Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Dogpile

MP Question: How many 30-min bar touches before you call it 'fat profile'?

Recommended Posts

ok, trend day should be 'elongated' on 30-min. Fat profile shows lack of conviction in the directional auction.

 

ie, today (June 6) -- S&P futures have touched 20.75 and 21.00 on 6 different 30-min bars. I call 6 touches as a 'fat profile' and say that the market is balancing if it touches the same price on 6 different bars. What do you use as your 'line in the sand' as to what makes for an 'elongated profile'/trend-day and what doesn't? (FTR, I don't base any trades on this directly, just context for other set-ups). I am not saying 6 touches means anything specifically, just seems like electronic markets have a tendency that when they go down --- they go down quickly... and so hanging around for 6 30-min bars is sign of possible longer-term, patient buyers coming in to nibble and offsetting some others long liquidation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the reason I think this is important is what it really means for the following day.

 

in my view, electronic markets may go up either with hard, momentum based 'dogpile' action or they go up in creep mode as buy programs just hit over and over again.

 

but electronic based markets are different on downside. they generally do not go down in slow, creep mode -- they generally just freefall quickly. we did have a day about 2 weeks ago where market went down really hard with single prints... then chopped around and formed a somewhat 'fat' profile (a 'b' profile) -- and then it had a 'price spike' down late in the day. but all this did was set up a great buy for the next day as it gapped up and ran hard -- you were offered asymmetric location for a buy late in the day on the hard push below the point of control.

 

Now beware, you must have a good entry technique with a very reasonable stop loss point as the market did form a 'b' profile on the day before it crashed on February 27th. But having a good short-term entry/stop loss technique will get you out of the market when it breaks hard lower but will also allow you into the market for the majority of times that the market squeezes back up...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The answer to your question - for what in essence you are asking is when does the profile change from a responsive to an initiative style - depends on the type of trader you are. Let me make a comment that for the longer term horizon trader what Pete Steidlemayer referred to as the other time frame trader 5 points in the S&P is just a bid/offer spread.

Let us assume you are a day trader and a scalper at that and my comments are purely for the S&P for it differs depending on product.

 

To look purely at the TPO and try to set a rule of when does it become a fat profile is not sufficient.... for volume as well as time together with the value all in relation to previous as well as current pattern make up the market profile..... BUT...... the short answer to your question is 8 TPOs and to be on look out once 4 have formed

 

Looking at the slightly longer term profile of composite days then the moment that you get 22 is time to be aware of the possibility of change. And once you reach 42 you should be monitoring in ultra-short term mode because at 48 that is about the point of time that change occurs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

once you get to 4 TPOs then you are looking for the possibility that the trade alters from responsive to initiative. if it does not occur by this time then the chances of a trend day are lessened and so from 8 TPOs you are then effectively looking at a new IB distribution that frequently becomes a late running profile. ES on Fridaty Jun 8th was just such a clssic one in that respect.

 

Back in 1986 Pete Steidlmayer wrote about needing to wait for the first 4.5 hours in ES to pass before establishing a trade and as per usual I contend nothing has changed over the years

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<<for what in essence you are asking is when does the profile change from a responsive to an initiative style>>

 

that wasn't what I was asking but a thoughtful response nonetheless.

 

I was just trying to derive the value where buyers and sellers agreed enough where it is a price that can be used in the future as a spot where more activity might occur (a re-test). To me, it is useful to know that price returns to its previous days POC 75% of the time as I can use that information as 1 bias/tendency to mix in with other tendencies to create an effective overall strategy.

 

I generally expect a morning reversal (responsive activity) and afternoon trendiness (initiative activity) as a default rule. Clean trend days these days (like Thursday) are so rare that I think most investors are far too overly-concerned on catching these. What do you think? I try to be realistic whenever I see dogpile type of action. The odds are strongly against a trend day every day --- Thursday had a nice 'shock event' of the bond market collapse/climax that supported a trend day. Most days do not have such unusual circumstances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

trend days occur 15% of the time data back to 1982 and it does not matter which start or end date always 15%

 

The reason why price returns to prev POC is because markets are mean reverting in nature

 

As for Thursday you can assign the bond market if you like as the reason but the MP was already set for the move. IE it would have done the move regardless of the bond market but the bond market move possibly reinforced and generated possibly a faster move than might have occurred without the bonds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think of trend days as a day where no price is 'accepted' by both buyers and sellers -- that is, any day that has a 'fat' profile is not a trend day...

 

I use 6-7 TPO's as measure of acceptance. by this measure, 15% is too high. by your measure, 15% may indeed by consistent over time. I just don't know what your definition of a trend day is so 15% does not have much trading application to me. Are you saying that the market builds 8 TPO's at a given price 85% of the time? Doesn't sound right and might not be what you are saying. I am trying to combine your previous post with this one. Maybe you can elaborate what the 15% number means in terms of a trading strategy application??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.