Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

walterw

Walter`s First Forex Research (various ideas)

Recommended Posts

Walter

 

Nice find on the Sunday range.

 

Here I post an example of a flip that took place this morning, works out well for 20+ pips. Only trouble is that it took place at 6am this morning.

 

What I was wondering was, how long do you think the sunday range would be valid for and / or would this idea not be a scalping one, more of a breakout swing one?

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

sundayrange.thumb.png.5d5a3d9f72feac281fdd69acf592cbcb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BluRay, this Sunday range has given me an inspiration of what are the advantages of small ranges...

 

On the other side you can see how you can trade out of ranges with our variety of FHR setups... Including "flip"..

 

so from there on I am on the search for a small range previous to every session, I will post soon on the topic... but as you can see we are trying to combine all our methods together, FHR + flip + icon + small range, etc... to come up with something cool.... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Todays Holiday I did meditate in forex... some ideas of very simple stuff (nothing new) have been arround... some kind of average reject type thing that would look similar to an icon type thing... something for a very easy reading... I dont know, I want something easy... complexity its not the way here, it doesnt guarantee nothing...

 

I found an average (Black) that could be the one to be crossed and rejected... notice the red ribbon how it crosses the black average then pulls back to it without crossing it again... oscillators could give timing here... something to meditate in... cheers Walter.

5aa70de5c8de6_AverageRejectTrade.thumb.png.210293cfdec5d50cdaafe7afe11e560e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok... I had been doing some research on some other forex forums... there are very nice things out there, others just not that good....

 

One thing I notice is that some threads get started very good and suddenly the creator disappears and the rest of the people just do something completely diferent, in other cases the same creator drops his method and changes to a diferent one... I dont know why they just dont open a new thread... well so far in terms of forex I did open this "idea" thread wich is conceived to be a poupurry of ideas... so I think here its the proper place to bring things that will not necesarilly will keep going on... FHR has been the first forex thread with one clear topic so far coming out from here... I think FHR could have some future,(still on beta, we will see) any way I would like to introduce now a new idea here for forex wich has some hibrids from other forums combined with my typical way of looking at things...

 

This one can be nice for the "day traders" its not so scalping type... I will use a 15 min and a 5 min chart... ¡¡ chatterbox:p I think it can give a little more room to make more pips...(probably thats one of the things I am still not convinced about the 1 min timeframe in FHR`s ) some times it can be a small range trap where you can hardly get even with your costs... so this is an easy one...

 

Lets call it: The "Pivot Reject" Trade if this takes some color we will eventually open a thread about it...

 

Now we have this pivot line (red) its fixed during the entire day, it belongs to yesterdays data... and this other magenta line wich is some kind of average... we basicly are above or below this pivot... if above we are thinking in longs, if below, we are thinking in shorts... very simple...

 

Now... we will be looking to have a move towards this pivot... if we are above, going down to the pivot, if we are below, going up to the pivot... then REJECTION, bounce of this pivot... doesnt need to test it but the near we get to it the better...

 

And like always ( for me the best and simplier) CCI will do the timing for us on the "very specific timing" at 5 min...

 

I attach some charts to show this... later I explain this better... cheers Walter.

 

Pd: I still dont have exits decided... this is a first argumental idea...

5aa70de5eeecd_Pivotreject1.thumb.png.b9488c8de2a195f990b2171c928840f2.png

5aa70de6102e1_PivotReject2.thumb.png.a378ef45687b6463a6aa805c5f8250dd.png

5aa70de618dd1_Pivotreject3.thumb.png.19c0ca6b64836ffdf5ec447049f0885a.png

5aa70de61de67_pivot1.thumb.png.71c56e7a21ff74b5903a482c9df6a77d.png

5aa70de62301b_pivot2.thumb.png.d2ec00efc52bff521bfb4f9ff594fd6e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok.. I still keep bringing ideas to my forex aproach... I know nothing its new here, just about all methods had been discovered and developed at this time so this is more of adapting some pre-existing method to my personal needs...

 

If I have to make a grand clasification of methods I have to talk about trend or counter trend methods... on the other hand momentum vs cyclical methods... is any method better than the other ?... dont think so, I believe both types of aproaches have same potential...

 

now I believe we as humans have certain propension to certain type of "models" on diferent areas of life... some people are very social others dont like to hang out... some eat a lot others are frugal... some people like to use beard others they shave every day... so the same happens with trading, there is no clear explanation (technical) exactly why some traders like to be trendwise and others counter... as some like to trade in the storm of momentum while others love to trade on quiet waters...

 

so here comes my point and I think the word "confort" aplies very well to this issue... where are you confortable ? what method makes you feel confortable... there are great techniques, but maybe you dont feel confortable with them.. and some times a technique thats not a super technique you do fell confortable with it, now thats what I call an edge there... some times the edge comes from the confort more than from the technique itself...

 

So in trading its technique + confort in perfect equilibrium...

 

So far I keep adding ideas here on the pursuit of technique + confort... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Walter,

 

good thread ideas. I am going to be following along!

 

Also, on another thread you mentioned me sharing some of my ideas, and I recently started a thread to do just that. Longer term methods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its this guy crazy ? maybe yes... my wife thought I was crazy with my expectations on the futures markets some years ago... today she has a complete diferent concept of me: She still thinks I am crazy but with clear tangible results... so with this same insane thinking I will aproach forex trading... (want to join the challenge ? I already welcome you )

.

 

Classic. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone idea here if the forex techniques have been changed since the crisis hit the market again with it’s bankruptcy and losing job effects. I was in a forex trading firm but after market crash down with big point my forex techniques couldn’t help me in saving my money. I want to know if you guys working on some new forex techniques which can give good impact in the market rates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.