Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Smaller profits yields better results?

Recommended Posts

So I resisted starting this thread initially, but for whatever reason, felt like sharing today.

 

In my pursuit of a better exit strategy (as evidenced in my time at the WRB thread) I've looked and re-looked at just about everything - Fibs, pivots, trailing, fixed, etc. etc. And for me, I came to this conclusion - simpler is better and taking small bites out of the market is much easier than trying to devour the elephant at once. Yes, we'd all like to take one trade a day and let it run on trending days and stay out during chop or whatever, but you don't know what type of day is ahead of you till after the fact. And since you can't win if you don't play, that's no use to me.

 

So I went back and forth on this topic over and over recently - the topic of how/when to best exit for me and my trading methodology. And while I had been using a +2 point target before and during my WRB analysis, one thing stood out and the light went on - getting +2 on my trades with no risk to my initial stop was pushing the limits some days. Some days +2 is just not there. And then I realized that +1 - +1.5 was very achievable time after time. So then I asked myself if those extra ticks were worth the additional risk and stress to get. I of course thought probably not.

 

And then after realizing that taking +1.25 was achievable over and over, and then realizing that sometimes you just have to jump back onto a trade if another valid signal arises, I was able to become more nimble this week, esp today (Wed 6/6).

 

In a nutshell, I found for me that taking LESS in profits MADE me MORE money (at least this week and some previous backtesting). I realize that this could blow up in my face at a later date, but I'm going on record here with my observations. The WRB thread helped immensely not b/c I realized that WRB's are not going to work for me, but with the comments others made, esp in the last few pages, I realized that I could take less in profits each individual trade and make more money each day. Or it at least has the potential to do so.

 

The downside - some would say that I am 'over-trading' now. And at first glance, I get that. But if I told you that I could show you a way to make some money every day in the markets taking 3-7 trades or you could possibly make substantially more but would require many, many more trades (more on that later), would you be interested? I'm all about maximizing my work time. If I could take one trade and make a ton of money, I would. I have not found that however. What I have found is that for me (and this might not work for you, so please keep that in mind) taking multiple trades during the day and going for realistic targets is much easier. And to be perfectly honest, it's more fun. I'm active all day and really feel like I am doing my job. I don't know about others here, but taking 1 or 2 trades a day when you are a daytrader sucks. I know that if that works for you, then great and all that stuff, so please spare the lectures on why taking 1 or 2 is better. If it works for you, great, start your own thread. ;)

 

I've attached a couple very, very simple scenarios of how I have seen this way of trading work better for me. Please bare with me as these were drawn using SnagIt and I did it quickly for purposes of sharing here.

 

Scenario 1 - Tending Day

attachment.php?attachmentid=1664&stc=1&d=1181172630

 

Scenario 2 - Non-Trending Day

attachment.php?attachmentid=1665&stc=1&d=1181172638

 

Basically, by going for more realistic targets on the ES, my profits are taken out much more often and being flexible provides a way to get back into a trade if need be.

 

The key for me by looking for smaller targets is that on choppy or more range bound days, I can actually take some profits out of those moves. By going for +2 and/or a WRB, it wasn't always there on some of those days.

 

That's probably enough for now. I could go on and on some more, but I'll try to post some updates/stats of how things are going here. I would strongly suggest to those looking for a possible exit plan to consider bringing your targets CLOSER vs. going for more!

5aa70ddc1c12c_trendingday.png.9989a5e5fa0b7dd213a83d166a3ae0c6.png

5aa70ddc20f2e_non-trendingday.png.eef55bf4ca20888b84e16d22cc740a66.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter

Try entering an ES position with 3 targets: 1.25pts, 2pts, and 4 pts +.

 

Use 1/3 position on each target with a reasonable initial stoploss of, say 2 pts ( 8 ticks).

 

When your first target is met, move the stop loss to breakeven (entry).

 

If the second is met, move your stop loss up to entry + 1.25pts, and trail your stop from there.

 

Assuming that your entry criteria and trading plan is valid, you should be able to at least get your first target, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Brown ¡¡ welcome to the scalpers school ¡¡ thats what scalping its all about... not getting greedy on the exits but making eventualy some more trades... on the same aproach having a decent RRR...

 

Brown, you want to take a look at "flips" exits", you will notice two types of exits being dwelt with... one is the scalper exit, wich would be this 1-2 scenario you present here... and the other is the runner exit that cooter is mentioning if you can scale your position... thus with this runner you can cover better the next potential stops...

 

Obviously if you can get good at reading momentum... you can discretionally close your entire position on the scalper exit when market is slow and you are taking trades that are not pretended to make super moves...

 

Let me tell you Brown... you can perfectly do a daily target there that will make you :)...

 

Certainly this aproach its not suited for all traders... but good sincere considerations here... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brownsfan019,

 

It's seems that you have discovered your style of trading and a comfort level that meets your goals. One suggestion, if I may, is that you incorporate in your trading techniques, "high odds" trades vs. "low odds" trades.

 

High odds trades have a natural tendency to be associated with low risk (good technical stops based on price action) and good reward potential if successful and low odds trades in a simple form can be viewed as the majority of every thing else.

 

A significant number of traders understand Reward-to-Risk or Risk-to-Reward ratios, but may not apply them to their daily trading routine. So the more trades you experience and take, if the % is more low odds trades then for example, you will need to ensure that you let some of your high odds trades reach their target in order to offset the losses from the high number of low odds trades, breakeven and then try to make some additional profits. Hence it's very crucial to understand whether you are taking a lot of "high odds" trades or a lot of "low odds" trades.

 

Once you reduce the number of "low odds" trades you will see significant improvements in "FREE" trades and your profits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  lrushing said:
Brownsfan019,

 

It's seems that you have discovered your style of trading and a comfort level that meets your goals. One suggestion, if I may, is that you incorporate in your trading techniques, "high odds" trades vs. "low odds" trades.

 

High odds trades have a natural tendency to be associated with low risk (good technical stops based on price action) and good reward potential if successful and low odds trades in a simple form can be viewed as the majority of every thing else.

 

A significant number of traders understand Reward-to-Risk or Risk-to-Reward ratios, but may not apply them to their daily trading routine. So the more trades you experience and take, if the % is more low odds trades then for example, you will need to ensure that you let some of your high odds trades reach their target in order to offset the losses from the high number of low odds trades, breakeven and then try to make some additional profits. Hence it's very crucial to understand whether you are taking a lot of "high odds" trades or a lot of "low odds" trades.

 

Once you reduce the number of "low odds" trades you will see significant improvements in "FREE" trades and your profits.

 

Hi Irushing ... interesting that last term "FREE" trades... what would that exactly mean ? thanks Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of traders accept that day trading is a game of "odds". So the more trades you can get that go from a risk-based trade with some predetermined stop loss amount to a trade with a breakeven stop,(i.e, FREE trade) the better your chances of making profits consistently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  lrushing said:
A lot of traders accept that day trading is a game of "odds". So the more trades you can get that go from a risk-based trade with some predetermined stop loss amount to a trade with a breakeven stop,(i.e, FREE trade) the better your chances of making profits consistently.

 

Ok I got it... thanks for that Irushing... by the way do you do scalping or more day trading yourself ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both, If the market is demonstrating a sideways consolidation, I use scalping tactics. If the market is clearly demonstrating a trend, then I will day trade and swing trade the markets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  lrushing said:
Both, If the market is demonstrating a sideways consolidation, I use scalping tactics. If the market is clearly demonstrating a trend, then I will day trade and swing trade the markets.

 

 

Is it possible to ask you a critic of my "flip" trade... I would be delighted to hear your opinion on it... http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/flip-trade-support-resistance-changing-roles-1714.html would really apreciate that.... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
  lrushing said:
A lot of traders accept that day trading is a game of "odds". So the more trades you can get that go from a risk-based trade with some predetermined stop loss amount to a trade with a breakeven stop,(i.e, FREE trade) the better your chances of making profits consistently.

 

Exactly.

 

Hit your first initial target (in this case 1.25 ES pts - 5 ticks).

 

Then move your stop up to breakeven.

 

The rest is gravy, far as I'm concerned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

Great responses already, thanks!!!

 

I will take the ideas into consideration.

 

In response to particular posts:

 

  Quote
Try entering an ES position with 3 targets: 1.25pts, 2pts, and 4 pts +.

Use 1/3 position on each target with a reasonable initial stoploss of, say 2 pts ( 8 ticks).

When your first target is met, move the stop loss to breakeven (entry).

If the second is met, move your stop loss up to entry + 1.25pts, and trail your stop from there.

Assuming that your entry criteria and trading plan is valid, you should be able to at least get your first target, right?

 

Cooter - I've considered a setup like the suggestion many times over. What I have found, for the way that I trade, getting the 1.25 pts over and over is easier and more likely than catching the +2 or +4. I'm not saying that trades don't go there (eventually) but I'm much more interested in grabbing the 1.25 and then looking for a reason to jump back in if one presents itself.

 

  Quote
Ok Brown ¡¡ welcome to the scalpers school ¡¡ thats what scalping its all about... not getting greedy on the exits but making eventualy some more trades... on the same aproach having a decent RRR...

Brown, you want to take a look at "flips" exits", you will notice two types of exits being dwelt with... one is the scalper exit, wich would be this 1-2 scenario you present here... and the other is the runner exit that cooter is mentioning if you can scale your position... thus with this runner you can cover better the next potential stops...

Obviously if you can get good at reading momentum... you can discretionally close your entire position on the scalper exit when market is slow and you are taking trades that are not pretended to make super moves...

Let me tell you Brown... you can perfectly do a daily target there that will make you ...

Certainly this aproach its not suited for all traders... but good sincere considerations here... cheers Walter.

 

Walter - Yeah, I guess by most definitions this way of trading is more scalping. I always considered scalping going for 1-2 ticks, but anyone could argue that 5 ticks is scalping. It won't be easy at first, but time will tell if I can make it work.

 

  Quote
Brownsfan019,

 

It's seems that you have discovered your style of trading and a comfort level that meets your goals. One suggestion, if I may, is that you incorporate in your trading techniques, "high odds" trades vs. "low odds" trades.

High odds trades have a natural tendency to be associated with low risk (good technical stops based on price action) and good reward potential if successful and low odds trades in a simple form can be viewed as the majority of every thing else.

A significant number of traders understand Reward-to-Risk or Risk-to-Reward ratios, but may not apply them to their daily trading routine. So the more trades you experience and take, if the % is more low odds trades then for example, you will need to ensure that you let some of your high odds trades reach their target in order to offset the losses from the high number of low odds trades, breakeven and then try to make some additional profits. Hence it's very crucial to understand whether you are taking a lot of "high odds" trades or a lot of "low odds" trades.

Once you reduce the number of "low odds" trades you will see significant improvements in "FREE" trades and your profits.

 

Leroy - in my opinion, I'm not sure that any trades have a real high or low odds scenario when going for 1.25 ES points. What I mean is, just about any trade can realistically hit that profit target. I've often thought of ways to filter trades but in the end, I come back to just take all your setups, esp if just looking for a 5 tick pop in your direction.

 

 

Thanks for the feedback guys and I will do my best to post some statistical updates here as well!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question TinGull, exactly what I was thinking.

 

Its a very interesting topic, and I'm glad someone put this up in such a coherent manner.

 

Question: If your jumping in and out that often to chase your 5-8 ticks over a few different trades, doesn't that small number of ticks get eaten up by commissions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TinGull said:
browns, have you changed the timeframe (or...volume frame I guess) you're watching now that you've narrowed down your targets?

 

I'm still using a 5000 VBC Chart. Entries are little more 'flexible' now, but so far, well worth it.

 

  Nick1984 said:

Question: If your jumping in and out that often to chase your 5-8 ticks over a few different trades, doesn't that small number of ticks get eaten up by commissions?

 

Nick - commissions are important when taking 1.25 on the ES. That's for sure. My current negotiated rate is under $3.00 round trip and that will be changing soon after the broker sees the trading over a longer timeframe.

 

As time progresses however, I will have to look at just getting a CME seat for purposes of lower fees. If anyone has info on this, please start a thread!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With your 5000V charts, how are you placing your stops differently than before? I assume you're taking on a little less risk for a little less reward than before?

 

I only ask because this is something I was grappling with for a while...time frames. I used to trade an 89 tick chart looking for 50 point moves, and then realized the minutia I was seeing wasn't conducive to my targets. I would love to have a couple 20 point trades a day on average, and getting even 20 points off an 89t chart wasn't something that was easy. When I moved to even a 5 minute chart I was able to take out noise and get bigger profits, but had to take on more risk...but got stopped out less.

 

So...maybe its the opposite for you now. Taking smaller profits, smaller risk...but still the same timeframe? Im but only a teeny fish in the pool, and you're tons more experienced than I, but just thought I'd pose the Q since that was an issue I recently worked out with my coach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
  brownsfan019 said:
commissions are important when taking 1.25 on the ES. That's for sure. My current negotiated rate is under $3.00 round trip and that will be changing soon after the broker sees the trading over a longer timeframe.

 

As time progresses however, I will have to look at just getting a CME seat for purposes of lower fees. If anyone has info on this, please start a thread!!

 

1.25pt on the ES is 5 ticks, right? At $12.50/tick, that's $62.50 gross profit per contract before commissions.

 

Let's say, for the sake of argument, that your rate is $3 r/t all-in per car.

 

That's $59.50 net per contract. So then, what is the RRR on your setup that would lead you to seek an even lower commission?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cooter said:
1.25pt on the ES is 5 ticks, right? At $12.50/tick, that's $62.50 gross profit per contract before commissions.

 

Let's say, for the sake of argument, that your rate is $3 r/t all-in per car.

 

That's $59.50 net per contract. So then, what is the RRR on your setup that would lead you to seek an even lower commission?

 

He can do ok with 5 tick target and 3 tick stop.... anyway I would add a runner for momentum conditions and let this runners profit absorb future stops...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tin - my initial stop placement has not changed that much to be honest. Here's how it's worked for me:

 

> Initial stop was always good in my opinion, some as little as 1-2 ticks.

 

> When to exit was causing concern b/c of the fact that my stops are 'closer'. So, in order to get that +2 or +3, I might have to be willing to accept some heat on the trade, which was fine; however if you have a 2 tick stop and going for 8 ticks, the Risk/Reward looks incredible, but that 2 tick stop can be EASILY taken out.

 

So, I thought, keep the stops at 4 ticks or lower (about 3 on average) and go for 5 ticks. I understand that the risk/reward may not be textbook or what others would call ideal, but for me, it works so far.

 

In the end, you need to know where your break-even point is. In other words, what % of your trades can you win and still make money. For me right now, it's approx. 40%. Well, hitting 40% is not the problem. Now it's a matter of how much over 40% I want to get!

 

You bring up some good points for consideration though when trading for smaller profits, but more often (I'll start a list here and we can update as needed):

KEYS TO TRADING WITH A SMALLER REWARD, HIGHER FREQUENCY TRADING PLAN:

 

1) Commissions are important here, negotiate the lowest rate possible. At some point, need to consider a seat on the exchange.

 

2) Initial stop placement is critical. While risk/reward is always a consideration, in this setup your risk/reward is going to be closer to 1 to 1. If you can't accept that, do not attempt this.

 

3) Higher frequency can mean A LOT of trades for some people. I'll update my stats from this morning shortly.

 

4) Smaller profit targets SHOULD AND MUST increase your win %. If you are still not hitting profit targets after bringing them, something needs adjusted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's today's actual stats to help with the questions:

NUMBER OF TRADES: 29

 

GROSS ES PTS: 15.00

 

NET ES PTS: 13.6 (2.32 COMMISSION RATE)

 

WIN %: 67.8%

 

-------------------------

 

That's my numbers from the AM session.

 

Some might like that, some might not.

 

I am personally cool with that.

 

The key here is that I was extracting profits when there wasn't huge moves taking place. For example - I shorted 3 times near the open. Two of these produced profits. Take a look at your ES chart at the open - there's not much movement there for shorts, right? Well, taking 1.25 twice and one loss of .75 yielded profits. Going for a larger profit and that would have been a full loss. I prefer to make money. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TinGull said:
Wow, nice work! 29 trades...in the morning alone...phew! Im sweatin just thinking about that hahaha

 

Tin - understand that this is a learning experience for me as well since I was trading no more than 10 in a typical day. It's an adjustment to say the least.

 

But like I mentioned, it's much more 'fun' doing my job. I know that it's not supposed to be about fun, but if you enjoy your job, it makes life a little easier in my opinion. It was just an adjustment on my end - instead of saying I wish I caught that entire move with one trade, I am saying glad that I caught a good part of that move with many trades.

 

Here's another example: around 12:30pm EST we started a nice downtrend. Since then, I have taken about 14 trades. All shorts, but not all worked. Of the 14, 6 failed and 8 worked. So a 57% win rate. Nothing exciting if you just look at that number, but it's yield nice returns as all wins are 1.25 and stops are .75 on average.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  walterw said:
Brown : I dont know if you will ever share your setups, but I would love to learn them... should you consider this thread about sharing.. http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f96/altruistic-traders-why-1871.html as too my experience I had only been capitalized sharing my entire setups... :) cheers Walter.

 

Walter - I guess b/c of how much time, effort and money is in what I do, it's hard to just give it all away on an open forum. I understand that may not be in the spirit of the board, but trust me, my system is for sake of argument here. It's not in one clean thread, but it's here if willing to invest some time piecing it together.

 

Here's what everyone knows on how I trade:

$ Use candlestick analysis heavily

$ Smaller stops

$ Closer profit targets (now)

$ Things are kept simple

 

Take that with a couple of my charts and who knows.

 

I personally place a lot of value on what candlesticks can 'tell' you. I don't necessarily use them in a traditional sense. In a post here, I suggested a poster try to 'see' what the candles are 'telling' him between the ongoing fight between the bulls and bears. EVERY single candle tells you something - who won, who lost and the occasional even fight. Once you know who just won the fight, you might be able to capitalize on that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
Walter - I guess b/c of how much time, effort and money is in what I do, it's hard to just give it all away on an open forum. I understand that may not be in the spirit of the board, but trust me, my system is for sake of argument here. It's not in one clean thread, but it's here if willing to invest some time piecing it together.

 

Here's what everyone knows on how I trade:

$ Use candlestick analysis heavily

$ Smaller stops

$ Closer profit targets (now)

$ Things are kept simple

 

Take that with a couple of my charts and who knows.

 

I personally place a lot of value on what candlesticks can 'tell' you. I don't necessarily use them in a traditional sense. In a post here, I suggested a poster try to 'see' what the candles are 'telling' him between the ongoing fight between the bulls and bears. EVERY single candle tells you something - who won, who lost and the occasional even fight. Once you know who just won the fight, you might be able to capitalize on that.

 

Ok... maybe you can post some chart at the premium section of TL with some arrows of where your trades wher without any explanations, so we creative people can have some fun this weekend figuring out aprox. what you are doing... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW, WHAT A DAY TO BE TRADING LIKE THIS.

 

Today was a great example of a day where serious money can and was made.

 

NUMBER OF TRADES: 65

 

GROSS ES PTS: 33.75

 

NET ES PTS: 30.734 (2.32 COMMISSION RATE)

 

WIN %: 66%%

 

If every day could be like today, life would be very good. ;)

 

This was a great example of a day where taking small chunks can real add up. Outside of the nice down move in the afternoon, most other trades were taking small pops here and there. It can add up.

 

I suggest you consider this if looking for something to exit on. Just my humble opinion but when my account is reflecting + $1535 NET PER CONTRACT traded, that grabs my attention.

 

Great day today!!

 

Now if the CAVS can pull off a win tonight it would be the great way to end the day!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.