are commercial. Let's just put the cards on the table and not create a smoke and mirrors environment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I completely agree, however the post in question was never made to be a commercial type post from my perspective. I'd never heard of Joe Ross, so I figured it was just another trader giving some information that many of us have heard many times over.

 

If someone was to begin posting their website or other services, then by all means, the motive is known and if he's (or she) is not paying for advertising on the site then either get them to pay or have them be gone. I have since closed that thread, btw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tin - we won't always know every vendor on the site, but I think the concern was what the real motive behind posting. If Joe and/or James provided a brief disclaimer that while Joe is a vendor he is here to contribute, or he is here to market, that makes things easier. Of course it's easy for a vendor to say they are just here to participate when in reality they are here to market. I would guess that most reservations us 'regular' guys have with vendors on a board is that all of us have seen few (if any) that actually just want to be a 'regular' guy on a board. Of course, if that's what they wanted, they could just make an anonymous screen name.... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brown, I completely agree and understand your point. What I personally didn't know is that this guy had a "motive" behind his posting. For someone to read that post, not knowing this guy from your average "joe", there would be no inference of anything commercial in it. I guess that's where Im coming from with regards to it. If there was any hint of anything commercial in that post, then for sure....do away with it if he's not gonna pay for the advertising. I just think it could have easily been you or torero or jperl or anyone whos name couldve been atop that post and we wouldn't be having this discussion.

 

Hope that helps to clarify my points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

Question is...

 

Do you know whether it is really that vendor or not?

 

Could be someone using his or her name to hawk the vendor's services via a referral link to their webpage, BTW.

 

I say this only because the writing style seems hauntingly similar to another vendor on the site.

 

Just my two ticks' worth...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joe Ross signed up as a "Registered Trader" and provided an appropriate biography in his profile stating that he is an educator, etc. Isn't that an appropriate introduction? I believe he did the right thing by providing the disclaimer. He should be held to the same rules as everyone else. If he starts pushing his products and services without having the appropriate vendor status on TL, then the moderators should handle his posts accordingly.

 

My suggestion is to ask people if they are a vendor during the registration process, and if so, require them to include an appropriate biography/disclaimer like Joe Ross did. "Registered Traders" who are also vendors can then have their handle set a different color, or something like that, to make others aware of them. If a vendor lies during registration and (s)he is busted, then (s)he should be called out and put to shame. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
  ant said:
Joe Ross signed up as a "Registered Trader" and provided an appropriate biography in his profile stating that he is an educator, etc. Isn't that an appropriate introduction? I believe he did the right thing by providing the disclaimer. He should be held to the same rules as everyone else. If he starts pushing his products and services without having the appropriate vendor status on TL, then the moderators should handle his posts accordingly.

 

My suggestion is to ask people if they are a vendor during the registration process, and if so, require them to include an appropriate biography/disclaimer like Joe Ross did. "Registered Traders" who are also vendors can then have their handle set a different color, or something like that, to make others aware of them. If a vendor lies during registration and (s)he is busted, then (s)he should be called out and put to shame. :D

 

 

I or anyone else could sign up as "Joe Schmoe", famous trader, with all the relevant info given. And I could use an affiliate link to a vendor website as my homepage.

 

Vendors should be vetted by the appropriate moderator or site admin prior to posting to ensure that it is they who are speaking in their own voice, and not just some affiliate impostor posing on their behalf.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cooter said:
I or anyone else could sign up as "Joe Schmoe", famous trader, with all the relevant info given. And I could use an affiliate link to a vendor website as my homepage.

 

Vendors should be vetted by the appropriate moderator or site admin prior to posting to ensure that it is they who are speaking in their own voice, and not just some affiliate impostor posing on their behalf.

 

 

Thats true cooter... it wil be very conveniant to validate his identity... anyway he deserves respect from our part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good points guys. No easy solution I suppose.

 

You don't want to turn away a potential contributing member to the board and we also don't want to turn this into a trading sales forum either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess this is a repetition from another thread but you have to give people the benefit of the doubt. He may sell something but until he commits that act, we shouldn't judge him. Indeed, if impersonate as someone else by another nickname, posting the same content, no one would say anything. We all judge too hastily. Wait for him to commit the act, then book him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I personally have paid over $150 for Joe Ross' books. However, I am more than pleased to have him on board with us. This place is about knowledge, improvement, and education. Any content and information that fall into this category is valued from my perspective.

 

Regarding vendors and educators, the tip on having to include this in the registration process is an excellent idea. Also please feel free to post any thoughts or recommendations regarding this topic. I will absorb these ideas and try to create an atmosphere accordingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

James - along the lines of identifying vendors in the registration, it would be helpful if then there was some sort of unique identifier in their screenname that would tell everyone real quick this is a vendor. That could eliminate threads turning into a debate. If everyone easily knows (w/o having to click their profile and read thru it), that could help minimize concerns. It doesn't need to be gaudy, just a small icon or something that would symbolize this person is some sort of trading vendor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
James - along the lines of identifying vendors in the registration, it would be helpful if then there was some sort of unique identifier in their screenname that would tell everyone real quick this is a vendor. That could eliminate threads turning into a debate. If everyone easily knows (w/o having to click their profile and read thru it), that could help minimize concerns. It doesn't need to be gaudy, just a small icon or something that would symbolize this person is some sort of trading vendor.

 

Great idea. Perhaps when a member points out that he/she is a vendor or educator they can be placed in a seperate usergroup for clarification purposes. Hence under their username a different label will appear. I will add this on my to-do-list. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.