Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

dominover

Institutional Trading Techniques

Recommended Posts

I have always wondered about something.... What methods do institutional traders (from Investment Banks or Hedge Funds) to trade stocks?

 

I always thought they would have to justify their choices of trades by tying each trade back to some solid science. I can't imagine they would say that they saw the 'head and shoulders' pattern and bought on that basis.

 

Do they use Charting. If so, do they do this by looking at charting patterns or other acceptable techniques?

 

Also.. Do they only follow the day to day news and react like everyone else?

 

I'm curious as to what is considered an acceptable method used in trading in reputable institutions?

 

Is there any book recommendations which walk you through how institutions go about this kind of thing?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mits,

 

"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those that speak it." George Orwell

in other words -

You are fkn despicable :rofl:

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  dominover said:
I have always wondered about something.... What methods do institutional traders (from Investment Banks or Hedge Funds) to trade stocks?

 

I always thought they would have to justify their choices of trades by tying each trade back to some solid science. I can't imagine they would say that they saw the 'head and shoulders' pattern and bought on that basis.

 

Do they use Charting. If so, do they do this by looking at charting patterns or other acceptable techniques?

 

Also.. Do they only follow the day to day news and react like everyone else?

 

I'm curious as to what is considered an acceptable method used in trading in reputable institutions?

 

Is there any book recommendations which walk you through how institutions go about this kind of thing?

 

Thanks

 

Very very generally -

A large percentage (~80% ?) of institutional traders are bound in the instruments they can trade and have ‘someone’ they call every morning for daily guidance. For example, every institutional bond trader I’ve gotten to know has a ‘friend’ ( in Chicago or the Caymans or wherever) that they raise on the phone before acting. Individual traders ‘copy’ that by using advisory services.

 

Only a tiny percentage (~1-3% ? ) discover and create opportunities on their own. Individual traders ‘copy’ that by discovering and creating opportunities on their own... well duh

 

In the middle is that remaining percentage whose direction is set by management and they bring a competency at the level of portfolio management. Individual traders can ‘copy’ that by emphasizing portfolio structure and composition and sizing instead of focusing on trade selection...

 

  dominover said:

 

I always thought they would have to justify their choices of trades by tying each trade back to some solid science.

 

At any level of trading, the narrative reasons given are rarely the actual reasons for trades taken.

...

What an 'institutional' trader tells his immediate supervision depends on their informal relationship... and what an 'institutional' trader tells higher mgmt. is likely different from what he tells his immediate supervision

 

  dominover said:

I can't imagine they would say that they saw the 'head and shoulders' pattern and bought on that basis.

 

Do they use Charting. If so, do they do this by looking at charting patterns or other acceptable techniques?

 

...

 

I'm curious as to what is considered an acceptable method used in trading in reputable institutions?

 

After a couple of years, they can "use" any method they want as long as they are in the black. Actually, they can use "use" any method they want even if they are in the red - just not for too long with the original firm ...

 

  dominover said:

 

Also.. Do they only follow the day to day news and react like everyone else?

 

 

Some do. Some don't.

 

  dominover said:
Is there any book recommendations which walk you through how institutions go about this kind of thing?

 

Halfway through most any book you get on the subject you’ll probably realize you and the author were not sharing a common meaning for the term ‘institutional trader’ ... :)

 

Q: How do you think the unthinkable?

A: With an itheberg.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"It's a club... and you're not in it" I rather like that statement. My data feed crashed a few minutes ago... I'm not in the club either.

 

When I was starting out, I had the same questions. It seems that someone would have written a book (or attempted to) about how institutional traders become traders. The ins and outs of institutional trading. I don't know of any such book...

 

If you take some time to consider the world of finance, I think you would realize that the details are complex and ever changing. There are so many different players working so many different schemes... how could anyone write a comprehensive book on the subject? I would assume (quite certain) there are confidentiality agreements that go along with being in said employment as well.

 

That said... there are a couple of books that come to mind. Though these books would be worth nothing more than entertainment value to you.

 

Jim Cramer / "Confessions of a Street Addict"

(author that can't recall) / "Liar's Poker"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  dominover said:
I have always wondered about something.... What methods do institutional traders (from Investment Banks or Hedge Funds) to trade stocks?

 

I always thought they would have to justify their choices of trades by tying each trade back to some solid science. I can't imagine they would say that they saw the 'head and shoulders' pattern and bought on that basis.

 

Do they use Charting. If so, do they do this by looking at charting patterns or other acceptable techniques?

 

Also.. Do they only follow the day to day news and react like everyone else?

 

I'm curious as to what is considered an acceptable method used in trading in reputable institutions?

 

Is there any book recommendations which walk you through how institutions go about this kind of thing?

 

Thanks

Institutional traders are of two sorts. Those that trade on fundamentals and those that use technical analysis. The fundamental determine the general trend and the technical determine the "path" of the general trend. That is, over the long haul the fundamental institutions determine the longterm trend and the technical institutional traders determine the shorter trends. Hft's are a type of institutional technical traders that micro scalp. Nearly all technical analysis is mathematical in nature. So yes, the technical institutions look at charts and trade patterns. They especially pay attention to support and resistance. Fundamentals pay more attention to value. When they think it is cheap they will begin buying in quantity. When they think it is overvalued they will begin selling. However, generally speaking, it is the technical institutional traders that drive the mark to the undervalued levels and to the overvalued levels. Institutions trading on value will load up their positions when they think the appropiate value has been reached. The markets move because of institutional size trading. The chart leaves their footprint. They cannot hide it. As Mit says "everything to the left in a chart is free info" it tells you what they are doing if you know how to read it. News, in general,m is useless because there is always a bearish interpretation and a bullish interpretation of it. Take the brexit thing. Bearish...now recovering...soon to be bullish..the charts will show it all and tell you all you need to know. Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They use an incredible amount of leverage (look at bank stocks roe and roa) beyond the next time there is another disaster that they need to be bailed out of, losing more money than they made since the last disaster. This is true in spite of the cheating, insider trading, and other, categorically, unethical practices. It's not about employing profitable strategies; instead, it's about putting as much money in your pocket right now with no concern for tomorrow.

 

You'd be shocked to see how carelessly these mega-$bilion institutions are managed. Pointing it out would get you fired.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mm,

good post. yep

‘institutional trading’ after 1980 reminds me of

Of Two Minds - Governments Change, the Corporatocracy Endures

and

Cat's Cradle - Salient

 

beyond,

re;

"At least I know how mitsubishi feels now.. This still doesn't answer the question."

it appears dominover is looking for a description of pre 1980 ‘institutional trading’

 

 

patuca,

I disagree there are only two types of ‘institutional’ trader. I discussed a third type above - which if you have to have a single word for is best summed up as ‘narrative’ trading among networks (...to be clear - these narratives are NOT fundamentals. ...and btw, the real ‘narratives’ are rarely publicized... rather the financial media is complicit in generating false narratives. )

 

 

 

  Quote
If we will be quiet and ready enough, we shall find compensation in every disappointment.

– Henry David Thoreau (1817 – 1862)

 

  Quote
If we will be quiet and ready enough, we shall find disappointment in every compensation .

- zdo (1542 – 1636)

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
mm,

good post. yep

‘institutional trading’ after 1980 reminds me of

Of Two Minds - Governments Change, the Corporatocracy Endures

and

Cat's Cradle - Salient

 

beyond,

re;

"At least I know how mitsubishi feels now.. This still doesn't answer the question."

it appears dominover is looking for a description of pre 1980 ‘institutional trading’

 

 

patuca,

I disagree there are only two types of ‘institutional’ trader. I discussed a third type above - which if you have to have a single word for is best summed up as ‘narrative’ trading among networks (...to be clear - these narratives are NOT fundamentals. ...and btw, the real ‘narratives’ are rarely publicized... rather the financial media is complicit in generating false narratives. )

 

 

 

 

– Henry David Thoreau (1817 – 1862)

 

 

- zdo (1542 – 1636)

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

of course you are correct. i didn't actually mean only two. You got darks..pools...trading on insider info...etc

 

I was speaking in general terms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
    • UTZ Utz Brands stock, watch for a bottom breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?UTZ
    • FL Foot Locker stock, nice breakdown follow through at https://stockconsultant.com/?FL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.