Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Review of Open ECry (futures broker)

Recommended Posts

Guest cooter

For me, working with OEC has been the best broker I've EVER dealt with. This includes going from Alaron, to ProActive Futures and Mirus Futures. The only one I will warn of is Alaron. I just didn't like what I saw (and paid). ProActive and Mirus are good, but as an IB, there's only so much they can do on commissions to be competitive.

 

So, how are you finding the OEC Trader and DOM compared to your other broker's software?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, how are you finding the OEC Trader and DOM compared to your other broker's software?

 

Good question cooter. For the most part, it's on par or exceeding previous softwares that I've used, including the $500/mo T4 that I was on. I have one thing that I am working on getting them to change though - I would like the DOM to re-center more quickly. In a volatile time, the price can be off-centered quite a bit and I don't care for that. I'm hoping they can consider at least giving the user the option to re-center more often. What are your thoughts on that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

A few thoughts...

 

A button on the DOM itself to manually re-center would be nice. Something where you could easily turn on and off centering on the DOM itself, without having to mess with the DOM settings dialog.

 

The volume histogram feature on the DOM is a long overdue addition.

 

The new tiered brackets (called Strategy Order) is somewhat clunky in operation, and only has three tiers (five would have been optimal), but it does allow users to save separate bracket profiles for each DOM.

 

Market if Touched orders are finally supported in this release, and are available on the DOM.

 

One thing you might want to do is compare the speed of the OEC DOM versus another brokers, though. I was surprised to find the Transact AT just a smidgen faster than OEC, for both CME and CBOT contracts.

 

All-in-all, this upgrade (3.1.1.1) is well worth the wait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RESULT: VERY CLEAN SHEET. That's important to me and hard to do in the futures biz.

 

FCM Capital Data direct from the CFTC - http://www.cftc.gov/marketreports/financialdataforfcms/index.htm

 

Hey brownsfan,

 

Thanks for the info you've been providing on OEC. I've actually been taking a look at them as well based on your recommendation. One concern I have about them is that they barely have $1M in net capital. I would expect a company in a strong financial position to have more like many others at the link you provided. I don't know if I could get past this. Does this concern you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey brownsfan,

 

Thanks for the info you've been providing on OEC. I've actually been taking a look at them as well based on your recommendation. One concern I have about them is that they barely have $1M in net capital. I would expect a company in a strong financial position to have more like many others at the link you provided. I don't know if I could get past this. Does this concern you?

 

I was more concerned about the segregated accounts number since that represents client assets. $29 mill is not a ton, but enough for my consideration. As for the net capital, it is above the requirement set by the CFTC and NFA. I'll email my contact and see what the response is to that number and let you know what I find out.

 

My biggest concern would be that NFA report. If there were a ton of cases and arbitration, I would not even bother looking at the CFTC report, regardless of how much money is at the firm.

 

Like I said, I think with OEC you are getting a firm that is constantly improving their software for their traders and large enough to be a player, small enough for you and me to trade there at competitive commission rates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

One other thing....

 

There's an old issue that has resurfaced with this recent release (3.1.1.1) concerning the display of the correct open P/L on the DOM for side-by-side electronic and pit contracts. This value also shows up incorrectly in the open P/L on the Account Summary.

 

During RTH, when both are trading, the DOM will show the open P/L on the electronic DOM based on the pit quotes - even if you didn't place a pit order. ZBU7 and USU7 are prime examples of this. It also shows in the Account Summary too.

 

Why?

 

If the pit contract has different quotes (which is often the case) then this would cause the electronic P/L to show the wrong open P/L, based on the pit contract. The only instance where this might be tolerable is if a pit order was pending or executed on the same side-by-side contract. However, this activity is happening even when no pit order is made, let alone contemplated.

 

Let's stop and think about this for a second.

 

You are trading the 30 yr bond electronic contract (ZB). It has a side-by-side fungible pit contract (US) as well. This means that you can open one position on either contract, and close it out on the other, if you like.

 

With OEC you have the luxury of being able to trade pit contracts via the DOM without having to pick up the phone and call your pit broker. So the DOM for pit contracts looks and feels pretty much the same as the DOM for electronic contract (except that there isn't a price ladder full of pending orders).

 

If you place a pit order, the open P/L will be displayed on the DOM, in the same manner as an electronic order. Where the contracts are side-by-side, the same open position will be reflected on the other contract, since you can close out the position with either contract.

 

However, the quotes for each contract may differ, since the pit and electronic contracts are "separate but equal" contracts. So during open outcry hours (RTH), you can have two different prices for essentially the same instrument - one pit-traded, and one electronically-traded.

 

But what if you are trading electronically, and don't really care about the pit-contract? Well, the open P/L for your trade should be based solely upon the electronic contract - after all, that's what you're trading, isn't it.

 

Only if you choose to exit your position on the pit contract, should the P/L change if the quote is different.

 

So, let's say you have an open position on the ZB 30 yr bond electronic sometime during RTH. Say 10 cars. Decent size, right? And the open P/L in the DOM ***and*** Account Summary both show $312.50 (tick value is $31.25/tick).

 

Whoo-hoo! You think you've got a winner - one tick is better than nothing. Your limit order is hit, and your position is closed. But wait!

 

To your chagrin, your Realized P/L on the Account Summary is FLAT? How is that?

 

Turns out that the OPEN P/L you saw was based on the pit contract which was one tick up on the electronic quote. But the REAL P/L for your contract was NOT shown on the DOM or account summary - until the contract was closed, and the P/L was "realized".

 

It may not be a big deal if you are "nickel-and-dime"ing it one contract at a time, but start pushing a few contracts and this issue could bite you one day too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As for the net capital, it is above the requirement set by the CFTC and NFA. I'll email my contact and see what the response is to that number and let you know what I find out.

 

Brownsfan, do you know what the CFTC and NFA requirement is and what happens when a firm falls below the requirement? I thought the requirement was $1M in net capital and Open ECry has $1.029M according to the link. Anyway, I'll wait to see what you find out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One other thing....

 

There's an old issue that has resurfaced with this recent release (3.1.1.1) concerning the display of the correct open P/L on the DOM for side-by-side electronic and pit contracts. This value also shows up incorrectly in the open P/L on the Account Summary.

 

Not good! That's worse than TradeStation showing cumulative daily P&L in their Matrix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brownsfan, do you know what the CFTC and NFA requirement is and what happens when a firm falls below the requirement? I thought the requirement was $1M in net capital and Open ECry has $1.029M according to the link. Anyway, I'll wait to see what you find out.

 

Here is what I found out tonight regarding the capital that is reported on the CFTC report:

 

We have the same question from most of the larger clients or IBs we are in talks with. We basically keep a bit more than the minimum requirement. We have ready capital in reserve that we can / do bring in to support additional business as required.

 

Now, I've dealt with this contact since day one of my talks with OEC in considering brining my biz there, so I trust his word. This is not just a regular broker you deal with at OEC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A few thoughts...

 

A button on the DOM itself to manually re-center would be nice. Something where you could easily turn on and off centering on the DOM itself, without having to mess with the DOM settings dialog.

 

Cooter - doesn't the 'Go To Last' button the DOM do exactly what you are asking here?

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=2483&stc=1&d=1187797695

 

 

 

And if you just want to center it manually, you could just turn off the 'Auto Center Price' in the setup:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=2484&stc=1&d=1187797790

tl.png.95ca757f31b7ab3a9a2cb441c78f7738.png

tl2.png.5a9dd0d5d599d9b3d3be909707029274.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
Cooter - doesn't the 'Go To Last' button the DOM do exactly what you are asking here?

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=2483&stc=1&d=1187797695

 

 

Yeah, must have been late at night for me too. Guess it's the placement of where that button is located on the DOM that made me think it wasn't there...

 

I'm loathe to even think of touching that button though for fear of accidentally sending a market order through - although I suppose that turning the order confirmation back on would alleviate that concern.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
Cooter - you will be happy to know that OEC is aware of the situation you have outlined here and Rob is working on the fix. It has something to do with time stamps. No ETA given at this point.

 

Well, "timestamps" seems like a specious reason to me, IMHO, when it's actually the logic of using pit quotes to calculate open P/L on an electronic contract that is the core issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

Anyone have problems with OEC and their bracket orders lately?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

Bracket orders not filling properly.

 

Stops and targets (OCO) on bracket not entered/held when main order accepted.

 

Or main order triggered, and bracket order stops and targets rejected and cancelled outright.

 

This puts both me and OEC at risk when stops and targets for intended brackets aren't accepted and are cancelled, while the main order sits live and working.

 

IMHO, they should reject the entire bracket order if any piece of it is not going to being filled or accepted to begin with.

 

Supposedly there's a fix going into the system this evening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
There apparently was some sort of major fiasco the other day over at OEC...

 

Well, some folks had their bracket orders "disappear", only to find that they were still alive and working, but not appearing on the DOM.

 

Here's a few posts elsewhere about it: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=103390

 

Curious to hear what you've found out about what's going on over there too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Per your requests...

A brief break-down of the issue on Friday:

The CME servers (as a standard practice) send out a "heartbeat" request to all of their incoming connections at regular intervals. If the CME doesn't not receive a response back within specified parameters, it will effectively disable that connection to the exchange. At 10:26AM the response from OEC to the CME was not received and our connection was disabled by the exchange. At 10:35AM the connection was restored but was not performing as expected. Our tech team made a decision to resolve the issue but resetting the connection at 11:42AM.

 

The particular issue has been isolated and addressed.

 

We take great pride in our up-time and reliability and go to pretty extensive lengths to strive for 100% uptime. I will also note that we went to great length on Friday to address any reported customer issues. If a customer reported an issue, we did some verification and agreed to do a full refund (not too many other firms do this...and I don't think we get much (any) credit for the way we handle such issues)

 

 

-----------------------------

 

Here's my take - sh*t happens. It happens at most/all brokers at some point. What counts is how the broker handles it. While at TradeStation, if something like this happened and I requested any type of refund or reimbursement, they would have laughed and said 'read the agreement you signed'. Same thing at ProActive. Same thing when I was a stockbroker - if a system went down, oh well, tough luck.

 

So, if OEC is willing to back their stuff up with MONEY, that works for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Per your requests...

A brief break-down of the issue on Friday:

The CME servers (as a standard practice) send out a "heartbeat" request to all of their incoming connections at regular intervals. If the CME doesn't not receive a response back within specified parameters, it will effectively disable that connection to the exchange. At 10:26AM the response from OEC to the CME was not received and our connection was disabled by the exchange. At 10:35AM the connection was restored but was not performing as expected. Our tech team made a decision to resolve the issue but resetting the connection at 11:42AM.

 

The particular issue has been isolated and addressed.

 

We take great pride in our up-time and reliability and go to pretty extensive lengths to strive for 100% uptime. I will also note that we went to great length on Friday to address any reported customer issues. If a customer reported an issue, we did some verification and agreed to do a full refund (not too many other firms do this...and I don't think we get much (any) credit for the way we handle such issues)

 

 

-----------------------------

 

Here's my take - sh*t happens. It happens at most/all brokers at some point. What counts is how the broker handles it. While at TradeStation, if something like this happened and I requested any type of refund or reimbursement, they would have laughed and said 'read the agreement you signed'. Same thing at ProActive. Same thing when I was a stockbroker - if a system went down, oh well, tough luck.

 

So, if OEC is willing to back their stuff up with MONEY, that works for me.

 

You are definitely right.

 

I wasn't aware of the outcome. Thanks for posting that.

 

Money Talks- BS Walks. Most definitely.

 

That is impressive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Money Talks- BS Walks. Most definitely.

 

 

You said it. Words mean nothing to me if you can't back them up.

 

OEC obviously talks the talk and walks the walk.

 

I stand by my ringing endorsement of OEC as the ONE futures firm that you SHOULD be trading at.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

I stand by my ringing endorsement of OEC as the ONE futures firm that you SHOULD be trading at.

 

Have they fixed the outstanding issue with bracket orders yet? This is another issue that caused problems for some traders recently. I didn't see a fix or upgrade yet....

 

IMHO, when you get to the point of having to run Camtasia Studio on all your trades, "just in case", you have to wonder....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have they fixed the outstanding issue with bracket orders yet? This is another issue that caused problems for some traders recently. I didn't see a fix or upgrade yet....

 

IMHO, when you get to the point of having to run Camtasia Studio on all your trades, "just in case", you have to wonder....

 

My brackets are fine Cooter, so I didn't ask.

 

If it's that big of a concern, then shop around and see what's out there. There's plenty of FCM's and IB's to trade through; however, I wonder how many would step up AND take responsibility like OEC has done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know a whole lot about OEC and a few things always seemed weird to me, as other brokers have their own quirks...but to back up a statement like that with MONEY....that earns some respect...Word are cheap and easy...but once again Money Talks-BS Walks.

 

I'll give it to OEC on this one. I definitely noticed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • re TikTok Recently metafakebook made what was apparently a move to stay aligned with ‘culture’ - no more fact ‘checking’, no more censorhip... basically ‘Zucker’ was shown that his mission was failing because they were only building profiles on ‘useful idiots’ instead of those who oppose the great centralization  (... just like long ago he only saw campus potential and had to be shown the promise and rewarded for fronting the great spyware and social engineering project called Fakebook)... ie they could have replaced him long ago In the same vein, who holds ‘title’ to tiktok doesn’t matter either... it will remain a spyware project regardless of who ‘buys’ it... and the data will forever be available to the CCP Just sayin’
    • Omobola,  As an engineer surely you have money to buy a ticket to Monterey, Mexico... just a hop and a jump from there to Texas...  hth zdo 
    • Date: 20th January 2025.   The NASDAQ Rises As Trump Inauguration Edges Closer!   US indices increased in value for the first time after struggling for 5 consecutive weeks. Of the main US indices the NASDAQ witnessed the strongest gains (4.12%). Risk indicators point to a higher risk appetite under the new US President, Donald Trump. President Trump's inauguration will take place this afternoon and has promised to sign over 100 consecutive orders within his first week. NASDAQ - Higher Investor Confidence! NASDAQ traders begin to stomach less frequent interest rate adjustments, the market turns its attention to earnings and Trump’s presidency. Investors are becoming more bullish under expectations that Trump will apply policies to support the US economy and entice further investment into the US stock market. A "risk-on" sentiment is evident in today's sessions, reflected in risk indicators like the VIX, High-Low Index, and Bond yields.     Investors this week will concentrate on two factors. The first factor is Trump’s consecutive orders which he has advised will be signed within his first week. Investors will closely monitor how and if these policies influence the US economy and stocks. The second factor is earnings season, which will start to gain momentum this week. Tomorrow, Netflix will release its quarterly earnings report after the market closes. Netflix is the NASDAQ’s 10th most influential company and 11th most impactful stock. Analysts expect the company’s earnings per share to drop from $5.40 to $4.21, but for Revenue to rise to $10.11 Billion. If Netflix is able to beat the earnings per share and revenue expectations, fundamental elections would indicate a rise in the price. Over the past 12 months the price has risen 76%. A further increase would further support the NASDAQ. Thereafter, investors will turn their attention to Intuitive Surgical’s earnings report. Currently, investors believe the company’s earnings per share and revenue will rise compared to the previous quarter. Intuitive’s stock has risen by more than 9% in the past week alone indicating that investors believe the company will continue to beat earnings expectations. The company has beat expectations over the past 12-months. How are Markets Reacting to Trump's inauguration? Trump pledged to issue executive orders aimed at advancing artificial intelligence programs and establishing the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). Analysts expect these two alone to support US stocks. However, investors are not yet certain to what extent upcoming tariffs will pressure the NASDAQ and stocks. During the previous trade wars, the NASDAQ fell by 25% over a period of 4-months. Traders also should note that the NASDAQ rose in the 6-weeks after Trump won the elections. Over the past week, the VIX index fell by more than 12% indicating that the market believes US stocks will perform well under a Trump presidency. Simultaneously, US Bond yields have fallen from 4.80% to 4.58% which is known to positively influence the US stock market. Both the VIX and lower bond yields indicate higher investor confidence as Trump advises that policies will prompt more employment, US made products and more pro-US policies. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis The price of the NASDAQ trades above the 200-bar Moving Average on a 5-minute Chart indicating bullish price movement. Moving Averages have also crossed over upwards and the price trades above the VWAP indicating that the asset is maintaining its bullish momentum. Price action is also forming clear higher highs and higher lows, but investors will be cautious if the price does not find resistance at the $21,637 resistance level. In order to break above this level, investors will be hoping for positive earnings data from Netflix and Intuitive.     Key Takeaways: President Trump's inauguration will take place this afternoon with promise to sign over 100 consecutive orders within his first week. US indices rise after 5 weeks of declines, with the NASDAQ leading at 4.12%. Trump pledged to issue executive orders aimed at advancing artificial intelligence programs and establishing the Department of Government Efficiency. Analysts expect Netflix earnings per share to drop from $5.40 to $4.21, but for Revenue to rise to $10.11 Billion. Investors are becoming more bullish under expectations that President Trump will apply policies to support the US economy and entice further investment into the US stock market. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news. Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Consider: some 80% of small to medium-sized businesses around the world don’t have a website.   Many businesses in emerging economies rely on social media platforms (e.g., WhatsApp, Facebook) as their primary digital presence instead of formal websites.   But even in more digitally advanced economies, the number can hover around half.   Why? Simple answer: although we’ve made it easier to make a website, it’s still not easy enough.   Let’s say a yoga instructor wants to offer online classes but lacks tech skills or a budget.   Instead of struggling with confusing platforms, she tells her AI agent, “Set up a website for me to host yoga classes.”   The AI handles everything.   It integrates Stripe for payments, Zoom for live classes, scheduling services for in-person classes, and a chat module for inquiries.   It even suggests templates.   When the instructor picks one and asks for a purple and white color scheme, the AI updates it instantly.   No coding. No frustration. Just results.   And the best part? She didn’t have to touch a single screen or key.   This is the future Wilson describes in Age of Invisible Machines.   And, as mentioned, it’s powered by three core technologies:   Conversational User Interfaces (CUIs): Say what you need; the system handles it. From building websites to booking flights, it’s fast and human-like.   Composable Architecture: Traditional business solutions become “modules”. Like LEGO bricks, modular tools—payments, chats, scheduling—snap together to create custom solutions without starting from scratch.   No-Code Programming: AI agents code for you, empowering anyone to create without needing a developer. It’s not just a better way to interact with technology…   It’s a complete reimagining of how industries operate.   As Harvard Business School’s Marco Iansiti says, “This isn’t disruption—it’s a fundamental shift in production and interaction.”   And, the thing is…   It’s not just possible. It’s already happening.   Early examples are already here. – Chris Campbell, AltucherConfidential Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • Question: My name is Omobola Sikiru from Lagos, Nigeria. I am mechanical engineering. Where can I find someone that can be my helper to relocate me to the USA?   Answer: According to your own profile, you are trying to enter other countries through deception and immigration fraud.   You are an engineer in Nigeria, but you are not licensed as an engineer in any other country.   There are no helpers, no sponsors, and nobody is going to give you money, get you an engineering job, or get you a visa.   You must qualify to immigrate. Nobody can help you with that.   Either you qualify and have settling in money, or you don’t.   You need to improve your English before trying to get a job in a Western, English speaking country. Engineers write reports. You wrote, ‘I am mechanical engineering’. Nobody will hire you if you write like this. Rathkeale Source: https://www.quora.com/My-name-is-Omobola-Sikiru-from-Lagos-Nigeria-I-am-mechanical-engineering-Where-can-I-find-someone-that-can-be-my-helper-to-relocate-me-to-the-USA   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.