Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Intercontinental Exchange wins trading rights for Russell equity indexes

Recommended Posts

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-tue_ice0619jun19,1,5526876.story?ctrack=1&cset=true

 

Merc loses futures to ICE

Russell move may affect CBOT battle

 

By Robert Manor

Tribune staff reporter

Published June 19, 2007

 

The IntercontinentalExchange Inc., which is attempting a merger with the Chicago Board of Trade, said Monday it had won the exclusive right to trade a well-known group of equity index futures previously traded mainly on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, a move that could weaken the Merc's competing merger bid for CBOT.

 

The ICE announcement involves the Russell Investment Group's two popular stock indexes of large and smaller capitalization stocks. Such index futures products have grown increasingly popular in recent years.

 

Patrick O'Shaughnessy, an equity analyst with Morningstar, said ICE's win of the contracts will serve two purposes. One is to diversify its offerings, which now are mainly energy and commodities such as sugar and cocoa, to include the increasingly fast-growing universe of financial futures.

 

It is also to strengthen ICE's bid to merge with the CBOT, a merger also sought by the Merc. "The ICE platform will offer investors worldwide exclusive access to Russell's unparalleled group of equity indexes," said Jeffrey Sprecher, the chief executive of ICE.

 

"They want people to see that they are here to stay and that they are a big player," O'Shaughnessy said. "It certainly brings ICE some credibility."

 

Russell equity indexes have been trading with the Merc since 1992, the company said, although some Russell products trade on the New York Board of Trade, which was recently acquired by ICE.

 

A spokesman for the Merc played down the loss of the Russell indexes. "Russell products make up only 1.5 percent of the total CME equity standard products, which means out of the 6 million contracts we do each day it's below half a percent of total volume," said Allan Schoenberg, director of corporate communications for the Merc.

 

Even backers of the Merc's bid for CBOT said the loss of the Russell indexes will have some impact on CBOT shareholders, who are to vote on the merger issue July 9.

 

"It will have a lot of shock value," to the Merc, said Alan Palmer, an independent trader at the CBOT. But he said that, in the long run, Merc's offer for CBOT is still more attractive than that of ICE.

 

The Russell Investment Group has developed a number of stock indexes intended to measure how different types of stocks are performing.

 

Russell licenses the use of the name for the indexes.

 

Kelly Haughton, strategic director for Tacoma, Wash.-based-Russell, could not give an exact timetable for when trading in the index futures would migrate from the Merc to ICE.But Haughton said ICE could win the right to trade other Russell equity indexes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know there are some ER2 traders here, so make sure you follow how this progresses and what changes you need to make in order to keep trading the ER2 when it's at the ICE.

 

Coincidentally, the CME had an announcement as well:

 

CME and S&P Announce New E-mini Small Cap Stock Index Futures Contracts

Chicago Mercantile Exchange MediaRoom - News Releases

 

 

Hmmmm.... A small cap E-mini... why would they do that? ;)

 

My guess is that this new E-mini coupled with a S&P 400 E-mini push, the CME is hoping to keep ER2 traders there. Problem is that the new e-mini is just that, new, and the S&P 400 has yet to get some good volume. Time will tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I trade the ER2 almost exclusively. Thanks for posting this info Brownsfan. Now I'm thinking additional real time feed and possible liquidity issues initially. Why can't they just leave well enough alone . . .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bh_trade said:
I trade the ER2 almost exclusively. Thanks for posting this info Brownsfan. Now I'm thinking additional real time feed and possible liquidity issues initially. Why can't they just leave well enough alone . . .

 

It's all about the benjamins baby. :D

 

I wonder what the Russell 'company' gets from this kind of stuff. The exchange is buying a license basically and you know the CME probably fought hard to keep it there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sandler O'Neill research report on the news:

 

 

04:09pm EDT 19-Jun-07 Sandler O'Neill & Partners LP (Richard Repetto, CFA) CME

Sandler: CME: The Response to the Russell Movement

 

 

Sandler O'Neill + Partners, L.P. EQUITY RESEARCH

Company Note

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Chicago Mercantile Exchange NYSE: CME - $545.99

eFinance RATING: BUY

12-Month Price Target: $630.00

-------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------

 

June 19, 2007

 

Richard Repetto, CFA, Principal

212-466-7906

rrepetto@sandleroneill.com

 

Betsy Miller, Vice President

212-466-7962

bmiller@sandleroneill.com

 

Christopher R. Donat, Associate Director

212-466-8068

cdonat@sandleroneill.com

The Response to the Russell Movement

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

EPS

Estimate

Mar Jun Sep Dec Year Growth Change P/E

------- ------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------

2006A $2.61 $3.12 $2.95 $2.91 $11.60 31.7% -- 47.1x

2007E $3.69A $3.53 $3.68 $3.86 $14.76 27.2% -- 37.0x

2008E $4.26 $4.71 $4.50 $4.63 $18.10 22.6% -- 30.2x

 

* CME announces its competitive response to ICE's acquisition of Russell

Index rights. This morning, CME announced an expansion of its agreement

with Standard & Poors to include E-mini futures on the Small Cap S&P

Indexes. After CME's license to trade the Russell indices expires in

September 2008, CME stated that it would incent traders to transfer their

open interest from CME Russell 2000 futures to the new CME/S&P E-mini Small

Cap contracts.

* CME can trade Russell index futures until September 2008. We learned from

CME management today that the company has a license to trade Russell index

futures until September 2008, although ICE can trade it concurrently for

just over a year. Once ICE obtains Hart-Scott-Rodino approval, which should

be in roughly 30 days, it can begin trading the Russell.

* The product versus the platform. We will have to take a "wait and see"

approach as to where liquidity shifts for small cap E-mini indexes. The

pros for ICE (the product) include large funds that are specifically

indexed to the Russell. The pros for CME (the platform) include its

technology, clearinghouse and cross-margining benefits with CBOT contracts.

* Exclusive rights have not driven market for CME's main contracts. YTD in

2007, Eurodollar futures have accounted for 56% of CME's daily volume, and

CME has no exclusive trading agreement for those. FX products have

accounted for another 9% of CME's volume, and it has no exclusive licenses

for those contracts either. The takeaway here is that there is more to

driving volume than the exclusive right to trade a contract.

* June-to-date volumes are tracking above expectations. In June-to-date, CME

has traded an average of 8.73 million contracts per day, up 43.8%

sequentially. We note the early part of the month included the roll, and we

believe volume will drop off somewhat in the second half of June. Still,

over the last two years, the second part of June has been down 25.0% and

26.2% from the first part. Our 2Q07 estimate of 6.07 million contracts per

day implies the second part is down 41.9% from the first part. With open

intererst also at record levels in the roll cycle, we believe there is

upside potential to our 2Q07 EPS estimate of $3.53. The consensus is at

$3.56.

* Maintaining BUY rating. We are maintaining our BUY rating and our price

target of $630, which is based on a 30x multiple of our 2008 pro forma

earnings power EPS estimate of $19.87. We also add $30 for the discounted

value of the $0.88 we estimate that CME Reuters FXMarketSpace initiative

will earn in 2009.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cooter said:
How far back?

 

Depends on what format you want (minute, tick, etc.) and if you are plugging that data into the OEC trader or another platform like MC. The minute data appears to go back pretty far on it's own w/o requesting more data.

 

The guys at OEC are good guys and if you ask nicely, you just might be able to get even more data. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.